Input:
A database consisting of
static tables that do not scale with number of users or time
dynamic tables that grow when users interact with the application (so scale with number of users and time)
a database with real life data for x users
Task:
scale the database to simulate larger number of users
Example:
Tables:
t_user (scale target)
UserId , Name
1 , John
2, Terry
t_post (dynamic)
AuthorId, PostId, TagId
1, 1 , 1
1, 2 , 2
1, 3 , 2
2, 4 , 1
t_tag (static)
TagId, Name
1, C#
2, Java
Desired output with scale factor = 2
t_user
UserId , Name
1 , John
2, Terry
3 , John
4, Terry
t_post (dynamic)
AuthorId, PostId, TagId
1, 1 , 1
1, 2 , 2
1, 3 , 2
2, 4 , 1
1, 5 , 1
1, 6 , 2
1, 7 , 2
2, 8 , 1
t_tag (static)
TagId, Name
1, C#
2, Java
Ofcourse for such a small database this can be done in MySQL but I need a solution that will work for a database with 150+ tables (writing a scaling routine for each is not a solution) and scale factors that will bring a database form 100 to up to 10 000 users.
Does anyone know a dedicated tool or hack that can accomplish this?
Benchmark Factory for Databases looks like it might do what you need it to, or you could give the MySQL Benchmark Tool a try.
I ended up with writing my own script. Below you will find a simplified version (many columns in tables are ommited for clarity). This worked very well. I was able to scale the DB by a factor of 100 quite efficiently. Hope this helps
SET autocommit = 0;
START TRANSACTION;
SET #UMAX = (SELECT MAX(UserID) AS MX FROM t_user);
SET #QSMAX = (SELECT MAX(QuestionSetID) AS MX FROM t_question_set);
SET #QGMAX = (SELECT MAX(QuestionGroupID) AS MX FROM t_question_group);
SET #QMAX = (SELECT MAX(QuestionID) AS MX FROM t_question);
SET #TMAX = (SELECT MAX(TestID) AS MX FROM t_test);
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t_seq;
CREATE table t_seq AS
(
SELECT
1 S
);
INSERT INTO t_seq (S) VALUES (2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10);
INSERT INTO `t_user`
(
`UserID`,
`Login`,
`Password`,
)
SELECT
`UserID` + 1000000 + #UMAX * t_seq.S,
concat(if(Login is null, '', Login), `UserID` + 1000000 + #UMAX * t_seq.S),
`Password`,
FROM t_user,
t_seq;
INSERT INTO `t_question_set`(`QuestionSetID`)
SELECT `QuestionSetID` + 1000000 + #QSMAX * t_seq.S
FROM t_question_set,t_seq;
INSERT INTO `t_question_group`(
`QuestionGroupID`,
`QuestionSetID`
)
SELECT
`QuestionGroupID` + 1000000 + #QGMAX * t_seq.S,
`QuestionSetID` + 1000000 + #QSMAX * t_seq.S,
FROM t_question_group,t_seq;
INSERT INTO `t_question`(`QuestionID`, `QuestionGroupID`)
SELECT
`QuestionID` + 1000000 + #QMAX * t_seq.S,
`QuestionGroupID` + 1000000 + #QGMAX * t_seq.S,
FROM t_question, t_seq;
INSERT INTO `t_test`
(
`TestID`,
`QuestionSetID`,
`UserID`,
)
SELECT
`TestID` + 1000000 + #TMAX * t_seq.S,
`QuestionSetID` + 1000000 + #QSMAX * t_seq.S,
`UserID` + 1000000 + #UMAX * t_seq.S,
FROM t_test,t_seq;
INSERT INTO `t_question_answer`(
`QuestionID`,
`TestID`
)
SELECT
`QuestionID` + 1000000 + #QMAX * t_seq.S,
`TestID` + 1000000 + #TMAX * t_seq.S,
FROM t_question_answer,t_seq;
COMMIT;
Related
I am stuck at a point where i have to increment a string, and my strings are of type C001,SC001,B001
in my data base they are defined like
what i am trying to do do is write a query which check the previous highest code present into my db and the incriment it to +1
