On this grammar page there's a main 590px X 183px image at the top and 5 121px X 137px images at the bottom, aligned horizontally next to each other:
The bottom images are a resized crop of the main image at the top. In the screenshot example, the 3rd image at the bottom is the resized crop of the image at the top, buses. If you click on the first bottom images (books) it will take you to a page where books is also the image at the top (like buses above).
All this long-but-hopefully-clear introduction, is to ask how can I horizontally-align the the bottom images as a resized crop of the images at the top?
Now the bottom images were cropped and resized offline, and then uploaded as new files. So to visit all the 5 pages linked to from the bottom images, one has to download 10 image files. But if I could resize and crop (and still have the images horizontally aligned), those would be just 5 files.
I tried margin-left (and height) to resize and crop:
<img style="height:135px; margin-left:-290px;" src="http://www.imparare-inglese.it/uploads/1/1/1/6/11169156/7674785.png"/>
<img style="height:135px; margin-left:-610px;" src="http://www.imparare-inglese.it/uploads/1/1/1/6/11169156/6647450.png"/>
But just as I set the margin-left on the 2nd img, the 2nd image goes over the first. How do I prevent that? What am I missing?
Example with tables: http://jsfiddle.net/EZnAg/
Place the image inside a div, apply a width, height, float:left, position:relative and overflow:hidden on that div containing the image, then absolute position the image as required. If the image needs a faux/css resize, apply that in css too.
* {
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
.panels {
float:left;
}
.placeholder {
width:200px;
height:200px;
float:left;
overflow:hidden;
margin:0 20px 0 0;
}
.placeholder img {
/*width:100%;*/
}
<div class="panels">
<div class="placeholder">
<img src="http://www.jakss.co.uk/common/images/shell/header/client-logo.png" />
</div>
<div class="placeholder">
<img src="http://www.jakss.co.uk/common/images/shell/header/client-logo.png" />
</div>
<div class="placeholder">
<img src="http://www.jakss.co.uk/common/images/shell/header/client-logo.png" />
</div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/seemly/PmUzY/
If you reinstate the width:100%; on the .placeholder img in my jsfiddle, hopefully this provides the effect you want, or at least gives you a head start?
cropped images are actualy new created images (from the original ones)with different aspect ratio. assuming that these images are totally different images(and not the same images just shown as width="smallpx" height=smallpx"), u can place them inside a div something like this
<div id="all_image contained" style="width: 300px;">
<div style="width: 100px; float:left">
<img src="images/img1.jpg" width="80px" height="50px"/>
</div>
<div style="width: 100px; float:left">
<img src="images/img2.jpg" width="80px" height="50px"/>
</div>
<div style="width: 100px; float:left">
<img src="images/img3.jpg" width="80px" height="50px"/>
</div>
</div>
in order to cropping, u have to use jquery script, to create new images with small aspect ratio and dimensions....
or else if u want to display the same large images, in small thumbnail size, then u may use a fixed size div and set overflow as hidden
Related
I am trying to overlay an image over another base image.
The images that I am using do not conform to a particular size but varies from page to page.
Each image overlay uses a style sheet similar to the one mentioned below:
#image1 {
position: absolute;
top: 44.594%;
left: 30.642%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
The base image uses a style sheet similar to the one mentioned below:
.base-image {
position: relative;
text-align: center;
}
Thus far, if the image is smaller than the screen size I don't have any issues.
If it is larger than the current screen size, the positions are relative to the screen size.
If I change the base-image position to absolute, I do get the effect I am interested in but the rest of my page becomes hidden under the base-image.
Is there anything in CSS that I can do to achieve my desired effect?
One of the fragments of a page:
<div class="base-image">
<img src="Content/Images/baseimage.jpg" />
<div id="image1">
<img src="Content/Images/image1.jpg" alt="image1" />
<br />
<span>Some Text</span>
</div>
<div id="image2">
<img src="Content/Images/image2.jpg" alt="image2" />
<br />
<span>Some Text 2</span>
</div>
...
</div>
The question is similar but does not address my problem directly:
Html Image over image
Their solution is what I have been using thus far for me to overlay the image. But for some reason, when the image resolution is larger than the screen size, the resultant overlay appears to be scaled down to fit the screen resolution. The image locations are therefore all wrong with respect to the base image.
I am pretty sure you can make a <div> with the same position properties as your current picture and then have the pictures inside the <div> have a position:fixed and then move the pictures as you like with top:10%; left:10% and etc
Hope this helps
I'm working on a website project where in the header section I have a grid of 6 images (2 rows with 3 images in each). It's not a problem to make them responsive (kinda "liquid") with max-width:100% and height:auto, however this website should be linked with some admin tool in the future, so the end user(s) could upload their own images.
