I notice that there are many libraries out there for playing HTML5 audio, but ain't the whole idea of HTML5 audio that we don't need a library for this to work properly?
If I don't need Flash fallback, but a simple solution for streaming music (my own) that can also play each track after each other, do I then need a library like jPlayer or Soundmanager2?
I know I need different audio formats, but that's not a problem as I won't have many tracks online.
The "whole idea" of HTML5 audio is that end users and web page authors shouldn't need to rely on a browser plugin to play audio - the functionality should be included in the browser, and controllable directly from standardised HTML/JavaScript.
I haven't used an HTML5 audio library, but looking at the jPlayer and Soundmanager2 home pages, it looks like the main functionality they offer is fallbacks for browsers that don't support HTML5 audio.
I suspect they might also have some built-in custom UI for playing audio though, in case you don't like the native audio controls that browsers provide.
You could use straight-up HTML5, but you'd soon realize that has a whole host of problems.
Library's like jPlayer (which is great by the way) account for many common issues like browser support, optimization and fall-backs etc.
If you want to code all that yourself you can, but a popular library will be leaps ahead and it's the wise choice to take.
The truth is, HTML5 offers very powerful features, but its support is thin at this current moment in time. It's all to make your life easier!
HTML-5 audio actually encompasses two distinct factions at this point. One is the audio tag and the other is the Web Audio API. The former is a quick mechanism for playing an embedding audio files, the latter is a way to play,process and manipulate audio in a low-latency manner acceptable for game development and more professional environments where features like reverb effects,filters,"3D" sound and other characteristics are needed. But to answer your question, the only real reason to use a library for the HTML 5 audio tag is (in my opinion) for backward compatibility between browsers as well as ease of use for things like multi-shot file triggering and event handling.
Related
I can't watch Periscope without flash:
Since Periscope is pretty new and hype I find it a pity flash is required. My best guess then is that they simply can't.
But what is the technical restriction if one?
I can't say for sure about their own technical restrictions but they are serving the video in chunks of .ts files. It is not impossible for HTML5-based player to handle MPEG-TS streams so I can only assume this is a temporary solution.
Example of an HTML5 player handling .ts format is THEOPlayer. Also DailyMotion released an open-source JavaScript HLS streaming client. If others can already do it now, Twitter will do it soon.
Why Flash? :
It's an easy solution that works same on all browsers that it's installed onto so Edge, Chrome, Safari & Firefox etc so it will each give a consistent result to their user base without specific browser limitations (since it's a plugin).
Why assume temporary? :
First of all as you said it's still new (growing/developing). They have a few job openings for video programmers. This particular job opening requires "Ability to create an interface in HTML, CSS and JavaScript". They are currently using a Flash-based JW Player instead of a custom-made Twitter player. That will change in time.
For a long time I've been using Soundmanager2 (http://www.schillmania.com/projects/soundmanager2/) whenever I need to add sound to a webpage. This is a good overall library that makes playing sounds on the web easy and straight forward.
Are there any better/more modern approaches to web sound, particularly with HTML5 audio, or is this technology still not mature enough to be useful?
HTML5 allows you to have a native audio player that is essentially supported by all the major browsers, and the advantage of HTML5 is that you can still use your soundmanager2 as what is called a "fallback". http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/audio/quick/
Coursera has these interactive questions in the middle of their video lecture
how could I go about implementing this myself,
or better yet, does this feature exist for public use somewhere?
Furthermore, I'm trying to decide which HTML5 video player / platform to invest in and the key criteria would be feature-rich (so as to not reinvent the wheel / spend lots of time implementing video player features) as well as highly customizable (for those custom needs).
I.e. which player should I use to get the quiz up,
but in the near future I would also need to add the speed feature that Coursera has
I need Closed Captions support
and would like to overlay slides every now and then
plus all the expected features of switching between different source resolutions (360p, 720p etc), it should work in IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Android and iOS native browsers etc
Candidates
In terms of customizability and feature-set, SublimeVideo seems to come on top, but I don't know when they will support subtitles.
Haven't researched Flowplayer much, would that be better for my purposes?
Jwplayer is good for all the standard features, and includes subtitle support, but I haven't really seen any plug-ins, aesthetic skinning aside, deep customization does not really seem to be their focus / strength?
Or videojs
Or something else yet ?
Flowplayer and Jwplayer are amazing players and you could do what you want, but in the free version you can't remove their branding. I try to stick to opensource projects you you don't worry about licenses.
I've done something similar as you need with Mediaelementjs. It supports all you need at the moment, and they will support the variable speed at some point on the future as announced in their website. However it has been like that for more than a year now since I started watching, so probably your "near future" is before their "coming soon".
I think your best free option will be Videojs. They also support all you need. For the variable speed there is this plugin.
Basically you set up a listener in the timeupdate event, and when it reaches the point that you need, you attach the quiz html to overlay the video area.
I have used flowplayer extensively. I'm just now starting to dive more into their new HTML5 version. The licensing for flowplayer is reasonable. It does have a plugin for doing subtitles and the cue point functionality works great. I also like that they have the Flash version that works well for fallback and I still use it for rtmp streaming.
I have built a video presenter with synchronized slides using the flash version which I'll be changing over to have an HTML5 version. I use it to produce speaker videos with Powerpoint presentations. Sometimes we have surveys (live) so I have also been planning to build in the option for a survey slide.
You can take a look at what I have built as an example here (it has some lose ends). Example synchronized video slide presentation (I have no affiliation with Flowplayer. WebVideoDesk, branded on the linked page, is a service I am planning to launch someday.)
