I have some links to my facebook and twitter, these links are images. I want these links to turn lighter when I hover over them. I was thinking I could do this by making two images and making the images change when I hover over the image link. Is this the best way to do it and if it is how do i do it? I couldn't find any help on how to do it this way.
Here is my HTML:
<div class="social">
<a href="https://www.facebook.com/seth.urquhart?sk=wall&v=wall">
<img src="../img/facebook_logo_extended.jpg"/>
</a>
</div>
<br>
<div class="social">
<a href="https://twitter.com/SethUrquhart">
<img src="../img/twitter_logo_extended.jpg"/>
</a>
</div>
Here is my CSS:
p {
color: #232323;
text-indent:0px;
margin-left:30px;
padding-right: 30px;
}
ul {
text-align: center;
color: gray;
}
ul a {
text-decoration: none;
color: black;
}
ul a:hover {
text-decoration: underline;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
}
html {
background: #e8e9e1;
}
h1 {
text-align: center;
}
body {
font-family: sans-serif;
color: #232323;
}
.wrap {
min-width: 600px;
width: 1200px;
margin: auto;
height: 100px;
text-align: center;
background-color: none;
}
.content {
background: #ffffff;
width: 900px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right:auto;
height: auto;
text-indent: 50px;
}
.footer {
text-align: center;
background-color: #383838;
width: 900px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
color: #e8e9e1;
}
.social {
width: 900px;
margin: auto;
height: 100px;
text-align: center;
background-color: none;
}
.social:hover {
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
background:#cccccc;
color:#000;
}
ul#list-nav {
padding: 0;
list-style: none;
width: 605px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
ul#list-nav li {
display:inline;
}
ul#list-nav li a {
text-decoration:none;
padding:5px 0;
width:150px;
background:#383838;
color:#eee;
float:left;
border-left:1px solid #fff;
}
ul#list-nav li a:hover {
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
background:#cccccc;
color:#000;
}
Assuming you're willing to use CSS3, I created an example showing one way to get a brief widening effect for the icons (I suppose that is what "dense" means in the question). Reduced code here:
.icon {
-webkit-transition: 0.25s;
transition: 0.25s;
}
.icon:hover {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
transform: scale(1.7);
-ms-transform: scale(1.7); /* IE 9 */
-webkit-transform: scale(1.7); /* Safari and Chrome */
}
The transform property has good support. The effect with transition isn't so well supported (no IE9 support), but if you are thinking on graceful degration, I think it's quite valid to use that.
EDIT
I'm updating this answer because it could help other people in future. The accepted answer isn't the right approach, since it's using obtrusive JavaScript to do things about styling, where CSS is the right tool. I really hope the OP will take a look here and change their code.
Based on the OP's feedback, I updated the example showing how to get a brightness effect simulated by changing the opacity property with a fallback using filter for IE6-8. In short, here's the code:
.icon {
opacity: 1;
filter: Alpha(Opacity=100);
}
.icon:hover {
opacity: .6;
filter: Alpha(Opacity=60);
}
It's easy and works very well when the parent's background-color is lighter than the element. If you need something more elaborated (if you really want changing between two images), I really suggests you to use CSS sprites.
I don't know what you mean by dense, but you can alter any image property via the onmouseover and restore it with onmouseout. Here's a code snippet to show how to do it. This code simply makes an image dimmer when the mouse is over it, then restores it when the mouse leaves:
<img
src = "test.jpg"
style = "width:50%;"
id = "test"
onmouseover = "document.getElementById('test').style.opacity=0.5"
onmouseout = "document.getElementById('test').style.opacity=1" />
If you wanted to make the images bigger on the hover, you'd change any of the size attributes. For instance, here's a particularly dramatic size jump:
<img
src = "test.jpg"
style = "width:50%;"
id = "test"
onmouseover = "document.getElementById('test').style.width='75%'"
onmouseout = "document.getElementById('test').style.width='50%'" />
Please note that the above is for illustrative purposes only. There are other ways of doing this, and I am not saying the way I presented is the best or even a good one. However, it's clear and I just want you to clearly see how this can be done.
The simpliest solution would probably for you to use background-images rather than images so you can just switch between them. You can even go as far as creating 3 states this way.. inactive, hover, and selected..
