I have this situation where I declare inside my main class a function that looks like this:
public class Main extends MovieClip
{
public static var instance:Main;
public function Main()
{
// constructor code
welcomeScreen();
instance = this;
}
public final function welcomeScreen():void
{
//some code in here
}
public final function startLevelOne():void
{
//some other code here
}
}
In some other class I use this statement to fire a reset:
restart.addEventListener('click', function() {
Main.instance.welcomeScreen();
});
Somehow in another class I try to use the same statement for 'startLevelOne' but it seems it is not working and gives the fallowing error:
1195: Attempted access of inaccessible method startLevelOne through a reference with static type Main.
Any ideas?
UPDATE #1
The class where I try to access the function is in full this one:
public class LevelBrief extends MovieClip
{
public function LevelBrief()
{
// constructor code
startBut.addEventListener('click', function() {
Main.instance.startLevelOne();
});
}
}
UPDATE #2
I have pasted the full code of the main definition here http://pastebin.com/s6hGv7sT
Also the other class could be found here http://pastebin.com/s6h3Pwbp
UPDATE #3
Even though the problem was solved with a workaround, I still cannot understand where was the problem.
I would recommend to leave the static instance (singleton), and work event-based. Now you make all functions public, which is not desirable. It's not that hard to use custom events. See this is how your Main class could look:
public class Main extends MovieClip
{
public function Main()
{
this.addEventListener(Event.ADDED_TO_STAGE, handleAddedToStage);
}
public function handleAddedToStage(event:Event)
{
this.removeEventListener(Event.ADDED_TO_STAGE, handleAddedToStage);
this.showWelcomeScreen();
stage.addEventListener(ScreenEvent.SHOW_WELCOME_SCREEN, handleScreenEvent);
stage.addEventListener(ScreenEvent.SHOW_LEVEL, handleScreenEvent);
}
private function handleScreenEvent(event:ScreenEvent):void
{
switch (event.type)
{
case ScreenEvent.SHOW_WELCOME_SCREEN:
{
this.showWelcomeScreen()
break;
}
case ScreenEvent.SHOW_LEVEL:
{
// event.data contains level number
this.startLevel(event.data);
break;
}
default:
{
trace("Main.handleScreenEvent :: Cannot find event.type '" + event.type + "'.");
break;
}
}
}
private function showWelcomeScreen():void
{
trace("show WelcomeScreen")
//some private code in here
}
private function startLevel(level:int):void
{
trace("start level: " + level)
//some other private code here
}
}
This is how the custom event class should look (ScreenEvent.as). Note it has an optional parameter called data. You can pass any value (objects, numbers, strings etc) into this. To the example as clear as possible, I used one event-class for both actions, you can also choose to make more specific custom events for other actions with more detailed parameters, you would have names like ScreenEvent, LevelEvent, PlayerEvent, GameEvent etc etc..
At the top of the class the (static constant) types are defined. An event should only have getters.
package
{
import flash.events.Event;
public class ScreenEvent extends Event
{
public static const SHOW_WELCOME_SCREEN:String = "ScreenEvent.showWelcomeScreen";
// event.data contains level number
public static const SHOW_LEVEL:String = "ScreenEvent.showLevel";
private var _data:String;
public function ScreenEvent(type:String, data:String):void
{
super(type);
this._data = data;
}
public function get data():String
{
return this._data;
}
override public function clone():Event
{
return new ScreenEvent(this.type, this._data);
}
}
}
.. Anywhere in your code you can dispatch the event to the stage.
// dispatch event to Main (stage). Should show welcome screen in our case
stage.dispatchEvent(new ScreenEvent(ScreenEvent.SHOW_WELCOME_SCREEN));
// show level 2
stage.dispatchEvent(new ScreenEvent(ScreenEvent.SHOW_LEVEL, 2));
I know, its a bit more code, it looks more difficult at first but if the project grows, it will help a lot. The difference with events is 'this could happen, and when it happens, do this' instead of 'do this here, do that over there'
The advantage is that if you remove the event listener in the Main class, nothing will break (loosely coupled). This makes it easier to maintain, it saves a singleton, and you have the ability to extend the Main class if you want to.
