Is it possible to reset a resolved jQuery object to an 'unresolved' state and kick off it's initialization and callbacks all over again?
The specific thing I'm doing is that I have a jQuery deferred wrapper over the local file system api. From there I build up higher level deferreds for the things I care about:
var getFs = defFs.requestQuota(PERSISTENT, 1024*1024)
.pipe (bytes) -> defFs.requestFs(PERSISTENT, bytes)
var getCacheContents = getFs.pipe (fileSystem) ->
defFs.getDirectory('Cache', fileSystem.root).pipe (dir) ->
defFs.readEntries(dir)
Now most of the time, when I call getCacheContents I don't mind the memo-ized values being returned, in fact I prefer it. But, on the occasion when I want to write to the cache I really would like the ability to reset that pipe and have it re-select and rescan the cache next time its accessed.
I could cobble something together from $.Callbacks but a deferred-based solution would really be ideal.
No. A Promise is by definition a thing that resolves only once - from unresolved to fulfilled OR to rejected. You will not be able to do this with jQuery's Deferreds.
What you are actually searching for are Signals. They are to be fired more than once, but provide a similiar interface. There are some implementations around, you might ceck out js-signals or wire.js.
The only solution I could find is to reset the $.Deferred object and return new Promise from that one. It works together with some internal API dirty checking (if something gets edited / deleted), but would be more performant to just reset the existing $.Deferred and let it re-resolve on the next Promise request.
An example of a possible solution is:
$.myDeferredList = [];
$.createRestorableDeferred = function(a,b) {
// JUST BY SIMPLE $.when().then();
$.myDeferredList[a] = {
deferred: $.Deferred()
, then: b
,restore : function() {
$.myDeferredList['myReady'].deferred = $.Deferred();
$.when($.myDeferredList['myReady'].deferred).then($.myDeferredList['myReady'].then);
}
,resolve : function() {
$.myDeferredList['myReady'].deferred.resolve();
}
}
$.when($.myDeferredList['myReady'].deferred).then($.myDeferredList['myReady'].then);
window[a] = $.myDeferredList['myReady'];
}
var counter = 0;
$.createRestorableDeferred('myReady', function () {
console.log('>> myReady WHEN called',++counter);
$.myDeferredList['myReady'].restore();
});
// RESOLVING ways
$.myDeferredList['myReady'].deferred.resolve();
$.myDeferredList.myReady.deferred.resolve();
myReady.resolve();
Results in console:
>> myReady WHEN called 1
>> myReady WHEN called 2
>> myReady WHEN called 3
Related
With gulp you often see patterns like this:
gulp.watch('src/*.jade',['templates']);
gulp.task('templates', function() {
return gulp.src('src/*.jade')
.pipe(jade({
pretty: true
}))
.pipe(gulp.dest('dist/'))
.pipe( livereload( server ));
});
Does this actually pass the watch'ed files into the templates task? How do these overwrite/extend/filter the src'ed tasks?
I had the same question some time ago and came to the following conclusion after digging for a bit.
gulp.watch is an eventEmitter that emits a change event, and so you can do this:
var watcher = gulp.watch('src/*.jade',['templates']);
watcher.on('change', function(f) {
console.log('Change Event:', f);
});
and you'll see this:
Change Event: { type: 'changed',
path: '/Users/developer/Sites/stackoverflow/src/touch.jade' }
This information could presumably be passed to the template task either via its task function, or the behavior of gulp.src.
The task function itself can only receive a callback (https://github.com/gulpjs/gulp/blob/master/docs/API.md#fn) and cannot receive any information about vinyl files (https://github.com/wearefractal/vinyl-fs) that are used by gulp.
The source starting a task (.watch in this case, or gulp command line) has no effect on the behavior of gulp.src('src-glob', [options]). 'src-glob' is a string (or array of strings) and options (https://github.com/isaacs/node-glob#options) has nothing about any file changes.
Hence, I don't see any way in which .watch could directly affect the behavior of a task it triggers.
