So I want to create an array that would contain my App's UNViewControllers. I'm using a navigationcontroller to switch between views. What my overall aim is to use this Array so that I can load the views using this array. My only problem is I don't have an idea how I would utilise this function. Do I need to create the array in my Projects AppDelegate file so I can apply the Array to all my sub ViewControllers? Any advice would be really helpful. Thanks in advance!
You have a navigation controller right? So you don't need an array of viewcontrollers, the navigation controller will handle it. Just give each view controller an identifier in interface builder (storyboard) and then use:
MyViewController *vc = [self.storyboard instantiateViewControllerWithIdentifier:#"MyVCIdentifier"];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:vc animated:YES];
Related
I want to create a controller based JavaFX GUI consisting of multiple controllers.
The task I can't accomplish is to pass parameters from one Scene to another AND back.
Or in other words:
The MainController loads SubController's fxml, passes an object to SubController, switches the scene. There shall not be two open windows.
After it's work is done, the SubController shall then switch the scene back to the MainController and pass some object back.
This is where I fail.
This question is very similar to this one but still unanswered. Passing Parameters JavaFX FXML
It was also mentioned in the comments:
"This work when you pass parameter from first controller to second but how to pass parameter from second to first controller,i mean after first.fxml was loaded.
– Xlint Xms Sep 18 '17 at 23:15"
I used the first approach in the top answer of that thread.
Does anyone have a clue how to achieve this without external libs?
There are numerous ways to do this.
Here is one solution, which passes a Consumer to another controller. The other controller can invoke the consumer to accept the result once it has completed its work. The sample is based on the example code from an answer to the question that you linked.
public Stage showCustomerDialog(Customer customer) {
FXMLLoader loader = new FXMLLoader(
getClass().getResource(
"customerDialog.fxml"
)
);
Stage stage = new Stage(StageStyle.DECORATED);
stage.setScene(
new Scene(
(Pane) loader.load()
)
);
Consumer<CustomerInteractionResult> onComplete = result -> {
// update main screen based upon result.
};
CustomerDialogController controller =
loader.<CustomerDialogController>getController();
controller.initData(customer, onComplete);
stage.show();
return stage;
}
...
class CustomerDialogController() {
#FXML private Label customerName;
private Consumer<CustomerInteractionResult> onComplete
void initialize() {}
void initData(Customer customer, Consumer<CustomerInteractionResult> onComplete) {
customerName.setText(customer.getName());
this.onComplete = onComplete;
}
#FXML
void onSomeInteractionLikeCloseDialog(ActionEvent event) {
onComplete.accept(new CustomerInteractionResult(someDataGatheredByDialog));
}
}
Another way to do this is to add a result property to the controller of the dialog screen and interested invokers could listen to or retrieve the result property. A result property is how the in-built JavaFX dialogs work, so you would be essentially imitating some of that functionality.
If you have a lot of this passing back and forth stuff going on, a shared dependency injection model based on something like Gluon Ignite, might assist you.
I've used AfterBurner.fx for dependency injection, which is very slick and powerful as long as you follow the conventions. It's not necessarily an external lib if you just copy the 3 classes into your structure. Although you do need the javax Inject jar, so I guess it is an eternal reference.
Alternately, if you have a central "screen" from which most of your application branches out you could use property binding probably within a singleton pattern. There are some good articles on using singleton in JavaFX, like this one. I did that for a small application that works really great, but defining all of those bindings can get out of hand if there are a lot of properties.
To pass data back, the best approach is probably to fire custom Events, which the parent controller subscribes to with Node::addEventHandler. See How to emit and handle custom events? for context.
In complex cases when the two controllers have no reference to each other, a Event Bus as #jewelsea mentioned is the superior option.
For overall architecture, this Reddit comment provides some good detail: https://www.reddit.com/r/java/comments/7c4vhv/are_there_any_canonical_javafx_design_patterns/dpnsedh/
I've created a library class file in my CakePHP 2.0 app. It's a single PHP class called emailManager Which exists within a folder emailManager within CakePHP's libaray folder. I would love to know what is the simplest way to reference the database from this library class.
I would love to be able to do something like $this->AppModel->query("SELECT * FROM some_table_in_my_db"), that way I do not have to track DB configurations in separate places, but I'm not sure how to achieve this.
