I'm trying to make a small parser which receives the json string and the path to get:
var args = process.argv;
var jsonToBeParsed = args[2];
var path = args[3];
var result = JSON.parse(jsonToBeParsed);
console.log(result);
console.log(result.path);
I'm calling this with
node parser.js '{"asd":"123", "qwe":"312"}' 'asd'
It gives me undefined
I think it has to be done with some eval function but I don't have too much experience with node/JS.
How can I resolve this?, I need to get the result from the command line.
Edit: I'm expecting "123" in the second log. Thanks #Esailija, the question wasn't too clear ...
I think you are trying to use dynamic property, you cannot use .path, because that literally means .path property.
Try this:
console.log(result);
console.log(result[path]);
if path === "asd", then it will work, which is statically equivalent to result["asd"] or result.asd
To add to #Esailija's answer:
node parser.js '{"path": "123"}' 'asd'
Would return 123. The dot notation expects the property name. If you have a dynamic property name, you need to use the square brackets notation.
console.log(result['ads']);
// But what you want is:
console.log(result[path]); // 'path' is a variable with the correct string
I wanted to embed the json parser into a git alias, To get a json node in bash (using node)
node -e "console.log(JSON.parse(process.argv[1]).foo.bar)" '{"foo":{"bar":"Hello World"}}'
Related
I am having output in following format as
"[{"a":"a1"},{"a":"a2"}]"
I want to actually extract it in array of json:
[
{
"a":"a1"
},
{
"a":"a2"
}
]
How to convert it?
You have tagged this with Node-RED - so my answer assumes that is the environment you are working in.
If you are passing a message to the Debug node and that is what you see in the Debug sidebar, that indicates your msg.payload is a String with the contents of [{"a":"a1"},{"a":"a2"}] - the Debug sidebar doesn't escape quotes when displaying strings like that.
So you likely already have exactly what you want - it just depends what you want to do with it next.
If you want to access the contents you need to parse it to a JavaScript Object. You can do this by passing your message through a JSON node.
Assuming your input contains the double quotes in the beginning and end, it is not possible to directly JSON.parse() the string.
In your case, you need to remove the first and last character (the double quotes) from your string before parsing it.
const unformattedString = '"[{"a":"a1"},{"a":"a2"}]"'
const formattedString = unformattedString.substr(1, unformattedString.length - 2)
const json = JSON.parse(formattedString)
The variable json now contains your JSON object.
I would suggest a different method which will get your work done without using any third party library.
var a = '[{"a":"a1"},{"a":"a2"}]';
var b = JSON.parse(a);
console.log(b); // b will return [{"a":"a1"},{"a":"a2"}]
Another way which is eval function which is generally not recommended
var d = eval(a);
If you want to use JQuery instead use :
var c = $.parseJSON(a);
I'm using a thesaurus API to get synonyms from a word.
Here is the link:
http://thesaurus.altervista.org/testjs
It is returning a string which is supposed to contain JSON data, but it's wrapped in a callback function which I suspect is causing JSON.parse() to choke and I don't know how to remove/bypass it:
//results from 'elephant'
process({"response":[{"list":{"category":"(noun)","synonyms":"proboscidean|proboscidian"}},{"list":{"category":"(noun)","synonyms":"emblem|allegory"}}]})
I have tried it without the callback but it doesn't work and I found the reason for that: "HTTP response with "Access-Control-Allow-Origin", but only if the HTTP request is performed using the optional parameter "callback"".
So my theory is, maybe regular expressions can strip the process() off of it, then hopefully JSON.parse will be happy. Thanks.
In order to obtain a string that will be parseable by JSON.parse, remove the initial process( and final ):
var js = JSON.parse(s.replace(/^process\(|\)$/g, ''));
See the snippet:
var s = 'process({"response":[{"list":{"category":"(noun)","synonyms":"proboscidean|proboscidian"}},{"list":{"category":"(noun)","synonyms":"emblem|allegory"}}]})';
var js = JSON.parse(s.replace(/^process\(|\)$/g, ''));
document.getElementById("r").innerHTML = JSON.stringify(js);
<div id="r"/>
This question is multipart-
(1a) JSON is fundamental to JavaScript, so why is there no JSON type? A JSON type would be a string that is formatted as JSON. It would be marked as parsed/stringified until the data was altered. As soon as the data was altered it would not be marked as JSON and would need to be re-parsed/re-stringified.
(1b) In some software systems, isn't it possible to (accidentally) attempt to send a plain JS object over the network instead of a serialized JS object? Why not make an attempt to avoid that?
(1c) Why can't we call JSON.parse on a straight up JavaScript object without stringifying it first?
var json = { //JS object in properJSON format
"baz":{
"1":1,
"2":true,
"3":{}
}
};
var json0 = JSON.parse(json); //will throw a parse error...bad...it should not throw an error if json var is actually proper JSON.
