I'm aware that the :empty pseudo-class will select all elements with no children, but I want to only select elements with text-nodes as children.
I have a bottom-border on my hyperlinks that're a different color than the text, but this is a problem because the hyperlinked images are also getting this underline.
I've tried a *:not(*){ border-bottom-width: 0; } in an attempt to fix this, but it didn't work. Is there a way to select a tags with only text-nodes for children?
If I understand your problem correctly, you are trying to keep your hyperlinked images from being underlined. If so, why not do something like: a img { text-decoration:none }?
Edit: If its the links on img tags you don't want underlined, apply a class to those links with text-decoration:none
NEW ANSWER:
If you want a border under the image, but not the text do this:
a img { border-bottom: 1px solid #000; }
a:emtpy { border: none; }
If you want the opposite (border under the text but not the image) do this:
a:empty { border-bottom: 1px solid #000; }
a img { border: none; }
OLD ANSWER:
If it's just a problem with images that are wrapped in a tags, try:
a img { border-bottom: none; }
Instead of a crazy selector, why not hide the border with a negative margin:
a img {
margin-bottom: -6px;
}
Demo
When the ONLY CHILD of <a> is not an img ...
a:only-child:not(img)
{
border-bottom-width: 1;
}
This cannot be accomplished because of the way border property is applied and rendered outside the top-most box of your anchor - effectively the only way to achieve such an effect with a border would be to negate the property. Sometimes it coult be visually acceptable to use a bottom border in a background colour to overlay over that of of your anchor's - an unreliable practice to be frowned upon. Maybe the effect could be simulated with filters, but I wouldn't count on it being sufficiently well-supported cross-browser.
What I propose is going back to the text-decoration property *while still maintaining a different, independent underline colour` - a neat approach overall, but not without the overhead of an additional element:
<style>
.fancy-underline { color:blue; text-decoration:underline; }
.fancy-underline a { color:black; text-decoration:none; }
</style>
<span class="fancy-underline"><a href="#">I am a fancy link
<img src="//placekitten.com/30/30/" /> with an image in the middle of it
</a></span>
http://jsfiddle.net/ovfiddle/TwmmF/3/
I ended up just using jQuery. I don't believe it's possible with just CSS right now.
jQuery('document').ready(function(){
jQuery("a").each(function(){
if(this.children.length !== 0)
this.style.borderBottomWidth='0';
});
});
Related
I have this in line:
<div class="blue-car">
Car
</div>
<div class="iColor">
Blue
<div>
.blue-car:hover { color: red; }
.iColor:hover { color: read; }
I would like to make when someone hover to Car div second div which iColor change css and when hover to iColor div blue-car change css.
ie. I hover to 'Car' , 'Blue' will change color to red and when I hover to 'Blue' , 'Car' will change color to red, I want to make people aware that this two link is related.
I would love to have this in css only. No jquery. I have tried many no achievement at this moment.
Let me clear this, here is an example on this site. You could see when you hover to a country map, css link on right side will change, and you could see when you hover to a country link, country map css will change. This means this two div work each other. How they do this on this site: http://www.avito.ru
To start, CSS does NOT have a previous sibling operator. The only siblings that can be selected are adjacent (using +) or general (using ~).
It is possible to achieve the effect that you are seeking using only HTML and CSS. Below is one solution: http://jsfiddle.net/KGabX/. Basically, the .area is displayed as a table, which makes it wrap around the link and the image. However, the link is positioned absolutely, which prevents it from being "included" in a territory wrapped by the .area. This way, the .area is wrapped only around the image. Then, hovering over the .area we highlight the link. And, by hovering over the link we highlight the image.
Markup:
<div class = "area">
Link
<img src = "http://placehold.it/100x100" />
</div>
Styles:
.area {
display: table;
position: relative;
}
.area:hover > a {
color: red;
}
.area > img {
cursor: pointer
}
.area > a {
position: absolute;
right: -50px;
top: 50%;
font: bold 15px/2 Sans-Serif;
color: #000;
text-decoration: none;
margin-top: -15px;
}
.area > a:hover {
color: initial;
text-decoration: underline;
}
.area > a:hover + img {
opacity: 0.5;
}
Although I could not interpret what you wrote very well, I immediately noticed a flaw in your css selector.
