SO,
I've created a four-column fluid-width layout for a site, and I'm working on placing a fluid square DIV within one of my columns. There are a few techniques I've found to achieve this - namely, setting padding-bottom to the same percentage as the width - but none of these seem to work when the DIV contains content.
Is there a way to maintain a 1:1 (square) ratio on a fluid DIV when that DIV contains content?
Here's my HTML:
<div id="leftmostcolumn">
<div id="logo"></div>
</div>
<div id="leftcolumn"></div>
<div id="rightcolumn"></div>
<div id="rightmostcolumn"></div>
And my CSS:
body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: red;
}
#leftmostcolumn {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 25%;
height: 100%;
background-color: blue;
}
#leftcolumn {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 25%;
width: 25%;
height: 100%;
background-color: green;
}
#rightcolumn {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 50%;
width: 25%;
height: 100%;
background-color: yellow;
}
#rightmostcolumn {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 75%;
width: 25%;
height: 100%;
background-color: gray;
}
#logo {
width:100%;
padding-bottom:100%;
background-color: #aa2d2d;
color: white;
}
And here's a JsFiddle.
The DIV "logo" is the one I'm trying to maintain as a square. Right now, I've used the padding-bottom approach but that doesn't do the trick when there's content in the DIV. Any input is greatly appreciated!
Marca
EDIT:
Getting there...I'm adapting a script I found to find the width of the DIV and then apply that value to the height to keep it a square. However, as it stands now the script doesn't constantly resize the DIV, and it won't allow it to shrink below a certain size. Any thoughts on how to correct either of these issues?
HTML:
<div id="box"></div>
CSS:
#box { width: 75%; height: 50px; background-color: black; }
JQUERY:
$("#box").css("height", function() {
return $(this).width();
});
JsFiddle is here.
This is something I've actually been messing around with for a while, and have come up with a quasi (but not entirely) hacky, CSS-only solution that seems to work on most browsers in the past decade. The trick is to use images, and positioning in a tricky fashion. Consider the following (simplification) of your code.
Markup:
<div class="sqr_box">
your content goes here!
</div>
CSS:
.sqr_box
{
width: 50%; /* or 100px, or 20em, or whatever you want */
border: solid 2px pink;
background-color: grey;
color: white;
}
Now, we can't set the height in terms of percent, so we won't; instead, first we'll go into Photoshop, and make an image that is 2x2 px, transparent, or background-colored. Next we'll add the following to your markup:
<div class="sqr_box">
<img src="images/sizers/2x2.png" class="sizer">
<div class="content">your content goes here!</div>
</div>
and THIS to your CSS:
.sqr_box
{
width: 50%; /* or 100px, or 20em, or whatever you want */
position: relative; /* static positioning is less than ideal for this scenario */
}
.sqr_box > img.sizer
{
display: block; /* images default to an inline-block like thing */
width: 100%;
height: auto; /* CLUTCH!!! this ensures that the image's height changes to maintain proportions with it's width */
visibility: hidden;
}
.sqr_box > .content
{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%; /* Our parent element now has a dynamically assigned height, this will work */
border: solid 2px pink;
background-color: grey;
color: white;
}
Best of all, this will work for any sized ratio of box you'd want! Just change the proportions of the image!
Hope this is all still relevant to you, 3 months later.
-Sandy
Put all four columns in one div. set that div to 100% width and set the font size to 100em
Have each of your four columns have a width of 25em instead of 25%
Have your logo width and height set to 25em each
Related
I have 2 divs that have a height of 50% stacked as a row, on a page that is split into 2 colours.
However on smaller screens the user needs to scroll, which breaks the design. I want the two 50% divs to fill the entire webpage.
.first-50 {
height: auto;
width: 100%;
background: red;
position: relative;
color: #fff;
min-height: 50%;
}
.second-50 {
min-height: 50%;
height: auto;
width: 100%;
background: blue;
position: relative;
display: none;
}
<div class="height-50 first-50">
text
</div>
<div class="height-50 second-50">
text
</div>
Thank you
Here is a quick example that works in the limited scenario I tested it for.
With relative positioning, it is only going to fill as much space as it needs. You probably need absolute positioning/sizing to force it to fill the regions you require. However, note the other elements on your page (typically relative or the default static positioned) will not be aware of them at all, and will simply overlap them or whatever.
So if you are looking for just a background thing where it always fills 50%/50% regardless of the content on top, this absolute positioning approach could suffice. If you need these two areas to follow the flow of the page and respect elements around them, then it will not.
body {
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
.first50 {
background: red;
color: #fff;
}
.second50 {
top: 50%;
background: blue;
color: #fff;
}
.height50 {
height: 50%;
min-height: 50%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
}
<div class="height50 first50">
text
</div>
<div class="height50 second50">
text
</div>
To expound upon a previous user's answer, using vh is a way of getting the height of the device with near perfect support in modern browsers. You can split the two divs into 50vh and it will resize accordingly. CCS-Tricks has some more info on this topic!
