Before I start--I know we can do this with JS positioning. I'm trying to see if we can avoid the JS positioning.
You can see a close approximation here-- I've forced/dummied the overlay positioning using a top:nnn value for now (it's off a bit in the jsfiddle).
What I want to do is set the top of that overlay to start in line with the bottom of the selected table row. Again-- we dummied it for now using top with a fixed value, but there should be a CSS way to set it?
I did play around with tr.isSelected:after {...} type stuff, that didn't work as expected.
Try using tr.isSelected>td:first-child, and among the properties include position:absolute.
I'm not sure what the point is, though... Class toggling can only be done with JavaScript, so if you're already using JS then where's the harm in using it to calculate the position?
Related
This seems dissimilar to the accordion functionality provided by bootstrap.
To give an example, let's take the "how to format" info starting me in the face right now. I'd want it so that it only displays up to X pixels deep, and then stops until expanded. So it might look like:
and then, once expanded,
I happen to be using bootstrap. Is there a bootstrap native or other HTML solution to create this kind of experience?
Assume that the thing that I only want to show of is a single element, such as an image, rather than a series of text. This means a solution like min-height:50px and overflow:hidden won't work, as it will simply hide the entire image rather than part of it.
We can use jQuery .height() to accomplish knowing the rendered height of an element then making conditional modifications.
Documentation and examples for jQuery .height().
A combination of height and overflow in combination with the toggling of a class should work here.
http://jsfiddle.net/fm56je84/1/
The click of the arrow is bound to the following function:
function expandCollapse() {
$("#container").toggleClass("expanded");
$(".glyphicon").toggleClass("glyphicon-arrow-down"); // Flip Arrow
}
I have layered 4 canvases over the top of each over, however i want to be able to click a button and the linked canvas will come to the top.
http://jsfiddle.net/5g3Fe/ shows what i have currently got. I tried to put the following code into the button click functions. however this doesn't work.
function canvasView1()
{
document.getElementById("canvas1").style.z-index="1";
document.getElementById("canvas2").style.z-index="0";
document.getElementById("canvas3").style.z-index="0";
document.getElementById("canvas4").style.z-index="0";
}
can anyone suggest a way to be able to get specific canvas from a button click.
Thanks
For some reason, jsFiddle was ignoring your JavaScript code because of this reason. You can get around that by choosing No wrap - in <body> on the left hand side options.
Then your problem was that to set the z-index in javascript you use .style.zIndex rather than .style.z-index.
Working fiddle here
Or cleaner code version here
I have to implement this grid of divs. It won't change often, but it may at some point (meaning a box may be removed, and another resized). Each black box will eventually contain an image or a word, but that's not important.
How do I pull this off? Is there a more elegant way than by absolutely positioning every single box and manually entering every X/Y/width/height?
A grid based approach would be my recommendation.
Something like: http://960.gs/
EDIT (some more options)
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/grids/
http://cssgrid.net/
I have a collection of items in an unordered list that overlap each other. My issue is that I need the first item to have the highest z-index and then go down from there. I can do this manually by setting the z-index:
http://jsfiddle.net/dp9YD/7/
But I would like to do this without manually setting each z-index (not sure if this is possible). Right now If i don't use the z-index it renders like this:
http://jsfiddle.net/dp9YD/8/
With items that come later in the list being on top which is what I would expect. Is there a way that I can get it to render like the first example without manually specifying the z-index or using javascript?
I have needed to do something similar in the past. I solved it be floating all li's to the right and listing them in reverse order.
See this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/sl1dr/KfK9w/
Usless Background Info
Hello, all. This is my first post here, but I often come here for help.
I am an amateur web designer and have been in web designing for almost a year now.
The Problem
My question is about CSS3 transforms. I have a small, circular element in the center of my page that transforms successfully when I hover over it. I have a larger circular element that is, by z-index, underneath it. The larger circle also has CSS3 transforms coded in the CSS, but will not transform, or even triggerd when hovered over. Both circles are overlaid, with the smallest on top, to create concentric circles.
My Attempted Solution
One word: Z-index. I have tried putting the larger circle on top, which works fine. The problem with this is that the smaller circle no longer triggers...
The Result I Want
I would like for the circles to remain in their 'concentric' positions and for the larger circle on the outside to transform by :hover. Is it possible to have an 'alternate trigger'? e.g.: in JavaScript, I can trigger an animation by hovering over any element that I specify. Is this possible to do in CSS? Can I hover element (I), and change properties for element (II)? If I cannot do this, how would I go about triggering animations for both circles, by hovering over only one? I am trying to stay with pure CSS/HTML, but I will accept JavaScript answers.
Last Notes
I hope I have provided ample info for a decent answer... Here is a screenshot: http://i.stack.imgur.com/WPj62.png
The circle with the infinity sign is the smaller circle element. The larger circle with the faint border around the screen is the other element.
EDIT:
Something's still not right, please take a look at the full code posted here: http://cssdesk.com/eJ8BH
If I understand your question, it sounds like when you hover over the small circle, you want both the large and small circle to transform, correct?
The easiest way is likely to use javascript for this. If you are using jQuery, it's even easier:
$('.littleCircle')
.hover(function(){
$(this).addClass('myTransformationClass');
$('.biggerCircle').addClass('myTransformationClass');
})
UPDATE: Some further examples based on follow-up feedback.
Here's what I'd do. First, give all 4 related elements a class so you can grab them via jQuery. For the example I use .rolloverSet
// grab all 4 elements and cache them
$rolloverSet = $('.rolloverSet');
// grab the one element that needs to have two classes
$otherElement = $rolloverSet.find('.otherElement');
$rolloverSet
.hover(function(){ // we'll add a hover event to each element in the group
$(this).addClass('myTransformationClass');
$otherElement.addClass('myOtherTransformationClass');
})
.blur(function(){ // remove the classes on mousout
$(this).removeClass('myTransformationClass');
$otherElement.removeClass('myOtherTransformationClass');
})
You do not need jQuery for this. You need to apply :hover on the parent element of the concentric circles and then apply the animation to its immediate children like this: http://jsfiddle.net/nimbu/taqr4/
Things I changed:
Updated to use shorter transitions, animations property
Added moz, o, unprefixed properties
Removed -webkit- from border-radius
Gathered common properties of concentric circles to prevent repetition
Fixed incorrect background-color (#00000000)