Hence, I need to understand how keep these two rows of images responsive but at the same time give them a fixed height (in this case they should be 220px). When I crop the images and make them all equal in height (using Photoshop), everything works fine, but as soon as I use images with different height values, the grid starts to break. Is there any known workaround for this?
Thanks in advance!
Use percents and #media
Example :
#media only screen and (min-width : 320px) {
img {
width:40%;
height:60%; /*Images should be bigger in small devices*/
}
}
#media only screen and (min-width : 480px) {
img {
width:30%;
height:55%;
}
}
Please Note : The percent is calculated from parent. For example if you put an image in a div with width : 400px and height : 300px, it will show the image with 160px width and 180px height on device with min-height of 320px.
max-height is another choice.
Well, let's see if I understood good enough your question (my bad english, not yours).
If yoy want 2 rows, 220px height each with 3 images each filling the width of the row while keeping the same height as the parent, the problem you may have is that the images will distort to adapt to their responsive parent container.
This may not work for you as even if your images are simillar in aspect ratio (height x width) once the window width is small (responsive) they will get distorted too much.
Here is an example: I've use different sizes images some horizontal and some vertical so it can be easier to understand.
Basic html:
<div class="header">
<div class="row">
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
<div class="img">
<img src="" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
Please notice that the row is 240px insteed of 220 just so you can see easily the row (with red background) and I add for the same reason a white border to the image containers.
FIDDLE
The option I would try though is to make the images fit into the container without distortion, they will fit in height OR in width, but of course, they will leave space at the sides if it fit height or on top and bottom if fit in width but at least the images will be always centered in the container:
the green color is the background of the images container:
FIDDLE
There may be better options but without the help of jquery I can't help you more
If your goal is to keep the images (or their container's) height fixed, that will mean that the images will not be stretching or contracting in a fluid way. Given that this concept is contradictory in practice, I will instead show you a 'responsive' solution that comes from making container elements themselves responsive rather than instead of the images.
The case you're referring to (2 rows 3 images) sounds like a great place to implement a cascading images look-and-feel. When the page width shrinks the images will float under each other whereas viceversa when the website width is stretched; this in essence achieves a fluid and responsive functionality without affecting the image heights themselves. The below code should apply the 'building blocks' you'll be needing for in order to achieve this effect... granted there is a lot of custom work you can do here (like using background: cover, instead of img tags as suggested in the comments). Take a look and let me know if this helps you get closer to what you're trying to achieve.
HTML
<div class="wrapper bg-purple center-div">
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
</div>
<div class="clear-both"></div>
<div class="wrapper bg-cyan center-div">
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
<div class="img-container left">
<img src="http://placehold.it/200x200"/>
</div>
</div>
CSS
.wrapper {
display: table;
}
.img-container {
height: 50px;
padding: 2px;
}
.center-div {
margin: 0 auto;
}
.left {
float: left;
}
.clear-both {
clear: both;
}
.bg-purple {
background-color: purple;
}
.bg-cyan {
background-color: cyan;
}
#media only screen and (max-width: 450px) {
.left {
clear: both;
}
}
so I'm trying to position my content box and its working fine for left, but when I try change the right value it doesn't allow. As you can see I have four images, but I want to show three, so therefore I'm trying to increase the right value so the box can only fit three (and also bring it in to the center a bit more)
I can get it to work by changing it to padding-right instead of right, but I don't understand why that works? My understanding is that : Padding = Distance between the content and the border, and right = how far from the edge?
Image:
This is my content box code (the images are inside it in another box)
.imagesArea {
position:relative;
top:15px;
left:100px;
padding-right:180px;
}
Thanks
edit: html (removed some of the image code)
<div class="imagesArea">
<div class="images">
<figure>
<img src="photos/image1.jpg" alt=”Photo” width=150 height=150>
<figcaption>Watch #1</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<div class="images">
<figure>
<img src="photos/image2.jpg" alt=”Photo” width=150 height=150>
<figcaption>Watch #2</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<div class="images">
<figure>
<img src="photos/image3.jpg" alt="Photo" width="150" height="150">
<figcaption>watch #3</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
</div>
Your understanding of relative positioning is completely wrong. It sounds like you are confusing it with margins.
With relative positioning, the element is sized and positioned according to normal flow (i.e. as if it was statically positioned), and then the whole box is offset according to left/right/etc. This can cause it to overlap with other elements.