I think you wrote
Main.startLevelOne();
instead of
Main.instance.startLevelOne();
Hmm. Given your code, there is only one serious question - what is PerwollGame? You have there public static var instance:PerwollGame; and you assign it an object of type Main. Perhaps that PerwollGame has a startLevelOne() function with a different signature, that obscures your function in the Main class. Also, the other people who answered you are right as well, you should never use nested functions in your code, really put that listener of yours out from inline declaration.
Judging from your coding style and the error reported, I would assume you did this.
public static function startLevelOne():void
There is a fine line between static methods and instantiated objects.
Also never use nested functions
public class LevelBrief extends MovieClip
{
public function LevelBrief()
{
// constructor code
startBut.addEventListener('click', onMyClick )
}
public functiononMyClick (e:Event) {
Main.instance.startLevelOne();
});
}
}
I assume that when you register the listener Main.instance is not already assigned.
Did you try to trace Main instance here?
public function LevelBrief()
{
// constructor code
startBut.addEventListener('click', function() {
Main.instance.startLevelOne();
});
trace(Main.instance); // I assume Main.instance is null
}
what about if you add the listener in another method in LevelBrief like :
public function registerListeners():void{
trace("Main.instance == null? -> " + (Main.instance == null)); //not null here if called later.
startBut.addEventListener('click', function() {
Main.instance.startLevelOne();
});
}
Related
I wonder which one of these methods is the best when trying get a variable from anotherClass to the Main-document-class, and why? Are there any more, even better ways?
In example no 1, and the Main-function, can the if-else statement be triggered before the checkLogin function was completely done? Thanks!
My no 1. way
public class Main extends MovieClip {
// Declaring other classes.
private var checkLogin:CheckLogin;
public function Main() {
checkLogin = new CheckLogin();
if(checkLogin.isLoggedIn == true) {
trace("Is logged in");
} else {
trace("Not logged in");
}
}
}
and
public class CheckLogin {
public var isLoggedIn:Boolean;
public function CheckLogin() {
isLoggedIn = false;
}
}
Or is it a lot better to do it this way,
(Way no 2):
public class Main extends MovieClip {
// Declaring other classes.
private var checkLogin:CheckLogin;
public function Main() {
checkLogin = new CheckLogin();
checkLogin.addEventListener("checkLogin.go.ready", checkLoginReady);
checkLogin.go();
}
public function checkLoginReady(event = null) {
if(checkLogin.isLoggedIn == true) {
trace("Is logged in");
} else {
trace("Not logged in");
}
}
}
and
public class CheckLogin extends EventDispatcher {
public var isLoggedIn:Boolean;
public function CheckLogin() {
isLoggedIn = true;
}
public function go() {
this.dispatchEvent(new Event("checkLogin.go.ready"));
}
}
Generally, using events will make your code easier to maintain.
The login check you describe seems to be instant, so approach number 1 would be ok for such a simple case.
Often the login check (or whatever process) may not be instant, for example if the CheckLogin class sent a server request and waited for the response. In this case using events is better. The Main class can listen for a LOGIN_SUCCESS or LOGIN_FAIL event and handle it when the event occurs. All the login logic stays within CheckLogin.
Also, using events will allow multiple interested classes to react, without them knowing any of the inside login process.
This is AS3 question.
I have Class "addadd", "Symbol1"(Button1), "Symbol2"(Button2).
In "addadd" I have 3 functions. Function "StanishevFadd" creates object and add Event Listener, function "stanishevFremove" removes Event Listener and function "frameDOstanishev" that will be triggered when the event is added.