for example C001 -> C002,C009->C010,C099`->C100 and so on
Similarly for SC001->SC002,SC009->SC010,SC099->SC100 and so on
Similarly fro B001 -> B002,B009->B010,B099`->B100 and so on
I have a query which my friend has suggested me to use but that query only incriminating AAAA->AAAA01 , AAAA09->AAAA10
query is
SELECT id AS PrevID, CONCAT(
SUBSTRING(id, 1, 4),
IF(CAST(SUBSTRING(id, 5) AS UNSIGNED) <= 9, '0', ''),
CAST(SUBSTRING(id, 5) AS UNSIGNED) + 1
) AS NextID
FROM (
-- since you allow strings such as AAAA20 and AAAA100 you can no longer use MAX
SELECT id
FROM t
ORDER BY SUBSTRING(id, 1, 4) DESC, CAST(SUBSTRING(id, 5) AS UNSIGNED) DESC
LIMIT 1
) x
when i am replacing ID with CategoryCode it is giving me PrevID-C004 NextID-C00401 which is not my requirement i want PrevID-C004 and NextID->C005
NOTE i am using my sqlServer 5.1
Just try this one ,
SELECT
CategoryCode,CAST(CONCAT(LPAD(CategoryCode,1,0),LPAD(MAX(RIGHT(CategoryCode,
3)) + 1, 3, 0) ) AS CHAR),
FROM test
SELECT
SubCategoryCode,CAST(CONCAT(LPAD(SubCategoryCode,2,0),
LPAD(MAX(RIGHT(CategoryCode, 3)) + 1, 3, 0) ) AS CHAR),
FROM test
SELECT
BrandCode,CAST(CONCAT(LPAD(BrandCode,1,0), LPAD(MAX(RIGHT(BrandCode, 3)) +
1, 3, 0)) AS CHAR) FROM test
I have the following column strand which is ordered in ascending order but its taking 3.10 as next after 3.1 instead of 3.2..
the column is varchar type..
Strand
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.1.1
3.1.1.2
3.1.2
3.1.2.1
3.10 # wrong
3.10.1 # wrong
3.10.1.1 # wrong
3.2 <- this should have been after 3.1.2.1
3.2.1
3.2.1.1
..
3.9
3.9.1.1
<- here is where 3.10 , 3.10.1 and 3.10.1.1 should reside
I used the following query to order it;
SELECT * FROM [table1]
ORDER BY RPAD(Strand,4,'.0') ;
how to make sure its ordered in the right way such that 3.10,3.10.1 and 3.10.1.1 is at last
Try this:
DROP TABLE T1;
CREATE TABLE T1 (Strand VARCHAR(20));
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES ('3.1');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('3.1.1');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('3.1.1.1');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('3.1.1.2');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('3.2');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('3.2.1');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('3.10');
INSERT INTO T1 VALUES('3.10.1');
SELECT * FROM T1
ORDER BY STRAND;
SELECT *
FROM T1
ORDER BY
CAST(SUBSTRING_INDEX(CONCAT(Strand+'.0.0.0.0','.',1) AS UNSIGNED INTEGER) *1000 +
CAST(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX(CONCAT(Strand,'.0.0.0.0'),'.',2),'.',-1) AS UNSIGNED INTEGER) *100 +
CAST(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX(CONCAT(Strand,'.0.0.0.0'),'.',3),'.',-1) AS UNSIGNED INTEGER) *10 +
CAST(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX(CONCAT(Strand,'.0.0.0.0'),'.',4),'.',-1) AS UNSIGNED INTEGER)
Output not ordeded:
Strand
1 3.1
2 3.1.1
3 3.1.1.1
4 3.1.1.2
5 3.10
6 3.10.1
7 3.2
8 3.2.1
Output Ordered:
Strand
1 3.1
2 3.1.1
3 3.1.1.1
4 3.1.1.2
5 3.2
6 3.2.1
7 3.10
8 3.10.1
you can order the result baset on the integer value of your field. your code will looks like
select [myfield]from [mytable] order by
convert(RPAD(replace([myfield],'.',''),4,0),UNSIGNED INTEGER);
in this code replace function will cleand the dots (.)