If you want to process only the changed files, you can use gulp-changed (https://www.npmjs.com/package/gulp-changed) if you want to use gulp.watch, or you cold use gulp-watch.
Alternatively, you could do this as well:
var gulp = require('gulp');
var jade = require('gulp-jade');
var livereload = require('gulp-livereload');
gulp.watch('src/*.jade', function(event){
template(event.path);
});
gulp.task('templates', function() {
template('src/*.jade');
});
function template(files) {
return gulp.src(files)
.pipe(jade({
pretty: true
}))
.pipe(gulp.dest('dist/'))
}
One of the possible way to pass a parameter or a data from your watcher to a task. Is through using a global variable, or a variable that is in both blocks scops. Here is an example:
gulp.task('watch', function () {
//....
//json comments
watch('./app/tempGulp/json/**/*.json', function (evt) {
jsonCommentWatchEvt = evt; // we set the global variable first
gulp.start('jsonComment'); // then we start the task
})
})
//global variable
var jsonCommentWatchEvt = null
//json comments task
gulp.task('jsonComment', function () {
jsonComment_Task(jsonCommentWatchEvt)
})
And here the function doing the task work in case it interest any one, But know i didn't need to put the work in such another function i could just implemented it directly in the task. And for the file you have your global variable. Here it's jsonCommentWatchEvt. But know if you don't use a function as i did, a good practice is to assign the value of the global variable to a local one, that you will be using. And you do that at the all top entry of the task. So you will not be using the global variable itself. And that to avoid the problem that it can change by another watch handling triggering. When it stay in use by the current running task.
function jsonComment_Task(evt) {
console.log('handling : ' + evt.path);
gulp.src(evt.path, {
base: './app/tempGulp/json/'
}).
pipe(stripJsonComments({whitespace: false})).on('error', console.log).
on('data', function (file) { // here we want to manipulate the resulting stream
var str = file.contents.toString()
var stream = source(path.basename(file.path))
stream.end(str.replace(/\n\s*\n/g, '\n\n'))
stream.
pipe(gulp.dest('./app/json/')).on('error', console.log)
})
}
I had a directory of different json's files, where i will use comments on them. I'm watching them. When a file is modified the watch handling is triggered, and i need then to process only the file that was modified. To remove the comments, i used json-comment-strip plugin for that. Plus that i needed to do a more treatment. to remove the multiple successive line break. Whatever, at all first i needed to pass the path to the file that we can recover from the event parameter. I passed that to the task through a global variable, that does only that. Allow passing the data.
Note: Even though that doesn't have a relation with the question, in my example here, i needed to treat the stream getting out from the plugin processing. i used the on("data" event. it's asynchronous. so the task will mark the end before the work completely end (the task reach the end, but the launched asynchronous function will stay processing a little more). So the time you will get in the console at task end, isn't the time for the whole processing, but task block end. Just that you know. For me it doesn't matter.
There aren't many examples demonstrating indexedDB in a ServiceWorker yet, but the ones I saw were all structured like this:
const request = indexedDB.open( 'myDB', 1 );
var db;
request.onupgradeneeded = ...
request.onsuccess = function() {
db = this.result; // Average 8ms
};
self.onfetch = function(e)
{
const requestURL = new URL( e.request.url ),
path = requestURL.pathname;
if( path === '/test' )
{
const response = new Promise( function( resolve )
{
console.log( performance.now(), typeof db ); // Average 15ms
db.transaction( 'cache' ).objectStore( 'cache' ).get( 'test' ).onsuccess = function()
{
resolve( new Response( this.result, { headers: { 'content-type':'text/plain' } } ) );
}
});
e.respondWith( response );
}
}
Is this likely to fail when the ServiceWorker starts up, and if so what is a robust way of accessing indexedDB in a ServiceWorker?
Opening the IDB every time the ServiceWorker starts up is unlikely to be optimal, you'll end up opening it even when it isn't used. Instead, open the db when you need it. A singleton is really useful here (see https://github.com/jakearchibald/svgomg/blob/master/src/js/utils/storage.js#L5), so you don't need to open IDB twice if it's used twice in its lifetime.
