I have this annoying space under my picture for no reason.
I'm using www.getskeleton.com as the framework.
HTML code
<div class="four columns bottom">
<div class="box">
<img src="images/picture.png" title="" alt="">
</div>
</div>
CSS code
.box{
border: 1px solid #bfbfbf; /* ---- Border OUTSIDE*/
}
Although I'm sure this has since been resolved, I believe none of these answers are correct (or at least, the link from the "accepted" answer is dead).
The way to deal with this spacing issue (and why it isn't set in util libraries like normalize I'm not sure) is vertical alignment of the image. This'll solve it for HTML pages when using the HTML 5 doctype. Oddly, when using e.g., HTML 4.01 doctype, images will not exhibit this errant space below behaviour.
The fix:
img {
vertical-align: top;
}
I hope that helps someone who may have run into this problem.
Edit: Some extra info I noticed after writing this and subsequently researching why normalize doesn't set alignment on the img tag; the default alignment for images is vertical-align: baseline; - that's the behaviour which introduces the space underneath. Normalize's author believes this behaviour is consistent cross-browser, and so has decided not to 'normalize' this. I suppose that makes sense if you wanted text sitting next to an image to align properly with any subsequent lines of text. Some people also prefer to use vertical-align: middle as opposed to top to address this issue - so you can vary this as you wish.
However, regarding baseline alignment, in the case where I had an image that was so big that it was higher than the line-height, I'd probably be floating it or some other behaviour anyway... but there you go.
I've used the vertical-align stuff for a while now without any incident. But as always, do ensure you test for any repercussions for images no longer being aligned to the baseline.
Try this:
.box img {
display: block;
padding: 0px;
margin: 0px;
}
Try this: .box { font-size: 0; }
Your image need to be floated. Try this:
#yourimage{
float: left;}
As mentioned, more information would help a lot but i have no doubt that it is padding that is causing the border to go out of the image, reason put very simply being
margin pushes outside the element
padding pushes inside the element
as it were.
Fix then:
.box {
padding-bottom: 0px;
}
//to be sure that the image doesn't have any padding, even though OP said the .box img fix didn't help
.box img {
margin-bottom: 0px;
}
It's an age old quirk - the whitespace from your line formatting is causing the gap. Add
<br /> after the image.
Try this
.box{
display:flex
}
Related
This question already has answers here:
Image inside div has extra space below the image
(10 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
When I change my website to
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
Every img element that is wrapped inside a DIV has a 3px bottom margin to it even though that margin is not defined in CSS. In other words, there are no style attributes that are causing that 3px bottom margin.
<div class="placeholder">
<img alt="" src="/haha.jpg" />
</div>
Now let's say haha.jpg is 50x50, and .placeholder is set to display: table. Strangely the height dimensions of .placeholder in my observation is 50x53...
Has anyone encountered this anomaly before and fixed it?
EDIT
Here is the JS FIDDLE
http://jsfiddle.net/fRpK6/
This problem is caused by the image behaving like a character of text (and so leaving a space below it where the hanging part of a "y" or "g" would go), and is solved by using the vertical-align CSS property to indicate that no such space is needed. Almost any value of vertical-align will do; I'm fond of middle, personally.
img {
vertical-align: middle;
}
jsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/fRpK6/1/
I often solve this by giving the image element display:block or display:inline-block as appropriate.
it is solved my problem.
line-height: 0;
I believe setting
line-height: 1;
on the image will also fix this problem, especially if it's in a block by itself.
apply display: block to the image fix it, i have this issue with images inside floated divs.
For me it was a combination of
font-size: 0px;
line-height: 0;
on the wrapping container that fixed it.
I'm not sure of the exact explanation of why it happens, but give your placeholder div font-size: 0px;
.placeholder {
font-size: 0px;
}
maybe it is the problem of the white-space that causes this.
so, the methods bellow maybe useful
img {
display: block;
}
or
img {
vertical-align: top/middle/...;
}
or
.placeholder {
font-size: 0;
}
In my special case none of the above solutions worked.
I had a wrapping div with display: flex;.
I managed to make this working by adding: align-items: flex-start; to the wrapping div AND to all the images: display: block;.
Before I explicitly told the content to align it messed up the Layout. After setting it to flex-start everything works like a charm.
not sure what's the exact problem but i have try this with 2 different option first apply class on img tag this will work and second apply font size 0 px;
http://jsfiddle.net/fRpK6/3/
It also happens with piled up divs, just add float property.
Example:
<body>
<div class="piledUpDiv">Some text</div>
<div class="piledUpDiv">Some text</div>
<div class="piledUpDiv">Some text</div>
</body>
Problematic CSS:
.piledUpDiv{
width:100%;
display:inline-block;
}
Solution:
.piledUpDiv{
width:100%;
display:inline-block;
float:left;
}
This is a common problem but I can't figure out why it happens.
I have a parent div and inside that div I have 3 divs with width set to 33% (exactly, not 33.3%!) and display: inline-block.