So we have no choice but to do this:
var json0= JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(json));
However, there are some inconsistencies, for example:
JSON.parse(true); //works
JSON.parse(null); //works
JSON.parse({}); //throws error
(2) If we keep calling JSON.parse on the same object, eventually it will throw an error. For example:
var json = { //same object as above
"baz":{
"1":1,
"2":true,
"3":{}
}
};
var json1 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(json));
var json2 = JSON.parse(json1); //throws an error...why
(3) Why does JSON.stringify infinitely add more and more slashes to the input? It is not only hard to read the result for debugging, but it actually puts you in dangerous state because one JSON.parse call won't give you back a plain JS object, you have to call JSON.parse several times to get back the plain JS object. This is bad and means it is quite dangerous to call JSON.stringify more than once on a given JS object.
var json = {
"baz":{
"1":1,
"2":true,
"3":{}
}
};
var json2 = JSON.stringify(json);
console.log(json2);
var json3 = JSON.stringify(json2);
console.log(json3);
var json4 = JSON.stringify(json3);
console.log(json4);
var json5 = JSON.stringify(json4);
console.log(json5);
(4) What is the name for a function that we should be able to call over and over without changing the result (IMO how JSON.parse and JSON.stringify should behave)? The best term for this seems to be "idempotent" as you can see in the comments.
(5) Considering JSON is a serialization format that can be used for networked objects, it seems totally insane that you can't call JSON.parse or JSON.stringify twice or even once in some cases without incurring some problems. Why is this the case?
If you are someone who is inventing the next serialization format for Java, JavaScript or whatever language, please consider this problem.
IMO there should be two states for a given object. A serialized state and a deserialized state. In software languages with stronger type systems, this isn't usually a problem. But with JSON in JavaScript, if call JSON.parse twice on the same object, we run into fatal exceptions. Likewise, if we call JSON.stringify twice on the same object, we can get into an unrecoverable state. Like I said there should be two states and two states only, plain JS object and serialized JS object.
1) JSON.parse expects a string, you are feeding it a Javascript object.
2) Similar issue to the first one. You feed a string to a function that needs an object.
3) Stringfy actually expects a string, but you are feeding it a String object. Therefore, it applies the same measures to escape the quotes and slashes as it would for the first string. So that the language can understand the quotes, other special characters inside the string.
4) You can write your own function for this.
5) Because you are trying to do a conversion that is illegal. This is related to the first and second question. As long as the correct object types are fed, you can call it as many times as you want. The only problem is the extra slashes but it is in fact the standard.
We'll start with this nightmare of your creation: string input and integer output.
IJSON.parse(IJSON.stringify("5")); //=> 5
The built-in JSON functions would not fail us this way: string input and string output.
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify("5")); //=> "5"
JSON must preserve your original data types
Think of JSON.stringify as a function that wraps your data up in a box, and JSON.parse as the function that takes it out of a box.
Consider the following:
var a = JSON.stringify;
var b = JSON.parse;
var data = "whatever";
b(a(data)) === data; // true
b(b(a(a(data)))) === data; // true
b(b(b(a(a(a(data)))))) === data; // true
That is, if we put the data in 3 boxes, we have to take it out of 3 boxes. Right?
If I put my data in 2 boxes and take it out of 1, I'm not holding my data yet, I'm holding a box that contains my data. Right?
b(a(a(data))) === data; // false
Seems sane to me...
JSON.parse unboxes your data. If it is not boxed, it cannot unbox it. JSON.parse expects a string input and you're giving it a JavaScript object literal
The first valid call to JSON.parse would return an object. Calling JSON.parse again on this object output would result in the same failure as #1
repeated calls to JSON.stringify will "box" our data multiple times. So of course you have to use repeated calls to JSON.parse then to get your data out of each "box"
Idempotence
No, this is perfectly sane. You can't triple-stamp a double-stamp.
You'd never make a mistake like this, would you?
var json = IJSON.stringify("hi");
IJSON.parse(json);
//=> "hi"
OK, that's idempotent, but what about
var json = IJSON.stringify("5");
IJSON.parse(json);
//=> 5
UH OH! We gave it a string each time, but the second example returns an integer. The input data type has been lost!
Would the JSON functions have failed us here?
var json = JSON.stringify("hi");
JSON.parse(json);
//=> "hi"
All good. And what about the "5" ?
var json = JSON.stringify("5");
JSON.parse(json));
//=> "5"
Yay, the types have been preseved! JSON works, IJSON does not.
Maybe a more real-life example:
OK, so you have a busy app with a lot of developers working on it. It makes
reckless assumptions about the types of your underlying data. Let's say it's a chat app that makes several transformations on messages as they move from point to point.
