I am trying too use my C++ class in PHP. in my C++ code I have declared the typedef as:
typedef unsigned char byte;
so I intended to let SWIG consider my typedef in wrapper class, my interface file is something like this:
%module xxx
typedef unsigned char byte;
%include "xxx.h"
....
%{
typedef unsigned char byte;
#include "xxx.h"
%}
and in my test code I refer to type as:
byte *data;
but I've got the following error:
Fatal error: Class 'unsigned_char' not found in xxx.php
P.S: I also include "stdint.i" in my interface file but got the same error
Any ideas?
I can confirm that the interface you've shown is viable and works for simple cases, e.g. I wrote the following header file to test:
byte *make() { return NULL; }
void consume(byte *data) {}
And used the interface:
%module xxx
typedef unsigned char byte;
%include "xxx.h"
%{
typedef unsigned char byte;
#include "xxx.h"
%}
Which I was able to compile and test with the following PHP:
<?php
include("xxx.php");
$r = xxx::make();
xxx::consume($r);
?>
and it worked as expected.
A few points to note from that though:
In general I would be inclined to write the code you want passed through to the module (i.e. the bits inside the %{ %} before your %include.
Rather than using your own typedef for byte I'd be inclined to use one of the standard int types, e.g. uint8_t
It's not clear from your question quite how you intend to use byte *data - presumably it's an array in which case you'll want to add a little more code to your interface. (Or better still use std::vector<byte> since it's C++):
%module xxx
%{
typedef unsigned char byte;
#include "xxx.h"
%}
%include <carrays.i>
%array_class(byte,ByteArray);
typedef unsigned char byte;
%include "xxx.h"
Which can then be used in PHP as:
$a = new ByteArray(100);
$a->setitem(0, 1);
$a->setitem(1, 2); //...
xxx::consume($a->cast());
ByteArray is a utility class provided by SWIG to hold and wrap a raw C array of bytes.
Related
When calling a swig generated function returning std::tuple, i get a swig object of that std::tuple.
Is there a way to use type-maps or something else to extract the values? I have tried changing the code to std::vector for a small portion of the code, and that works. (using %include <std_vector.i> and templates) But i don't want to make too many changes in the C++ part.
Edit: here is a minimal reproducible example:
foo.h
#pragma once
#include <tuple>
class foo
{
private:
double secret1;
double secret2;
public:
foo();
~foo();
std::tuple<double, double> return_thing(void);
};
foo.cpp
#include "foo.h"
#include <tuple>
foo::foo()
{
secret1 = 1;
secret2 = 2;
}
foo::~foo()
{
}
std::tuple<double, double> foo::return_thing(void) {
return {secret1, secret2};
}
foo.i
%module foo
%{
#include"foo.h"
%}
%include "foo.h"
When compiled on my linux using
-:$ swig -python -c++ -o foo_wrap.cpp foo.i
-:$ g++ -c foo.cpp foo_wrap.cpp '-I/usr/include/python3.8' '-fPIC' '-std=c++17' '-I/home/simon/Desktop/test_stack_overflow_tuple'
-:$ g++ -shared foo.o foo_wrap.o -o _foo.so
I can import it in python as shown:
test_module.ipynb
import foo as f
Foo = f.foo()
return_object = Foo.return_thing()
type(return_object)
print(return_object)
Outputs is
SwigPyObject
<Swig Object of type 'std::tuple< double,double > *' at 0x7fb5845d8420>
Hopefully this is more helpful, thank you for responding
To clarify i want to be able to use the values in python something like this:
main.cpp
#include "foo.h"
#include <iostream>
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
using namespace std;
int main()
{
foo Foo = foo();
auto [s1, s2] = Foo.return_thing();
cout << s1 << " " << s2 << endl;
}
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Github repo if anybody is interested
https://github.com/simon-cmyk/test_stack_overflow_tuple
Our goal is to make something like the following SWIG interface work intuitively:
%module test
%include "std_tuple.i"
%std_tuple(TupleDD, double, double);
%inline %{
std::tuple<double, double> func() {
return std::make_tuple(0.0, 1.0);
}
%}
We want to use this within Python in the following way:
import test
r=test.func()
print(r)
print(dir(r))
r[1]=1234
for x in r:
print(x)
i.e. indexing and iteration should just work.