So, I obviously want to trigger the event from Symbol1 and stop the same event from Symbol2. Unfortunately doesn't work this way. I am totally confuzed. For example if I want to add and remove the event listener from Symbol1 only - YES works, but I am not able to create event from Symbol1 and remove the same event from Symbol2 in class addadd. Please help guys, please!
public class addadd
{
var stanishev:stanishev_line = new stanishev_line;
public function addadd()
{
}
public function stanishevFadd()
{
Main.display.addChild(stanishev);
stanishev.gotoAndPlay("start");
stanishev.addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, frameDOstanishev);
}
public function stanishevFremove()
{
stanishev.removeEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, frameDOstanishev);
}
public function frameDOstanishev(e:Event)
{
trace (stanishev.currentFrame);
}
}
//------------------------------
public class Symbol1 extends SimpleButton
{
var call_creator:addadd = new addadd;
public function Symbol1()
{
// constructor code
addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, eventResponse);
}
function eventResponse(e:MouseEvent)
{
call_creator.stanishevFadd();
}
}
//----------------------
public class Symbol2 extends SimpleButton
{
var call_creator:addadd = new addadd;
public function Symbol2()
{
// constructor code
addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_DOWN, eventResponse2);
}
function eventResponse2(e:MouseEvent)
{
call_creator.stanishevFremove();
}
}
OK, I am not sure what the overall purpose of this whole thing, so I am going to call this thing OddView. I'm going to try to get close to what it looks like you are trying to do in a more OO way.
I believe it should be possible for you to encapsulate all of this behavior without involving your Main Class, and there are a lot of reasons not to involve it, especially not with static variables like you're doing.
public class OddView extends Sprite {
protected var _btn1:SimpleButton;
protected var _btn2:SimpleButton;
protected var _stanishev:StanishevLine;//note I changed your Class name to be more in line with AS3 standards
public function OddView() {
super();
}
public function get btn1():SimpleButton {
return _btn1;
}
public function set btn1(value:SimpleButton):void {
if (value != _btn1) {
if (_btn1) {
removeEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, goToState2);
}
_btn1 = value;
if (_btn1) {
_btn1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, goToState2);
}
}
}
public function get btn2():SimpleButton {
return _btn2;
}
public function set btn2(value:SimpleButton):void {
if (value != _btn2) {
if (_btn2) {
removeEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, goToState1);
}
_btn2 = value;
if (_btn2) {
_btn2.addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, goToState1);
}
}
}
public function get stanishev():StanishevLine {
return _stanishev;
}
public function set stanishev(value:StanishevLine):void {
if (value != _stanishev) {
if (_stanishev) {
cleanUp(null);
}
_stanishev = value;
initStanishev();
}
}
public function initStanishev():void {
if (_stanishev) {
_stanishev.visible = true;
_stanishev.goToAndPlay('start');
addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, showStanishevFrame);
addEventListener(Event.REMOVED_FROM_STAGE, cleanUp);
}
}
public function goToState1(e:Event) :void {
goToAndStop(1);
}
public function goToState2(e:Event):void {
goToAndStop('State2');
}
public function showStanishevFrame(e:Event):void {
if (stanishev) {
trace('current frame', stanishev.currentFrame);
}
}
public function cleanUp(e:Event):void {
removeEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, showStanishevFrame);
removeEventListener(Event.REMOVED_FROM_STAGE, cleanUp);
}
}
Note that I'm assuming that you're going to apply OddView as the Base Class of a library symbol. I'm not including any instantiation or positioning logic, since I tend to use the stage for those things.
Note that the reason I check for existence on the stage instances is that it is theoretically possible for someone to assign OddView as the Base Class and not put a btn1, btn2, or stanishev on the stage of that library symbol.
However, this Class is written assuming you're going to handle the visual parts of those 3 items by placing btn1, btn2, and stanishev on the stage where you want them to be.
Also note that I strongly suspect that most of this is completely unnecessary. It's quite possible that you could handle most of this by simply using the over state of btn1. However, that doesn't completely account for why you want to only remove the event listener and take no other action when btn2 is cicked. So I went for "overkill" in the absence of real info about what you're actually trying to accomplish.