Consider cascades and specificity.. If you define your inactive state first, hover state is defined second overwriting the same definitions, selected state is defined last, again with the same definitions and level of specificity. Now each will overwrite the other in the appropriate or they will happen.
An image
div { background:url('http://www.placehold.it/200x200/f2f2f2') no-repeat; }
On hover display a different image
div:hover { background:url('http://www.placehold.it/200x200/666666') no-repeat; }
If the element is an anchor or has some onclick function defined with it.. display a different image on select with a new class
div.selected { background:url('http://www.placehold.it/200x200/000000') no-repeat; }
Related
So my website should be multilingual. To let the user change between languages there will be flags in a dropdown.
To get a better resize ability for my images (of the flags) I wanted to create them soley via CSS. However I failed doing this, so I created little 1x3 and 3x1 .jpgs files which I wanted to resize via CSS.
Here are 2 examples I created:
(Most likely you should just download the pictures and scale them really high to understand what I did.)
My plan was using the image-rendering properties pixelated to get a resized images without any smoothing or color gradients and it worked fine until I used IE.
I created a little code snippet to recreate the basic idea:
.ger {
image-rendering: pixelated;
background-image: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/tNV8n.jpg);
background-size: 1px 45px;
background-repeat: repeat;
}
.fr {
image-rendering: pixelated;
background-image: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/ErVbV.jpg);
background-size: 120px 1px;
background-repeat: repeat;
}
#flag1, #flag2{
width: 120px;
height: 45px;
}
<body>
<div id="flag1" class="ger"></div>
<br/>
<div id="flag2" class="fr"></div>
</body>
But I guess I'm too new to this topic to be able to do it right. Because somehow it won't show the german flag to you.
Anyways... I can't ask you to make IE starting to support this function. But what I can ask is if you know some way to work arround this.
If not, do you know some way to create these simple flags just using CSS?
I was thinking of three divs of different colors beneith each other.
For example:
.black, .red, .yellow{
width:800px;
height:100px;
}
.black{
background-color:black;
}
.red{
background-color:red;
}
.yellow{
background-color:yellow;
}
<div class="black"></div>
<div class="red"></div>
<div class="yellow"></div>
... for the german flag.
But if I try to implement something similar into my dropwdown...
I fail...
ul {
list-style-type: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #333;
}
li {
float: left;
}
li a, #dropbtn {
display: inline-block;
color: white;
text-align: center;
padding: 14px 16px;
text-decoration: none;
}
li.dropdown {
display: inline-block;
float: right;
}
.dropdown-content {
display: none;
position: absolute;
background-color: #f9f9f9;
min-width: 160px;
box-shadow: 0px 8px 16px 0px rgba(0,0,0,0.2);
}
.dropdown-content a {
color: black;
padding: 12px 16px;
text-decoration: none;
display: block;
text-align: left;
}
.dropdown:hover .dropdown-content {
display: block;
}
.black, .red, .yellow{
width:60px;
height:10px;
}
.black{
background-color:black;
}
.red{
background-color:red;
}
.yellow{
background-color:yellow;
}
<ul>
<li><a class="logo">Logo</a></li>
<li class="dropdown">
<div class="black"></div><div class="red"></div><div class="yellow"></div>
<div class="dropdown-content">
Flag 1
Flag 2
Flag 3
</div>
</li>
</ul>
Because if I do it like this, it will never have the full size of the bar, will it?
I'm sorry for providing so much information, because it's propably just too much. However these were my attempts and I really have no clue what I'm missing out onto.
In the ende the bar (shown in the last snippet) should contain a flag. The flag should touch the right and upper border of the window and the bottom broder of the bar. If you hover over it a dropdown should appear with similar flags.
If I wasn't clear at some point just ask I will try to make it clearer.
The problem with the first snippet is that there were <style> tags in the CSS section of the snippet, and that was messing it up.
.ger {
image-rendering: pixelated;
background-image: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/tNV8n.jpg);
background-size: 1px 45px;
background-repeat: repeat;
}
.fr {
image-rendering: pixelated;
background-image: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/ErVbV.jpg);
background-size: 120px 1px;
background-repeat: repeat;
}
#flag1,
#flag2 {
width: 120px;
height: 45px;
}
<body>
<div id="flag1" class="ger"></div>
<br/>
<div id="flag2" class="fr"></div>
</body>
When you hover over the paragraph text in JS Fiddle the image gets covered with the background. Using z-index everywhere I could think of doesn't have any effect. (I left the useless z-index stuff in there so show you what I tried.) I also tried pointer-events: none; in various places.