By re-using some of the pre-processor tricks I used to wrap std::function (which were themselves originally from another answer here on SO) we can define a neat macro that "just wraps" std::tuple for us. Although this answer is Python specific it should in practice be fairly simple to adapt for most other languages too. I'll post my std_tuple.i file, first and then annotate/explain it after:
// [1]
%{
#include <tuple>
#include <utility>
%}
// [2]
#define make_getter(pos, type) const type& get##pos() const { return std::get<pos>(*$self); }
#define make_setter(pos, type) void set##pos(const type& val) { std::get<pos>(*$self) = val; }
#define make_ctorargN(pos, type) , type v##pos
#define make_ctorarg(first, ...) const first& v0 FOR_EACH(make_ctorargN, __VA_ARGS__)
// [3]
#define FE_0(...)
#define FE_1(action,a1) action(0,a1)
#define FE_2(action,a1,a2) action(0,a1) action(1,a2)
#define FE_3(action,a1,a2,a3) action(0,a1) action(1,a2) action(2,a3)
#define FE_4(action,a1,a2,a3,a4) action(0,a1) action(1,a2) action(2,a3) action(3,a4)
#define FE_5(action,a1,a2,a3,a4,a5) action(0,a1) action(1,a2) action(2,a3) action(3,a4) action(4,a5)
#define GET_MACRO(_1,_2,_3,_4,_5,NAME,...) NAME
%define FOR_EACH(action,...)
GET_MACRO(__VA_ARGS__, FE_5, FE_4, FE_3, FE_2, FE_1, FE_0)(action,__VA_ARGS__)
%enddef
// [4]
%define %std_tuple(Name, ...)
%rename(Name) std::tuple<__VA_ARGS__>;
namespace std {
struct tuple<__VA_ARGS__> {
// [5]
tuple(make_ctorarg(__VA_ARGS__));
%extend {
// [6]
FOR_EACH(make_getter, __VA_ARGS__)
FOR_EACH(make_setter, __VA_ARGS__)
size_t __len__() const { return std::tuple_size<std::decay_t<decltype(*$self)>>{}; }
%pythoncode %{
# [7]
def __getitem__(self, n):
if n >= len(self): raise IndexError()
return getattr(self, 'get%d' % n)()
def __setitem__(self, n, val):
if n >= len(self): raise IndexError()
getattr(self, 'set%d' % n)(val)
%}
}
};
}
%enddef
This is just the extra includes we need for our macro to work
These apply to each of the type arguments we supply to our %std_tuple macro invocation, we need to be careful with commas here to keep the syntax correct.
This is the mechanics of our FOR_EACH macro, which invokes each action per argument in our variadic macro argument list
Finally the definition of %std_tuple can begin. Essentially this is manually doing the work of %template for each specialisation of std::tuple we care to name inside of the std namespace.
We use our macro for each magic to declare a constructor with arguments for each element of the correct type. The actual implementation here is the default one from the C++ library which is exactly what we need/want though.
We use our FOR_EACH macro twice to make a member function get0, get1, getN of the correct type of each tuple element and the correct number of them for the template argument size. Likewise for setN. Doing it this way allows the usual SWIG typemaps for double, etc. or whatever types your tuple contains to be applied automatically and correctly for each call to std::get<N>. These are really just an implementation detail, not intended to be part of the public interface, but exposing them makes no real odds.
Finally we need an implementation of __getitem__ and a corresponding __setitem__. These simply look up and call the right getN/setN function on the class and call that instead. We take care to raise IndexError instead of the default exception if an invalid index is used as this will stop iteration correctly when we try to iterate of the tuple.
This is then sufficient that we can run our target code and get the following output:
$ swig3.0 -python -c++ -Wall test.i && g++ -shared -o _test.so test_wrap.cxx -I/usr/include/python3.7 -m32 && python3.7 run.py
<test.TupleDD; proxy of <Swig Object of type 'std::tuple< double,double > *' at 0xf766a260> >
['__class__', '__del__', '__delattr__', '__dict__', '__dir__', '__doc__', '__eq__', '__format__', '__ge__', '__getattr__', '__getattribute__', '__getitem__', '__gt__', '__hash__', '__init__', '__init_subclass__', '__le__', '__len__', '__lt__', '__module__', '__ne__', '__new__', '__reduce__', '__reduce_ex__', '__repr__', '__setattr__', '__setitem__', '__sizeof__', '__str__', '__subclasshook__', '__swig_destroy__', '__swig_getmethods__', '__swig_setmethods__', '__weakref__', 'get0', 'get1', 'set0', 'set1', 'this']
0.0
1234.0
Generally this should work as you'd hope in most input/output situations in Python.