Note on the edits
Note what I'm doing there in the setter--if there was already a value stored, we remove the listeners that were on that old, outgoing, listener. Then if the incoming value is not null, we add the new listener.
I still suspect you don't need to do so much, but considering the information you have provided, this should help point you in the right direction.
You could make the variable stanishev in you addadd class a static variable. However I would not recommend doing this, one reason being you can only have one instance of stanishev. Hopefully #Amy Blankenship will tell you how to completely redesign your program, because it needs to be redesigned. This approach will work though, you should also add conditionals to the functions that add and remove eventListeners to stanishev to see if stanishev already has an eventlistener or does not have one.
public class addadd
{
public static var stanishev:stanishev_line = new stanishev_line;
public function addadd()
{
}
public function stanishevFadd()
{
Main.display.addChild(stanishev);
stanishev.gotoAndPlay("start");
stanishev.addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, frameDOstanishev);
}
public function stanishevFremove()
{
stanishev.removeEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, frameDOstanishev);
}
public function frameDOstanishev(e:Event)
{
trace (stanishev.currentFrame);
}
}
public class Symbol1 extends SimpleButton
{
public function Symbol1()
{
// constructor code
addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_OVER, eventResponse);
}
function eventResponse(e:MouseEvent)
{
addadd.stanishev.stanishevFadd();
}
}
public class Symbol2 extends SimpleButton
{
public function Symbol2()
{
// constructor code
addEventListener(MouseEvent.MOUSE_DOWN, eventResponse2);
}
function eventResponse2(e:MouseEvent)
{
addadd.stanishev.stanishevFremove();
}
}
What I am trying to do is kind of odd, but I am wondering if anyone can come up with a clever way to do what I want to do. Basically, I want to re-define a named function at runtime. I can do this with anonymous functions, but I can't figure out a way to do it for named functions. I want to do this so that I can implement a "spy" functionality on an object for a testing framework (a port of Jasmine to Flex).
Take, for instance, this class:
public class TestClass
{
public var anonymous:Function = function():void {
trace("original anonymous");
};
public function named():void {
trace("original named");
}
}
I can easily re-define the anonymous function because it is just a variable. Javascript uses this idiom a lot.
var testClass:TestClass = new TestClass();
testClass.anonymous = function():void { trace("overridden anonymous"); }
BUT, when I do the same thing for named functions, you get a compile-time error:
// Does not compile
testClass.named = function():void { trace("overridden named"); }
I tried to make it a bit more "squishy" but this leads to a runtime failure "Cannot assign to a method named on TestClass".
// Compiles with runtime failure
testClass["named"] = function():void { trace("overridden named"); }
Can anyone more clever than I come up with a way to hack this? Can the bytecode be hijacked? Something?
I want to modify an object, not a
class
But object doesn't contain functions, only non-static variables. I tried to use prototype property and replace method there, but original method still gets called instead of injected one.
About "hack" bytecode, do you mean "hack" already loaded SWF in runtime? I think it's not possible. I'm sure, though, you can parse SWF with something like as3swf, find method in bytecode, replace it and save result in new SWF.
I had an idea bout making a function "cache" . This might work with what you need.
Let's say you have a class "Car" with a method you need to redefine at runtime:
public class Car extends Sprite
{
private var functionCache:Function;
public function Car()
{
super();
}
public function flexibleFunction(functionBody:*=null):void{
if(functionBody is Function){
functionBody.call();
functionCache=functionBody;
} else {
functionCache(functionBody);
}
}
}
Usage:
public class Main extends Sprite
{
private var car:Car;
public function Main()
{
car = new Car();
car.flexibleFunction(function(){trace("redefine test #1")});
car.flexibleFunction();
car.flexibleFunction(function(doParametersWork:String="let's see"){trace("redefine test #2: " + doParametersWork);});
car.flexibleFunction("yes they do");
car.flexibleFunction();
}
}
an easy way to accomplish what you want is to simply pass a new function to the original function and execute it from there:
package
{
//Imports
import flash.display.Sprite;
//Class
public class RedefineFunction extends Sprite
{
//Constructor
public function RedefineFunction()
{
originalFunction();
originalFunction(redefinedFunction);
}
//Original Function
public function originalFunction(redefinition:Function = null):void
{
if (redefinition != null)
redefinition();
else
trace("Original Function Definition");
}
//Redefined Function
private function redefinedFunction():void
{
trace("Redefined Function Definition")
}
}
}
traces:
Original Function Definition
Redefined Function Definition
I got this idea of expanding my trace() messages.
