This might be obvious to some people, but I have CSV data that I'm storing as a String in which every number is off by -1. I'd like to write a function (in ActionScript 3) in which I go in and increase every value by +1. How can I do this?
My CSV String looks like this:
public static const CSV_DATA:String = "14,15,16,8,9,8,9,8,9,8,9,264,265,266,267,268,269,8,9,260,261,262,263,8,9,1,2,3\n" +
"32,33,34,26,27,26,27,26,27,26,27,282,283,284,285,286,287,26,27,278,279,280,281,26,27,19,20,21\n" +
... etc
Thank you in advance.
In your case, just use String.split(). Primary split string by '\n', secondary split by ','. In result array every string with number process with parseInt function. After that, you can increase your numbers by one.
But if you need to read real CSV files, you can write class for this or use open-source
Here you go:
var CSV_DATA:String = "14,15,16,8,9,8,9,8,9,8,9,264,265,266,267,268,269,8,9,260,261,262,263,8,9,1,2,3,32,33,34,26,27,26,27,26,27,26,27,282,283,284,285,286,287,26,27,278,279,280,281,26,27,19,20,21";
var UPDATED_CSV_DATA:String = addOne(CSV_DATA);
function addOne(CSV:String):String
{
var CSVArr:Array = CSV.split(",");
for(var i=0;i<CSVArr.length;i++)
{
CSVArr[i] = Number(CSVArr[i]) + 1 ;
}
return CSVArr.toString();
}
Related
I currently have a flat file with around 1million rows.
I need to add a text string to the end of each row in the file.
I've been trying to adapt the following code but not having any success :-
public void Main()
{
// TODO: Add your code here
var lines = System.IO.File.ReadAllLines(#"E:\SSISSource\Source\Source.txt");
foreach (string item in lines)
{
var str = item.Replace("\n", "~20221214\n");
var subitems = str.Split('\n');
foreach (var subitem in subitems)
{
// write the data back to the file
}
}
Dts.TaskResult = (int)ScriptResults.Success;
}
I can't seem to get the code to recognise the carriage return "\n" & am not sure howto write the row back to the file to replace the existing rather than add a new row. Or is the above code sending me down a rabbit hole & there is an easier method ??
Many thanks for any pointers &/or assistance.
Read all lines is likely getting rid of the \n in each record. So your replace won't work.
Simply append your string and use #billinKC's solution otherwise.
BONUS:
I think DateTime.Now.ToString("yyyyMMdd"); is what you are trying to append to each line
Thanks #billinKC & #KeithL
KeithL you were correct in that the \n was stripped off. So I used a slightly amended version of #billinKC's code to get what I wanted :-
string origFile = #"E:\SSISSource\Source\Sourcetxt";
string fixedFile = #"E:\SSISSource\Source\Source.fixed.txt";
// Make a blank file
System.IO.File.WriteAllText(fixedFile, "");
var lines = System.IO.File.ReadAllLines(#"E:\SSISSource\Source\Source.txt");
foreach (string item in lines)
{
var str = item + "~20221214\n";
System.IO.File.AppendAllText(fixedFile, str);
}
As an aside KeithL - thanks for the DateTime code however the text that I am appending is obtained from a header row in the source file which is being read into a variable in an earlier step.
I read your code as
For each line in the file, replace the existing newline character with ~20221214 newline
At that point, the value of str is what you need, just write that! Instead, you split based on the new line which gets you an array of values which could be fine but why do the extra operations?
string origFile = #"E:\SSISSource\Source\Sourcetxt";
string fixedFile = #"E:\SSISSource\Source\Source.fixed.txt";
// Make a blank file
System.IO.File.WriteAllText(fixedFile, "");
var lines = System.IO.File.ReadAllLines(#"E:\SSISSource\Source\Source.txt");
foreach (string item in lines)
{
var str = item.Replace("\n", "~20221214\n");
System.IO.File.AppendAllText(fixedFile, str);
}
Something like this ought to be what you're looking for.
This question relates to an animated map template which we have developed at the UKs Office for National Statistics. It has been applied to many datasets and geographies many uses without problem. For example,
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/interactive/vp3-census-map/index.html
http://www.statistica.md/pageview.php?l=ro&idc=390&id=3807
The .fla calls on a supporting .as file (see below) to introduce a thousand separator (in the UK a comma, in Germany a full stop (period) defined elsewhwere.