The "activate" event is a great place to open IDB and let any "onupdateneeded" events run, as the old version of ServiceWorker is out of the way.
You can wrap a transaction in a promise like so:
var tx = db.transaction(scope, mode);
var p = new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
tx.onabort = function() { reject(tx.error); };
tx.oncomplete = function() { resolve(); };
});
Now p will resolve/reject when the transaction completes/aborts. So you can do arbitrary logic in the tx transaction, and p.then(...) and/or pass a dependent promise into e.respondWith() or e.waitUntil() etc.
As noted by other commenters, we really do need to promisify IndexedDB. But the composition of its post-task autocommit model and the microtask queues that Promises use make it... nontrivial to do so without basically completely replacing the API. But (as an implementer and one of the spec editors) I'm actively prototyping some ideas.
I don't know of anything special about accessing IndexedDB from the context of a service worker via accessing IndexedDB via a controlled page.
Promises obviously makes your life much easier within a service worker, so I've found using something like, e.g., https://gist.github.com/inexorabletash/c8069c042b734519680c to be useful instead of the raw IndexedDB API. But it's not mandatory as long as you create and manage your own promises to reflect the state of the asynchronous IndexedDB operations.
The main thing to keep in mind when writing a fetch event handler (and this isn't specific to using IndexedDB), is that if you call event.respondWith(), you need to pass in either a Response object or a promise that resolves with a Response object. As long as you're doing that, it shouldn't matter whether your Response is constructed from IndexedDB entries or the Cache API or elsewhere.
Are you running into any actual problems with the code you posted, or was this more of a theoretical question?
I have an array = [ 'something', 'other' ]
And I want to retrieve only the values of those 2 ids from Firebase, which contains more than 2 items ( potentially millions ), but if I do this:
var questionRef = new Firebase(fireBaseURL+"/morethanamillionitems/");
loadUID.once('value', function (dataSnapshot) {
dataSnapshot.forEach(function(childSnapshot) { // Firebase method
console.log(dataSnapshot.numChildren()); // potentially outputs 1.000.000 +
var uid = childSnapshot.name();
var childData = childSnapshot.val();
console.log(uid.indexOf('something'));
result.push(uid)
});
}
I first basically load the whole database, which is not that efficient
Now I could do:
array.forEach(key, function() {
var questionRef = new Firebase(fireBaseURL+"/morethanamillionitems/"+key);
refID = questionRef.val();
result.push(refID);
})
Or maybe:
questionRef = new Firebase(fireBaseURL+"/morethanamillionitems/");
array.forEach(key, function() {
if ( questionRef.child(key) !== null ){
refID = questionRef.val();
result.push(refID);
}
})
The last one seems the nicest, the previous one seems a bit expensive on the old RAM.
However, I apparently have to call questionRef.once('value', function(){}) each time, hence already loading the whole document-root...
Or am I misunderstanding how Firebase handles these requests? is the .numChildren() just an answer directly from the server?
Is the .forEach actually remotely executed?
I'm wondering if there is any other way to reduce traffic per request. Which brings me to another question: it seems that firebase searches locally first, but eventually will search remotely, but it's not clear when this exactly happens. Does it periodically check if something has changed? Or will that only happend when I use .on() and not .once().
Or am I using the wrong backend for this purpose? Any other suggestions? I tried hood.ie which is still very beta, looked at Parse but firebase seemed to have the simplicity I need.
(sorry for the sloppy syntax, but you can see what I intended)
[update]
I now have this:
load: function(uids){
var FB = new Firebase(URL);
uids.map(function(uid) {
var currentRef = FB.child( uid+"/_current" );
currentRef.once('value', function (each) {
eachVal = each.val()
if (eachVal !== null){
var localSave = {};
localSave[uid] = eachVal;
this.saveLocal(localSave)
} else {
console.error("Not found: [%s]", uid)
}}, function (err) { });
});
}
But I'm still wondering when the request actually happens, on .child()? or in .once() and if the latter, what is the use of .child() exactly? It seems it's only used for referencing.
