I have this Adobe Edge Content by a client.
THe HTML Code is
<div id="Stage" class="EDGE-XXXXXXXXX">
</div>
What should I do to have an alternative content for IE 8 and below?
If I just insert some content inside the div, it is not overwritten by Edge.
I know, there is kind of down-level support in Edge, but I don't own Edge myself, so I cannot try out.
So what is the actual HTML markup that uses the down-level support feature?
edit
<noscript> won't work, because Internet Explorer 8 has JS
in the *_edgePreload.js file navigate to the end of the file where it says:
})("EDGE-XXXXXXXX");
where the ID is the same as in your HTML source. IMMEDIATELY before this exact string (there may be some spaces) add a new variable as follows (ensure dlContent isn't already assigned with a similar stanza, and if it is then replace that assignation - I'm guessing your js files are minified so this will not look the same as your version, but it'll still work when pasted into the file!):
dlContent={
dom: [
{
id:'Poster',
type:'image',
tag:'img',
linkURL:"URL/to/some/content",
//This line can be omitted if no linking of the image is desired
linkTarget:"_top",//omit this line if the above line has been omitted
rect:['0','0','100%','100%','auto','auto'],
//values in order: x-pos, y-pos, width, height, ?, ?
// not sure what the two auto values correspond to right now
// the rectangle is the "viewport" into what would be the animation in better browsers.
fill:["rgba(0,0,0,0)",'/path/to/an/image.jpg','0px','0px']
// values in order: background colour and alpha transparency, an image to use, image position x and y within the rectangle defined above.
}]};
Related
I'm new to XMonad. I'd like to have 1px borders for all windows (so I can tell which one is active), except for the browser. In a conventional window manager, I typically have one maximized web browser window in a designated workspace. I'm very used to bringing the mouse cursor all the way to the top edge of the screen to select browser tabs. But if I have 1px border around the browser window, if I slide the mouse all the way to the top it ends up over this border pixel and cannot select the tabs.
Is there a way to define different rules for specific windows regarding border width, or any other such properties?
Alternatively, is there a way to not have a border around any window, if it's the only one on the workspace?
Yes, all of it is possible.
Import xmonad-contrib's NoBorders Layout Extension using
import XMonad.Layout.NoBorders
Then, in your manageHook you can use hasBorder with conditions like checking the program's className (you may want to use XOrg's Property displayer xprop to find out your browser's actual className)
className =? "firefox" --> hasBorder False
Alternatively, you can launch your browser within a given layout and modify that layout in your layoutHook definition to not show borders at all using noBorders, or to remove them only in given one-window or fullsize-floating scenarios using smartBorders
noBorders Full ||| smartBorders Tall ||| ...
Today I read about HTML5's color input and I thought I'd give it a try:
<input type="color" name="background" id="background" value="#ff0000">
When I click the input (in chrome and firefox, on windows), a color picker appears. However, it is positioned in the top left corner of my screen, not above the input.
Is this a known issue and will this be 'fixed' in the future? Is it possible to position the color picker through code? Or is this something that browsers can't do much about and that users have to live with?
The positioning of the input of type color is browser-specific implementation, in the official documentation there is no given rule for user-agents (i.e. browsers) how to position it over the page's element. This makes custom positioning via CSS for example, or JavaScript not possible.
However, there are some other rules (for example, there is always a color picked, and there is no way to set the value to the empty string.)
Keep in mind when using the input of type color, that Internet Explorer and Safari browsers do not support it yet.
One more caveat is that when creating a custom picker control, use 0-size instead of display: none. Otherwise browser will place the picker in the corner (out of the Visual DOM tree).
<input type="color" width="0" height="0" value="#ff0000">
<button onClick="/* logic to show the picker */">Pick a colour</button>
I had this same question. I wanted to create a Theme editor and wanted to do this. Like the VS Code when editing a CSS file.
I figured out some strategies for solving this problem:
Method A using positioned iframe and signalling changes between iframe and parent.
Figure out the absolute screen location where you want your picker to open.
Create a <input type=hidden with an id like signalColor. And monitor this id for changes.
Move a hidden <div with the absolute position and size where you need the color picker.
Place an iframe in the <div with the code to create a colour picker. Also, in the Iframe you will need an input with your initial color.
Set the color of the initial color within the iframe and then show the div.
Use the following post to figure out when to signal the new color or if cancelled.
https://lugolabs.com/articles/how-to-use-a-color-picker-in-javascript
Method B using window.open(…)+ Ajax
Figure out the absolute screen location where you want your picker to open.