Along the way you'll have:
IJSON.stringify
data moves across a network
IJSON.parse
Another IJSON.parse because who cares? It's idempotent, right?
String.prototype.toUpperCase — because this is a formatting choice
Let's see the messages
bob: 'hi'
// 1) '"hi"', 2) <network>, 3) "hi", 4) "hi", 5) "HI"
Bob's message looks fine. Let's see Alice's.
alice: '5'
// 1) '5'
// 2) <network>
// 3) 5
// 4) 5
// 5) Uncaught TypeError: message.toUpperCase is not a function
Oh no! The server just crashed. You'll notice it's not even the repeated calling of IJSON.parse that failed here. It would've failed even if you called it once.
Seems like you were doomed from the start... Damned reckless devs and their careless data handling!
It would fail if Alice used any input that happened to also be valid JSON
alice: '{"lol":"pwnd"}'
// 1) '{"lol":"pwnd"}'
// 2) <network>
// 3) {lol:"pwnd"}
// 4) {lol:"pwnd"}
// 5) Uncaught TypeError: message.toUpperCase is not a function
OK, unfair example maybe, right? You're thinking, "I'm not that reckless, I
wouldn't call IJSON.stringify or IJSON.parse on user input like that!"
It doesn't matter. You've fundamentally broken JSON because the original
types can no longer be extracted.
If I box up a string using IJSON, and then unbox it, who knows what I will get back? Certainly not you, and certainly not the developer using your reckless function.
"Will I get a string type back?"
"Will I get an integer?"
"Maybe I'll get an object?"
"Maybe I will get cake. I hope it's cake"
It's impossible to tell!
You're in a whole new world of pain because you've been careless with your data types from the start. Your types are important so start handling them with care.
JSON.stringify expects an object type and JSON.parse expects a string type.
Now do you see the light?
I'll try to give you one reason why JSON.parse cannot be called multiple time on the same data without us having a problem.
you might not know it but a JSON document does not have to be an object.
this is a valid JSON document:
"some text"
lets store the representation of this document inside a javascript variable:
var JSONDocumentAsString = '"some text"';
and work on it:
var JSONdocument = JSON.parse(JSONDocumentAsString);
JSONdocument === 'some text';
this will cause an error because this string is not the representation of a JSON document
JSON.parse(JSONdocument);
// SyntaxError: JSON.parse: unexpected character at line 1 column 1 of the JSON data
in this case how could have JSON.parse guessed that JSONdocument (being a string) was a JSON document and that it should have returned it untouched ?
I read my json file using http and cordova file readAsText functions.
http request returns an object which is ok.
cordova file readAsText function return 'string' which contain extra "r\n\" symbols. This make it impossible to use JSON.parse(evt.target.result)
function readJson(absPath, success, failed){
window.resolveLocalFileSystemURL(absPath, function (entry) {
entry.file(function (file) {
var reader = new FileReader();
reader.onloadend = function (evt) {
success(evt.target.result);
};
reader.readAsText(file);
}, failed);
}, failed);
}
readJson(cordova.file.dataDirectory + 'my.json', function(res){
console.log(JSON.parse(res)); //here I've got an parsing error due to presence of r\n\ symbols
}, failed );
How to read JSON files using cordova?
UPDATE:
funny thing that the following works:
a = '{\r\n"a":"1",\r\n"b":"2"\r\n}';
b = JSON.parse(a);
so the problem not only with \r\n... there is something else that is added by cordova readAsText
UPDATE2
as a workaround I use now var object = eval("(" + res + ")")
Still search for a common way to load json objects...
No one has answered this and I just had to solve it for my project, so I will post my solution.
The readAsText method outputs a string, so you CAN actually run a replace on it, but what you need to do is use a RegExp to find the newline character. here's my solution:
var sanitizerRegex = new RegExp(String.fromCharCode(10), 'g');
var sanitizedData = JSON.parse(result.replace(sanitizerRegex, ''));
I've used the String method fromCharCode to get the specific newline character and the "g" flag to match all instances in the entire string. The problem with your string solution is that you can't do a string replace using the characters for backslash and "n" because the issue is the actual new line character, which is merely represented as "\n".
I do not know the reason JSON.parse can't handle the newline character, or why the file plugin introduces this problem, but this solution seems to work for me.
Also, NEVER use eval like this if you can avoid it, especially on input from a source like a JSON file. Even in a cordova app, using eval is potentially very unsafe.
I found out the solution after debug deeply. readAsText function returned text has one more letter at the first position of text.