I am redesigning a music player. It currently uses Soundmanager2 V2.97a.20110801. But now since the HTML5 is so easy to use, is there much of a reason why I should continue using Soundmanager2? Or are there advantages to it that I am unaware of? Could you possibly help with a simple compare and contrast of the 2?
Soundmanager uses flash, HTML5 audio uses the native capabilities of the browser. A pitfall with <audio> is that you'll have to encode your audio at least twice, as mp3 and ogg.
Another thing is that older browsers, IE8 in particular, don't support <audio>. You may want to detect* audio support, and, if not, fall back to Soundmanager.
About audio codecs
This web page talks about <video>, but detecting <audio> is done almost the same way.
the HTML5 audio tag is still a work in progress and unfortunately still has too many browser specific differences in supported audio formats for an easy cross browser solution.
it still varies widely depending upon what you want to accomplish.
here is a link to the info you should read through:
http://www.schillmania.com/projects/soundmanager2/doc/getstarted/#intro
this may be a little off topic but i built an opensource audio library on github for playing multichannel sounds like this...
// play the lowest piano key (1)
jThump( 1, 'piano' );
// play the highest piano key (88)
jThump( 88, 'piano' );
below is a simple demo that plays random notes when you press the 'z' key
http://jthump.com
I want so serve some videos on my site. They are available as .MP4 files gotten from a FlipShare camera.
Now I tried converting them to WMV (which succeeded, but when embedded in html in a <object id='mediaPlayer' width='320' height='285' classid='CLSID:22d6f312-b0f6-11d0-94ab-0080c74c7e95' etc' tag, users have to install an addon and the user experience of 10 Windows Media Players on the site isn't just so good.)
So then I looked at youtube and wondered how they do it, but I can't figure out what format they convert the video to.
So my question is: What format do I have to convert my video to, to show it in a player which does not need to be installed in the users browser. What tool do i need and what is the html code to embed such a video?
As you can see: starting from scratch.
PS: I often hear: This or that file extension is just a container, there can be anything inside. If you're using this in your answer, can you explain this to me, because I never understood this. For me a .cs is a c# file and a .doc a Word file, and not 'a container'.
This isn't an easy question. The basic answer is that you need to use a format that the user's computer already supports. There is no one answer to this question. YouTube encodes videos as MP4 and embeds them in the page with a Flash-based movie player, and Flash is pretty widely supported, but you'll notice that Flash isn't available on a lot of mobile platforms — so anybody using an iPhone is shut out if you go the Flash route.
HTML5 introduces the video tag, which is meant to solve this problem once and for all, but there's still a hiccup even there — most HTML5-enabled browsers support h.264-encoded video, but Mozilla supports Ogg Theora instead. YouTube is currently experimenting with a <video>-based player, so this does seem like the future.
I believe the current best practice to support the most people possible is to encode as h.264, try to serve as a <video> element, and have a Flash-based player as a fallback if that doesn't work (which can play the same h.264 file).
I'd say the most popular solution at the moment - utilized by YouTube and other major video portals - is H.264 encoded Flash-based Video. Flash can play Video since... I think Version 8 or 9, and has since gained significant market share.
My personal favourite Flash player is LongTail Player, but it isn't free for commercial use.
Here's a SO question with a list of Flash based players including open source ones.
Flash won't play on iPhone and iPad, though.
If you want to support computers with Flash Player 9 (I've seen some around, but I don't have any hard numbers) you will need to encode FLV files (which use a codec named Sorenson I think).
The upcoming alternative is HTML 5 Video but suport for that in browsers is nowhere near a major market share.
This question requires a re-answer now that it's no longer 2010 and HTML5 videos (as utilized by most video hosting sites) and chunk-based videos (sent as responses to periodic XHR requests - as utilized by Youtube) are the norm. While there is no best way to add video to your site, Flash is definitely nowhere close to even being good as of the time of writing of this answer.
The simple un-researched answer is: Just use a video tag and it'll work out!
This is simple and intuitive, and should work fine in many of your use-cases.
The researched answer is: Unfortunately, upload the video on Youtube and embed it on your site.
The pros and cons of embedding on Youtube over just having a video tag:
The pros:
Allows you to offer your video in a multitude of qualities.
Very bandwidth efficient. Youtube is bandwidth efficient for your users since it reencodes videos, and is also bandwidth efficient for you since you'll no longer be serving your videos off your own hosting.
Offers features like closed captions, automatic subs, playing at multiple speeds, full screen player, etc.
The cons:
It's a very heavily monetized service, chances are they'll want to put ads on your video if any of its content isn't 100% originally yours.
It has very strict laws/terms and conditions that you need to adhere to, at least in my opinion.
It tracks your users. If your application requires privacy and you can't rely on your users to protect themselves, then Youtube isn't ideal.
Other alternatives that mix the pros and cons of those two options are:
Using a Javascript video library to get HTML5 video along with some of the pros of using youtube, but none of its cons.
Using FFMPEG on the server side, for bandwidth issues.
Using some CDN that supports video to deliver the video, for reliability and bandwidth issues. My current favorites are ones that rely on service workers and the bittorent protocol, to stream from users to each other, but whether that suits you or not depends on your application.
Using AWS storage services to store the video, and AWS gateway/CDN services to serve it, which might be a great solution cost-wise and efficiency-wise if you don't want youtube but don't want to store videos on whatever infrastructure is serving your website.
Sources of this answer: Personal experience. As much as I didn't want to answer from experience, this question really needed a new answer! Feel free to edit it with something more concrete.
Converting your video MPEG-4 with H.264 will get you 97% coverage on current browsers across desktop and mobile, although some Android devices don't support hardware acceleration for this format. To address that you could also serve WebM with VP9 codec.
I wrote up a summary of browser support that might be useful: https://stuartk.com/posts/whats-the-best-html-video-format-to-serve/