hope thin help
You must normalize each group of digits
SELECT * FROM [table1]
ORDER BY CONCAT(
LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(Strand,'.',1),3,'0'), '-',
LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX(Strand,'.',2),'.',-1),3,'0'), '-',
LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX(Strand,'.',3),'.',-1),3,'0'), '-',
LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX(Strand,'.',3),'.',-1),3,'0'));
sample
mysql> SELECT CONCAT(
-> LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX('3.10.1.1','.',1),3,'0'), '-',
-> LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX('3.10.1.1','.',2),'.',-1),3,'0'), '-',
-> LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX('3.10.1.1','.',3),'.',-1),3,'0'), '-',
-> LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX('3.10.1.1','.',3),'.',-1),3,'0'));
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| CONCAT(
LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX('3.10.1.1','.',1),3,'0'), '-',
LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX('3.10.1.1','.',2),'.',-1),3,'0'), '-',
LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX('3.10.1.1','.',3),'.',-1),3,'0'), '-',
LPAD(SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRI |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 003-010-001-001 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0,00 sec)
Cause "strand" column is text data, so it will be ordered in alphabetical. To make it be ordered as your desire, you should format your data before insert or update it. Suppose maximum digit for each level is 3, your data should be formated like this
003.001
003.001.001
003.001.001.001
003.002
003.002.001
003.002.001.001
003.010
010.001
The altenative way is splitting "strand" column into mutiple columns. Each column will store data for each level, such as
Level1 | Level2 | Level3 ...
3 | 1 | 0
3 | 1 | 1
3 | 2 | 0
...
3 | 10 | 0
Datatype of these columns should be number and then you should be able to order by these columns.
If the point(.) in your data is no more than 3, you can try this:
select *
from demo
order by replace(Strand, '.', '') * pow(10, (3 + length(replace(Strand, '.', '')) - length(Strand)))
If the point is uncertain, here you can should use subquery to get max num of point:
select demo.Strand
from demo
cross join (
select max(length(Strand) - length(replace(Strand, '.', ''))) as num from demo
) t
order by replace(Strand, '.', '') * pow(10, (num + length(replace(Strand, '.', '')) - length(Strand)))
See demo in Rextester.
As you see, I've used function replace, length, pow in order by clause.
1) replace(Strand, '.', '') will give us int number, like:
replace('3.10.1.1', '.', '') => 31011;
2) (3 + length(replace(Strand, '.', '')) - length(Strand)) will give us the count of point which the max num of point minus point's count in Strand, like:
3.1 => 2;
3)pow returns the value of X raised to the power of Y;
so the sample data will be calculated like:
3100
3110
3111
3112
3120
3121
31000
31010
31011
3200
3210
3211
3900
3911
by these nums, you will get the right sort.
I have a table with columns showing ranges, like
id from to
1 10 100
2 200 300
I have a query which will be a list of values, like 17, 20, 44, 288 etc.
Is it possible to have a result set which would include the where condition, so I get:
id from to input
1 10 100 7
1 10 100 20
1 10 100 144
2 200 300 288
Right now the code runs one query per where value and it works, and I'm looking to increase performance by combing it into one large multiple where clause, like
SELECT *
FROM table
WHERE (from<=7 AND start>=7)
OR (from<=20 AND start>=20)
OR (from<=144 AND start>=144)
OR (from<=288 AND start>=288)
What you want makes no sense regarding ranges.
7 and 144 has no compatible range yet you want to put then into the first range.
In a result set with lots of values listing you will probably get to many conditions.
What you can do is to put those values that isn't in a range to show without correspondence. Like this:
With the structure being:
create table test (
id integer,
vfrom integer,
vto integer
);
insert into test values
(1, 10, 100),
(2, 200, 300);
create table vals(
val integer
);
insert into vals values (7), (20), (144), (288);
You can use this query:
select val, id, vfrom, vto
from vals v left join
test t on ( t.vfrom <= v.val and t.vto >= v.val )
It will bring you:
7 null null null
20 1 10 100
144 null null null
288 2 200 300
see it here on fiddle: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!2/f68fd/8
Maybe it isn't what you want but it is more logical.
Sure there is a query for this. Trouble is we need a table for specific values to show up; and then there are sub-queries and union selects:
SELECT table.*, values.val AS input
FROM (SELECT 7 AS val UNION SELECT 20 AS val UNION SELECT 144 AS val UNION SELECT 288 AS val) as values
JOIN table ON table.from <= values.val AND table.to >= values.val
This should do the trick. Note that you only have to specify the column name in the first SELECT with in a UNION SELECT.
I will suppose you are using Java as your application language. You could build your query this way:
public String buildQuery(int[] myList) {
String queryToReturn = "";
for (int queryIndex = 0; queryIndex < myList.length; queryIndex++) {
queryToReturn += ((queryIndex == 0) ? ("") : (" union ")) +
"(select `id`, `from`, `to`, " + myList[queryIndex] + " as input
from MyTable
where `from` < " + myList[queryIndex] + " and " + myList[queryIndex] " < `to`)";
}
return queryToReturn;
}
Then run the returned query.
yes i know this question ever asked plenty of time but all seems outdated from 2012, base of thoses question/ansewers ,
i tried to perform the classic search distance with column POINT
but i have some trouble unresolvable..
is normal my POINT column looks like this ?
