Two blocks based on different tables with same structure. Control field determines which table shows data. Data exists in both tables. Problem is data is only displayed from table that is block 1. Block 2 never shows data. What is the trick to allow data to be seen in block 2. Both blocks sit on same canvas. Thanks.
Create the relationship between this two blocks and data will be automatically retrived based on this relation..
P.S: I hope there will be some relation between this two table..
simply add the following code to the when-new-form-instance:
`go_block('block_one');
execute_query;
go_block('block_two');
execute_query;`
I hope it works for you
Related
I've been trying to figure this out, but I'm struggling.
Working in Microsoft Report Builder (latest version), I have a table that, for the most part, contains general information from a specific table, which I'll call GeneralInfo. In that table, each person has only a single row containing information about that person. However, one of my columns has a one-to-many relationship with the rest of the row. I'll call this other column DetailInfo.
This table provides an example of the kind of thing I'm going for:
In this example, all of the white cells come from the GeneralInfo table. The Orange cell may include many rows of work history, and each entry includes multiple elements from the DetailInfo table, separated by Newlines. The two tables can be matched / joined on the ID value.
This may not be the best way to go about a report, but it's part of the spec I was given. I know this can be done, but I'm having trouble learning how. Can anyone help me out?
Edit - I just found out that another column is also potentially one-to-many. In the example table, it would be saying that the "Occupation" value comes from the DetailInfo table, rather than the GeneralInfo table.
In MOST circumstances, this would just be "Construction Foreman" over and over again, and we would only want to show that once. However, in rare circumstances, an individual may have multiple concurrent (differing) Occupation values that would have to be shown. Is that possible? Should I make that a separate question?
I took Soundappan A's advice and created a sub-report in the column that needed the extra data. This video was helpful to me in learning how to set that up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhSitVAnhyc
I have a table that contains data from repeated experiments (for example, site A has one sample, and the lab processed the sample three times obtaining slightly different values). I need to average these results in a separate table, but what I have read on the Microsoft support site is that a query that pulls data into another table with a calculated field is not possible on Access.
Can I query multiple data points from one table into a single calculated field in another table? Thank you.
UPDATE
I ended up doing a lot of manual adjustments of the file format to create a calculated field in the existing table that averages each sites data, so my problem is, for my current purposes, solved. However I would still like to understand. Following up with you both, I think the problem was that I had repeated non-unique IDs between rows when I probably should have made data columns with unique variable names so that I could query each variable name for an average.
So, instead of putting each site separately on the y axis, I formatted it by putting the sample number for each site on the x-axis:
I was able to at least create a calculated field using this second format in order to create an average value for each site.
Would have there been a way to write a query using the first method? Luckily, my data set was not at all very hefty, so I could handle a reformat manually, but if the case were with thousands of data entries, I couldn't have done that.
Also, here is the link to the site I mentioned originally https://support.office.com/en-ie/article/add-a-calculated-field-to-a-table-14a60733-2580-48c2-b402-6de54fafbde3.
Thanks all.
I have a data set where i'm using a table to display Name, Radio #, and Unit # information in SSRS tablix. As some of the groups have 60+ members, i thought it would be better to expand the tables into 4 columns repeating those detail fields instead of displaying a 3 page long skinny table. In the SQL i used a row count%4 function to assign a "position" number 0-3 for each name. If i create a table with the detail members above and then add a parent column group on position, i get the tables repeated as i want but each name/radio/unit appears on a unique row. I've tried several different ways of grouping rows/columns but always seem to get this staggered table (with only name/radio to make it easier to digest): sample_pic
Sorry if this is a duplicate. I've really searched quite a bit before putting this in but it's probably the case that if i knew what to search, i wouldn't be putting this question in. So if you'd rather tell me what to search i can do that too. :)
SSRS will display a row in the table for each row returned from the dataset, this is normal behaviour for data to display.
One way to get what you want is to create a query which has all the information form your column headings in one row, probably with a pivot or similar.
Or you could just display your columns in separate tables.
I'm using Microsoft Office Access as my DBMS and I'm using VBA to write my code for this project.
I'm doing data scraping for items on a website and I encountered something that appeared odd to me after I had inserted my data into a table.
In my code I use a loop to iterate through and collect all the items that the website has to offer. Once I have all the data for one item I insert it into my table and then move on to the next. There's 14,724 items that I need to insert into my table. If I iterate over all of them, they will be added to the table but they are out of order once I look at them in the table, even though all the items are there, however if I adjust the loop to only collect...let's say only the first 10 items then they will appear in the same order in which they were collected which is the same order they appear in the source code for the website.
It is important to note that my table does not have an id field because it is not required as there's one other field that serves as a unique identifier for an item in the table.
This does not seem like a big issue but I'm curious as to why this happens. Is there some kind of limitation when using MS-Access as your DBMS?
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
A table is not a spreadsheet.
This is by design of any relational database engine. Records in a table have no order other than what you eventually assign or apply.
If you want to sort the data (ascending or descending) use a Query. The Table doesn't have any order. Even the Fields don't have any relevant order.
Is it possible with LINQ to do a cross tab query to add new columns? These columns come from a second and third table and need to be converted to JSON to be displayed in a Telerik table.
One table contains the name of the columns that need to be displayed and the other contains the value for the rows of each column, and this relates to the first table, which has the main related data.
I have investigated dynamically creating the extra columns, but also come unstuck as they need to go through JSON serialization, as well as the difficulties of creating new properties within any class dynamically.
Any ideas would be helpful.
Regards
Mark
I hope this helps, although I'm not sure I understand completely what you're asking ...
Since you're serializing to JSON anyway (and so presumably are not overly concerned with schema/type info), I would suggest just using a Dictionary and populating your data that way. It sounds like you could run some kind of nested loop, cycling through the column names from the one table, and pulling the values from each column from the second table.
EDIT
BTW, it is possible to do dynamic properties using System.ComponentModel, although this seems like overkill from how you described your scenario (you don't require data binding, for instance). Here's a good post on SO, if you're interested: Data binding dynamic data