Can someone show me how to compare a local branch with remote branch to see the all the differences or new changesets added?
I only want to see what's new like hg incoming or hg outgoing. I don't want to compare individual files.
It would be something like this hg incoming --branches Branch:Branch so the first one is the local branch and second is the remote branch, something like that.
OK so I will give the answer of my own question:
We can apparently use -b (or --branch in the exact way) flag with commands like hg incoming and hg outgoing. So when I want to compare a specific branch I need to do the followings
Compare local branch1 with remote branch1: hg outgoing -b branch1
Compare remote branch1 with local branch1: hg incoming -b branch1
This helps.
Related
It occurs quite often that I want to know the full status of my local copy of a project, compared to the remote repository. By full status, I mean the following:
Are there some uncommitted changes locally?
Are there some unpushed commits locally?
Are there some unpulled commits remotely?
Am I on head of default branch?
I know that I can use some graphical tool such as HgView or TortoiseHg, or even my IDE to deal with Mercurial repositories, but I find it more convenient to use CLI when working with several projects/repos at the same time.
The way I am doing currently is by using an alias
alias hg_full='hg incoming; hg outgoing; hg status'
If everything is fine (i.e. local synchronized with remote), I then ensure being on head of default by
hg update default
This approach is perfectly working, but when I work with a slow remote repository, it is quite annoying to wait for both the incoming and outgoing command to return before performing the update.
Is there some way (by the mean of an extension or a more advanced command) to get a full status summary of the local copy compare to remote repository without performing hg in and hg out sequentially?
I think hg summary --remote might be exactly what you're looking for:
$ hg summary --remote
parent: 1:c15d3f90697a tip
commit message here
branch: default
commit: 1 modified
update: (current)
remote: 1 or more incoming, 1 outgoing
You can save yourself some network traffic by doing hg incoming --bundle <filename>, which fetches the incoming changesets and stores them in a bundle file. You can then run hg outgoing (or hg pull) against the bundle file, which doesn't use the network at all.
hg incoming --bundle incoming.bundle # Creates the bundle
hg outgoing incoming.bundle
hg pull incoming.bundle
hg update default
I just cloned a repo from their remote.
I built the software, changed about 4 files, committed them locally and now want to create a patch that I can show them.
When I run :
hg diff -U8p abc efg pqr > patch_file
I don't see the changes I made. Does hg diff only compare the current files with the last committed files?
How do I get this to work?
To diff the working directory against a particular revision REV, use
hg diff -r REV
To compare two revisions against each other, use
hg diff -r REV1 -r REV2
To figure out which revisions to compare, examine the output of hg log. If you'll be doing this a lot and the base revision is fixed, give it a name (e.g., whatipulled) with
hg tag -r REV whatipulled
You can then specify whatipulled as the revision, instead of a numeric rev id (or a hash).
To export your diffs in a richer format, including commit comments etc., you can also use the following which is designed for this purpose:
hg export -r REV
There's also hg bundle -r REV, which produces a binary file with similar information.
But if you're sending changes back to the parent repo, the best method is to use hg push. It communicates your changesets directly to the parent; you don't even need to know which changesets need pushing. Of course, you must have the right to push to the parent repo.
hg push [ parent_repo_url ]
(If you pulled from it, mercurial should already know the path and you can leave it out).
If the parent repo is on bitbucket and you don't have pu, you can set up your own account on bitbucket, pull/push to that from your local repo, and then issue a "pull request" to the project repo, asking them to pull from you.
All of the above have options to control their behavior, which see.
From hg help diff
If only one revision is specified then that revision is compared to the working directory
In your diff for -r you must to use old tip (latest "not your" changeset) and update to tip (your latest changeset) before diffing.
If some binary data was modified in your changesets, don't forget to use -g option
hg up & hg diff -r <CSET> -g > some.patch
Improved diff for any active changeset and without hand-work for detecting base changeset (for linear history == in single branch)
hg diff -r "parent(min(outgoing()))" -r tip
By default, hg diff compares the currently checked out file with the last commit. You can change this by adding options:
-r REV compares the currently checked out files with a specific revision REV.
-c REV shows the changes made by revision REV
So in your case hg diff -c 123 ... would give you the diff for commit 123.
My guess is that hg outgoing is exactly what you want -- it compares what you've committed locally with what is at the default remote server and shows you a list of those changesets or with -p the commits.
That does, however, shows each changeset separately. If you want to see all the changes combined, you'd have to do hg diff -r HERE -r THERE or since -r HERE is a default, hg diff -r THERE
I see you've asked in a comment "How do I know what THERE is", where THERE is the last changeset remote has, and you can get that answer by doing hg outgoing. If hg outgoing shows it would send changesets 66, 67, and 68, then you want to do hg diff -r 65 to compare what's already there (65) with what's local (68).