There are a few improvements we could look to make:
Implement repr
Implement slicing so that tuple[n:m] type indexing works
Handle unpacking like Python tuples.
Maybe do some more automatic conversions for compatible types?
Avoid calling __len__ for every get/setitem call, either by caching the value in the class itself, or postponing it until the method lookup fails?
Suppose a tool X need to developed which are written in C/C++ and having Tcl commanline interface, what will the steps or way?
I know about Tcl C API which can be used to extend Tcl by writing C extension for it.
What you're looking to do is embedding Tcl (totally a supported use case; Tcl remembers that it is a C library) but still making something tclsh-like. The simplest way of doing this is:
Grab a copy of tclAppInit.c (e.g., this is the current one in the Tcl 8.6 source tree as I write this) and adapt it, probably by putting the code to register your extra commands, linked variables, etc. in the Tcl_AppInit() function; you can probably trim a bunch of stuff out simply enough. Then build and link directly against the Tcl library (without stubs) to get effectively your own custom tclsh with your extra functionality.
You can use Tcl's API more extensively than that if you're not interested in interactive use. The core for non-interactive use is:
// IMPORTANT: Initialises the Tcl library internals!
Tcl_FindExecutable(argv[0]);
Tcl_Interp *interp = Tcl_CreateInterp();
// Register your custom stuff here
int code = Tcl_Eval(interp, "your script");
// Or Tcl_EvalFile(interp, "yourScriptFile.tcl");
const char *result = Tcl_GetStringResult(interp);
if (code == TCL_ERROR) {
// Really good idea to print out error messages
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %s\n", result);
// Probably a good idea to print error traces too; easier from in Tcl
Tcl_Eval(interp, "puts stderr $errorInfo");
exit(1);
}
// Print a non-empty result
if (result[0]) {
printf("%s\n", result);
}
That's about all you need unless you're doing interactive use, and that's when Tcl_Main() becomes really useful (it handles quite a few extra fiddly details), which the sample tclAppInit.c (mentioned above) shows how to use.
Usually, SWIG (Simplified Wrapper and Interface Generator) is the way to go.
SWIG HOMEPAGE
This way, you can write code in C/C++ and define which interface you want to expose.
suppose you have some C functions you want added to Tcl:
/* File : example.c */
#include <time.h>
double My_variable = 3.0;
int fact(int n) {
if (n <= 1) return 1;
else return n*fact(n-1);
}
int my_mod(int x, int y) {
return (x%y);
}
char *get_time()
{
time_t ltime;
time(<ime);
return ctime(<ime);
}
Now, in order to add these files to your favorite language, you need to write an "interface file" which is the input to SWIG. An interface file for these C functions might look like this :
/* example.i */
%module example
%{
/* Put header files here or function declarations like below */
extern double My_variable;
extern int fact(int n);
extern int my_mod(int x, int y);
extern char *get_time();
%}
extern double My_variable;
extern int fact(int n);
extern int my_mod(int x, int y);
extern char *get_time();
At the UNIX prompt, type the following:
unix % swig -tcl example.i
unix % gcc -fpic -c example.c example_wrap.c \
-I/usr/local/include
unix % gcc -shared example.o example_wrap.o -o example.so
unix % tclsh
% load ./example.so example
% puts $My_variable
3.0
% fact 5
120
% my_mod 7 3
1
% get_time
Sun Feb 11 23:01:07 2018
The swig command produces a file example_wrap.c that should be compiled and linked with the rest of the program. In this case, we have built a dynamically loadable extension that can be loaded into the Tcl interpreter using the 'load' command.
Taken from http://www.swig.org/tutorial.html
I'm writing a CUDA kernel that is compiled at runtime using NVRTC (CUDA version 9.2 with NVRTC version 7.5), which needs the stdint.h header, in order to have the int32_t etc. types.
If I write the kernel source code without the include, it works correctly. For example the kernel
extern "C" __global__ void f() { ... }
Compiles to PTX code where f is defined as .visible .entry f.
But if the kernel source code is
#include <stdint.h>
extern "C" __global__ void f() { ... }
it reports A function without execution space annotations (__host__/__device__/__global__) is considered a host function, and host functions are not allowed in JIT mode. (also without extern "C").
Passing -default-device makes the PTX code .visible .func f, so the function cannot be called from the host.
Is there a way to include headers in the source code, and still have a __global__ entry function? Or alternately, a way to know which integer size convention is used on the by the NVRTC compiler, so that the int32_t etc. types can be manually defined?