Why
trace() is all over my code, I want to turn them on/off by a simple command and maybe add some sort of priority functionality to the trace(), i.e.
myTrace.TraceMsg("loosehere",debugme, 0);
myTrace.TraceMsg("winhere",debugme, 1);
And when I run, only the one with the higher priority, "1" in this case, shows.
There is a lot more functionality I would like to add as well, like logging messages to file and so on.
Problem
How do trace() work? -Is it possible to overload trace() somehow? -How would I implement the custom TraceMsg(what code here?) method?
Having some serious problems finding info on this subject on our favourite search engine, so any help would be appreciated.
I have come up with a rather efficient, yet tedious way of using my own trace() function in Flash only projects, but calling it simply with
trace("this", "that", "and that too");
I basically implement one trace() method in every class of my project, that calls a public function (so that i can call the real trace() function from there.
here is what I do : in every class I call this
include "trace_implementation.as";
in the .as file comes a simple method implementation (it could be a static method too).
public function trace(... arguments){
for(var i in arguments){
myTrace(arguments[i]);
}
}
and the myTrace function is defined in its own myTrace.as file
package pt.utils{
import flash.external.ExternalInterface
public function myTrace(_s:String):void{
trace(_s);// this will call the original flash trace() function
ExternalInterface.call("console.log", _s);// to get traces outside of flash IDE
/*implement what you want here*/
}
}
so now when I compile with "omit trace actions", my whole debugging is ignored as if I used trace() simply.
the really good part here is that you could implement custom actions depending on instructions you give in the trace, so :
trace(Debug.DEBUG_MESSAGE, "message to output in debug");
trace(Profile.START_PROFILING, this, 'name');
/*do heavy code*/
trace(Profile.STOP_PROFILING, this);
then dispatch it from myTrace, or a Tracer class or anything :)
Hope this helps future tracers.
trace() itself is a top-level function, not a class, so unfortunately we cannot extend it. That being said, we can utilize it in a simple class to do just what it does normally, only in this case the trace is based on conditions (i.e. Boolean - true|false, etc). First we create the Trace class, which we wouldn't instantiate ourselves because we are utilizing a Factory design pattern through the class below, Tracer. Tracer is built around the singleton design pattern, yet utilizes the Factory pattern to instantiate instances of Trace, when the trace method of Tracer is called.
//This class is handled by Tracer, which is right below it.
//You WILL NOT instantiate these, nor hold references.
package
{
public class Trace
{
private function _value:*;
private function _trace:Boolean;
public function Trace(pValue:*, pTrace:Boolean):void
{
_value = pValue;
_trace = pTrace;
}
public function get value():*
{
return _value;
}
public function get trace():Boolean
{
return _trace;
}
}
}
//This is the important class and the only one you will work with.
package
{
/**
*Utilizes Singleton and Factory design patterns.
*/
public class Tracer
{
private var _traceArray:Array;
private static var _instance:Tracer;
public function Tracer(pvt:PrivateClass = null):void
{
if(pvt == null)
{
throw(new Error("You cannot instantiate this class directly, please use the static getInstance method."));
}
_init();
}
public static function getInstance():Tracer
{
if(Tracer._instance == null)
{
Tracer._instance = new Tracer(new PrivateClass());
}
return Tracer._instance;
}
public function trace(pValue:*, pTrace:Boolean):void
{
var trace:Trace = new Trace(pValue, pTrace);
if(trace.pTrace)
{
trace(pValue);
}
}
//Since we have the option for individual traces to be disabled
//I provide this to get access to any and all later.
public function traceAll():void
{
traceStr:String = _traceArray.toString();
}
public function get traceables():Array
{
return _traceArray;
}
//Here we provide a method to trace all, even if set to false in their constructor.
private function _init():void
{
_traceArray = new Array();
}
}
}
//Here we create a class that is OUTSIDE of the package.
