I have a dedicated server with WHM and cPanel installed on it.
recently I decided to move to cloud services since the dedicated server is costly and I'm not actually using any of its power, freedom and functionality.
I was considering moving to AWS or Heroku since they are less expensive, scalable and I don't need to manage the server myself.
I only have few websites on my server and I'm managing them via cPanel and WHM
I'm only using mySql database
I have also have some cron jobs setup
I use ftp to upload and maintain my websites (no git)
I was wondering if anyone could explain how I can transfer my files, databases, and domains to either AWS or Heroku.
I prefer the one that is easier and faster to migrate to.
Thanks.
If server/network management is not your strength, I would strongly advise against using AWS (even as big a proponent of AWS as I am). You absolutely must manage the servers yourselves, at least the configuration aspect (not the hardware aspect). In fact, you will find that you have to do things like set up security policies, identity access management, IP addresses, etc. that are not always that intuitive to one who is not used to working in a bit of an operations capacity.
You will also likely have to consider application architecture changes to work best with AWS services. Additionally, you will have to become accustomed to the AWS way of doings things (that starting and stopping server instances may make all your data go away and such).
If you are looking for a hands-off server approach, you might be better served looking at something like Slicehost/Rackspace.
I can't talk much to Heroku as I have only minimal experience prototyping on it. You can think of it more as an application platform. For simple applications that don't have unique traffic demands or architectural requirements, it seems a good solution for getting an application up and running with minimal server-related configuration. Again a legacy app will probably require some re-architecting to do things the Heroku way.
AWS are good but the support at Rackspace is far better and much more suited for someone like you. Rackspaces support is 24/7 and even on their online chat system you don't need to wait more than a few mins to speak to someone who actually knows what they are doing.
Related
Simple question can a Java service layer running on Tomcat7 on a host machine connect to persistent data store (mySQL) running inside a virtual box with portforwarding? I want to know if the hibernate or Jdbc connection strings from host machine work if mySQL server is installed inside a VirtualBox.
Also if it does work can I expect behavioral deviations in terms of speed and connection pooling if everything is packaged into one single system and deployed in a real world web server in a single enviroment?
The short answer is yes, it is possible and will work. You will likely have to play with the firewall settings on your virtual box instance. You don't specify OS, so it's hard to tell you what exactly you'll need to tweak.
As far as deploying this in a real-world environment, if you mean production, you probably should NOT do that. This is a great setup to build on, but not something I would run in production.
To be clear, there won't be any issues behaviorally speaking, it will act as MySQL always acts, but it will absolutely be slower than running it on 'bare metal' -- how much slower will vary based on hardware, workload, etc. and it is generally not a great design for a production deployment..
I used to develop app with classical hosting, let's say we have an MVC app running a MySQL database hosted in a classical hosting company like Godaddy
My question is : My application seems very fast, and managing well concurrent connections, but will grow probably exponentially. So I am wondering if keeping my application layers (app files) on Godaddy and moving the database on the cloud like Amazon-RDS is possible. And if possible will it make my app faster than it is.
It is defintely possible, but might not be the best solution: it depends on wether or not you are having a latency problem or a database query performance issue. Using aws to host MySQL gives you almost unlimited ability to scale up the performance of your db operations, but if that is not the bottleneck, it won't do you much good. Hosting the web on godaddy and db on aws will introduce additional latency between the web and the db.
Personally, if you are thinking of moving Part of your stack to aws, you might as well move the web layer as well -you'll get fast and scalable db performance with none of the additional latency cause by use both hosts and disparate locations.
I recommend you to deploy your web application on the same infrastructure where you are going to use your MySQL database. Amazon RDS provides you a great way where you can scale up or down your MySQL database. As far as I know, the hosting provider that you mention has its own infrastructure, so I would deploy your application on the same Amazon datacenter.
However, you have more options than using AWS, as there are some PaaS (Plarform as a Service) which use Amazon as an IaaS. The benefit of using a PaaS is that you can scale up or down your application in the same way that you are thinking about your MySQL database.
I have developed several websites on my local host for school. I can program database driven aspects of a webisite such as a blog on my own no problem. At school I used a MySQL DB which was hosted on a dedicated server, so when the server went down I could not have access to my data. I also have a mysql DB on my localhost but...my question is this: If i use the MySQL DB on my localhost, won't I only have access to the data when my computer is running so that my site can make server requests?
How can I set up any kind of DB for my site that is reliable and doesn't depend on my localhost to act as a DB Server?