Edit:
Example program that shows the problem:
#include <cstdlib>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <memory>
#include <cassert>
#include <iostream>
#include <cuda.h>
#include <cuda_runtime.h>
#include <nvrtc.h>
[[noreturn]] void fail(const std::string& msg, int code) {
std::cerr << "error: " << msg << " (" << code << ')' << std::endl;
std::exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
std::unique_ptr<char[]> compile_to_ptx(const char* program_source) {
nvrtcResult rv;
// create nvrtc program
nvrtcProgram prog;
rv = nvrtcCreateProgram(
&prog,
program_source,
"program.cu",
0,
nullptr,
nullptr
);
if(rv != NVRTC_SUCCESS) fail("nvrtcCreateProgram", rv);
// compile nvrtc program
std::vector<const char*> options = {
"--gpu-architecture=compute_30"
};
//options.push_back("-default-device");
rv = nvrtcCompileProgram(prog, options.size(), options.data());
if(rv != NVRTC_SUCCESS) {
std::size_t log_size;
rv = nvrtcGetProgramLogSize(prog, &log_size);
if(rv != NVRTC_SUCCESS) fail("nvrtcGetProgramLogSize", rv);
auto log = std::make_unique<char[]>(log_size);
rv = nvrtcGetProgramLog(prog, log.get());
if(rv != NVRTC_SUCCESS) fail("nvrtcGetProgramLog", rv);
assert(log[log_size - 1] == '\0');
std::cerr << "Compile error; log:\n" << log.get() << std::endl;
fail("nvrtcCompileProgram", rv);
}
// get ptx code
std::size_t ptx_size;
rv = nvrtcGetPTXSize(prog, &ptx_size);
if(rv != NVRTC_SUCCESS) fail("nvrtcGetPTXSize", rv);
auto ptx = std::make_unique<char[]>(ptx_size);
rv = nvrtcGetPTX(prog, ptx.get());
if(rv != NVRTC_SUCCESS) fail("nvrtcGetPTX", rv);
assert(ptx[ptx_size - 1] == '\0');
nvrtcDestroyProgram(&prog);
return ptx;
}
const char program_source[] = R"%%%(
//#include <stdint.h>
extern "C" __global__ void f(int* in, int* out) {
out[threadIdx.x] = in[threadIdx.x];
}
)%%%";
int main() {
CUresult rv;
// initialize CUDA
rv = cuInit(0);
if(rv != CUDA_SUCCESS) fail("cuInit", rv);
// compile program to ptx
auto ptx = compile_to_ptx(program_source);
std::cout << "PTX code:\n" << ptx.get() << std::endl;
}
When //#include <stdint.h> in the kernel source is uncommented it no longer compiles. When //options.push_back("-default-device"); is uncommented it compiles but does not mark the function f as .entry.
CMakeLists.txt to compile it (needs CUDA driver API + NVRTC)
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.4)
project(cudabug CXX)
find_package(CUDA REQUIRED)
set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 14)
set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED 14)
add_executable(cudabug cudabug.cc)
include_directories(SYSTEM ${CUDA_INCLUDE_DIRS})
link_directories(${CUDA_LIBRARY_DIRS})
target_link_libraries(cudabug PUBLIC ${CUDA_LIBRARIES} nvrtc cuda)
[Preface: this is a very hacky answer, and is specific to the GNU toolchain (although I suspect the problem in the question is also specific to the GNU toolchain)].
It would appear that the problem here is with the GNU standard header features.h, which gets pulled into stdint.h and then winds up defining a lot of stub functions which have the default __host__ compilation space. This causes nvrtc to blow up. It also seems that the -default-device option will result in a resolved glibC compiler feature set which makes the whole nvrtc compiler fail.
