How does Rails build a MySQL statement? - mysql

I have the following code that run on heroku inside a controller that intermittently fails. It's a no-brainer that it should work to me, but I must be missing something.
#artist = Artist.find(params[:artist_id])
The parameters hash looks like this:
{"utf8"=>"������",
"authenticity_token"=>"XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
"password"=>"[FILTERED]",
"commit"=>"Download",
"action"=>"show",
"controller"=>"albums",
"artist_id"=>"62",
"id"=>"157"}
The error I get looks like this:
ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error: : SELECT `artists`.* FROM `artists` WHERE `artists`.`id` = ? LIMIT 1
notice the WHEREartists.id= ? part of the statement? It's trying to find an ID of QUESTION MARK. Meaning Rails is not passing in the params[:artist_id] which is obviously in the params hash. I'm at complete loss.
I get the same error on different pages trying to select the record in a similar fashion.
My environment: Cedar Stack on Heroku (this only happens on Heroku), Ruby 1.9.3, Rails 3.2.8, files being hosted on Amazon S3 (though I doubt it matters), using the mysql gem (not mysql2, which doesn't work at all), ClearDB MySQL database.
Here's the full trace.
Any help would be tremendously appreciated.

try sql?
If it's just this one statement, and it's causing production problems, can you omit the query generator just for now? In other words, for very short term, just write the SQL yourself. This will buy you a bit of time.
# All on one line:
Artist.find_by_sql
"SELECT `artists`.* FROM `artists`
WHERE `artists`.`id` = #{params[:artist_id].to_i} LIMIT 1"
ARel/MySQL explain?
Rails can help explain what MySQL is trying to do:
Artist.find(params[:artist_id]).explain
http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2011/12/6/what-s-new-in-edge-rails-explain/
Perhaps you can discover some kind of difference between the queries that are succeeding vs. failing, such as how the explain uses indexes or optimizations.
mysql2 gem?
Can you try changing from the mysql gem to the mysql2 gem? What failure do you get when you switch to the mysql2 gem?
volatility?
Perhaps there's something else changing the params hash on the fly, so you see it when you print it, but it's changed by the time the query runs?
Try assigning the variable as soon as you receive the params:
artist_id = params[:artist_id]
... whatever code here...
#artist = Artist.find(artist_id)
not the params hash?
You wrote "Meaning Rails is not passing in the params[:artist_id] which is obviously in the params hash." I don't think that's the problem-- I expect that you're seeing this because Rails is using the "?" as a placeholder for a prepared statement.
To find out, run the commands suggested by #Mori and compare them; they should be the same.
Article.find(42).to_sql
Article.find(params[:artist_id]).to_sql
prepared statements?
Could be a prepared statement cache problem, when the query is actually executed.
Here's the code that is failing-- and there's a big fat warning.
begin
stmt.execute(*binds.map { |col, val| type_cast(val, col) })
rescue Mysql::Error => e
# Older versions of MySQL leave the prepared statement in a bad
# place when an error occurs. To support older mysql versions, we
# need to close the statement and delete the statement from the
# cache.
stmt.close
#statements.delete sql
raise e
end
Try configuring your database to turn off prepared statements, to see if that makes a difference.
In your ./config/database.yml file:
production:
adapter: mysql
prepared_statements: false
...
bugs with prepared statements?
There may be a problem with Rails ignoring this setting. If you want to know a lot more about it, see this discussion and bug fix by Jeremey Cole and Aaron: https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/7042
Heroku may ignore the setting. Here's a way you can try overriding Heroku by patching the prepared_statements setup: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/5297
remove the query cache?
Try removing the ActiveRecord QueryCache to see if that makes a difference:
config.middleware.delete ActiveRecord::QueryCache
http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/configuring.html#configuring-middle
try postgres?
If you can try Postgres, that could clear it up too. That may not be a long term solution for you, but it would isolate the problem to MySQL.

The MySQL statement is obviously wrong, but the Ruby code you mentioned would not produce it. Something is wrong here, either you use a different Ruby code (maybe one from a before_filter) or pass a different parameter (like params[:artist_id] = "?"). Looks like you use nested resources, something like Artist has_many :albums. Maybe the #artist variable is not initialized correctly in the previous action, so that params[:artist_id] has not the right value?

Related

Couldn't figure out how the payload worked

I was solving one of TryHackMe's rooms about SQL injection.But I couldn't figured out one thing that came to my mind and after spending lots of time I thought it's best to ask that question here. In the room there is a machine to deploy, after deployed machine it gave me an interface(webapp) that takes inputs from me like so :
And if you give it a value like test. It returns following output:
When I saw it, I thought it was an easy SQLi question so I tried most basic SQLi payloads for common dbms like so:
' ; sleep(1) --
' or 1=1 -- ...
But none of them worked and returned me an error message like that:
After that failure, I run sqlmap and it found 2 types of SQLi payload with following payloads:
Then I realized that in time based SQLi, sqlmap used ||. Then I tried to send '|| (select sleep(2)) -- . And it worked. Now my question is why my first payload(' ; select sleep(2) -- ) didn't work, but this one worked ?
By default, MySQL query interfaces do not support multiple queries separated by semicolon. To get that, the application would have to explicitly request this feature to be enabled when it connects to the database. There's a connect option for that.
So by default, any type of SQL injection that works by trying to append a malicious query after a semicolon doesn't work.
But an SQL injection that works by modifying an expression in the single query can still work.