Change your code to this:
<style>
.blue-car:hover a { color: red; }
.iColor:hover a { color: red; }
</style>
What's different about it? iColor:hover a. Look at the a, anchor selector. It was added because your previous CSS was only selecting the div. In css the child element, in this case the anchor, will supersede it's parents. There's two ways you can approach this. The first, or make the anchor tags color in css inherit.
If this wasn't your problem I'll fix my answer.
I'm not quite sure what you're asking because your question is a bit unclear.
From what I can understand, your issue stems from the fact that you're referring to the color property of the div, rather than the color property of the link.
That's a simple fix: all you need to do is drill down through the div to the link.
.blue-car:hover a{
color: red;
}
.iColor:hover a{
color: red;
}
Demo
Keep in mind that this isn't the best way to do this unless you absolutely need to refer to the links within the context of the div. I understand that your question fits into a broader context within your code, but for the example you gave here, all you really need is this:
a:hover{
color: red;
}
Again, I realize that you may need to change the colors or be more specific, but there's probably a better way to do this, even if that's the case.
The issue with this particular implementation is that your div is larger than your link, and a hover on your div is what activates the color change, so you'll run into this issue:
When I mouse over linked images I see hover background color beneath the image. How to avoid this?
Is there any solution that would not involve applying special class to a elements (like a.nobackground:hover)?
CSS:
a:hover, a:focus {
background-color: rgb(240,39,96);
cursor: pointer;
}
HTML:
<img src="with_transparency.png" alt=""/>
edit:
setting img background to none doesn't work
a img {
background: none !important;
}
setting img background to any other color would do the job if there's no non-solid color (or graphic) beneath the image (in this case .png)
a img {
background: #000 !important;
}
Does setting the background color of the images do what you want?
a img {
background: none;
}
Depending on your stylesheets, you might need the !important bang in front of "none" to overwrite other conditions.
Edit: On second thought, you might want to explicitly set a color value instead of simply saying "none."
Another edit: True, if the color or background behind the transparent PNG wasn't a solid color, you'll encounter some issues. One alternative is this:
And the CSS:
.transparent_png {
background-image: url('with_transparency.png');
background-color: transparent;
display: inline-block;
width: ??px;
height: ??px;
}
So here, you're not actually using an image tag, but can overwrite the background-color property that's normally applied on a:hover and a:active. Does this work?
If I understood the question correctly... You will need to either apply a special class to that specific link, or call the link by its location if it´s different from others. For example:
div div div a {}
And as Matt said you might need to use !important because you have a rule that includes all the links in the page. I´d recommend a different class, it´s better from a semantic´s point of view.
I've been trying to use a:hover pseduo class so that when you hover over the image, you get a border to appear so that it looks clickable.
However, when I do this the border appears below the image in the space below but I'm unsure why.
#overlay a:hover {
border: solid 2px #666;
}
As you can see the border is not around the image, it's below it.
Hope someone can help me with this problem.
Put the border on the image, not the anchor.
#overlay a:hover img {
If your image has position: relative or one of the crazy non-block alignments, then the enclosing link doesn't expand to surround it.
We need to see some HTML to be sure, but try to take alignment parameters off the image, and you should it working. If you made the <a> position: relative I think the link block would surround it.
Use Firebug to experiment with DOM object layouts.
Try this:
#overlay a:hover {
border: 2px solid #666;
}
I want to make all text links at my website have a bottom border. I use:
a
{
border-bottom: 1px dotted #333;
}
... but it adds a border to image links too and I don't want that.
How do I make it work for text links only?
a { border-bottom:1px dotted #333; }
a img { border:0; }
Just override the inherited rule, the native css way.
Edit: Wow, I'm really not paying attention. Can you just throw a class to anchors that include images?
a.contains-image { border:0; }
This would be the only non-scripting solution without relying on CSS3's not selector.
Add this:
img {
border: none;
}
That will get rid of borders on images.
Adding a border on links and removing it if it contains some img isn't possible in CSS, with or without :not()
You can't select an element depending on its descendants (CSS isn't XPath) and you can't affect parents styling.
I'd use jQuery selectors (Sizzle to be precise) and add a class depending on the presence of an image:
<style type="text/css">
.underline { border: 4px dotted #333; }
a img { border:0; /* remove the default blue border from images within links */}
</style>
<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.2/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function() {
$('a:not(:has(img))').addClass('underline');
});
If you've not only 100% text and a>img:only-child links but also text+img mixed in links, you could also target img:only-child or wrap text in links (except img) in span elements to style mixed links in a certain way, if you've these edge cases in your page.
