I am trying to output just the hometeam name's to the page so that I can try to understand how to work with my code better. It is only printing one team to the page, and it is printing all the details of that team to the page, whereas I only want it to print one part.
This is my code, I want it to print the name's of each hometeam to the page
app.get('/home', function(req, res) {
Match.findOne({}).populate('hometeam.name').exec(function(err, teams){
util.log(teams);
res.send(teams);
});
});
But when I load the page all I get is the first piece of data from this list of Matches
[
{
"hometeam": "5106e7ef9afe3a430e000007",
"_id": "5113b7ca71ec596125000005",
"__v": 0,
"key": 1360246730427
},
{
"hometeam": "5113c13e0eea687b28000001",
"_id": "5113e951354fe70330000001",
"__v": 0,
"key": 1360259409361
},
{
"hometeam": "5113c13e0eea687b28000001",
"_id": "5113e999354fe70330000002",
"__v": 0,
"key": 1360259481412
}
]
Also, if I try to put util.log(teams.hometeam.name) I get the following:
TypeError: Cannot call method 'toString' of undefined
But I would want it to be able to print the name which belongs to hometeam here. As hometeam is just the objectId of a Team in my database, am I missing something with the DBreferencing here?
Update:
Team Schema
var Team = new Schema({
'key' : {
unique : true,
type : Number,
default: getId
},
'name' : { type : String,
validate : [validatePresenceOf, 'Team name is required'],
index : { unique : true }
}
});
module.exports.Schema = Team;
module.exports.Model = mongoose.model('Team', Team);
Match Schema
var Team = require('../schemas/Team').Schema;
var Match = new Schema({
'key' : {
unique: true,
type: Number,
default: getId
},
'hometeam' : { type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: 'Team' },
'awayteam' : { type: Schema.ObjectId, ref: 'Team' }
});
module.exports = mongoose.model('Match', Match);
Populate takes the property name of the property you are trying to retrieve. This means that you should use 'hometeam' instead of 'hometeam.name'. However, you want to retrieve the name of the team so you could filter for that. The call would then become..
Match.findOne({}).populate('hometeam', {name: 1}).exec(function(err, teams)
Now you have a property called 'hometeam' with in that the name. Have fun :)
EDIT
Showing how to have a single mongoose instance in more files to have correct registration of schemas.
app.js
var mongoose = require('mongoose');
var Team = require('./schemas/team-schema')(mongoose);
var Match = require('./schemas/match-schema')(mongoose);
// You can only require them like this ONCE, afterwards FETCH them.
var Team = mongoose.model('Team'); // LIKE THIS
schemas/match-schema.js
module.exports = function(mongoose) {
var Match = new mongoose.Schema({
'key' : {
unique: true,
type: Number,
default: getId
},
'hometeam' : { type: mongoose.Schema.ObjectId, ref: 'Team' },
'awayteam' : { type: mongoose.Schema.ObjectId, ref: 'Team' }
});
return mongoose.model('Match', Match);
};
schemas/team-schema.js
module.exports = function(mongoose) {
var Team = new mongoose.Schema({
'key' : {
unique : true,
type : Number,
default: getId
},
'name' : { type : String,
validate : [validatePresenceOf, 'Team name is required'],
index : { unique : true }
}
});
return mongoose.model('Team', Team);
};
Related
I've been stressing around trying to fix this and I've burnt myself out. I'm calling my serverless mysql trying to get kanbans from teams. I've used this method multiple times and all were working fine but that is most likely because of they only return single item whilst this returns multiple items.
This is my code which returns empty object.
async function getKanbans(team_id){
let kanbans = [];
await sql_query(`SELECT id, sName FROM table WHERE iTeam = ?`, [team_id])
.then(result => {
result.forEach(kanban => {
// console.log(kanban);
kanbans.push({
id: kanban.id,
name: kanban.sName
});
});
})
.catch(err => {
console.log(err);
});
console.log(kanbans);
return kanbans;
}
As you can see.. I am trying to print kanbans and I do get:
[
{ id: 1, name: 'Kanban_1' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Kanban_2' }
]
of out it. Then I'm trying to return it to the item that called this function and this is how that looks like:
teams.push({
id : team.id,
sName : team.sName,
sColor : team.sColor,
aKanbans : result[0]['selectedTeam'] == team.id ? getKanbans(team.id) : null,
});
(a small snippet of something bigger)
Okay, so now when I try and look at the data response (from the frontend) I get this:
{
"success": true,
"message": "Found teams",
"teams": [
{
"id": 1,
"sName": "Team1",
"sColor": "#fcba03",
"aKanbans": {}
},
{
"id": 2,
"sName": "Team2",
"sColor": "#2200ff",
"aKanbans": null
}
]
}
aKanbans from Team1 is empty, empty object. What the **** do I do? I tried mapping it and still got an empty object. React/javascript is not my main language, I just like to learn. Any suggestions?
