Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
The main site says it is now hosted on GitHub, however that page now 404s. A search for "JUnit" does not return anything that looks like it's the main project and it is not listed as one of Kent Beck's repositories.
The SourceForge site also points you to the GitHub site. It also says
"We are deprecating our SourceForge installation." Also, the latest version hosted on SourceForge is 4.10 while the last released was 4.11.
So, where is the current source code for JUnit hosted?
The source code for JUnit is hosted at GitHub:
http://github.com/junit-team/junit
Previously it was hosted by a member: KentBeck, but now it is hosted by a GitHub-company: junit-team, and that's the reason of the 404 you are receiving (the repo was transfered from member to company).
As you noticed it, they didn't updated their site with this information.
For some time jUnit has been hosted at github: https://github.com/junit-team/junit
Related
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I have made a website I really like, but I don't know how to deploy it. I've heard about Jekyll, but anything will work for me. If you have any advice, please share! :)
The most popular and probably easiest way is to use GitHub Pages. Github Pages has built-in Jekyll support and will automatically build your site and serve it to a github.io domain or a custom domain if you set it up.
Jekyll Docs: https://jekyllrb.com/docs/github-pages/
GitHub Pages Docs: https://docs.github.com/en/github/working-with-github-pages/setting-up-a-github-pages-site-with-jekyll
I recently learned about Netlify, which purports to do the same thing as GitHub Pages with some additional features. It has a free tier, and they have a published guide on deploying Jekyll sites: https://www.netlify.com/blog/2020/04/02/a-step-by-step-guide-jekyll-4.0-on-netlify/
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I would like to display a code snippet from my own public GitHub source repo in my own web site, without having to make a copy. This is for a tutorial to illustrate some programming concepts. So not to run it but to pretty print it, as it were.
I bet this is something that many people need. I am looking for a lead on how to do this.
You could use the GitHub API to accomplish this.
See the Get Contents endpoint.
Yes, you can do that either by publishing your repo on npm and then referring it as npm dependency in projects package.json.
or 2nd , you can directly refer GitHub repo as dependency in package.json.
Hope this gets you in right direction.
thanks
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm completely new to Git, and one question I have that I cannot seem to find an answer to is this: when building a website is there any advantage to using private repositories vs public? I'm not referring to developing web-apps or other proprietary information so-to-speak, just basic web development. For example I would like to learn to use git (github) by updating our current website. Since source code is viewable to all, what advantages would be gained by using a private repository?
Thanks in advance!
If you are just developing in html/css/javascript(frontend), that is all viewable to the client. If you start to use server side scripting, (i.e PHP) you may have more sensitive data that you do not want public. You can also use git as a local repository and not have anything on github. That will handle source control and will all be kept local to the machine it is on. If you are developing on a server that other people use, they can also have access to edit that local repository.
Here is a good page for how to set up a local repository.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I am trying to create a Minecraft 24/7 vanilla server for free, but I can't seem to get html to run Minecraft_Server.jar (the jar file), located at https://s3.amazonaws.com/MinecraftDownload/launcher/minecraft_server.jar. I dont know the startup class, but I do know the download link. The jar file was made to save to and read from files on a computer, and is normally started by a .command. Any help?
I shall address the issues you are facing one at a time.
HTML alone cannot run a Java program. HTML can run an applet; this is how the Minecraft Demo works.
The minecraft_server.jar is not a Java applet. Therefore you cannot run it online using HTML.
The unmodded minecraft_server.jar is not designed to run from a BAT file (I think you mean BAT rather then a .command file).
If you are trying to administrate a Minecraft server online take a look at some online consoles such as McMyAdmin or SpaceBukkit. You can also find online hosting that provides these console with a quick Google.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am going to create my first open source project and I am trying to decide where to host it google code or codeplex. It seems to me codeplex has a better set of community features and google code has real svn and a version diff tool. What has been a deciding factor for where to host your project?
For me the number one feature is getting my code in and out of the repositories, which is super easy with google code, and even assembla (altho I'm not up to date with what the latest terms of usage with assembla are). Codeplex leans towards TFS which is hard to use, but you can make it work with SVNBridge and tortoise, which is easier.
Once you worked out getting code in and out, it really comes down to personal preference.
Do you want a Wiki?
Do you want an issue tracker?
Do you want to have automated builds?
Do you need integration with third party tools (like fogbugz or trac)?
For Task Coach, I started with Sourceforge and Yahoo groups for mailinglists. When we added translations for Task Coach, we also started using Launchpad because of its support for editing translations via the web. I considered moving Task Coach to Launchpad completely (I like Bazaar) but Launchpad does not offer website hosting, while Sourceforge does. Also, Sourceforge offers multiple version control systems these days, including Bazaar. At the moment, I'm considering to use Uservoice to allow Task Coach users to vote for new features.
I guess these are the features I have been/are looking for in open source hosts:
Project website hosting
Support for end-user downloads
Source code version control
Bug/feature request/support request tracker
Support for editing translations
Mailinglists