Example:
{"name":"John"} => ?{"name":"John"} (?: API didn't return ?, just one string)
I confirmed this with length of result, so we need to use substr(1) before parse JSON.
fileContent = fileContent.substr(1);
var jData = jQuery.parseJSON(fileContent);
I am using PowerShell v3 and the Windows PowerShell ISE. I have the following function that works fine:
function Get-XmlNode([xml]$XmlDocument, [string]$NodePath, [string]$NamespaceURI = "", [string]$NodeSeparatorCharacter = '.')
{
# If a Namespace URI was not given, use the Xml document's default namespace.
if ([string]::IsNullOrEmpty($NamespaceURI)) { $NamespaceURI = $XmlDocument.DocumentElement.NamespaceURI }
# In order for SelectSingleNode() to actually work, we need to use the fully qualified node path along with an Xml Namespace Manager, so set them up.
[System.Xml.XmlNamespaceManager]$xmlNsManager = New-Object System.Xml.XmlNamespaceManager($XmlDocument.NameTable)
$xmlNsManager.AddNamespace("ns", $NamespaceURI)
[string]$fullyQualifiedNodePath = Get-FullyQualifiedXmlNodePath -NodePath $NodePath -NodeSeparatorCharacter $NodeSeparatorCharacter
# Try and get the node, then return it. Returns $null if the node was not found.
$node = $XmlDocument.SelectSingleNode($fullyQualifiedNodePath, $xmlNsManager)
return $node
}
Now, I will be creating a few similar functions, so I want to break the first 3 lines out into a new function so that I don't have to copy-paste them everywhere, so I have done this:
function Get-XmlNamespaceManager([xml]$XmlDocument, [string]$NamespaceURI = "")
{
# If a Namespace URI was not given, use the Xml document's default namespace.
if ([string]::IsNullOrEmpty($NamespaceURI)) { $NamespaceURI = $XmlDocument.DocumentElement.NamespaceURI }
# In order for SelectSingleNode() to actually work, we need to use the fully qualified node path along with an Xml Namespace Manager, so set them up.
[System.Xml.XmlNamespaceManager]$xmlNsManager = New-Object System.Xml.XmlNamespaceManager($XmlDocument.NameTable)
$xmlNsManager.AddNamespace("ns", $NamespaceURI)
return $xmlNsManager
}
function Get-XmlNode([xml]$XmlDocument, [string]$NodePath, [string]$NamespaceURI = "", [string]$NodeSeparatorCharacter = '.')
{
[System.Xml.XmlNamespaceManager]$xmlNsManager = Get-XmlNamespaceManager -XmlDocument $XmlDocument -NamespaceURI $NamespaceURI
[string]$fullyQualifiedNodePath = Get-FullyQualifiedXmlNodePath -NodePath $NodePath -NodeSeparatorCharacter $NodeSeparatorCharacter
# Try and get the node, then return it. Returns $null if the node was not found.
$node = $XmlDocument.SelectSingleNode($fullyQualifiedNodePath, $xmlNsManager)
return $node
}
The problem is that when "return $xmlNsManager" executes the following error is thrown:
Cannot convert the "System.Object[]" value of type "System.Object[]" to type "System.Xml.XmlNamespaceManager".
So even though I have explicitly cast my $xmlNsManager variables to be of type System.Xml.XmlNamespaceManager, when it gets returned from the Get-XmlNamespaceManager function PowerShell is converting it to an Object array.
If I don't explicitly cast the value returned from the Get-XmlNamespaceManager function to System.Xml.XmlNamespaceManager, then the following error is thrown from the .SelectSingleNode() function because the wrong data type is being passed into the function's 2nd parameter.
Cannot find an overload for "SelectSingleNode" and the argument count: "2".
So for some reason PowerShell is not maintaining the data type of the return variable. I would really like to get this working from a function so that I don't have to copy-paste those 3 lines all over the place. Any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks.
What's happening is PowerShell is converting your namespace manager object to a string array.
I think it has to do with PowerShell's nature of "unrolling" collections when sending objects down the pipeline. I think PowerShell will do this for any type implementing IEnumerable (has a GetEnumerator method).
As a work around you can use the comma trick to prevent this behavior and send the object as a whole collection.
function Get-XmlNamespaceManager([xml]$XmlDocument, [string]$NamespaceURI = "")
{
...
$xmlNsManager.AddNamespace("ns", $NamespaceURI)
return ,$xmlNsManager
}
More specifically, what is happening here is that your coding habit of strongly typing $fullyQualifiedModePath is trying to turn the result of the Get (which is a list of objects) into a string.
[string]$foo
will constrain the variable $foo to only be a string, no matter what came back. In this case, your type constraint is what is subtly screwing up the return and making it Object[]
Also, looking at your code, I would personally recommend you use Select-Xml (built into V2 and later), rather than do a lot of hand-coded XML unrolling. You can do namespace queries in Select-Xml with -Namespace #{x="..."}.