.first-50 {
height: 50vh;
width: 100%;
background: red;
position: relative;
color: #fff;
}
.second-50 {
height: 50vh;
width: 100%;
background: blue;
position: relative;
}
<div class="height-50 first-50">
text
</div>
<div class="height-50 second-50">
test
</div>
You can use the vh to adjust the height when the viewport resizes
quote from w3schools.com
vw Relative to 1% of the width of the viewport
vh Relative to 1% of the height of the viewport
div {
height: 50vh;
width: 100%; /* or width : 100vw */
}
and add what ever you want to it
I'm building an web app which has a 100% height/width/fullscreen layout. I am looking for a CSS-trick to proportionally resize an elements dimensions according to its height.
Right now I am looking for an equivalent of what this trick does to the x-axis:
html, body{
height:100%;
margin:0;
}
#view {
min-height: 100%;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
background-color: #333333;
}
#test-hld {
position: absolute;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
background-color: tomato;
width: 100%;
height: 75%;
}
.test{
position: relative;
width: 30%;
}
.test:before{
content: "";
display: block;
padding-top: 75%;
}
.content{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
background: black;
}
<div id="view">
<div id="test-hld">
<div class="test">
<div class="content"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
But changing (for example) .test{height: 80%} and .test:before{padding-left: 75%} makes the browser render no dimensions of the box at all.
My question(s) is
Why is the opposite not working?
Has it something fundamental to do with setting heights of elements with CSS?
Can flex/flexbox solve this?
I know it's possible to fix this with some lines of JS but I just can't believe it's not doable with CSS until someone slaps my face telling me to get real.
First of all, just to know why the padding trick works.
Padding-top and padding-bottom are vertical dimensions that are related to the width (so, an horizontal dimension) of the container.
That allows the ratio of an element to be fixed, and related to the width of the container. But there isn't any horizontal dimension that is related to some vertical of the container, so the equivalent trick over the height is not posible right now.
I have tried to get this same result using another technique, but I have had a very partial success.
My failed attempt is try to use an image to set the ratio
body, html {
height: 99%;
}
.base {
height: 40%;
border: solid 1px green;
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
}
.ratio {
content: url("http://placehold.it/400x200");
opacity: 0.05;
height: 100%;
width: auto;
position: relative;
}
<div class="base">
<img class="ratio" />
</div>
This is working in IE and Chrome, and failing in FF. But just on initial loading.
Changing the browser size won't work until the page is reloaded. I just can't figure out why, or how to solve it
Examining this HTML:
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
<hr />
<p>some text</p>
</div>
and CSS:
.footer {
position: absolute;
height: 100px;
width: 100%;
bottom: 0;
background-color: black;
}
.wrapper {
padding-bottom: 100px;
background-color: blue;
height: 100%;
}
.content {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
margin: auto;
background-color: green;
}
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
You can see that footer have position absolute and stay at the bottom of the page. wrapper will cover the remaining space and contain a content inside it. I want to vertical-align content without breaking the current layout. Do you have any suggestion?
Here is JSFiddle link. (Note: jsfiddle doesn't work as expected, there always a space beneath footer, this behavior doesn't occur when run the HTML file in browser).
Note: I don't want to use fixed height for wrapper, I want it covers all the remaining space, so please don't suggest me to use line-height
I tried the example here but it doesn't seem to work
NOTE I want the layout easy to modify (like add a header or content at the top) without breaking it therefore I want to avoid using absolute position on wrapper and content
NOTE 2 Sorry for not to clarify, actually, content doesn't have fixed size, its size depend on the content inside it, so the solution using negative margin doesn't work as I mentioned above
Here is one approach using the following CSS:
.footer {
position: absolute;
height: 100px;
width: 100%;
bottom: 0;
background-color: black;
}
.wrapper {
background-color: blue;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 100px;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
.content {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
background-color: green;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
margin-top: -50px;
margin-left: -100px;
}
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
Use absolute positioning and then negative margins, since your content has well-defined
dimensions, this is relatively straightforward.
See demo at: http://jsfiddle.net/audetwebdesign/DgUV2/
For .wrapper, use the top, bottom, left and right offsets to stretch the div to the
full width and height, taking into account the 100px for the footer.
For .content, set top and left to 50%, the center point of the .wrapper and then adjust
for the center of the .content div using negative margins.
Remember to zero out the margin for the body or else you might see 10px whitespace
depending on your browser.
Add this to your .content
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
Just 3 lines of code to vertical align
I was able to get it to work using Method 1 from the example you linked
I added the following:
.content {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
margin: auto;
background-color: green;
/* THE BELOW WAS ADDED */
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
margin: -100px 0 0 -100px;
}
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
/* BELOW ADDED TO REMOVE EXTRA SPACE AROUND EDGES */
margin: 0;
}
jsFiddle of working example
Assume, that I have three boxes (divs) on website (see image below):
header with logo
content with some text
footer with contact info
Each box have unique color (in order: yellow, orange and blue) and black border.