//It can only be accessed from within this class file. We use this
//to make sure this class isn't instantiated directly.
class PrivateClass
{
function PrivateClass():void
{
trace('can only be accessed from within this class file');
}
}
//Now for use in doc class
package
{
import flash.display.Sprite;
import flash.events.Event;
//No need to import Tracer and Trace, they are also in the
//unnamed package.
public class DocumentClass extends Sprite
{
private var _tracer:Tracer;
public function DocumentClass():void
{
if(stage) _init();
else addEventListener(Event.ADDED_TO_STAGE, _init);
}
private function _init(e:Event = null):void
{
_tracer = Tracer.getInstance();
_tracer.trace(10*20, false);
_tracer.trace(10*20, 0); //SAME AS ABOVE
_tracer.trace("I love AS3", true); //traces
_tracer.traceAll(); //Would trace: 200, 200, I love AS3
}
}
}
Keep in mind this is off the hip and very well could have a bug or two, but the idea is there; That is to say that this is not tested, it is merely to give you an idea of how you might implement this.
I hope this helps.
Look at the Flex logging API, particularly the section: Implementing a custom logger with the logging API.
Look up the TraceTarget class as well.
You can't override trace itself, but for ease of typing I like to create a global function called 'tr'. It's a little known fact that you can create global functions in AS3, but it's easy.
Create a file called tr.as inside you main source directory (not in a subdirectory or package), with the contents:
package {
public function tr(msg:String, ...):void {
// add custom trace logic here
trace("tr message: "+msg);
}
}
If you need to have a lot of logic or static storage variables etc, it might be better to make a separate static class, and have the global tr function call out to that, such as:
package {
import org.code.MyTracer;
public function tr(msg:String, ...):void {
MyTracer.tr(msg); // all the tracing logic is inside the MyTracer class
}
}
Here is a super simple custom trace function I use. debugFlag can be set to true/false
elsewhere in the package.
public static function myTrace(... vars) :void {
if (debugFlag) {
var output:Array = new Array;
for each (var arg in vars) {
output.push(arg);
}
trace(output);
}
}
In AS2, it was possible to override the global trace function by doing something like this (taken from memory, might be a bit wrong but the gist of it is there):
public static var realTrace:Function = _global["trace"];
// This is put in some init code somewhere
_global["trace"] = myTrace;
public static function myTrace(... args):void
{
// Do whatever you want with args here, build a nice formatted string or whatever
// before passing to realTrace. Using with MTASC one could add line numbers, class
// names and all sorts of nice meta data. Or just return should you want to turn
// tracing off.
realTrace.apply(args);
}
Unfortunately I haven't found a way to do the same in AS3. Yet.
Trace is a top-level function, so you can't override it, and as far as I know, it does not fire any events. Since it's a top-level function (not contained in any named package), you can use it without import statements.
Here is an example of a top-level "Tracer" class that you can use in place of trace without import statements.
Just call "Tracer.write" or "Tracer.writeError" for tracing Error objects.
"Tracer.write" accepts a variable number of arguments, just like the built-in trace function. "Tracer.writeError" is a helper method that allows you to easily trace Error objects.
Features:
Calls built-in trace.
Keeps a log of all your calls to Tracer.write as an array of strings.
The call log is accessible as a string through getText, which joins all elements in the array with a newline character and will optionally tack on line numbers!
Fires events when new lines are added to the log, so if you have some kind of display window for the log, the display window can listen for Tracer events to update the log display in real-time as the events occur. This is great for displaying trace events when running inside a web browser or stand-alone player.