However, the dataset I am currently mapping has large negative values, and it tutrns out that the ORIGINAL HELPER FUNCTION below does not like negative values with 3, 6, 9 or 12 (etc) digits.
-100 to -999 for instance are rendered NaN,100 to NaN,999.
This is because such values are recognised as being 4 digits long. They are being split, the comma introduced, and the -ve sign is misunderstood.
I reckon the approach must be to use absolute values, add in the comma and then (for the negative values) add the -ve sign back in afterwards. But so far, trials of the ADAPTED HELPER FUNCTION have produced only error. :-(
Can anyone tell me how to put the -ve sign back in , please?
Many thanks.
Bruce Mitchell
==================================================================================
//ORIGINAL HELPER FUNCTION: ACCEPTS A NUMBER AND RETURNS A STRING WITH THOUSANDS SEPARATOR ATTACHED IF NECESSARY
function addThouSep(num) {
/*
a. Acquire the number - 'myTrendValue' or 'myDataValue' - from function calcValues
b. Record it (still as a number) to data precision.
1. Turn dataORtrend into a string
2. See if there is a decimal in it.
3. If there isn't, just run the normal addThouSep.
4. If there is, run addThouSep just on the first bit of the string - then add the decimal back on again at the end.
*/
var myNum:Number = correctFPE(num); // Create number variable myNum and populate it with 'num'
// (myTrendvalue or myData Value from calcValues function) passed thru 'correctPFE'
var strNum:String = myNum+""; // Create string version of the dataORtrend number - so instead of 63, you get '63'
var myArray = strNum.split("."); // Create array representing elements of strNum, split by decimal point.
//trace(myArray.length); // How long is the array?
if (myArray.length==1) { // Integer, no decimal.
if (strNum.length < 4)//999 doesn't need a comma.
return strNum;
return addThouSep(strNum.slice(0, -3))+xmlData.thouSep+strNum.slice(-3);
}
else { // Float, with decimal
if (myArray[0].length < 4)//999 doesn't need a comma
return strNum;
return (addThouSep(myArray[0].slice(0, -3))+xmlData.thouSep+myArray[0].slice(-3)+"."+myArray[1]);
}
}
==================================================================================
//ADAPTED HELPER FUNCTION: ACCEPTS A NUMBER AND RETURNS A STRING WITH THOUSANDS SEPARATOR ATTACHED IF NECESSARY
function addThouSep(num) {
/*
a. Acquire the number - 'myTrendValue' or 'myDataValue' - from function calcValues
b. Record it (still as a number) to data precision.
1. Turn dataORtrend into a string
2. See if there is a decimal in it.
3. If there isn't, just run the normal addThouSep.
4. If there is, run addThouSep just on the first bit of the string - then add the decimal back on again at the end.
*/
var myNum:Number = correctFPE(num); // Create number variable myNum and populate it with 'num'
// (myTrendvalue or myData Value from calcValues function) passed thru 'correctPFE'
var myAbsNum:Number = Math.abs(myNum); // ABSOLUTE value of myNum
var strNum:String = myAbsNum+""; // Create string version of the dataORtrend number - so instead of 63, you get '63'
var myArray = strNum.split("."); // Create array representing elements of strNum, split by decimal point.
//trace(myArray.length); // How long is the array?
if (myNum <0){ // negatives
if (myArray.length==1) { // Integer, no decimal.
if (strNum.length < 4)//999 doesn't need a comma.
return strNum;
return addThouSep(strNum.slice(0, -3))+xmlData.thouSep+strNum.slice(-3);
}
else { // Float, with decimal
if (myArray[0].length < 4)//999 doesn't need a comma
return strNum;
return (addThouSep(myArray[0].slice(0, -3))+xmlData.thouSep+myArray[0].slice(-3)+"."+myArray[1]);
}
}
else // positive
if (myArray.length==1) { // Integer, no decimal.
if (strNum.length < 4)//999 doesn't need a comma.