You can defeat this (in a very hacky way) by predefining a feature set for the standard library which excludes all the host functions. Changing your JIT kernel code to
const char program_source[] = R"%%%(
#define __ASSEMBLER__
#define __extension__
#include <stdint.h>
extern "C" __global__ void f(int32_t* in, int32_t* out) {
out[threadIdx.x] = in[threadIdx.x];
}
)%%%";
got me this:
$ nvcc -std=c++14 -ccbin=g++-7 jit_header.cu -o jitheader -lnvrtc -lcuda
$ ./jitheader
PTX code:
//
// Generated by NVIDIA NVVM Compiler
//
// Compiler Build ID: CL-24330188
// Cuda compilation tools, release 9.2, V9.2.148
// Based on LLVM 3.4svn
//
.version 6.2
.target sm_30
.address_size 64
// .globl f
.visible .entry f(
.param .u64 f_param_0,
.param .u64 f_param_1
)
{
.reg .b32 %r<3>;
.reg .b64 %rd<8>;
ld.param.u64 %rd1, [f_param_0];
ld.param.u64 %rd2, [f_param_1];
cvta.to.global.u64 %rd3, %rd2;
cvta.to.global.u64 %rd4, %rd1;
mov.u32 %r1, %tid.x;
mul.wide.u32 %rd5, %r1, 4;
add.s64 %rd6, %rd4, %rd5;
ld.global.u32 %r2, [%rd6];
add.s64 %rd7, %rd3, %rd5;
st.global.u32 [%rd7], %r2;
ret;
}
Big caveat: This worked on the glibC system I tried it on. It probably won't work with other toolchains or libC implementations (if, indeed, they have this problem).
Another alternative is creating stand-ins, for some of the standard library headers. NVRTC's API supports your specifying header file contents as strings, associated with header names - before it will go looking through the filesystem for you. This approach is adopted in NVIDIA JITify, and I've adopted it myself working on something else which may or may not be released.
The easy way to do this You can just take the JITify header stubs for stdint.h, limits.h , from here, which I'm also attaching since it's not very long. Alternatively, you can generate this stub yourself to make sure you're not missing out on anything that's relevant from the standard. Here's how that works:
Start with your stdint.h file (or cstdint file as the case may be);
For each include directive in the file (and recursively, for each include in an include etc):
2.1 Figure out whether you can skip including the file altogether (possibly by making a few defines which are known to hold on the GPU).
2.2 If you're not sure you can skip the file - include it entirely and recurse to (2.), or keep it as its own separate header (and apply the whole process in (1.) to it).
You now have a header file which only includes device-safe header files (or none at all)
Partially-preprocess the file, dropping everything that won't be used on a GPU
Remove the lines which might be problematic on a GPU (e.g. #pragma's), and add __device__ __host__ or just __host__ as appropriate to each function declaration.
Important note: Doing this requires paying attention to licenses and copyrights. You would be creating a "derivative work" of glibc and/or JITify and/or StackOverflow contributions etc.
Now, the stdint.h and limits.h from NVIDIA JITify I promised. I've adapted them to not have namespaces:
stdint.h:
#pragma once
#include <limits.h>
typedef signed char int8_t;
typedef signed short int16_t;
typedef signed int int32_t;
typedef signed long long int64_t;
typedef signed char int_fast8_t;
typedef signed short int_fast16_t;
typedef signed int int_fast32_t;
typedef signed long long int_fast64_t;
typedef signed char int_least8_t;
typedef signed short int_least16_t;
typedef signed int int_least32_t;
typedef signed long long int_least64_t;
typedef signed long long intmax_t;
typedef signed long intptr_t; //optional
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
typedef unsigned short uint16_t;
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
typedef unsigned long long uint64_t;
typedef unsigned char uint_fast8_t;
typedef unsigned short uint_fast16_t;
typedef unsigned int uint_fast32_t;
typedef unsigned long long uint_fast64_t;
typedef unsigned char uint_least8_t;
typedef unsigned short uint_least16_t;
typedef unsigned int uint_least32_t;
typedef unsigned long long uint_least64_t;
typedef unsigned long long uintmax_t;
#define INT8_MIN SCHAR_MIN
#define INT16_MIN SHRT_MIN
#if defined _WIN32 || defined _WIN64
#define WCHAR_MIN SHRT_MIN