I also tried this type of thing elm1:hover elm2{}, but that didn't help. I'm new to CSS and I'm applying what I have searched and found.
Edit: The problem: on hover background color covers image
Markup:
<div id="col2-middle" class="three-cols-middle three-cols">
<a href="About.php#how-we-work- projects">
<h1 class="h-big-font">Specific Projects</h1>
<img class="col-img" src="3dplotCroppedWithFinancial.png" alt="3dplot">
<p class="p-on-white">
XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX hover here to cover img XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
<br/>
<br/>
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
</p>
</a>
</div>
css:
div.three-cols {
float: left;
width: 29.33%;
position: relative;
left: 70.67%;
overflow: auto;
padding: 1% 1% 1% 1%;
min-width: 200px;
z-index:-1;
}
.three-cols a {
position: relative;
text-decoration: none;
color: #000;
}
.three-cols a p:hover {
background-color: #ecebeb;
}
.col-img {
float: left;
padding: 4%;
z-index: 1;
}
.three-cols h1 {
margin-bottom: 2%;
text-align: center;
}
.three-cols p {
padding: 0.5% 0 3% 0;
z-index: -1;
}
p {
word-wrap: break-word;
color: #000;
margin: 0;
padding: 10px 20px;
font-size: 16px;
}
Here is my demo:
http://jsfiddle.net/pxD33/
PS - needs to be responsive and solution all in CSS and HTML.
<a> is by default an inline-level element. Once you set display: block to it, it fixes the issue.
.three-cols a {
display: block;
position: relative;
text-decoration: none;
color: #000;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/teddyrised/pxD33/2/
p/s: You don't need z-index for your case. You can safely remove all of them.
Anything you use a z-index with has to also have a position attribute.
I hope this helps!
You can get rid of the z-indexes, and then change
.three-cols a p:hover {
background-color: #ecebeb;
}
to
.three-cols:hover {
background-color: #ecebeb;
}
Updated fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/pxD33/1/
updated fiddle: Fiddle
just change anchor's display to block:
.three-cols a {
display:block;
position: relative;
text-decoration: none;
color: #000;
}
and give hover class to a not p:
.three-cols a:hover {
background-color: #ecebeb;
}
As #Terry said, setting display: block on your three-cols a element should do the trick.
If you want to have a "free hanging" picture on the left of your text, you could also use a media object.
Simply add the following rules
display: block;
overflow: hidden;
to col-img and three-cols p.
You can read more about the media object here.
I'm trying to enlarge a smaller picture. I have a small and a large version of the pictures. I've searched on the internet, the one i'm using is the best i've found.
I know this would be much easier with 'Lightbox2' or other javascript things, but the purpose is to only use html & css.
Here you can find the link (dropbox, .zip file) to the website' folder --> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/61634717/Website.zip
It would be nice if someone could find the problem why my smaller pictures aren't enlarged when hovering over. The website is only showing the small pictures when hovering over them.
Here is the html code (for one picture):
<div class="ienlarger"><a href="#nogo"><img src="Pictures/Artists/PeopleTalkTechnoSmall.png" alt="thumb" class="resize_thumb" /><span>
<img src="Pictures/Artists/PeopleTalkTechno-Large.png" alt="large" /><br />Some text can go here.</span></a>
</div>
Here is the css code:
.ienlarger {
float: left;
clear: none;
padding-bottom: 5px;
padding-right: 5px;
}
.ienlarger a {
display:block;
text-decoration: none;
cursor:default;
}
.ienlarger a:hover{
position:relative;
}
.ienlarger span img {
border: 0px solid #FFFFFF;
margin-bottom: 8px;
}
.ienlarger a span {
position: absolute;
display:none;
color: #FFCC00;
text-decoration: none;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 13px;
background-color: #2E2E2E;
font-weight: bold;
padding-top: 10px;
padding-right: 10px;
padding-bottom: 13px;
padding-left: 10px;
}
.ienlarger img {
border-width: 0;
}
.ienlarger a:hover span {
display:inline-table;
top: 50px;
left: 90px;
z-index: 100;
}
.resize_thumb {
width: 170px;
height : auto;
}
NOTE: Do not pay attention to the background colors :D. I know they are weird, but it is just for me to see the different < div > (they will be changed when the website is closer to being completed).