I am now developing in .NET
Thanks. PS I don't have access to schools' server any more.
PPS I still don't have a site set up through a hosting provider...probalby going to go with godaddy
You'll need a server for that. A server will cost you on a monthly basis, I haven't heard of any free mysql servers, someone else may be able to help you with that.
Regular hosting providers supply PHP and MySQL server. I run my sites on Dreamhost (www.dreamhost.com)
It might also be worthwhile to look into Amazon EC2 : http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/
Also Amazon RDS for pure database only usage : http://aws.amazon.com/rds/
They provide a pay as you use service and the tier 1 service is free for the first year as I understand
There's no magic, you have to host your DB on a server that will run 24/7. Could be on the internet, it depends on the firewalls surrounding you.
The website will always depend on some sort of database server, why so worried that your database will be unreachable? Your webserver can go down also and will have the same consequences as the db.
Why don't you get some paid hosting? It is fairly cheap these days, for around 30dollar/year you will have some reliable hosting. When the DB will break down, it is not your responsibility.
If you don't want te be dependent of MySQL, you will need to use plain-text database that will be maintained by PHP or something.
You might consider running the MYSQL in i.e. a cloud provider, like Amazon EC2. It will certainly cost some money.
Any good resource on how to port a LAMP stack to Ec2?
Mainly I'm concerned about storage, the MySQL part. The existing app works agains a single store. Do I need to port all my storage to S3? Will the EC2 instances be able to share a single MySQL database? Alternatively I can partition my data and have a single database for each EC2 image, but I still need a global user account database for authentication and if the data is partitioned the requests have to be routed to the proper image. Not sure how this is achieved in EC2.
To wrap up: where should I start?
These Tips for deploying a LAMP stack on Amazon EC2 are IMO a really good starting point. I'd suggest to read them first (I'm not sure I understand your concerns about the storage part), maybe things will be clearer after.
I know this is old, but for anyone who's in this situation check out: http://www.robotmedia.net/2011/04/how-to-create-an-amazon-ec2-instance-with-apache-php-and-mysql-lamp/
That is the most straight forward tutorial I've found for implementing a LAMP stack on Amazon EC2.
Using S3 isn't required, although it is an affordable way to host files. Yes, multiple instances can share a single database and you can use database replication for additional availability. Here's a great tutorial for that: http://aciddrop.com/2008/01/10/step-by-step-how-to-setup-mysql-database-replication/
Are there any database only hosting services?
I need a MySQL only hosting service but I couldn't find any. All mysql hostings are part of a package e.g. PHP + MySQL.
I need it for development purposes. Having my PHP files somewhere else I can remotely connect to this mysql server and once an application is ready I can put that on a server having both PHP + MYsql. [well, there a some reason to have this kinda setup, if you have something to suggest please do.]
Any suggestion/recommendation if you have used any.
Thanks
The problem with a database-only host would be the security. The database need to be accessed over the Internet, thus username and password to access it are sent over the Internet. Even though you could add encryption and other protection, there's still a risk that the security is breached.
In general, you should never allow direct access to databases over the Internet! It's a real bad practice, which also explains why it's hard to find.
One way to get around such limitation is by building a web service around your database. In this web service you'll add all the functionality that you need to apply on this database, and the web service itself will keep the database itself protected. There would still be a risk that your web service gets compromised but even in that case, the attacker could never do more damage than the specific web service allows.
Such a web service can be created in PHP, although I myself have more experience with doing something similar with .NET and C# on SQL Server...
I think that you can find hosts with MySQL and PHP cheap enough that it would be easiest for you just to use one of those hosts and only use what you need.
Web Hosting Buzz has a plan for $5.95 (a month) which has unlimited databases, 400GB storage, and 500GB/Month data transfer.
A few weeks after the question was posted, Amazon announced a beta of "Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS)." It acts like MySQL 5.1.
http://aws.amazon.com/rds/
Seems pricey for what you want, but you never said you were the one who would be paying the bill.
Contract a dedicated server.
Use it only to host your MySQL database
If the server is managed, they should help you with basic MySQL problems as it is usually preinstalled. I use http://www.hostingmatters.com/
If you are just needing this for developement purposes for PHP + MySQL why not just install EasyPHP (http://www.easyphp.org/). This installs quickly and easily and I think it's great for developement.
I've had no problems installing additional PEAR extensions and such after the fact with this.
There's a free option on Heroku and paid options up from there: https://addons.heroku.com/cleardb
You can try freemysqlhosting.
http://freemysqlhosting.net/