I have this html code
<div id="mybox"> aaaaaaa </div>
and this is my css
#mybox{
background-color:green;
}
#mybox:hover{
background-color:red;
}
the question is how to hide the content of the div (aaaaaaa) when the mouse hover event by using css only and without changing the structure of the code
I think I should put some code under #mybox:hover but I don't know the code.
Without changing the markup or using JavaScript, you'd pretty much have to alter the text color as knut mentions, or set text-indent: -1000em;
IE6 will not read the :hover selector on anything other than an anchor element, so you will have to use something like Dean Edwards' IE7.
Really though, you're better off putting the text in some kind of element (like p or span or a) and setting that to display: none; on hover.
Here is the simplest way to do it with CSS3:
#mybox:hover {
color: transparent;
}
regardless of the container color you can make the text color transparent on hover.
http://caniuse.com/#feat=css3-colors
Cheers! :)
Hiding through CSS is achieved by using either the "visibility" or the "display" attributes. Though both achieve similar results, it's useful to know the differences.
If you only want to hide the element but retain the space occupied by it, you should use:
#mybox:hover {
visibility: hidden;
}
If you want to hide the element and remove the space occupied by it, so that other elements can take its space, then you should use:
#mybox:hover {
display: none;
}
Also remember that IE6 and below do not respond to :hover for anything except A tags. In which case, you'll need some Javascript to change the classname:
document.getElementById('mybox').className = 'hide';
and define the "hide" class in CSS:
.hide { display: none; }
sounds silly but font-size:0; might just work. It did for me. And you can easily override this with the child element you need to show.
You could make the text color the same as the background color:
#mybox:hover
{
background-color: red;
color: red;
}
What about opacity
#mybox:hover {
opacity: 0;
}
Best way to hide in html/css using display:none;
Example
<div id="divSample" class="hideClass">hi..</div>
<style>
.hideClass
{display:none;}
</style>
This is a late answer but still, guess setting the color to transparent is the best option.
#mybox:hover{
background-color:red;
}
There are many ways to do it:
One way:
#mybox:hover {
display:none;
}
Another way:
#mybox:hover {
visibility: hidden;
}
Or you could just do:
#mybox:hover {
background:transparent;
color:transparent;
}
#mybox:hover { display: none; }
#mybox:hover { visibility: hidden; }
#mybox:hover { background: none; }
#mybox:hover { color: green; }
though it should be noted that IE6 and below wont listen to the hover when it's not on an A tag. For that you have to incorporate JavaScript to add a class to the div during the hover.
I would say:
#mybox{
background:green;
}
#mybox:hover{
color:transparent;
}
<div id="mybox">
This text will disappear on hover
</div>
This will hide text, but of course, it still contains the text, but it is a tricky way to hide the text (make in invisible), but it will work well
Sorry to be 7 years late but this could be achieved by using the below:
.your-block{
visibility: hidden;
width: 0px;
height: 0px;
}
This will keep the content on the page and won't occupy any space whereas display:none will completely hide the content.
Using the above code can be useful if you need to reference code in a div but don't need it to display.
.button {
width: 40px;
height: 40px;
font-size: 0;
background: url("data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,%3Csvg%20xmlns%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2000%2Fsvg%22%20width%3D%2224%22%20height%3D%2224%22%20viewBox%3D%221284%20207%2024%2024%22%3E%3Cg%20fill%3D%22none%22%3E%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M1298.5%20222.9C1297.5%20223.6%201296.3%20224%201295%20224%201291.7%20224%201289%20221.3%201289%20218%201289%20214.7%201291.7%20212%201295%20212%201298.3%20212%201301%20214.7%201301%20218%201301%20219.3%201300.6%20220.5%201299.9%20221.5L1302.7%20224.2C1303%20224.6%201303.1%20225.3%201302.7%20225.7%201302.3%20226%201301.6%20226%201301.2%20225.7L1298.5%20222.9ZM1295%20222C1297.2%20222%201299%20220.2%201299%20218%201299%20215.8%201297.2%20214%201295%20214%201292.8%20214%201291%20215.8%201291%20218%201291%20220.2%201292.8%20222%201295%20222Z%22%20fill%3D%22%239299A6%22%2F%3E%3C%2Fg%3E%3C%2Fsvg%3E") #f0f2f5 no-repeat 50%;
}
<button class="button">Поиск</button>