You are mixing async / await function with normal Promises handling.
Try to change your getKanbans code like this:
async function getKanbans(team_id) {
let kanbans = [];
try {
const result = await sql_query(
`SELECT id, sName FROM table WHERE iTeam = ?`,
[team_id]
);
result.forEach((kanban) => {
kanbans.push({
id: kanban.id,
name: kanban.sName,
});
});
} catch (err) {
console.log(err);
}
return kanbans;
}
And then populate the teams using (declare the parent async):
teams.push({
id : team.id,
sName : team.sName,
sColor : team.sColor,
aKanbans : result[0]['selectedTeam'] == team.id ? getKanbans(team.id) : null,
});
How can I successfully run the following code?
onSubmit() {
let pdfData = [
{
field_name: 'data.Date',
value: this.freshDeskData.date,
placeholder: '',
page_no: 1,
},
{
field_name: 'data.Fullname',
value: "Bob Jones",
placeholder: '',
page_no: 1,
},
];
for(let i=0;i<pdfData.length;i++){
this.signHub.addPDFInfo(pdfData[i]).subscribe((data) => {
this.responseData = data[i]
});
}
}
Add PDF Service:
addPDFInfo(pdfInfo): Observable<PDFInfo> {
return this.http.put<PDFInfo>(
`${environment.apiUrl}/api/workflow/add-text-block?package_ID=${this.package_ID.data.package_id}¤t_Document_ID=${this.current_Document_ID.data.documentid}`,
pdfInfo
);
}
The service is meant to loop through the JSON object and POST the information on the selected item to populate the related field on a PDF document. However, only one field is populated via the loop. The other remains empty.
You could achieve this by using the RxJs merge-operator, eg.:
onSubmit() {
let pdfData = [
{
field_name: 'data.Date',
value: this.freshDeskData.date,
placeholder: '',
page_no: 1,
},
{
field_name: 'data.Fullname',
value: "Bob Jones",
placeholder: '',
page_no: 1,
},
];
const requests = [];
for(let i=0;i<pdfData.length;i++){
requests.push(this.signHub.addPDFInfo(pdfData[i]));
}
merge(...requests).subscribe((data) => {
this.responseData = data[i]
})
}
granted you'd need to combine the results of each "next result" (that you're currently assigning to this.responseData). A candidate to solve that issue could be the reduce-operator
But, it's difficult to give a precise answer, without having knowledge about more of your codebase.
My react-redux app is getting a single record in JSON but the record is an array and therefore it looks like this (notice [ ] brackets):
{"person":[{"PersonID":1,"Name":"John Smith","Gender":0}]}
So, the redux store shows it as person->0->{"PersonID":1,"Name":"John Smith","Gender":0}. As such, the state shows that the person object is empty:
Name: this.props.person?this.props.person.Name:'object is empty',
My PersonPage.js includes the details page like this:
<PersonDetail person={this.props.person} />
The details page has this:
import React from 'react';
import classnames from 'classnames';
class PersonDetail extends React.Component {
state = {
Name: this.props.person?this.props.person.Name:'',
PersonID: this.props.person?this.props.person.PersonID:null,
loading: false,
done: false
}
componentWillReceiveProps = (nextProps) => {
this.setState({
PersonID: nextProps.person.PersonID,
Name: nextProps.person.Name
});
}
This is my raw Redux state:
people: [
[
{
PersonID: 51,
Name: 'John Smith',
Gender: 0
}
]
]
Person is an array, that contains the object in which Name key is present, so you need to use index also, write it like this:
this.props.person && this.props.person.length ? this.props.person[0].Name : '';
Check this example:
var data = {
"person":[
{
"PersonID":1,
"Name":"John Smith",
"Gender":0
}
]
};
console.log('Name: ', data.person[0].Name);
I think that you are supposed to map the person detail foreach person's data.
