the scripts i've been working with in SQL work with close to 40,000 records and i've noticed a huge increase in execution time for when i use an UPDATE command
in 2 tables that have like 10 fields in them each, INSERT executes quicker for both combined than this UPDATE command
UPADTE table1
INNER JOIN table2 ON table1.primarykey = table2.primarykey
SET table1.code = table2.code
really what the UPDATE is doing is copying the code from one table to another where the identical records exists, this is because table1 is a staging table between 2 databases while table2 is a possessing table to insert staging table's data across multiple tables, both tables have the same number of record which is about 40,000
now to me UPDATE should be executing a lot quicker, considering it's only connecting 2 identical tables and inserting data for 1 field it should be running quicker than 2 INSERTS where 40,000 records are being created over 10 fields (so in other words, inserting 800,000 pieces of data) and i'm running the queries in a SQL console windows to avoid php timeouts
is UPDATE somehow more resource hungry than INSERT and is there any way to get it to go faster (apart from changing the fact that i use a separate table for processing, the staging table updates frequently so i copy the data like a snapshot and work with that, the code field is NULL to begin with so i only copy over records with a NULL code meaning records where code is not NULLhave already been worked with)
Is that UPDATE command the actual SQL? Because you need a WHERE clause to avoid updating every record in the table...
Also, INSERT doesn't first need to find the record to update from 2 joined tables.
Related
I'm working on automating the process of building a database. This is a database that needs daily updates after one build.
This database has 51 tables, divided into 3 schemas (there are 17 tables in each schema), and has a total of 20 million records, each record with a PK of manage_number .
I need to update 2000~3000 records every day, but I don't know which method to use.
Make a table for PK indexing
This is a method to separately create a table with a PK and a table name with a PK in the same database. To create a table with metadata about which table the manage_number is stored in. Currently, this methodology is applied. The problem is that the build time takes 5-6 times longer than before (increased from 2 minutes to 12 minutes).
Multi-table update query
This is how to perform update query on 17 tables with the same schema. However, in this case, the load in the FROM clause is expected to be very high, and I think it will be a burden on the server.
Update query may looks like below.
UPDATE table1, table2, table3, ..., table17
SET data_here
WHERE manage_number = 'TARGET_NUMBER';
Please share which way is better, or if you have a better way.
Thank you.
Good morning.
I have a table on MySQL DataBase.
In this table there are 5 robots that can write like 10 record each per hour.
Every 3 month a script that I have created, make a copy of the table and then delete all the table entries (In this way I can keep the IDs in a certain order).
My question is.
That are two different statement:
CREATE TABLE omologationResult_{date} AS SELECT * FROM omologationResult
DELETE FROM omologationResult
if the script is going to copy the table at point 0, and a record will be added from the robots, there's no problem, because the SQL statement starts from the lowest ID 'till the end. But if the script is going to delete the table and the robot is writing in it. What will happen? I lose the last robot record?
And if it's true. What can I do to make a copy of the table and then remove only the data that I've copied?
Thank you
Yes, this is not a safe operation because it's not atomic. It's quite possible for another thread to insert values into that table in between your CREATE .. SELECT and the DELETE. One option you have is to use a multi table DELETE
CREATE TABLE omologationResult_{date} AS SELECT * FROM omologationResult;
DELETE omologationResult FROM omologationResult
INNER JOIN omologationResult_{date} ON omologationResult_{date}.id = omologationResult.id
Will ensure that only items that exist in both tables have been deleted from omologationResult
Does any one how can I only sync the new records from table A to table B in SSIS?
I have 2 tables which table A and table B. Table A will be update time to time from user. However, records from table B is sync from table A every 30 mins. I have created a SSIS job to do the sync, see below for more details:
I have an issue here, every times when I'm ruining the job, it will copy all data from table A and insert into table B (this causing duplicate records had been insert). Any way that I can set the job so that it will only sync the new records into table B?
I would use a MERGE statement into an execute SQL Task.
Please review some examples about how to use the merge command:
Using MERGE in SQL Server to insert, update and delete at the same time
The MERGE Statement in SQL Server 2008
Kind Regards,
Paul
I have two tables T1 and T2 and want to update one field of T1 from T2 where T2 holds massive data.
What is more efficient?
Updating T1 in a for loop iteration over the values
or
Left join it with T2 and update.
Please note that i'm updating these tables in a shell script
In general, the JOIN will always work much better than a loop. The size should not be an issue if it is properly indexed.
There is no simple answer which will be more effective, it will depend on table size and data size to which you are going to update in one go.
Suppose you are using innodb engine and trying to update 1,000 or more rows in one go with 2 heavy tables join and it is quite frequent then it will not be good idea on production server as it will lock your table for some time and due to this locking some other operations also can be hit on your production server.
Option1: If you are trying to update few rows and based on proper indexed fields (preferred based on primary key) then you can go with join.
Option2: If you are trying to update a large amount of data based on multiple tables join then below option will be better:
Step1: Create a stored procedure.
Step2: Keep below query results in a cursor.
suppose you want TO UPDATE corresponding field2 DATA of TABLE table2 IN field1 of TABLE table1:
SELECT a.primary_key,b.field2 FROM table1 a JOIN table2 b ON a.primary_key=b.foreign_key WHERE [place CONDITION here IF any...];
Step3: Now update all rows one by one based on primary key using stored values in cursor.
Step4: You can call this stored procedure from your script.
I have this query that works fine. Its deletes records that are old based on current time.
$cleanacc_1 = "DELETE FROM $acc_1
WHERE `Scheduled` < DATE_SUB(UTC_TIMESTAMP(), INTERVAL 30 SECOND)";
$result = mysql_query($cleanacc_1);
However, there are over 100 tables (accounts) that need deleting and I was wondering if I can combine them into one query. If possible how?
This implies you create a new table for every account. Why are you not creating a record for each account within a single table?
For example...
create table account (id int unsigned primary key auto_increment, other fields...);
If you alter your table structure you will be able to delete individual account records with a single query...
delete from account where condition=true;
Individual transaction records for each account are then stored in another table and contain the account id they relate to...
create table transaction (id, account_id, other transaction fields);
If you don't change the database design you'll need to write PHP code that loops through each table and runs your delete query. This is very inefficient and I urge you to redesign the table as suggested.
If you don't understand why my table redsign suggestion is a better approach, post more information about your database and I'll explain in more detail with a working example.
No way to do that, AFAIK; anyways, I don't think it would be a big problem to run 100 queries, assuming you are not running that for each request or so..
Are you expecting performance issues? If that's the case, I'd probably use a cron job to run that query every X minutes..
You could setup a view of the tables and do then run the delete sql against the view. That should delete the underlying table data as well. Your table schema and permissions could have an affect whether this will work or not. Check out this answer, it might help as well.
Does deleting row from view delete row from base table - MYsql?
Please consider the following example.
I have three tables in following structure.
Table names : t1,t2,t3
Fields : Id, name
Im going to perform delete query with one condition which recode id must less than 10.
DELETE FROM t1, t2,t3 USING t1 INNER JOIN t2 INNER JOIN t3 WHERE t1.id<10 and t2.id<10 and t3.id<10.
The query has been successfully executed ( MySql ). I got the expected output.
So please try the same way with your condition.