In Chrome it works well, but in Mozilla and Opera it does not (I didn't test it in IE yet). I thought the problem might be in the algorithm browsers use to calculate pixel sizing from percentages. But when I checked the DOM metrics, I found that the parent's width is 864px and the child's is 285px (that's correct: 864 * .33 = 285.12). But why doesn't it fit in the parent? 285 * 3 = 855, that's 9px less than parent's width!
Oh, yes, padding, margin and border for all divs set to 0 and DOM metrics confirm that.
Whitespace in the HTML source code
In the HTML source code, When you have lines of text or images, or elements that are inline-block, if there is any whitespace between them (blank spaces, tabs, or new lines), a single blank space character will be added between them when the page is rendered. For example, in the following HTML, a blank space will appear between each of the four pieces of content:
one
two
<img src="three.png"/>
<span style="display: inline-block;">four<span>
This is very helpful for lines of text, and for small images or HTML elements that appear inside a line of text. But it becomes a problem when inline-block is used for layout purposes, rather than as way to add content inside a paragraph of text.
Removing the extra space
The safest, cross-browser way to avoid the extra 4px or so of space that's added between inline-block elements, is to remove any whitespace in the HTML source code between the HTML tags.
For instance, if you have a ul with 3 floated li tags:
<-- No space, tabs, or line breaks between </li> and <li> -->
<ul>
<li>...</li><li>...</li><li>...</li>
</ul>
Unfortunately, this hurts the maintainability of the website. Besides making the code unreadable, it severely compromises the separation of data and formatting.
If another programmer comes along later and decides to put each li tag on a separate line in the source code (unaware of why the tags were on the same line, or possibly running it through HTML Tidy and not even having a chance to notice any related HTML comments), suddenly the website has a formatting bug that may be difficult to identify.
Consider floating elements instead
The whitespace behavior strongly suggests that it may be inappropriate to use inline-block for general-layout purposes, to use it for anything other than adding content inside the flow of a paragraph of text.
Plus, in some cases inline-block content is very difficult to fully style and align, especially on older browsers.
Quick summary of other solutions
Put the close tag on the same line as the next open tag, with no white space between them.
Use HTML comments to fill all of the whitespace between the close tag and the next open tag (as #Arbel suggested).
Add a negative left margin to each element (usually -3px or -4px, based on the font-size). I don't recommend this particular approach.
Set the font-size for the container element to 0 or 0.01em. This doesn't work in Safari 5 (not sure about later versions), and it may interfere with Responsive Design websites, or any website that uses a font-size unit other than px.
Remove whitespace-only text nodes from the container using JavaScript or jQuery. This doesn't work in IE8 and earlier, as text nodes are not created in those browsers when there's only whitespace between elements, though space is still added between the elements.
Set letter-spacing and word-spacing for the container (as #PhillipWills suggested). Further info. This requires standardizing em sizes on the website, which may not be a reasonable option for all websites.
Add text-space-collapse: discard; to the container (previously called white-space-collapse). Unfortunately, this CSS3 style is not yet supported by any browsers, and the standard hasn't been fully defined.
If you don't want to mess up the HTML formatting e.g. having all the elements with inline-block written in one line for future readability and also get rid of the extra white space that is added between them, you can "comment" the white space.
For example in your code this will solve the problem, it will even work with 33.3% instead of 33%:
.parent {
width: 100%;
}
.child{
display: inline-block;
width: 33.3%;
}
/\
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">bla-bla1</div><!--
--><div class="child">bla-bla2</div><!--
--><div class="child">bla-bla3</div>
</div>
A space is added between the inner divs. There is some CSS voodoo to correct this problem:
div {
letter-spacing: -.31em;
word-spacing: -.43em;
}
div div {
letter-spacing: normal;
word-spacing: normal;
}
Of course, you'll probably prefer to use classes or something to differentiate between parent and children.
Add float:left;
.parent{
width: 100%
}
.child{
float:left;
display: inline-block;
width: 33%
}
http://jsfiddle.net/H6Whc/1/
Has anyone tried display: table? If that's not a good idea, why not? This works in all modern browsers and I tested it down to IE9.
.parent{
display: table;
width: 100%;
}
.containers {
box-sizing: border-box;
border: 1px solid #000;
height: 50px;
width: 33.3%;
display: table-cell;
}
This is a mentioned by a number of comments and by #Avin, but removing display: inline-block and replacing it with float: left works.
.parent{
width: 100%
}
.child{
float:left;
width: 33%
}
This is a common problem, but it can be sorted out very easily by assigning the display: table CSS property to the parent div.
I would like to put 3 horizontal line in a row.
Does anyone know how to put an horizontal line displaying in inline-block in IE7 ?
Here is my CSS:
hr.small {
width: 28.9%;
margin-right: 6px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
zoom: 1;
*display: inline;
height: 3px;
border: 0px;
color: #7c8690;
background-color: #7c8690;
}
but it doesnt works.
here is the JSFiddle Link: http://jsfiddle.net/sRuz3/6/
If anyone has a solution.
Thanks a lot.
Here you go: http://jsfiddle.net/eq3Z2/
It works in IE7 also.
Granted, they aren't HRs. They are DIVs. Trying to render the HR as an inline element
is tripping up IE7 but I don't know of a workaround.
