How can I add a new file to mercurial diff patch ? I can't seem to find any information in the man pages.
I'm not sure I fully understand your question but, if you are using Mercurial to generate a diff patch, the way to include new files you want to add to a repo is by marking the new files as part of the repo by using the hg add command and then doing the diff.
hg add newfile
hg diff > my.patch
Related
I push in our repository more big video files, my fault, I did not notice them and forgot to add the folder with the video to ignore file. Now my friends can not upgrade because a shortage of memory (abort: out of memory). How do I remove a video from the master repository? I tried to just delete the folder with the video in /home/hg/project/.hg/ But then do not start updating with an error. Help me pliz and sorry for my english/
See the Mercurial FAQ:
4.14. I committed a change containing nuclear launch codes, how do I delete it permanently?
4.15. I committed a large binary file/files, how do I delete them permanently?
There are some options described on the Editing History page as well.
You:
$ hg rm video.ogv
$ hg ci -m "removed video.ogv"
Other:
$ hg pull your-repository
$ hg update
The HG FAQ merely gives a few vague pointers. Here's how to do it:
Add to your .hgrc:
[extensions]
hgext.convert=
[convert]
hg.saverev=false
Create a filemap of what files you want to remove (myfilemap)
exclude "relative/path/to/file.mp4"
Use hg convert to make a new repo
hg convert --filemap myfilemap myrepo myrepo.new
Now you have the new repo without the excluded files.
Over time a number of the developers have committed files that were then added to the .hgignore. From what I hear there is no way to remove items from the history of mercurial, which is ok. But I also heard that there is a way to do a clone, I think using the convert plugin, to clone/export a repo while specifying which files to not include in the conversion.
I can't help but think that someone out there has a script that does this export/filter/convert using the patterns from the .hgignore file.
Has anyone created such a beast?
You could create a filemap from .hgignore doing something like this:
hg clone -U yourrepo temprepo # create a temp repo with no files in working dir
cd tmprepo
hg revert --all # put files in working dir
hg forget ** # un-add the files
hg status --ignored --no-status | sed 's/^/exclude /' > ../filemap
that will get you a filemap you can pass into hg convert that removes all the added files that would be ignored given your .hgignore.
Do understand though, that running convert creates a whole new repo that is unrelated to your previous repo. All existing clones will be unusable with the new one. It's not normally worth it.
hg convert is indeed the thing you want to use.
You will want to create a file map (just a text file) which will list all of the things you either want to include, exclude, or rename:
include subfolder
exclude subfolder/supersub
etc...
Read the following for a more concrete example:
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ConvertExtension#A--filemap
Once you have created this file you will just use the following command:
$ hg convert --filemap my_file_map /path/to/source/repo /path/to/dest/repo
The source repo will not be modified and a dest repo will be created. I don't want to just copy verbatim what the documentation already says so here is the link:
How to keep just a subdirectory (or run on the mercurial repo):
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ConvertExtension#Converting_from_Mercurial
There are two heads on my repository. I have five files that I've edited locally. The Bitbucket repo has 15 changed files that I haven't edited, but it also contains changed versions of the same 5 files.
I'd like to do the following:
1) If I've edited a file and the Bitbucket repo contains the same edited file, I'd like my changes to take preference.
2) If I haven't edited a file, I'd like to update to the latest version.
What sequence of commands in Mercurial will let me do this? Do I have to use an external program?
WITH LOCAL COMMITS
hg pull
hg update --rev ${my version}
hg merge --rev ${their version} --tool internal:local
See also hg help merge-tools
WITHOUT LOCAL COMMITS
hg status -qn gives you a list of files you have changed. Since it's only five files, I'd copy them away manually, then revert, pull, update and copy them back into place. On unix you could write a throw-away shell script, something that goes kinda' like this:
ls -l *.mine # check to see that there are none
for file in `hg status -qn`; do cp ${file} ${file}.mine; done
hg revert --all; hg pull; hg update
for file in *.mine; do cp ${file} ${file%.mine}; done
This is untested code. Run it at your own risk. Eat muffins and be happy.
just do
hg pull
hg merge
This will pull the latest changes from bitbucket and allow you to merge your local changes the way you want.
This is really a basic functionality, you should read some documentation about mercurial, for example HG Init like said in the comments.
Is it possible to clone a part(a single folder or even a single file) of a repository?
Basically it's not possible, there is nothing like Subversion's svn checkout http://example.com/project/dir1.
But you can get a partial clone by rewriting the changeset history with hg convert. On the upside, it will be a partial clone. On the downside, the resulting repository will be not related any more to the initial one. The changeset IDs will be different and it will be very hard to continue interacting with the source repo.
An example of creating a partial clone. Suppose you want to clone only the doc directory from the repo:
$ hg clone http://example.com/project local-project-repo
$ cat > filemap.txt << END
include doc
exclude .
END
$ hg convert --filemap filemap.txt local-project-repo docs-only-repo
Nope. That's called partial cloning (some file paths but not all) or shallow cloning (some revisions but not all), and not provided because the point of a DVCS is that everyone has a full copy of the full repository.