Before I push to a remote repository, I want to see a consolidated diff between the head of my local repository and the head of the repository I'm pushing too. The best way I know of doing this is to hg clone the remote repository, get the revision of the head, then do a diff between my head and that revision. But this is time-consuming. Is there a quick way?
In addition to
$ hg outgoing -p
which I normally use, I'll like to point you to revision sets. That is a query language that you can use with hg diff (and all other commands that lets you specify changesets). So you can implement hg outgoing -p by
$ hg log -r "outgoing()" -p
and you can get a diff between the parent of the first outgoing changeset and the last outgoing changeset with
$ hg diff -r "p1(first(outgoing()))" -r "last(outgoing())"
Finally, the remotebranch extension can maintain local information about the remote branches so that you don't need to use the network to lookup this information. It lets you use
$ hg log -r "not pushed()"
to find the outgoing changesets, but it's much faster since there's no network round trips involved.
If you're looking for a way of getting all the changes you've made that aren't in the remote repository.
$ hg outgoing -p
The -p is optional and reports in the form of a patch, otherwise it reports in the same way a hg log. This is just your changes regardless of whether anybody else has pushed anything to the remote repository.
If you're looking for changes in the remote repository that you don't have then you use
$ hg incoming
Again there's a -p form if you want it.
Neither of these are exactly what you asked for, but I suspect you don't actually want that.
If you really want the difference between your changes and the new head in the remote repo created by someone else, then you'll need to pull their changes over.
hg pull
hg heads # find revision number of new head
hg diff -r 124992 # or whatever the revision number is.
This may be a silly question but when comparing a local to remote file, what is the path to the remote file?
Does hg want you to provide the head/revision you are referring to or something?
ie:
hg diff /local/file /remote?/file?
Mercurial doesn't do this. The only comparison with other repositories is hg incoming and hg outgoning which show which changesets differ between repositories. You can add the --patch option to either of those to see the patches that are the meat of those changesets, but you can't compare two versions of a file without having them in the same local clone.
From Hg man
hg diff [OPTION]... ([-c REV] | [-r REV1 [-r REV2]]) [FILE]...
I am not sure if you can speak about a "remote file" in a DVCS: you need to fetch or clone a remote repo in order to be able to make any hg diff.
hg fetch, for instance, is described here.
Using Mercurial, say if I do an hg pull and hg up and now the local repo and working directory are both up to date.
What if I commit often, say 1 day later, and then 2 days later, and want to diff with the revision as of right now?
Otherwise, the diff is always comparing to the previous committed version.
I can use pencil and paper and write down the revision number right now, say, 4117, and then 1 day later, 2 days later, and any time before I am sure and push to the remote central repo, do an
hg vdiff -r 4117
(either using vdiff or diff). But instead of remembering this "magic number" 4117, is there a way to make Mercurial somehow remember this number? That way, hg vdiff is to see the difference between minor changes against committed code, but there is a diff that shows all changes before pushing to the remote repo.
(or, if there is command that shows the revision number since your last pull, which should also show 4117, so on bash we can do something like hg vdiff -r `hg --what-is-last-pull` )
Update: does hg out --patch show the diff of what would be pushed to the remote repo? If so, maybe it serves the purpose without caring the "magic number". But how to show the patch diff using kdiff3 or any other diff tools? Also, it seems we can do hg out and if we see 4118, 4119, 4120, then we know if we do hg vdiff -r ___ we should use (4118 - 1) which is 4117.
Update 2: actually, hg out --patch shows the diff between local repo and the remote repo, so it is close, but not exactly the same as the diff between working directory and the local or remote repo.
If you want to mark a revision you can use bookmarks extensions. It is shipped with mercurial. Documentationis available here
In your case,
hg pull -u
hg bookmarks lastpull
..hack..hack..
hg ci -m new-hack
hg diff -r lastpull:tip
hg bookmarks -d lastpull
Do it with multiple clones. When you clone from the remote repo initially use clone -U to create a clone that has no working directory files at all. Then clone again locally, for example:
$ hg clone my-local-clone-with-no-working-files my-working-clone
Do your commits and work in my-working-clone and then at any time you can check the tip in my-local-clone-with-no-working-files to see what the last thing you pulled from the server was. If you want to get fancy you could create a shell alias for:
hg diff -r $(hg -R $(hg root)/../my-local-clone-with-no-working-files id -i -r tip)
which will compare the working directory of the repo in which you run it (my-working-clone) with the tip of whatever you last pulled from the server.
It's worth nothing that this takes no extra disk space because local clones use hardlinks under the covers the the my-local-clone-with-no-working-files has no working directory files.
You can replace pen and paper with a local tag: hg tag -l -r <revision number on paper> tagname. Notice the -l, which makes the tag local, which means it does not get transferred by push and pull. You can also remove this tag by hg tag -l --remove tagname.