0x00000000010100000085B1852007052040C0B2D2A414684840
Here is all my steps, i am not able to see whats wrong,
i did based from last stack questions/answers.
I use mariadb 10 with Heideisql gui.
i have 2 colums lat and lon ,
i created a geopoints POINT column,
populate geopoint like this:
UPDATE geoFRA
SET geopoints = GeomFromText(CONCAT('POINT (', lon, ' ', lat, ')'))
After that my geopoints column looks like this :
0x00000000010100000085B1852007052040C0B2D2A414684840
Then i try to perform the query in 2 maners , first try :
SET#lat = 48.88;
SET#lon = 2.34;
SELECT *
FROM geoFRA
WHERE MBRContains(LineFromText(CONCAT(
'('
, #lon + 700 / ( 111.1 / cos(RADIANS(#lon)))
, ' '
, #lat + 700 / 111.1
, ','
, #lon - 700 / ( 111.1 / cos(RADIANS(#lat)))
, ' '
, #lat - 700 / 111.1
, ')' )
,geopoints)
and second try :
SET#lat = 48.88;
SET#lon = 2.34;
SET #kmRange = 172; -- = 50 Miles
SELECT *, (3956 * 2 * ASIN(SQRT(POWER(SIN((#lat - abs(`lat`)) * pi()/180 / 2),2) + COS(#lat * pi()/180 ) * COS(abs(`lat`) * pi()/180) * POWER(SIN((lon - `lon`) * pi()/180 / 2), 2)))) as distance
FROM `geoFRA`
WHERE MBRContains(LineString(Point(#lat + #kmRange / 111.1, #lon + #kmRange / (111.1 / COS(RADIANS(#lat)))), Point(#lat - #kmRange / 111.1, #lon - #kmRange / (111.1 / COS(RADIANS(#lat))))), `geopoints`)
Order By distance
I begin to think there is some mariadb incompatibility ?! or did i miss something?
thanks for any help..,
flau
CREATE TABLE geoFRA (id int NOT NULL, geopoints point NOT NULL);
INSERT INTO geoFRA (id, geopoints) VALUES
(1, geomFromText('POINT(48 2)')),
(2, geomFromText('POINT(48 3)')),
(3, geomFromText('POINT(48.88 2.34)')),
(4, geomFromText('POINT(49 2)')),
(5, geomFromText('POINT(49 3)'));
SET #p=geomFromText('POINT(48.88 2.34)');
SELECT X(geopoints), Y(geopoints), asText(geopoints), ST_Distance(geopoints, #p) as d
FROM geoFRA
ORDER BY d;
This returns the geopoints ordered by distance. Using geopoints without X(), Y() and asText() returns them in the Well-Known Binary (WKB) format: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/gis-data-formats.html#gis-wkb-format
I have a MySQL table which looks like this:
id load_transit load_standby hours_transit hours_standby
1 40 20 8 4
2 30 15 10 10
3 50 10 3 9
I need to do the following calculations:
(intermediate calculations)
hours_transit_total = 8+10+3 = 21
hours_standby_total = 4+10+9 = 23
(desired result)
load_transit_weighted_mean = 40*(8/21) + 30*(10/21) + 50*(3/21) = 36.667
load_standby_weighted_mean = 20*(4/23) + 15*(10/23) + 10*(9/23) = 13.913
Is it possible to do this in a single query? What would the best design be?
Note that
40*(8/21) + 30*(10/21) + 50*(3/21) =
(40*8)/21 + (30*10)/21 + (50*3)/21 =
(40*8 + 30*10 + 50*3)/21
and
20*(4/23) + 15*(10/23) + 10*(9/23) =
(20*4)/23 + (15*10)/23 + (10*9)/23 =
(20*4 + 15*10 + 10*9)/23
Which allows you to get the results you want using
SELECT sum(hours_transit * load_transit) / sum(hours_transit),
sum(hours_standby * load_standby) / sum(hours_standby)
FROM your_table
I just had this same question and built this little query I think makes it clear how to find the weighted average in a single query:
select sum(balance), sum(rate * balance / 5200) as weighted_rate, -- what I want
-- what you cannot do: sum(rate * balance / sum(balance))
sum(balance * rate) / sum(balance) as weighted_rate_legit -- ah thank you transitive math properties
from (
select '4600' as balance, '2.05' as rate from dual
union all
select '600' as balance, '2.30' as rate from dual
) an_alias;