return strNum;
return addThouSep(strNum.slice(0, -3))+xmlData.thouSep+strNum.slice(-3);
}
else { // Float, with decimal
if (myArray[0].length < 4)//999 doesn't need a comma
return strNum;
return (addThouSep(myArray[0].slice(0, -3))+xmlData.thouSep+myArray[0].slice(-3)+"."+myArray[1]);
}
}
==================================================================================
If you're adding commas often (or need to support numbers with decimals) then you may want a highly optimized utility function and go with straightforward string manipulation:
public static function commaify( input:Number ):String
{
var split:Array = input.toString().split( '.' ),
front:String = split[0],
back:String = ( split.length > 1 ) ? "." + split[1] : null,
pos:int = input < 0 ? 2 : 1,
commas:int = Math.floor( (front.length - pos) / 3 ),
i:int = 1;
for ( ; i <= commas; i++ )
{
pos = front.length - (3 * i + i - 1);
front = front.slice( 0, pos ) + "," + front.slice( pos );
}
if ( back )
return front + back;
else
return front;
}
While less elegant it's stable and performant — you can find a comparison suite at my answer of a similar question https://stackoverflow.com/a/13410560/934195
Why not use something simple like this function I've made?
function numberFormat(input:Number):String
{
var base:String = input.toString();
base = base.split("").reverse().join("");
base = base.replace(/\d{3}(?=\d)/g, "$&,");
return base.split("").reverse().join("");
}
Tests:
trace( numberFormat(-100) ); // -100
trace( numberFormat(5000) ); // 5,000
trace( numberFormat(-85600) ); // -85,600
Explanation:
Convert the input number to a string.
Reverse it.
Use .replace() to find all occurrences of three numbers followed by another number. We use $&, as the replacement, which basically means take all of those occurences and replace it with the value we found, plus a comma.
Reverse the string again and return it.
Did you try using the built in Number formatting options that support localized number values:
Localized Formatting with NumberFormatter
I guess a step back is in order. My original question is at the bottom of this post for reference.
I am writing a word guessing game and wanted a way to:
1. Given a word length of 2 - 10 characters, randomly generate a valid english word to guess
2.given a 2 - 10 character guess, ensure that it is a valid english word.
I created a vector of 9 objects, one for each word length and dynamically created 172000
property/ value pairs using the words from a word list to name the properties and setting their value to true. The inner loop is:
for (i = 0; i < _WordCount[wordLength] - 2; i)
{
_WordsList[wordLength]["" + _WordsVector[wordLength][i++]] = true;
}
To validate a word , the following lookup returns true if valid:
function Validate(key:String):Boolean
{
return _WordsList[key.length - 2][key]
}
I transferred them from a vector to objects to take advantage of the hash take lookup of the properties. Haven't looked at how much memory this all takes but it's been a useful learning exercise.
I just wasn't sure how best to randomly choose a property from one of the objects. I was thinking of validating whatever method I chose by generating 1000 000 words and analyzing the statistics of the distribution.
So I suppose my question should really first be am I better off using some other approach such as keeping the lists in vectors and doing a search each time ?
Original question
Newbie first question:
I read a thread that said that traversal order in a for.. in is determined by a hash table and appears random.
I'm looking for a good way to randomly select a property in an object. Would the first element in a for .. in traversing the properties, or perhaps the random nth element in the iteration be truly random. I'd like to ensure that there is approximately an equal probability of accessing a given property. The Objects have between approximately 100 and 20000 properties. Other approaches ?
thanks.
Looking at the scenario you described in your edited question, I'd suggest using a Vector.<String> and your map object.
You can store all your keys in the vector and map them in the object, then you can select a random numeric key in the vector and use the result as a key in the map object.
To make it clear, take a look at this simple example:
var keys:Vector.<String> = new Vector.<String>();
var map:Object = { };
function add(key:String, value:*):void
{
keys.push(key);
map[key] = value;
}
function getRandom():*
{
var randomKey = keys[int(Math.random() * keys.length)];
return map[randomKey];
}
And you can use it like this:
add("a", "x");
add("b", "y");
add("c", "z");
var radomValue:* = getRandom();
Using Object instead of String
Instead of storing the strings you can store objects that have the string inside of them,
something like:
public class Word
{
public var value:String;
public var length:int;
public function Word(value:String)
{
this.value = value;
this.length = value.length;
}
}
Use this object as value instead of the string, but you need to change your map object to be a Dictionary:
var map:Dictionary = new Dictionary();
function add(key:Word, value:*):void
{
keys.push(key);
map[key] = value;
}
This way you won't duplicate every word (but will have a little class overhead).