#define WCHAR_MAX SHRT_MAX
typedef unsigned long long uintptr_t; //optional
#else
#define WCHAR_MIN INT_MIN
#define WCHAR_MAX INT_MAX
typedef unsigned long uintptr_t; //optional
#endif
#define INT32_MIN INT_MIN
#define INT64_MIN LLONG_MIN
#define INT8_MAX SCHAR_MAX
#define INT16_MAX SHRT_MAX
#define INT32_MAX INT_MAX
#define INT64_MAX LLONG_MAX
#define UINT8_MAX UCHAR_MAX
#define UINT16_MAX USHRT_MAX
#define UINT32_MAX UINT_MAX
#define UINT64_MAX ULLONG_MAX
#define INTPTR_MIN LONG_MIN
#define INTMAX_MIN LLONG_MIN
#define INTPTR_MAX LONG_MAX
#define INTMAX_MAX LLONG_MAX
#define UINTPTR_MAX ULONG_MAX
#define UINTMAX_MAX ULLONG_MAX
#define PTRDIFF_MIN INTPTR_MIN
#define PTRDIFF_MAX INTPTR_MAX
#define SIZE_MAX UINT64_MAX
limits.h:
#pragma once
#if defined _WIN32 || defined _WIN64
#define __WORDSIZE 32
#else
#if defined __x86_64__ && !defined __ILP32__
#define __WORDSIZE 64
#else
#define __WORDSIZE 32
#endif
#endif
#define MB_LEN_MAX 16
#define CHAR_BIT 8
#define SCHAR_MIN (-128)
#define SCHAR_MAX 127
#define UCHAR_MAX 255
enum {
_JITIFY_CHAR_IS_UNSIGNED = (char)-1 >= 0,
CHAR_MIN = _JITIFY_CHAR_IS_UNSIGNED ? 0 : SCHAR_MIN,
CHAR_MAX = _JITIFY_CHAR_IS_UNSIGNED ? UCHAR_MAX : SCHAR_MAX,
};
#define SHRT_MIN (-32768)
#define SHRT_MAX 32767
#define USHRT_MAX 65535
#define INT_MIN (-INT_MAX - 1)
#define INT_MAX 2147483647
#define UINT_MAX 4294967295U
#if __WORDSIZE == 64
# define LONG_MAX 9223372036854775807L
#else
# define LONG_MAX 2147483647L
#endif
#define LONG_MIN (-LONG_MAX - 1L)
#if __WORDSIZE == 64
#define ULONG_MAX 18446744073709551615UL
#else
#define ULONG_MAX 4294967295UL
#endif
#define LLONG_MAX 9223372036854775807LL
#define LLONG_MIN (-LLONG_MAX - 1LL)
#define ULLONG_MAX 18446744073709551615ULL
My C code is like bellow.
// file.c
#include <stdio.h>
#define value 10
#define value 20
void func()
{
printf("%d\n",value);
}
My Interface file is like bellow.
//sample.i
%module sample
%{
#include "func.c"
%}
%include "func.c"`
When I run the command "swig -python sample.i", I am getting the error like bellow.
Macro 'value' redefined. The previous definition of 'value' is there.
How to handle this?
Interesting that swig considers it an error, but the compiler (mine anyway) considers it a warning. If you can't fix the header, you can do:
//sample.i
%module sample
%{
#include "func.c"
%}
#define value 20
void func()
{
printf("%d\n",value);
}
Basically, expand the header file inline and remove the offending line from swig processing. Otherwise, fix the header.
If I have these two C++ files:
foo.cpp:
#include "foo.h"
void foo(Foo* p) {};
foo.h:
class Foo {};
void foo(Foo*);
I can write this SWIG interface
%{
#include "foo.h"
%}
%include <cpointer.i>
%pointer_class(Foo, Foop)
%include "foo.h"
compile, and call
>>>p = Foop()
>>>foo(p)
How do I write the interface if Foo is typedef instead
typedef int Foo;
so that I can do the same Python calls as above?
I don't think %pointer_class is meant to be used with a typedef. SWIG considers a typedef the same as the original type and doesn't generate a wrapper for the typedef-ed name. For example, SWIG only generates Bar for Python:
%module x
%inline %{
class Bar {};
typedef Bar Foo;
void foo(Foo* p) {};
%}
Output:
>>> import x
>>> x.Foo
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'Foo'
>>> p=x.Bar()
>>> x.foo(p)
>>>
So I believe your case with typedef int Foo; and %pointer_class(Foo, Foop) doesn't work because the Foo wrapper doesn't exist. I found that the below "trick" works for a class and an int if you use a typedef in both cases and use the same value for both parameters of %pointer_class:
%module x
%inline %{
class Bar {};
typedef Bar Foo;
void foo(Foo* p) {};
%}
%include <cpointer.i>
%pointer_class(Foo, Foo) // doesn't work if 2nd param doesn't match 1st.
And:
%module x
%inline %{
typedef int Foo;
void foo(Foo* p) {};
%}
%include <cpointer.i>
%pointer_class(Foo, Foo) // doesn't work if 2nd param doesn't match 1st.
But if you really want an opaque type, don't let SWIG see the definition at all by only forward declaring the class and hiding the definition:
%module x
%inline %{
class Foo;
void foo(Foo* p);
%}
%include <cpointer.i>
%pointer_class(Foo, Foop)