Is this possible? I think I may have missed something obvious here. I have a live UI scripts app, and I need to fix a bug. The potential bugfix has to be tested on multiple browsers, so it actually has to be published, instead of just trying out the "current version". This means that it has to be published to a new URL.
Thanks.
it actually has to be published, instead of just trying out the "current version" ?
There is no reason why using different browsers should prevent from using de 'dev' version of an app... you can login in many browser at the same time and play with the dev version on each browser (I do that very often using a couple of android and osX browsers simultaneously). Did you try and did you meet issues doing so ?
Related
App build with ActionScript3/Harman SDK but we don't even have REQUEST_INSTALL_PACKAGES declared in our xml.
Also, I already checked the APK via Android Studio, the AndroidManifest doesn't contain also REQUEST_INSTALL_PACKAGES.
Any fix or advice for this? Thank you.
We checked our SDKs/ANE DISTRIQT and none of them that we are using is using the REQUEST_INSTALL_PACKAGES.
Check all of the available APKs for your application.
Google will check all available versions of your application so even if your update doesn't have the permission an older build may have. When updating you may have an older version available for different users.
Go through and disable or remove all older versions as part of the update have this permission before releasing.
I have been doing a research for quite a sometime but unable to find a good solution - therefore thought of asking on StackOverflow.
I have automated the testing using Selenium Webdriver for different browser but lately I had seen there were some issues which came for Chrome's older version - now, the question I had was if there is any way through which I could run the script for different versions of browsers e.g. test should run on Chrome 48 - Chrome 59 (covering majors versions only).
The two solution I got from my research was -
1.
Overriding the chrome binary location like the below link:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/16562068/6738995
I then started my research on how to download the binaries for Chrome and I found the official repo also - http://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.html
2. Use Selenium Webdriver on cloud solution provider like BrowserStack or SauceLabs etc who provides multi-version-browser support
Now, I want to exhaust all the options related to the 1st approach i.e. if there is no proper/easy way to implement the solution then I would have go for the 2nd approach.
The reason I am reluctant to go for 2nd approach is that I might loose control(I am speculating that there might be some restrictions on using that platform, I might be wrong and could only find out the try after tring that) and also there will be learning curve associated with this and I would also have to spend time & resources in order to stabilize with the chosen technology.
Thanks in advance.
If resource isn't a concern/constraint for you, then you can use a Virtual Machine, like VMWare and simulate separate test environments with different web browsers. However, if you are looking for the best solution, then you have to use Cloud solutions like SauceLabs or BrowserStack.
When we want to integrate Google map in windows application by using C# it gives the following errors when we run the application
error : you seem to be using an unsupported browser
Based from this forum, it seems that there is/are one or more addons or extension which is not allowing map to load. You can try to check one by one. Maybe it updated and broke maps.
You can also check this SO question which states that maybe the WebBrowser control is emulating an older version of Internet Explorer on your machine.
By default, this feature is enabled for Windows Internet Explorer and for applications hosting the WebBrowser Control. To disable this feature by using the registry, add the name of your executable file to the following setting.
Hope this helps!
You can consider a different web browser embedded control. For example, you can look at Chromium Embedded Framework.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_Embedded_Framework
I believe it should work pretty well. According to the documentation this framework embeds a Chromium browser (open-source web browser closely related to the Google Chrome browser) which uses the modern HTML5 and V8 JavaScript engine.
We are looking for an easy way for our users to download and install a small client widget (it is a windows app) used with our (much larger) web app.
Our web app is currently only supported in Chrome.
Our concern is that the clickonce support piece may be missing from most Chrome installs.
The questions:
-- Is clickonce really going to be useful in this situation?
-- What is the best option for "one click" download-and-install for Chrome on windows?
ClickOnce uses NPAPI which is being removed from Chrome. You will need to look at NaCl, Native Messaging or PPAPI instead of ClickOnce. There used to be browser extensions that you could use, however they have been removed from the store (or no longer work).
Using Chrome should not matter, so yes Click once will be useful in this situation.
The only thing you need to worry about is your clients using Windows and the appropriate version of the .net framework. I hope this helps.
I am developing my first extension for Chrome and as I am working on Ubuntu, I've encountered two awful bugs.
The first thing is that chrome.i18n.getUILanguage is not supported! (console gives me an error about unsupported method). The thing is that this problem is not listed on any WIKI page, which may become tricky for beginners. Anyone had similar issue? For now, I am using window.navigator.language.
The second bug is about rich notifications that are not supported (anyone knows when it will be released?). As far as I know, when the app will be about to send a notification, the scripts will stop due to the error (similar to the first bug). I am not sure if there is possibility to develop different packages for different platforms, but if I want my extension to be truly multi-platform, I will have to give up development of this feature.
Any suggestions or thoughts?
Thanks,
As i said earlier in a comment, it seems to be not supported with linux mint either where i'm developing the chrome extension.
In this link a member of the chrome team said that they submitted it... but this is not true.
Thanks for the window.navigator.language alternative.