-Tracer class definition
package
{
import flash.events.EventDispatcher;
public class Tracer extends EventDispatcher
{
private static var traced_text:Array = new Array( "--Start of Trace Log--" );
public static var enabled:Boolean = true;
private static var suspended:Boolean = false;
public static var instance:Tracer = new Tracer();
public static const newline:String = "\n"; //workaround for TextField.appendText bug.. use "\n" instead of "\r". See note and link to bug post in getText method
public function Tracer()
{
}
static public function write( ...args ):void
{
if (enabled && !suspended)
{
trace.apply( null, args );
var text:String = args.join( newline );
var next_index:int = traced_text.length;
traced_text.push( text );
suspended = true; //prevent recursive calls from TracerEvent handler
instance.dispatchEvent( new TracerEvent( text, next_index ) );
suspended = false;
}
}
static public function writeError( e:Error ):void
{
write( "errorID: " + e.errorID, "errorName: " + e.name, "errorMessage: " + e.message, "stackTrace: " + e.getStackTrace() );
}
static public function getText( include_line_numbers:Boolean ):String
{
var line_count:int = traced_text.length;
var lines:Array = traced_text; //store pointer to traced_text; pointer may be changed to reference an altered array that includes line numbers
if (include_line_numbers) //create temporary trace log copy with altered lines; allows quick call to join at end
{
var new_lines:Array = new Array();
for (var i:int = 0; i < line_count; i++)
new_lines.push( i.toString() + ": " + lines[i] );
lines = new_lines;
}
return lines.join( newline ); //do not include last newline character (workaround for bug in appendText method (https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-1982); I have to call appendText with newline character first, otherwise it has issues like not acknoledging the newline thats already there at the end).
}
static public function addEventListener(type:String, listener:Function, useCapture:Boolean = false, priority:int = 0, useWeakReference:Boolean = false):void
{
instance.addEventListener(type, listener, useCapture, priority, useWeakReference);
}
static public function removeEventListener(type:String, listener:Function, useCapture:Boolean = false):void
{
instance.removeEventListener(type, listener, useCapture);
}
static public function willTrigger(type:String):Boolean
{
return instance.willTrigger(type);
}
static public function hasEventListener(type:String):Boolean
{
return instance.hasEventListener(type);
}
}
}
-TracerEvent class definition
package
{
import flash.events.Event;
public class TracerEvent extends Event
{
public static const WRITE:String = "te_write";
public var text:String;
public var index:int; //index of newly traced text in the traced_text array (trace log)
public function TracerEvent( text:String, index:int )
{
super( WRITE, false, false );
this.text = text;
this.index = index;
}
override public function clone():Event
{
return new TracerEvent( text, index );
}
}
}
As mentioned below, there is no way to override trace (at least not if you want your traces to reach the output stream), but it's actually very easy to create your own universally accessable logging function. Plus, you can even define a universally accessable boolean to turn logging on or off:
log.as (note that the filename must reflect the name of the function)
package {
function log(... arguments):void {
trace("Custom logging FTW!");
if (logEnabled)
trace(arguments);
}
}
logEnabled.as (note that the filename must reflect the name of the variable)
package {
var logEnabled:Boolean = true;
}
Main.as
package {
import flash.display.MovieClip;
public class Main extends MovieClip {
public function Main() {
log("Testing");
logEnabled = false;
log("Testing2");
}
}
}
Response
Custom logging FTW!