I have a textInput control that sends .txt value to an array collection. The array collection is a collection of US zip codes so I use a regular expression to ensure I only get digits from the textInput.
private function addSingle(stringLoader:ArrayCollection):ArrayCollection {
arrayString += (txtSingle.text) + '';
var re:RegExp = /\D/;
var newArray:Array = arrayString.split(re);
The US zip codes start at 00501. Following the debugger, after the zip is submitted, the variable 'arrayString' is 00501. But once 'newArray' is assigned a vaule, it removes the first two 0s and leaves me with 501. Is this my regular expression doing something I'm not expecting? Could it be the array changing the value? I wrote a regexp test in javascript.
<script type="text/javascript">
var str="00501";
var patt1=/\D/;
document.write(str.match(patt1));
</script>
and i get null, which leads me to believe the regexp Im using is fine. In the help docs on the split method, I dont see any reference to leading 0s being a problem.
**I have removed the regular expression from my code completely and the same problem is still happening. Which means it is not the regular expression where the problem is coming from.
Running this simplified case:
var arrayString:String = '00501';
var re:RegExp = /\D/;
var newArray:Array = arrayString.split(re);
trace(newArray);
Yields '00501' as expected. There's nothing in the code you've posted that would strip leading zeros. You may want to dig around a bit more.
This smells suspiciously like Number coercion: Number('00501') yields 501. Read through the docs for implicit conversions and check if any pop up in your code.
What about this ?
/^\d+$/
You can also specify exactly 5 numbers like this :
/^\d{5}$/
I recommend just getting the zip codes instead of splitting on non-digits (especially if 'arrayString' might have multiple zip codes):
var newArray:Array = [];
var pattern:RegExp = /(\d+)/g;
var zipObject:Object;
while ((zipObject = pattern.exec(arrayString)) != null)
{
newArray.push(zipObject[1]);
}
for (var i:int = 0; i < newArray.length; i++)
{
trace("zip code " + i + " is: " + newArray[i]);
}
I have a MySQL database whose keys are of this type:
A_10
A_10A
A_10B
A_101
QAb801
QAc5
QAc25
QAd2993
I would like them to sort first by the alpha portion, then by the numeric portion, just like above. I would like this to be the default sorting of this column.
1) how can I sort as specified above, i.e. write a MySQL function?
2) how can I set this column to use the sorting routine by default?
some constraints that might be helpful: the numeric portion of my ID's never exceeds 100,000. I use this fact in some javascript code to convert my ID's to strings concatenating the non-numeric portion with the (number + 1,000,000). (At the time I had not noticed the variations/subparts as above such as A_10A, A_10B, so I'll have to revamp that part of my code.)
The best way to achieve what you want is to store each part in its own column, and I would strongly recommend to change table structure. If it's impossible, you can try the following:
Create 3 UDFs which returns prefix, numeric part, and postfix of your string. For a better performance they should be native (Mysql, as any other RDMS, is not really good in complex string parsing). Then you can call these functions in ORDER BY clause or in trigger body which validates your column. In any case, it will work slower than if you create 3 columns.
No simple answer that I know of. I had something similar a while back but had to use jQuery to sort it. So what I did was first get the output into an javascript array. Then you may want to insert a zero padding to your numbers. Separate the Alpha from Nummerics using a regex, then reassemble the array:
var zarr = new Array();
for(var i=0; i<val.length; i++){
var chunk = val[i].match(/(\d+|[^\d]+)/g).join(',');
var chunks = chunk.split(",");
for(var s=0; s<chunks.length; s++){
if(isNaN(chunks[s]) == true)
zarr.push(chunks[s]);
else
zarr.push(zeroPad(chunks[s], 5));
}
}
function zeroPad(num,count){
var numZeropad = num + '';
while(numZeropad.length < count) {
numZeropad = "0" + numZeropad;
}
return numZeropad;
}
You'll end up with an array like this:
A_00100
QAb00801
QAc00005
QAc00025
QAd02993
Then you can do a natural sort. I know you may want to do it through straight MySQL but I am not to sure if it does natural sorting.
Good luck!