on the PersonPage.js ,
map it as follows:
{
this.props.person.map((p)=>{
return (<PersonDetail person={p} />)
})
}
If I was you I would make an util function like this:
const parsePeople = people => {
if (people instanceof Array) return parsePeople(people.pop())
return people
}
const people = [
[{
PersonID: 51,
Name: 'John Smith',
Gender: 0
}]
]
const person = parsePeople(people)
console.log(person) -> Object
Using recursion we check if people is an instance of Array, we call the function again using people.pop() which return the last element of the array.
you have an array on your person data... you can only access that without the 0 using map...
example:
componentWillReceiveProps = (nextProps) => {
var PersonID = nextProps.person ? nextProps.person.map(item => { return item.PersonID}) : '';
var Name = nextProps.person ? nextProps.person.map(item => { return item.Name}) : '';
this.setState({
PersonID,
Name
});
}
this is considering you only have 1 array on person.
I fixed it! It was a combination of two of the answers given:
In the PersonPage.js, I had to call the PersonDetails object like this:
<PersonDetail
person={this.props.person[0]}
/>
And this is the new MapStatetoProps:
function mapStateToProps(state, props) {
const { match } = props;
if (match.params.PersonID) {
return {
person: state.people
}
}
Thanks to those who answered. This drove me nuts.
I'm building a "Test" system. each test has some questions.
Each question has answers.
I'm getting a JSON to create the question from another server as:
{
requestType: 'CreateNewQuestion',
questionId: 17447,
subject: "Math",
subsubject: "Heshbon",
questionText: "1+4 Equels?",
answers: [{text : "2",rightAnswer : false},
{text : "35",rightAnswer : false},
{text : "5",rightAnswer : true},
{text : "9",rightAnswer : false}]
}
I built 2 Schemas:
module.exports = mongoose.model('Answer' ,
{
text: String,
rightAnswer: Boolean
}
);
And
module.exports = mongoose.model('Question' ,
{
questionId: Number,
subject: String,
subsubject: String,
questionText: String,
answerTimeAvg: Number,
fastestAnswer: Number,
answers: [{ type : mongoose.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'Answer' }]
}
);
I made a function that get the JSON and try to save it like:
var QuestionSchema = require('./schemas/question');
var AnswerSchema = require('./schemas/answer');
CreateNewQuestion: function (message) {
var information = {
questionId: message.questionId,
subject: message.subject,
subsubject: message.subsubject,
}
//Save Question
var record = new QuestionSchema(information);
record.save(function (err) {});
}
How can I create the Answers object and populate them into the question?
I tried couple of things but keep getting error,
What is the proper way?
I tried to read in "mongoosejs.com/docs" but the site is down :(
I needed to change the model to:
module.exports = mongoose.model('Question' ,
{
subject: String,
subsubject: String,
questionText: String,
answerTimeAvg: Number,
fastestAnswer: Number,
answers: [{ type : mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId, ref: 'Answer' }]
} );
And save the answers first, and than use the IDs:
CreateNewQuestion: function (message) {
////////////////////////
// Saving the answers //
////////////////////////
var answers = message.answers;
var answers_ids = [];
for(var i in answers) {
var answer = new AnswerSchema(answers[i]);
answer.save();
answers_ids.push(answer._id);
}
/////////////////////////
// Saving the question //
/////////////////////////
var information = {
subject: message.subject,
subsubject: message.subsubject,
questionText: message.questionText,
answerTimeAvg: 0,
fastestAnswer: 0,
answers: answers_ids
}
var record = new QuestionSchema(information);
record.save(function (err) {
if (err) {
console.log("Bad = " + err);
var result = "bad";
message.sendReplay({result: result});
}
else {
var result = "AllGood";
message.sendReplay({result: result});
}
});
},
I need to save a deep object to the server all at once and haven't been able to find any examples online that use the latest ember data (1.0.0-beta.4).