I would like to website always fills the entire screen, the logo was on the top and the footer was at the bottom. So if there is not enough text in content, content should be extended, so that the footer was on the bottom. And if will be a lot of text in content, slider should appear on the right.
How do this in CSS? Important is that boxes have backgrounds. I found many solutions, but none doesn't work properly with backgrounds.
Solution Explained
The black box in your diagram gets min-height 100%, is the scrolling container, and is position relative, to allow child positions to be respective to it.
The red box in your diagram is actually composed of 2 boxes:
one for your dynamically-sized content; this has sufficient top and bottom padding to make room for your header and footer, and force the scrolling container to expand
one for the background; this is position absolute, with top and bottom position specified relative to the black box, its parent.
The yellow and blue boxes in your diagram can be position: absolute, top: 0 and bottom: 0, respectively... or however you choose to position them.
Here's a fiddle of it: http://jsfiddle.net/syndicatedshannon/F5c6T/
And here is another version with explicit viewport elements just to clarify, matching colors, and borders added to replicate the OP graphics (although per the OP the black border is actually the window).
Sample HTML
<html>
<body>
<div class="background"></div>
<div class="content"></div>
<div class="header"></div>
<div class="footer"></div>
</body>
</html>
Sample CSS
html { position: absolute; height: 100%; left: 10px; right: 10px; overflow: auto; margin: 0; padding: 0; }
body { position: relative; width: 100%; min-height: 100%; margin: 0; padding: 0; }
.background { position: absolute; top: 120px; bottom: 120px; background-color: red; width: 100%; }
.content { position: relative; padding: 120px 0; }
.header { position: absolute; top: 10px; height: 100px; width: 100%; background-color: yellow; }
.footer { position: absolute; bottom: 10px; height: 100px; width: 100%; background-color: cyan; }
Also note that this assumes you cannot rely on CSS3 yet.
If you're only targeting modern browsers, you can use calc()
body, html {
height: 100%;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
.header {
height: 50px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
.footer {
height: 100px;
margin-top: 20px;
}
.content {
min-height: calc(100% - 50px - 10px - 100px - 20px);
}
The drawback is that you need to know the header and footer sizes and they need to be fixed. I don't know any way around this without using Javascript. For slightly less modern browsers, you can use border-box to get the same effect as above.
body, html {
height: 100%;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
.header {
height: 50px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
z-index: 5;
position: relative;
}
.footer {
height: 100px;
margin-top: -100px;
z-index: 5;
position: relative;
}
.content {
box-sizing: border-box;
padding: 60px 0 120px 0;
margin-top: -60px;
min-height: 100%;
z-index: 1;
position: relative;
}
Lastly, here is the JS solution:
$(function(){
$('.content').css('min-height',
$(window).height()
- $('.header').outerHeight()
- $('.footer').outerHeight() - $('.content').marginTop()
- $('.content').marginBottom());
});
EDIT: My JS solution assumed border-box and no border. This solution should be more robust:
function setContentSize() {
$('.content').css('min-height',
$(window).height()
- $('.header').outerHeight()
- $('.footer').outerHeight()
- ($('.content').outerHeight()
- $('.content').innerHeight()));
}
$(setContentSize);
$(window).on('resize', setContentSize);
I am trying to put simple divs and arrange them, but my child div disappearing from parent div even though I am using parent div with relative and child div with absolute positioning. I want connect_us_01 and registeration divs insideheader_block1. I am working towards responsive webdesign. Many thanks.
JSFiddle
<div id="header">
<div id="header_block1">
<div id ="registeration">reg</div>
<div id ="connect_us_01">social media</div>
</div>
<div id="header_block2">
<div id="crown_logo">logo</div>
<div id="nav">navigation</div>
<div class="contact_No_01">020324234233</div>
</div>
</div>
css
#header {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
background-color: #ff6a00;
}
#header_block1 {
position: relative;
margin: 0 auto;
width: 90%;
background-color: pink;
}
#header_block2 {
margin: 0 auto;
width: 90%;
position: relative;
background-color: aqua;
}
/*----social media & connect us block*/
#connect_us_01 {
position: absolute;
width: 300px;
height: 50px;
right: 0;
background-color: blue;
}
#registeration {
position: absolute;
left: 1px;
width: 200px;
height: 50px;
background-color: brown;
}
Elements with position: absolute are taken out of the content flow, meaning they have no inherent height. Since the children have no height, the parent gets no height either, rendering the children invisible. You could resolve it by giving the parent a static height (as in, for instance, height: 100px), but that's not very practical and not responsive at all.
What you're looking for isn't position: absolute; it's float: left and float: right. Apply those properties to the children and give the parent overflow: hidden (or whatever method of clearing floats works best with your layout) and it'll work just fine.
To show block you refering to just add to #header_block1 a height parameter also.
#header_block1 {
position: relative;
margin: 0 auto;
width: 90%;
height: 50px;
background-color: pink;
}