See this example for a visual representation.
It won't adjust the size of the box at all, so it will have no influence over how much content it can hold.
If you want to control how wide the element is, use width, padding, border and/or margin.
You can use margin for inner content div images
.images{
display: inline-block;
margin:0 20px 0 20px;
}
and set parent div
.imagesArea {
position:relative;
top:15px;
left:100px;
padding-right:180px;
text_align:center;
}
As you want to show 3 images in a row, It will work for you.
I have a page which looks like this:
Content contains a static table of fixed width (determined by content) inside a centered div. Below content there is a div that contains a line of text and an image below that text. It is meant to float on the left of the Content. The page and image has max-width and max-height. But when page is resized, Image shrinks twice slower than the page. This causes the page to look like this:
I want Image to always be filling the most of that white gap on the left. When the page is resized, the Image should also resize accordingly.
http://jsfiddle.net/FZ4KG/
Html:
<section align="center">
<h4 align="center">Heading</h4>
<div align="center">
<table>Content</table>
<div id="image_box">
<p align="left">Text above image</p>
<img src="img.png" id="image">
</div>
</div>
</section>
Css:
#image_box {
padding-left: 15px;
height: 0px;
top: -75px;
position: relative;
}
#image {
float: left;
max-width: 20%;
}
A few things before I'm able to fully comprehend what it is you're looking for.
It's strange how you're using the HTML5 <section> tag with a deprecated, and as of HTML5 removed, align attribute. And still strange the use of an inline style when using css on those elements.
I will assume you're looking to center those elements within their parent containers. To achieve this, you would need to use a set width and set the horizontal margin of the element to auto.
div {
margin: 0 auto;
}
You also have a typo in your mark up. The DIV id says imabe_box. Assume it's supposed to be image_box.
<div align="center">
<table>Content</table>
<div id="imabe_box"> // ID should be set to 'image_box'
<p align="left">Text above image</p>
<img src="img.png" id="image">
</div>
</div>
Please add more code or reply to the answer and we can help you further.
Please check the code at http://jsfiddle.net/jfzZQ/
We are displaying two floating images dynamically next to each other. We are setting up the width of the images to 200px and not setting the height parameter.
As the images are of different proportions, the height of one image is longer than the other.
<style>
.img200 {width:200px;}
.credit {position: absolute; bottom: 8px; left: 8px;
width: 100%; color: #fff;font-size: 11px;}
</style>
<div style="width:405px;">
<div style="position: relative; float:left;">
<img class="img200" src="http://images.theage.com.au/2012/12/19/3902461/art-353- svMESSI-300x0.jpg" /> <span class="credit">site 1</span>
</div>
<div style="position: relative; float:right;">
<img class="img200" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/12/04/article-2242647-11D1474C000005DC-964_634x664.jpg" /> <span class="credit">site 2</span>
</div>
</div>
<div style="clear:both;">new line here</div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="width:405px;">
<div style="position: relative; float:left;">
<img class="img200" src="http://nimg.sulekha.com/sports/original700/lionel-messi-2009-12-21-15-41-46.jpg" /> <span class="credit">site 1</span>
</div>
<div style="position: relative; float:right;">
<img class="img200" src="http://media.npr.org/assets/img/2013/06/12/messi122way_custom-74f98cf7a4148d6405ad71c75457f7a4f516a9c9-s6-c30.jpg" /> <span class="credit">site 2</span>
</div>
</div>
<div style="clear:both;">new line here</div>
Is it possible to hide bottom part of one of the images, so that they both show as same height. In case 1, we would like to hide bottom part of the left image and in case 2 we would like to hide bottom part of right image.
Please guide. Thanks.
1)
Create 2 divs of equal height and set the images as their background
2)
Change of tactic .. background works but your images are too big. Lets overflow instead by adding this to the divs:
height: 200px; overflow: hidden;
http://jsfiddle.net/jfzZQ/1/
Notice i'm not fixing the height/width of the image. Only the width of the image is set as to keep the height/width proportions automatic. I'm just setting the height of the div and cutting it off with overflow.
3)
The solution from Mohammad seems fine to me
Did some css refactoring ..so don't know if you like it. If you prefer solution 3, be sure to give the creds to Mohammad & not me
http://jsfiddle.net/jfzZQ/5/
You need to set both pictures' width to auto, and their height to a specific value.
img {
width:auto;
height: /* make height same for both*/
}
That way, it will keep the proportions of both images and it will also make them smaller or bigger depending on the height. Make sure you don't add too much height, though, or the images will go to the next line.