User defined variables using SET is not working

I am using node 5.0.0 along with the node module mysql2 - 1.0.0-rc.11. It is working perfectly fine except when I try to use the user defined variables.
Example :
SET #user := 123456;
SELECT * FROM users WHERE user = #user;
The above simple query is throwing syntax error at my end. I am sure that, the syntax is a valid one. So I am wondering what may be the cause for this issue?
Doesn't the node module mysql2 - 1.0.0-rc.11 have support for SET yet? I have scanned the [document1, document2] thoroughly, I couldn't able to find the syntax support list. Can anyone help me to understand what's going wrong with this?
Following up on Andrey Sidorov's comment, you will need to have multipleStatements: true in the options object you pass to createConnection(), createPool(), etc. This is false by default for security reasons, so I don't recommend using it in production code.
https://github.com/mysqljs/mysql#multiple-statement-queries

How would this rails query be on sql query?

I'm trying to run something like this directly on mysql server database:
SupportRequest.all.map{ |support_request| SupportRequestFeedback.create(support_request_id: support_request.id) if support_request.support_request_feedback == nil}
I know the query it produces but not how to implemented in a 1 query command (with the loop)?
You can enter this line in rails console to display queries:
ActiveRecord::Base.logger = Logger.new(STDOUT)
Then enter your code and the query will be displayed.
I may be wrong, but I don't think Rails provides a call to do this kind of operation at once.
You can setup a service to perform this for you, though:
support_requests_without_feedback = SupportRequest.includes(:support_request_feedback).where(support_request_feedback: {id: nil})
You could use the active_record-import gem to achieve mass db insert or you could use this: (not so effecient, though):
support_requests_without_feedback.map{|sr| sr.support_request_feedback.create }

Couchbase CBQ Silent Fail

I'm trying to query a secure bucket via couchbase CBQon windows.
I've got couchbase/bin in my PATH and from the command line I am able to run this:
cbq -engine=http://localhost:8091 -c=hug_contenthub:password
seems to connect OK:
Connected to : http://localhost:8091/. Type Ctrl-D or \QUIT to exit.
Path to history file for the shell : C:\Users\kevin\.cbq_history
cbq>_
From here on I can't do anything except quit. I tried several commands:
cbq> select 1=1
> SELECT DISTINCT type FROM `beer-sample`
> create primary index on `beer-sample`
They are all ignored. No feedback at all. The only thing that changes is cqb> becomes "....>" the cqb bit is stripped off.
What am I missing here?
I'm relatively new to Couchbase Server, and I'm used to the old MS SQL ways, and so I think I had a similar problem.
My solution: I added a 'semicolon' at the end of each query.
I also tend to prefer to use the new Query Workbench tool instead of cbq when I'm just writing and tweaking N1QL queries. (But maybe that's just me).

Calling MySQL stored procedure in ROR 4

There are few example out there but non of them are very clarified (or on old version).
I want to call MySQL procedure and check the return status (in rails 4.2). The most common method I saw is to call result = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("call example_proc()"), but in some places people wrote there is prepared method result = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute_procedure("Stored Procedure Name", arg1, arg2) (however it didn't compiled).
So what is the correct way to call and get the status for MySQL procedure?
Edit:
And how to send parameters safly, where the first parameter is integer, second string and third boolean?
Rails 4 ActiveRecord::Base doesn't support execute_procedure method, though result = ActiveRecord::Base.connection still works. ie
result = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("call example_proc('#{arg1}','#{arg2}')")
You can try Vishnu approach below
or
You can also try
ActiveRecord::Base.connections.exec_query("call example_proc('#{arg1}','#{arg2}')")
here is the document
In general, you should be able to call stored procedures in a regular where or select method for a given model:
YourModel.where("YOUR_PROC(?, ?)", var1, var2)
As for your comment "Bottom line I want the most correct approach with procedure validation afterwards (for warnings and errors)", I guess it always depends on what you actually want to implement and how readable you want your code to be.
For example, if you want to return rows of YourModel attributes, then it probably would be better if you use the above statement with where method. On the other hand, if you write some sql adapter then you might want to go down to the ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute level.
BTW, there is something about stored proc performance that should be mentioned here. In several databases, database does stored proc optimization on the first run of the stored proc. However, the parameters that you pass to that first run might not be those that will be running on it more frequently later on. As a result, your stored-proc might be auto-optimized in a "none-optimal" way for your case. It may or may not happen this way, but it is something that you should consider while using stored procs with dynamic params.
I believe you have tried many other solutions and got some or other errors mostly "out of sync" or "closed connection" errors. These errors occur every SECOND time you try to execute the queries. We need to workaround like the connection is new every time to overcome this. Here is my solution that didn't throw any errors.
#checkout a connection for Model
conn = ModelName.connection_pool.checkout
#use the new connection to execute the query
#records = conn.execute("call proc_name('params')")
#checkout the connection
ModelName.connection_pool.checkin(conn)
The other approaches failed for me, possibly because ActiveRecord connections are automatically handled to checkout and checking for each thread. When our method tries to checkout a connection just to execute the SP, it might conflict since there will be an active connection just when the method started.
So the idea is to manually #checkout a connection for the model instead of for thread/function from the pool and #checkin once the work is done. This worked great for me.