Alright, I downloaded your code and messed around with it.
Removing max-width: 100%; from the img CSS seems to have fixed it (line 25). In the future, please post the code along with your question, or if there are a lot of parts to it, a JSFiddle is also acceptable.
Thanks.
In your css you have all images set to a max-width of 100% probably to make it responsive, which is good. But that is also your problem. The images can only be 100% of their container and no bigger. If you remove img {max-width: 100%} from your css that fixes your issue.
But is also makes it not repsonsive. :-(
So your solution is to add a class="larger" to the bigger image and add another line to your css. You would end up with something like this:
img {
max-width:100%;
height:auto;
}
img.larger {
max-width: 500px; /* the maximum size you would allow for larger images */
}
I use the CSS Sprite Technique with a background image that looks something like this:
The CSS code for the icons:
div.icon {
background-color: transparent;
background-image: url("/images/icons.png");
background-position: 0 0;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
display: inline-block;
height: auto;
vertical-align: text-top;
width: auto;
}
div.icon:empty {
width:16px;
height:16px;
}
div.icon:not(:empty) {
padding-left:20px;
}
div.icon.attenuation {
background-position: 0 0;
}
My icons can be used like this:
<div class="icon warning"></div>
I want to put some text inside my icons like:
<div class="icon warning">There is a warning on this page</div>
But the problem is that the background image covers the entire text area:
The question is: how can I use only part of an image as a background image for part of my element?
Notes:
setting width to 16px for div.icon doesn't help.
Remember, where ever possible, you shouldn't change your markup just to achieve a design. It is possible using your markup.
div.icon:before {
content: "";
background-color: transparent;
background-image: url("/images/icons.png");
display: inline-block;
height: 16px;
vertical-align: text-top;
width: 16px;
}
div.icon:not(:empty):before {
margin-right: 4px;
}
div.icon.attenuation {
background-position: 0 0;
}
You have two ways:
1)Your markup must be like this:
<div class="icon warning"></div><div class="txt">There is a warning on this page</div>
.icon {width:10px(for ex.)}
2)You must change the image. Icons in the image must be below the another
Sorry, my previous answer was not well though out.
Edit:
If you have a 16px padding, you should set the width to 0, not 16px. And I've got troubles getting the :not(:empty) bit to work on all browsers; better get rid of it. So the CSS becomes:
.icon {
...
width:0; height:16px; padding-left:16px;
}
.icon:empty {
width:16px; padding-left:0;
}
jsFiddle
set width: 16px; height: 16px; overflow: hidden; text-indent: -9999em; and remove padding
My current project involves setting up a bunch of sidebar links, such that the finished design looks like this:
The envelopes are supposed to move and overlap (i.e., change z-index), depending upon which icon/text is currently has :hover state.
I thought each would be a separate PNG file, but I've been given a sprite that looks like this:
Any suggestions how I could achieve this? Normally I'd just change the background position of the list elements each piece of text is in, but I don't think this is possible given the overlapping nature of these. Does he just need to export it differently?
Many thanks...
To me it looks like that sprite would work perfectly. The left most image is for when book is hovered, second image for twitter, third for facebook, forth for email. I'm guessing the last one is just the default state. Its tricky to make this work with pure css and :hover (but possible!), however, it would be extremely easy with javascript.
For the pure css solution, the div with the sprite would have to be the child of all the text elements, so you could change the background based on :hover on the parent (the text). If this isn't clear, I can make you some example code.
Edit:
Its not perfect, but its a proof of concept.
JsFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/jp6fy/
CSS:
#side{
position:relitive;
height:341px;
width:250px;
}
#link1{
top:0;
}
.link{
position:absolute;
left:0;
top:85px;
height:85px;
padding-left:160px;
width:90px;
}
#image{
position:absolute;
top:-255px;
left:0;
z-index:-1;
background:url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/I2Y4k.png) -720px 0;
height:341px;
width:150px;
}
#link1:hover #image{
background-position:-540px 0;
}
#link2:hover #image{
background-position:-360px 0;
}
#link3:hover #image{
background-position:-180px 0;
}
#link4:hover #image{
background-position:-0px 0;
}
HTML:
<div id='side'>
<div class='link' id='link1'>
email
<div class='link' id='link2'>
facebook
<div class='link' id='link3'>
twitter
<div class='link' id='link4'>
book
<div id='image'></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
It is possible. (But ugly.)