Also, I feel it is important to mention that the tables I am working with do not adhere to CakePHP table naming convention. They predate our use of CakePHP and so I cannot change my tables to fit CakePHP's model format. this is why I want generic database access via something like query
EDIT: I have constructed a temporary solution, but I know a better one is possible.
I have a model in my cake app called MySimpleConstuct and then in the library file I include the MySimpleConstruct Model as followed:
// import this model
$this->GivenModel = ClassRegistry::init('MySimpleConstruct');
$this->GivenModel = new MySimpleConstruct();
// Then it is possible to do as followed:
$table_data = $this->GivenModel->query('SELECT * FROM like_some_table_dude' WHERE 1);
This is not ideal so I still searching for a better solution.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
#John Galt, I suppose it's not an exact duplicate but it is very similar and the resolution does appear to apply to your situation very directly.
The other technique you could consider using would be to instantiate the Library in the controller and than give it a reference of the model.
class TestController extends AppController {
function index(){
App::uses('TheLibrary', 'Lib');
$obj = new TheLibrary();
$obj->GivenModel = &$this->GivenModel;
}
}
-EDIT-
And then within the library you've written do something like this.
class TheLibrary {
var $GivenModel = null;
function some_query(){
return $this->GivenModel->query('SELECT * FROM like_some_table_dude WHERE 1');
}
}
The first code snippet is of the Controller instantiating your library and then giving the library a reference to the Model as the property GivenModel. The "&" symbol makes the assignment a reference (see How does the '&' symbol in PHP affect the outcome?). The second code snippet is of a sample of how the library would use that property.
I do understand that you are trying to use a model from the library and that is what the solution you have in your edit and my proposed solution both do. However I will note again that this is not proper MVC convention and you should reconsider how you are using Libraries.
I've got a huge storyboard with lots of views defined. Now I created an additional view (and it's view controller) completely in code. How do I use that new, code-generated view in a storyboard? To make this a little bit more clear: I have three view controllers: A, B and C. A and C are defined via storyboards and work just fine. B is the one I generated in code. How do I wire this up?
I found a quite a few answers—but all of them did only work the other way around.
Thanks!
–f
You can only wire those code-generated view controllers with code too.
Firstly, create the subclass of the viewController, e.g. A and C, that you have in storyboard so that you can modify those view controllers from storyboard with code.
Then, use the navigationController pushViewController:animated: method to push the code-generated view controller, e.g. B or the view controller methods, e.g. A or C, presentViewController:animated:completion: to present the view controller modally.
If you want to push view controllers from storyboard within code-generated view controllers, you can use the storyboard method instantiateViewControllerWithIdentifier:. Just remember to set the Storyboard ID of the view controllers.
i'd like to know if i can call a controller action inside a template, and inside another controller in fatFree framework (F3).
I'm not sure if i understand you corrently, but calling a Class method in Template would go like this:
{{ MyConroller->doSomething() }}
Of cause you could call one controller within another too... just use raw php
$obj = new MyController();
$obj->foo();
or use the F3 call method $f3->call('MyController->doSomething');
Also check out the new API docs.
http://fatfreeframework.com/base#call
It's still under construction, but hopefully you'll find more information about this or any other framework part very soon.
Many MVC purists would balk at the idea of a View (template) calling methods on the Controller. They would say that the controller needs to provide the data that the view needs, or at least give it the Model, so that it can retrieve data from there.
Furthermore, the View probably shouldn't be doing anything (or asking another component to do anything), other than generating the display. But can query the Model for data. But maybe by doSomething() you do mean getSomeData().
While I'm not an MVC purist I do agree with the idea of keeping logic and functionality out of the view if at all possible.
I've got a collection of custom objects with a method, Update(), in each of them. I need a way to iterate over the collection and call that method. This is easy to do in C# with a List, but I'm not sure how to do it in ActionScript. Any help that you could provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
have a look at Array.foreach()
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/FlashPlatform/reference/actionscript/3/Array.html#forEach%28%29
So, after some experimentation, I found that you can type the iteration variable in the look to the object that the list is composed of, and it opens up all the methods and properties in that object:
for each(var ship:Ship in ships)
{
ship.Update();
}
Not too sure if this is GOOD to do or not, but it works...