I have integrated the following page click here into expression engine. Only certain PDFs will download in chrome, as demonstrated in the link above, whereas with Firefox users are able to download all PDFs on the page. I've been searching through various expression engine forums and followed instruction such as disabling my XSS Filter and re uploading all my PDFs. I'm also running this latest version of EE and i've tried downloading PDFs logged out of the super-admin account.
I'm not sure whether this is a browser issue or an issue with expression engine, has anyone come across this problem before?
It looks like you're delivering those as type application/octet-stream. You'll want to start, then, by delivering them as application/pdf. Add this to your .htaccess (if you don't have access to you Apache config or can't reload your Apache config):
AddType application/pdf .pdf
This is an apparently common issue with chrome. But, since chrome is up to date with HTML5, we can use the shiny new download attribute!
Broken
Works
Related
In a non-trivial number of cases, esp. after I've had my browser open for a while, Chrome will fail to display a PDF document, showing the error "Couldn't load plugin."
I'm on OSX. I know the NPAPI and PPAPI issue is not relevant here. The Disable PDF Isolation flag these users describe has been removed.
Others suggest as workarounds changing the way you browse, either restarting Chrome more frequently and opening fewer tabs. I would prefer a solution.
The solution I ultimately came to was to use an alternative to that in-browser PDF viewer provided via an extension in the Chrome web store.
I need to develop some sort of browser plugin/extension to track search string on some search engine web site, ex: google.com, bing.com.
From the research, for chrome extension, I saw somebody suggest content js is the way to go. Is it true? Is there a cross-browser approach?
You can use Content.JS or any other JS library you like for developing an extension but with only JS library you cannot develop an extension.
There is a specific way for each browser. It contains at least 4 files.
(1) Manifest file (2) HTML file (3) JS file (4) CSS file
You also need to refer browsers object model.
You can refer links below may help you to get more information.
(1) Creating a Microsoft Edge extension
(2) Getting Started Tutorial to create an extension for Chrome
(3) Your first extension for FireFox
To support cross browser functionality, You can try to port your chrome extension to Firefox or MS Edge. To get more information on porting an extension, you can refer links below.
(1) Porting an extension from Chrome to Microsoft Edge
(2) Porting a Google Chrome extension
Note:- You also need to refer policy of each browser to access browsing data of users. It can be possible that all browser has some difference in their policies.
I have an page with some forms. All the links work fine in IE. They open in a new tab nicely when the hyperlink is click by the user; however, I realized that when Chrome is use the link doesn't open. I keep clicking but nothing opens. The only way of opening the file is copying the hyperlink, opening a new tab in Chrome, paste and go.
Form1
Is this something that browser do? Because I tried it with FireFox and doesn't work either?
It there a way of going around? without installing anything in the browser? Because my user loves Chrome.
Thank you in advanced for the responses.
You can't access to files outside your server or "SandBox", sandbox include the files that user push to the browser or to your server.
If the access from browser to a pc files from web pages was possible, it would be a security problem.
The answer is that you can't with your approach and more importantly you shouldn't. Chrome behavior is in fact the right behavior and it protects you from having malicious users and/or scripts accessing your local resources.
The FILE protocol will access local or defined network named resources which will not be available to a remote user that visits the same page. In other words, you may have outsideserver mapped as a network resource/drive but someone else will not (This does not apply to IPs)
Here's what you can do:
Move the code to a server side script(php, asp, etc) and stream the file back out. Found a quick example here on SO. I did not verify it though. Streaming a large file using PHP
Install a webserver on outsideserver and map a new site to the shared folder. You can then reference it via http (http://outsideserver.com/form1.pdf)
Use the below extension for chrome. It will work.
Enable local file links
Below both options are working and tested.
Link 2
Link 3
Basically what I need is a way to automatize the result of the following operations:
open a new tab;
open the Network tab in the developer tools;
load an URL;
select "Save All as HAR".
Often, proposed solutions involves the use of PhantomJS, browsermob-proxy, or pcap2har; those won't fit my case since I need to work with SPDY traffic.
I tried to dive into the Google Chrome Extensions API and indeed I managed to automatize some tasks, but still no luck for what concerns the HAR files generation. Now this method is particularly promising but I still can't figure out how would I use it.
In other words, I need something like this experiment from the Google guys. Note the following:
We used Chrome's remote debugging interface with a custom client that starts up the browser on the phone, clears its cache and other state, initiates a web page load, and receives the Chrome developer tools messages to determine the page load times and other performance metrics.
Any ideas?
Solution
For the curious, I ended up with a Node.js module that automates such kind of tests: chrome-har-capturer. This also gave me the opportunity to dig deeper into the Remote Debugging Protocol and to write a lower-level Node.js interface for general-purpose Chrome automation: chrome-remote-interface.
The short answer is, there is no way to get at the data you are after directly. The getHAR method is only applicable to extensions meant to extend DevTools itself. The good news is, you can construct the HAR file yourself without too much trouble - this is exactly what phantom.js does.
Start Chrome with remote debugging
Connect to Chrome on the debugging port with a websocket connection
Enable "Network" debugging, you can also clear cache, etc - see Network API.
Tell the browser to navigate to the page you want to capture, and Chrome will stream all the request meta-data back to you.
Massage the network data into HAR format, ala phantom.js
...
Profit.
For a head start, I have a post that with sample Ruby code that should you get started with steps 1-4: http://www.igvita.com/2012/04/09/driving-google-chrome-via-websocket-api/
By now there's a browser plugin to do that: https://github.com/devtools-html/har-export-trigger
It uses the WebExtensions DevTools API and I got it to work with both Firefox and Chrome.
See my code for Chrome here: https://github.com/theri/web-measurement-tools/blob/master/load/load_url_using_chrome.py#L175
Automatically installing the plugin in Chrome is a bit more complicated than in Firefox, but feasible - I extracted the plugin archive locally and then link to it in chrome_prefs.json (see same repository).
Not sure if it helps, HAR Recorder uses chrome debug protocol to record HAR and generate a har file (without opening devtools). If you want a variation, you can fork and make changes on it.
I think I read once that google chrome was working on some kind of API for mapping file extensions to web sites, so that you could for example have a .docx map to a url like http://word.com?OpenFile=%1 Opening the file from your OS would fire up the browser and take you to the appropriate site and give the site access to the file.
Is this true or am I just going crazy? If so, where can I find the spec for that system?
Ha! Found it at http://googlecode.blogspot.com/2011/06/working-with-chromes-file-browser.html and http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/fileBrowserHandler.html
Take that, close voters!