As a :hover selector can only affect elements inside (or directly adjacent) to the triggering element, the solution is to nest the trigger elements: (jsFiddle)
<style>
div {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
position: absolute;
left: 100px;
}
#image { background: black; }
#trigger1, #trigger1:hover #image { background: red; }
#trigger2, #trigger2:hover #image { background: green; }
#trigger3, #trigger3:hover #image { background: blue; }
</style>
<div id="trigger1">
<div id="trigger2">
<div id="trigger3">
<div id="image"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
But preferably, you'd get the envelope sprites exported separately (you can of course still use CSS sprites). That should give you simpler HTML and CSS, a smaller image, and you'll avoid having to muck around with nested absolutely positioned elements, each having its own coordinate system.
I tried an approach which keeps the markup fairly simple, with only one extra non-semantic div per item:
<ul>
<li id="email">
<div class="background"></div>
<em>Email</em> chris
</li>
<li id="facebook">
<div class="background"></div>
<em>Facebook</em> follow us
</li>
<li id="twitter">
<div class="background"></div>
<em>Twitter</em> your life away
</li>
<li id="book">
<div class="background">
</div><em>Book</em> a project
</li>
</ul>
I positioned all the different copies of the background div at the same place, then varied the background position based on the hover states:
/* First, just style the document and the list text in general.
skip on for the important bit */
body {
background-color: black;
color: white;
}
ul {
width: 350px;
margin-top: 40px;
position: relative;
}
li {
margin-right: 40px;
font-family: "Century Gothic", Helvetica, sans-serif;
text-align: right;
margin-bottom: 0px;
padding: 15px 4px 25px 0;
}
li em {
text-transform: uppercase;
display: block;
}
li:hover {
color: red;
}
/* From here down is the important bit */
/* Set up the sprite in all the .background divs */
div.background {
background-image: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/I2Y4k.png);
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 341px;
width: 160px;
}
/* By default, turn off the background in all the divs */
div.background {
display: none;
}
/* Just picking an arbitrary item to show the default, non-hover background */
#email div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: -737px;
}
/* If we're hovering over the list as a whole, disable the default background,
so it doesn't show up underneath the background we want to display */
ul:hover #email div.background {
display: none;
}
/* For the email item, which shows our arbitrary default background, override
to the email background on hover with more specificity than the default rule */
ul:hover #email:hover div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: 0px;
}
/* For all other items, override to their background on hover */
#facebook:hover div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: -375px;
}
#twitter:hover div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: -189px;
}
#book:hover div.background {
display: block;
background-position-x: -556px;
}
Working, though slightly rough example, in this jsFiddle.
Note that it's okay to have multiple copies of the sprite in multiple different divs; the browser will just grab one copy for its cache and use that for all instances of the image.
Could you create an image map and then hover swaps the image to the one with the correct envelope in front. See this link on an interesting link
google search link on idea
My method with clean HTML.
.nav { position: relative; }
.nav li {
margin-left: 179.8px;
list-style-type: none;
}
.nav li:before {
position: absolute;
left: 0; top: 0;
content: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/I2Y4k.png);
clip: rect(0 899px 341px 719.2px);
margin-left: -719.2px;
z-index: 1;
}
.nav li:hover:before { z-index: 2; }
.email:hover:before {
clip: rect(0 179.8px 341px 0);
margin-left: 0;
}
.facebook:hover:before {
clip: rect(0 359.6px 341px 179.8px);
margin-left: -179.8px;
}
.twitter:hover:before {
clip: rect(0 539.4px 341px 359.6px);
margin-left: -359.6px;
}
.book:hover:before {
clip: rect(0 719.2px 341px 539.4px);
margin-left: -539.4px;
}
<ul class="nav">
<li class="email">Email</li>
<li class="facebook">Facebook</li>
<li class="twitter">Twitter</li>
<li class="book">Book</li>
</ul>