For example, with these models:
(jsfiddle)
App.Child = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
age: DS.attr('number'),
toys: DS.hasMany('toy', {async:true, embedded:'always'}),
});
App.Toy = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
child: DS.belongsTo('child')
});
And this code:
actions: {
save: function(){
var store = this.get('store'),
child, toy;
child = store.createRecord('child', {
name: 'Herbert'
});
toy = store.createRecord('toy', {
name: 'Kazoo'
});
child.set('toys', [toy]);
child.save();
}
}
It only saves the JSON for the child object but not any of the toys -- not even side loaded:
{
child: {
age: null
name: "Herbert"
}
}
Do I have to manually save the toys too? Is there anyway that I can have it send the following JSON to the server:
{
child: {
age: null
name: "Herbert",
toys: [{
name: "Kazoo"
}]
}
}
Or
{
child: {
age: null
name: "Herbert",
toys: [1]
}
}
See JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/jgillick/LNXyp/2/
The answers here are out of date. Ember Data now supports embedded records, which allows you to do exactly what you're looking to do, which is to get and send the full object graph in one big payload. For example, if your models are set up like this:
App.Child = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
age: DS.attr('number'),
toys: DS.hasMany('toy')
});
App.Toy = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
child: DS.belongsTo('child')
});
You can define a custom serializer for your Child model:
App.ChildSerializer = DS.RESTSerializer.extend(DS.EmbeddedRecordsMixin, {
attrs: {
toys: {embedded: 'always'}
}
});
This tells Ember Data that you'd like 'toys' to be included as part of the 'child' payload. Your HTTP GET response from your API should look like this:
{
"child": {
"id": 1,
"name": "Todd Smith",
"age": 5,
"toys": [
{"id": 1, "name": "boat"},
{"id": 2, "name": "truck"}
]
}
}
And when you save your model, Ember Data will send this to the server:
{
"child":{
"name":"Todd Smith",
"age":5,
"toys":[
{
"id":"1",
"name":"boat",
"child":"1"
},
{
"id":"2",
"name":"truck",
"child":"1"
}
]
}
}
Here is a JSBin that demonstrates this.
http://emberjs.jsbin.com/cufaxe/3/edit?html,js,output
In the JSbin, when you click the 'Save' button, you'll need to use the Dev Inspector to view the request that's sent to the server.
toys can't be both async and embedded always, those are contradicting options. Embedded only exists on the active model serializer currently.
toys: DS.hasMany('toy', {embedded:'always'})
the toys are a ManyToOne relationship, and since the relationship exists on the belongsTo side it is more efficient to save the relationship during the toy's save. That being said, if you are creating it all at once, then want to save it in one big chunk that's where overriding comes into play.
serializeHasMany: function(record, json, relationship) {
var key = relationship.key;
var relationshipType = DS.RelationshipChange.determineRelationshipType(record.constructor, relationship);
if (relationshipType === 'manyToNone' || relationshipType === 'manyToMany' ||
relationshipType === 'manyToOne') {
json[key] = get(record, key).mapBy('id');
// TODO support for polymorphic manyToNone and manyToMany relationships
}
},
And your save should be like this
var store = this.get('store'),
child, toy;
child = store.createRecord('child', {
name: 'Herbert'
});
toy = store.createRecord('toy', {
name: 'Kazoo'
});
child.get('toys').pushObject(toy);
child.save().then(function(){
toy.save();
},
function(err){
alert('error', err);
});
I needed a deep object, instead of a side-loaded one, so based on kingpin2k's answer, I came up with this:
DS.JSONSerializer.reopen({
serializeHasMany: function(record, json, relationship) {
var key = relationship.key,
property = Ember.get(record, key),
relationshipType = DS.RelationshipChange.determineRelationshipType(record.constructor, relationship);
if (property && relationshipType === 'manyToNone' || relationshipType === 'manyToMany' ||
relationshipType === 'manyToOne') {
// Add each serialized nested object
json[key] = [];
property.forEach(function(item, index){
json[key].push(item.serialize());
});
}
}
});
Now when you call child.serialize(), it will return this object:
{
child: {
name: "Herbert",
toys: [
{
name: 'Kazoo'
}
]
}
}
Which is what I need. Here's the jsfiddle with it in action: http://jsfiddle.net/jgillick/LNXyp/8/