Testing
Custom logging FTW!
you dont need to override it , just create a function in your project and call it trace then any trace call will point to this.trace ;)
function trace(... arguments){
yourfunction(arguments);
}
It's not a matter of life or death but I wonder if this could be possible:
I got a couple of events from one type of custom event (FormEvent) now I got a FormListener that listens to all those events and handles them according to the event type. Instead of adding one eventListener at the time I wish to add all events at once.
so now it looks like this:
private function addListeners():void {
addEventListener(FormEvent.SHOW_FORM, formListener);
addEventListener(FormEvent.SEND_FORM, formListener);
addEventListener(FormEvent.CANCEL_FORM, formListener);
}
private function formListener(event:formEvent):void {
switch(event.type){
case "show.form":
// handle show form stuff
break;
case "send.form":
// handle send form stuff
break;
case "cancel.form":
// handle cancel form stuff
break;
}
}
but instead of adding every event one at the time I would rather be doing something like
private function addListeners():void {
addEventListener(FormEvent.*, formListener);
}
I wonder if something like this is possible, i would love it. I work with loads of events :)
You only really need one event listener in this case anyhow. That listener will be listening for any change with the form and a parameter equal to what the change was becomes available to the event listener function. I will show you, but please remember that this is a pseudo situation and normally I wouldn't dispatch an event off of something as simple as a method call because the dispatch is implied so there is no real need to listen for it.
First the Custom Event
package com.yourDomain.events
{
import flash.events.Event;
public class FormEvent extends Event
{
//Public Properties
public static const CANCEL_FORM:int = "0";
public static const SHOW_FORM:int = "1";
public static const SEND_FORM:int = "2";
public static const STATE_CHANGED:String = "stateChanged";
//Private Properties
private var formState:int;
public function FormEvent(formState:int):void
{
super(STATE_CHANGED);
formState = formState;
}
}
}
So we have just created our custom event class and we have set it up so that we can catch the state through the listener function as I will demonstrate once done with the pseudo form class that will dispatch the for said custom event.
Remember that this is all hypothetical as I have no idea what your code looks like or how your implementing things. What is important is to notice that when I dispatch the event I need to send a parameter with it that reflects what the new state is.
package com.yourDomain.ui
{
import flash.events.Event;
import flash.events.EventDispatcher;
import com.yourDomain.events.FormEvent;
public class Form extends EventDispatcher
{
public function Form():void
{
//Anything you want form to do upon instantiation goes here.
}
public function cancelForm():void
{
dispatchEvent(new Event(FormEvent.CANCEL_FORM);
}
public function showForm():void
{
dispatchEvent(new Event(FormEvent.SHOW_FORM);
}
public function sendForm():void
{
dispatchEvent(new Event(FormEvent.SEND_FORM);
}
}
}
And finally we create the document class that will listen for it. Please know that I realize it isn't logical to create a listener that fires when you call a method of a class because you obviously know you called the method, but for this example it will due.
package com.yourDomain.ui
{
import com.yourDomain.ui.Form;
import com.yourDomain.events.FormEvent;
//Form is in the same package so we need not import it.
public class MainDocumentClass
{
private var _theForm:Form;
public function MainDocumentClass():void
{
_theForm = new Form();
_theForm.addEventListener(FormEvent.STATE_CHANGED, onFormStateChange, false, 0, true);
/*
The following three method calls each cause the
FormEvent.STATE_CHANGE event to be dispatched.
onFormStateChange is notified and checks what
the last change actually was.
*/
_theForm.cancelForm();
_theForm.showForm();
_theForm.sendForm();
}
private function onFormStateChange(e:FormEvent):void
{
switch(e.formState)
{
case CANCEL_FORM:
trace('The form was canceled');
break;
case SHOW_FORM:
trace('The form was revealed');
break;
case SEND_FORM:
trace('The form was sent');
break;
}
}
}
}
I hope that this was helpful, its late and I may have to revise some things later, but this should help get an understanding of how to make your own events and to customize how things work.
I don't know of any routines that let you do that directly, but you could write your own. The syntax here won't be perfect, but here's a first pass:
private function addMultipleEventListeners( evts:Array, callback:function ):void
{
for each( var evt:Event in evts )
{
addEventListener( evt, callback );
}
}
You could then call that routine like so:
var evts:Array = [ FormEvent.SHOW_FORM, FormEvent.SEND_FORM, FormEvent.CANCEL_FORM ];
addMultipleEventListeners( evts, formListener );