Generate a random token file name.
Open a new Window with needed position and size, loading in any into the HTML you will need. Embed in the script the token file name and pass ajax credentials you will be using. Add references to JQuery, etc. Create a loop in the parent DOM to detect when the window is closed.
When the operator clicks on a new selection detect the click and capture the new colour value.
Send an ajax message with the new colour to the host. Saving the value in the token file.
Then close the window which then triggers the parent to use ajax to request the token file.
Here's a hacked solution which worked for me.
After page load ("AfterViewInit" in Angular), I picked all inputs with the type color.
One of them should be the color input I was applying to. For me it was the first one.
Then, I changed its style attribute.
See the code below:
let colorPickerInputs = document.querySelectorAll('input[type=color]');
if (colorPickerInputs)
colorPickerInputs[0].setAttribute('style', 'position: absolute; top: 20px; opacity: 0;');
I know that the automatic rotation of JPG files is disabled in browsers.
They can not enable it because it would break the layout of some websites.
Is there a CSS property?
or javascript code to achieve that?
or something else?
or maybe the solution to this problem doesn't exist yet?
CSS image-orientation: from-image
from the specs https://www.w3.org/TR/css4-images/#the-image-orientation
6.2. Orienting an Image on the Page: the ‘image-orientation’ property
image-orientation: from-image
from-image: If the image has an orientation specified in its metadata, such as EXIF, this value computes to the angle that the metadata specifies is necessary to correctly orient the image. If necessary, this angle is then rounded and normalized as described above for an value. If there is no orientation specified in its metadata, this value computes to ‘0deg’.
Matching Chrome-Issue: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=158753
But the browser support is not here yet: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/CSS/image-orientation#Browser_compatibility
Rotate via JS
There is a JS snippet to do this: https://gist.github.com/runeb/c11f864cd7ead969a5f0
My conclusion
I think rotating the image on the server with tools like imagemagick is too much overhead.
The browser can rotate the image, but the web application needs to give the advice how to rotate this explicitly.
This explicit in browser rotation could be done like this: https://stackoverflow.com/a/11832483/633961
Since Chrome 81, image EXIF orientation is respected by default. Latest Safari (13.1 as of now) is also working correctly.
Firefox hasn't fully implemented this (see Bugzilla issue #1616169).
Here's a couple test pages I found:
https://image-orientation-test.now.sh
https://softov.org/oria/image-orientation
As for the standard, the image-orientation property is now marked deprecated on the latest CSS Images Level 3 spec draft:
'image-orientation'
This property is deprecated, and is optional for implementations.
From the latest update of chromium/chrome version 81, it will support exif orientation from image itself. This means that the exif orientation when present in an image, will be used to orient the image unless the "image-orientation: none" CSS property is present.
Before this update, you may used any other work around to rotate images or manually rotate based on the known image orientation. Then the newer chrome 81 will automatically rotate the image. If you need to avoid the automatic rotation and continue with the same work around option used for older chrome , you may need to set image-orientation: none, because now the image-orientation value is from-image by default.
image-orientation support chrome 81
I've written a little php script which rotates the image.
Be sure to store the image in favour of just recalculate it each request.
<?php
header("Content-type: image/jpeg");
$img = 'IMG URL';
$exif = #exif_read_data($img,0,true);
$orientation = #$exif['IFD0']['Orientation'];
if($orientation == 7 || $orientation == 8) {
$degrees = 90;
} elseif($orientation == 5 || $orientation == 6) {
$degrees = 270;
} elseif($orientation == 3 || $orientation == 4) {
$degrees = 180;
} else {
$degrees = 0;
}
$rotate = imagerotate(imagecreatefromjpeg($img), $degrees, 0);
imagejpeg($rotate);
imagedestroy($rotate);
?>
Cheers
As the previous poster said, you will need to rotate the image itself. But next to that, you might also want to set/reset the rotation tag in the EXIF. That way you will avoid that viewers that do respect the orientation tag will rotate it again. A tool that can edit the EXIF for you is called ExifTool, and is free.
The tool exifautotran can be used beforehand to quickly replace the EXIF orientation with the default one (1, for “top left”) and to rotate the image automatically so that the image looks the same as before the transformation. You can then use the JPG files thus obtained in a webpage without worrying about that stuff:
a#b:~/a/b/100_PANA$ exifautotran *.JPG
Executing: jpegtran -copy all -rotate 90 P1000638.JPG
Executing: jpegtran -copy all -rotate 270 P1000641.JPG
Executing: jpegtran -copy all -rotate 90 P1000642.JPG
Executing: jpegtran -copy all -rotate 90 P1000645.JPG
…
Use https://github.com/blueimp/JavaScript-Load-Image
It includes a demo index.html file that can load an image and display it correctly with the correct rotation applied.