Some online repositories will let you download .tar.gz files of all the files in a specific revision or a specific file from a specific revision, but that's not done using the Mercurial tool.
I have come across a problem that I "think" can only be resolved using patches.
I cloned a project from our main repository, made quite a few changes (updates, deletion of files & directory and additions) to it. These changes are not even committed. The problem is, project from the main repository has been deleted/removed and recreated as a new project (name is same, all the directory structures everything is same as before). I cloned that project again from the main repository and would like to transfer all my uncommitted changes to it.
I am still exploring the hg patch to resolve that. It would be helpful if someone could confirm that creating and adding a patch IS the right approach to this, any resources explaining the process would be of great help.
You're correct — a patch is what you need to transfer the information from one repository to another (unrelated) repository. This will work since the files are the same, as you note.
So, to transfer your uncommitted changes from your old clone, you do
$ hg diff -g > uncommited.patch
$ cd ../new
$ hg import --no-commit ../old/uncomitted.patch
That will restore the information saved in the patch. This includes information about files that are added or renamed in the old clone.
The following steps can be performed with a standard Mercurial install:
Commit the changes in your local repository. Note the revision number.
Use "hg export -r REV >patch.diff" to create a patch.
Clone the new repository.
Use "hg import patch.diff" to apply the patch to the new repository.
Example
C:\>hg init example
C:\>cd example
C:\example>echo >file1
C:\example>hg ci -Am file1
adding file1
C:\example>hg clone . ..\example2
updating to branch default
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
C:\example>rd /s/q .hg
C:\example>hg init
C:\example>hg ci -Am same-but-different
adding file1
At this point example and example2 have identical contents, but the repositories are unrelated to each other due to deleting and reinitializing the .hg folder.
Now make some changes and commit them in one of the repositories, then export them as a patch:
C:\example>echo >>file1
C:\example>echo >file2
C:\example>hg ci -Am changes
adding file2
C:\example>hg export -r 1 >patch.diff
Below shows that the other repository can't pull the changes, because of the reinitialization. It can, however, apply the patch successfully:
C:\example>cd ..\example2
C:\example2>hg pull
pulling from c:\example
searching for changes
abort: repository is unrelated
C:\example2>hg import ..\example\patch.diff
applying ..\example\patch.diff
I would first make copies of everything so you have a way of backtracking.
Then, in the working copy with the changes, I would first delete the .hg directory, then copy in the .hg directory from the new repo. This basically transfers all of the changed files into the new repo without the need to delete any files and directories.
You will still need to tell the repo about whether to remove any files marked as missing. You will also have to handle renames manually. If this is a small number of operations, it's easier than trying to use the patch method.
Once this is done, commit your changes and push, if necessary.
seems like what you want is patch queues. In that you have uncommitted changes, and you want to pull from the new repo before committing them....
$ hg qinit -c # initialize mq for your repo containing the uncommitted changes
$ hg qnew name_of_patch # create patch that contains your uncommitted changes
$ hg qpop # resets your working dir back to the parent changeset
no worries though, your changes are safe and sound in .hg/patches/name_of_patch to see for yourself.....
$ cat .hg/patches/name_of_patch
now pull in the new repo
$ hg pull -u http://location.of.new/repo # pull in changes from new repo update working dir
$ hg qpush # apply your uncommitted changes to new repo
If you are lucky you will have no merge conflicts and you can go ahead and commit the patch by....
$ hg qfinish -a # change all applied patches to changeset
And then if you want....
$ hg push http://location.of.new/repo
If the repos are unrelated, just init a patch repo on your new repo. and manually copy the patch in and add it to .hg/patches/series file.
assuming patch was created. clone new repo
$ hg clone http://location.of.new/repo ./new_repo
init patch repo
$ cd ./new_repo && hg qinit -c
copy patch
$ cp ../old_repo/.hg/patches/name_of_patch .hg/patches/
edit series file using an editor of some sort
$ your_favorite_editor .hg/patches/series
name_of_patch # <---put this in the series file
apply your patch to new repo
$ hg qpush
if no merge conflicts and you are convinced it works
$ hg qfinish -a
If the layout is the same, you can just copy all the files over (excluding .hg) and then use hg addrem.
Try to look into the MQ plugin, it does exactly this if I recall. I've never had a use for that though, so I can't say.
If the old repository was simply moved/cloned to a new URL then you could simply change the remote repository you talk to the new one.
If, however, it was recreated from the ground up (even with the same structure) then I don't believe Mercurial has any built-in functionality to help you here. Mercurial patches reference specific changesets which won't exist in your new repository.
You could use a merge tool to perform the diff and bring across any changes you made.
Edited To answer the question in the comment:
When you clone the repository you are taking a complete snapshot of the entire change history - along with the associated change-set IDs, etc.
Mercurial tracks changes by change-sets to the repository, rather than at the file level like Subversion.
If you clone, then you can easily push/merge into another repository that was also cloned from the same source.
If you recreated the repository then the change IDs won't match, and can't be merged in Hg.
The only option in this scenario would be to use a Merge tool which will let you see mismatches in files/folder structure.
Also: Worth pointing out http://hginit.com/ because it explains (indirectly) some of this.