Does it have to be inline-block? Can you not simply float them and set a height if necessary?
Edit - Example:
hr.small {
float:left;
width: 28.9%;
margin-right: 6px; /* Choice: Use border instead or halve the margin for IE7 and lowwer (double margin float bug). */
height: 3px;
background-color: #7c8690;
}
Edit again - Question:
Is this going in a fluid layout and how big is the container? You are setting a dynamic width but a fixed margin, this will cause issues in small scale and introduce unwanted white space to the far right in large scale. If it is a fixed area then consider using a fixed width.
It seems there's a solution if you can wrap the hrs in divs.
Set the div's to display:inline (we could use spans instead but hrs are not valid in spans)¹ and also give the divs hasLayout via zoom:1
See http://jsfiddle.net/YqKDJ/1/
¹ As an aside, there's a reason why hrs are not valid in spans and it's relevant here. An hr is not primarily a way of drawing a horizontal line - it has a specific semantic meaning of "Thematic break". It makes no sense to have two or more hr elements with no content betwwen them - there's nothing for the second thematic break to break from. If you want multiple horizontal lines for presentational purposes, you should use CSS to create them, along the lines of #Cynthia's answer.
I'm having a strange problem. I want to put border around the image, but it is showing some space at the bottom. Please have a look here: http://jsfiddle.net/4WKJY/
I don't want to put fixed height and width. Thanks for any help.
Contrary to the other answer, it has nothing to do with whitespace in the markup, and removing the whitespace won't fix this.
The problem is that images are inline by default and the initial value for vertical alignment is baseline. This means that the image is treated as if it were any other textual component of the page, and space is reserved beneath textual content for descenders - the tails on letters like lowercase 'j' etc.
To fix this, you either need to tell the rendering engine that the image shouldn't be treated like textual content - .thumb img { display: block; } will do this - or you can tell the rendering engine not to reserve space for descenders, and instead align the content to the very bottom - .thumb img { vertical-align: bottom; } will do this.
Edit: I seem to recall that old versions of Internet Explorer incorrectly handle whitespace, so removing the whitespace may have an effect there, but what I said above still stands; removing the whitespace is not a cross-browser fix for this problem.
You can fix it by making the img display:block in your CSS, as seen here.
Alternatively, apply the css only to images:
.thumb img{
position: relative;
padding:2px;
float: left;
margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;
border: solid 1px #ccc;
}
In the following HTML, I'd like the frame around the image to be snug -- not to stretch out and take up all the available width in the parent container. I know there are a couple of ways to do this (including horrible things like manually setting its width to a particular number of pixels), but what is the right way?
Edit: One answer suggests I turn off "display:block" -- but this causes the rendering to look malformed in every browser I've tested it in. Is there a way to get a nice-looking rendering with "display:block" off?
Edit: If I add "float: left" to the pictureframe and "clear:both" to the P tag, it looks great. But I don't always want these frames floated to the left. Is there a more direct way to accomplish whatever "float" is doing?
.pictureframe {
display: block;
margin: 5px;
padding: 5px;
border: solid brown 2px;
background-color: #ffeecc;
}
#foo {
border: solid blue 2px;
float: left;
}
img {
display: block;
}
<div id="foo">
<span class="pictureframe">
<img alt=''
src="http://stackoverflow.com/favicon.ico" />
</span>
<p>
Why is the beige rectangle so wide?
</p>
</div>
The right way is to use:
.pictureframe {
display: inline-block;
}
Edit: Floating the element also produces the same effect, this is because floating elements use the same shrink-to-fit algorithm for determining the width.
The beige rectangle is so wide because you have display: block on the span, turning an inline element into a block element. A block element is supposed to take up all available width, an inline element does not. Try removing the display: block from the css.
Adding "float:left" to the span.pictureFrame selector fixes the problem as that's what "float:left" does :) Apart from everything else floating an element to the left will make it occupy only the space required by its contents. Any following block elements (the "p" for example) will float around the "floated" element. If you "clear" the float of the "p" it would follow the normal document flow thus going below span.pictureFrame. In fact you need "clear:left" as the element has been "float:left"-ed.
For a more formal explanation you can check the CSS spec although it is beyond most people's comprehension.
Yes
display:inline-block is your friend.
Also have a look at: display:-moz-inline-block and display:-moz-inline-box.
The only way I've been able to do picture frames reliably across browsers is to set the width dynamically. Here is an example using jQuery:
$(window).load(function(){
$('img').wrap('<div class="pictureFrame"></div>');
$('div.pictureFrame').each(function(i) {
$(this).width($('*:first', this).width());
});
});
This will work even if you don't know the image dimensions ahead of time, because it waits for the images to load (note we're using $(window).load rather than the more common $(document).ready) before adding the picture frame. It's a bit ugly, but it works.
Here is the pictureFrame CSS for this example:
.pictureFrame {
background-color:#FFFFFF;
border:1px solid #CCCCCC;
line-height:0;
padding:5px;
}
I'd love to see a reliable, cross-browser, CSS-only solution to this problem. This solution is something I came up with for a past project after much frustration trying to get it working with only CSS and HTML.