This question is a little specific and I am hoping someone here can shed some light on a potential solution for me.
All of the following points are important:
I am writing some HTML pages that are going to be read on a third party hand-held device.
In order to fit the requirements of this device each word must be in a separate span, this is for an upcoming feature of the device that I am not allowed to go into, but it has to be formatted like this.
This HTML is being converted from SVG, the SVG is created from Adobe Illustrator documents.
The only place I have any control of the creation of the HTML is in the conversion from SVG to HTML.
My problem is this, in SVG text is broken down into "text" nodes and tspan nodes. Look at this simple SVG, note how I am changing the Y coord on the first tspan.
<text><tspan y="50">Hello</tspan><tspan> World</tspan></text>
When this renders in a webkit based browser, like safari, the sentence "Hello World" is displayed with the word "World" right next to the word "Hello".
In my converted HTML example:
<div><span style="position:absolute;top:50px;">Hello</span><span> World</span></div>
"Hello" is displayed with a y offset of 50, however "World" is displayed in the top left corner origin of the page.
This is frustrating as I do not have the coords of where the "World" span should be placed in the SVG (as Illustrator does not need this coord to render it correctly). Also, there may be one or more tspans in the SVG with altered positions which will prevent me from applying the style to the div.
In short, does anyone know if there is an attribute I can set to place the second span directly after the first?
Thanks
You could style the div instead of the span
<div style="position:absolute;top=50px;"><span>Hello</span><span> World</span></div>
That would keep text-chunks together and positioned relative to each other, but you could still have a span for every single word
Have figured this out after trying a bunch of different things.
It is actually very straightforward, however I didn't realise spans could be nested so I am going to let myself off.
<div><span style="position:absolute;top:50px;"><span>Hello</span><span> World</span></span></div>
The trick is to wrap all the words that need to be grouped together in a span. Hopefully this helps anyone who is stuck on a similar issue.
In actionscript 3, my TextField has :
CSS styling
embedded fonts
textAlign : CENTER
autoSize : CENTER
... when italics are used the very right character gets slightly cut off (specially caps).
It basically seems that it fails detecting the right size.
I've had this problem before but just wondered is there a nice workaround (instead of checking textWidth or offsetting text etc.)?
Initialize your textField as you always do, using multiline, autosize, htmlText...
Then do this little trick :
// saving wanted width and height plus 1px to get some space for last char
var savedWidth = myTextField.width + 1;
var savedHeight = myTextField.height + 1;
// removing autoSize, wich is the origin of the problem i think
myTextField.autoSize = "none";
// now manually autoSizing the textField with saved values
myTextField.width = savedWidth;
myTextField.height = savedHeight;
Not that it is much comfort to you, but Flash sometimes has trouble with this seemingly simple task. CSS styling of html TextField was a nice addition but it has caused headaches for text-rendering. In fact I very rarely use CSS for styling text for that reason. I can only imagine that combining bold, italic and normal type faces within the HTML causes Flash to get some of the width calculations wrong which causes autoSize to set the mask a tiny bit short. I hope very much that the new text rendering engine in Flash Player 10 will finally fix these issues (it certainly looks better in theory).
So my solution is never to use HTML with the exception being when I require <a> links in my text ... and there are even some tricky text shifting issues there. In those cases I avoid mixing different font weights and font styles within the same text field. All other cases I use TextFormat directly on TextField.
I suppose if you can't get out of your current architecture (for some reason) you could try adding to the end of your html encoded strings. Or you could manually set the width of the field and not rely on autoSize (as you have mentioned). But if you keep on the CSS/HTML route you may find another new and painful limitation just when you don't want it.
I've had issues with TextField masks behaving differently in the Flash preview, and in the actual browser plugin. Usually, and this is strange to me, it would appear more correctly in the browser. Have you tried running the swf in a browser to see if the problem is actually an annoyance rather than a permanent problem?
I had said this:
My in-ideal approach to solving this is to attach a change event to the TextField which always adds a space after the last character of the field. And then to remember to trim this space off when using the value.
But that didn't take into account that this probably doesn't have a change event and that it's an HTML rendered text field. To add a trailing space in the HTML text field throw in an again, that's not really fixing the problem.