Then the second thing, if I want to retrieve an array of a hundred items, this would still mean a hundred seperate requests? or does Firebase have a way of collecting requests and then send them in a batch?
In that last case .once would be a more 'conservative' option for initial retrieval, then later you could attach a .on listener if you need real-time updates.
I've been tracking down a bug for days... then I realized the bug was me. :/
I had been using webRequest.onComplete, filtered for scripts. My error was that I made the incorrect association between the scripts being loaded and being executed. The get loaded in a different order than they get executed, and thus the timing of the events is not in the order I need them in. I need to inject between certain scripts so I need an event right after a file has been executed and before the next one.
The only solution I can think of at the moment is to alter the JS being loaded before it gets executed. But it makes my stomach turn. And the bfcache would wreak even more havoc, so not a great solution either.
I would use the HTML5 spec's afterscriptexecute, but that is not implemented in Chrome. Is there another API, perhaps an extension API that I can use?
Note: This method no longer works as of Chrome 36. There are no direct alternatives.
Note: The answer below only applies to external scripts, i.e. those loaded with <script src>.
In Chrome (and Safari), the "beforeload" event is triggered right before a resource is loaded. This event allows one to block the resource, so that the script is never fetched. In this event, you can determine whether the loaded resource is a script, and check whether you want to perform some action
This event can be used to emulate beforescriptexecute / afterscriptexecute:
document.addEventListener('beforeload', function(event) {
var target = event.target;
if (target.nodeName.toUpperCase() !== 'SCRIPT') return;
var dispatchEvent = function(name, bubbles, cancelable) {
var evt = new CustomEvent(name, {
bubbles: bubbles,
cancelable: cancelable
});
target.dispatchEvent(evt);
if (evt.defaultPrevented) {
event.preventDefault();
}
};
var onload = function() {
cleanup();
dispatchEvent('afterscriptexecute', true, false);
};
var cleanup = function() {
target.removeEventListener('load', onload, true);
target.removeEventListener('error', cleanup, true);
}
target.addEventListener('error', cleanup, true);
target.addEventListener('load', onload, true);
dispatchEvent('beforescriptexecute', true, true);
}, true);
The dispatch times are not 100% identical to the original ones, but it is sufficient for most cases. This is the time line for the (non-emulated) events:
beforeload Before the network request is started
beforescriptexecute Before a script executes
afterscriptexecute After a script executes
onload After the script has executed
Here's an easy way to see that the events are working as expected:
window.addEventListener('afterscriptexecute', function() {
alert(window.x);
});
document.head.appendChild(document.createElement('script')).src = 'data:,x=1';
document.head.appendChild(document.createElement('script')).src = 'data:,x=2';
The demo can be seen live at http://jsfiddle.net/sDaZt/
I'm not familiar with Chrome Extensions (only browser javascript), but I think that you will unfortunately have to edit your loaded JS so that is calls a function of your choice when it is executed, if you want to do this nicely. This it what Google does for asynchronously loading its Maps Javascript file:
function loadScript() {
var script = document.createElement("script");
script.type = "text/javascript";
script.src = "http://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/js?sensor=false&callback=executed";
document.body.appendChild(script);
}
function executed() {
/* Google maps has finished loading, do awesome things ! */
}
If you really don't want to edit your loaded JS files, you could have a setInterval (or a recursive function with setTimeout) checking regularly if some functions or variables are initialized.
Have you tried script loading using Modernizr.js?
I had a similar issue, where the timing of script loading was causing conflict. I used Modernizr.js, which includes the library yepnope.js by default. Below is an example of some scripts I loaded conditionally. You can include a test clause, or simply load them in the order you prefer, with the guarantee that they will load and execute in the order you wish due to the callback.
Here is an example with a conditional clause:
Modernizr.load({
test: false, //Or whatever else you'd like. Can be conditional, or not so conditional
yep: {
'script1': 'MyJavascriptLibrary1.js'
},
nope: {
'script2': 'MyJavascriptLibrary2.js',
'script3': 'MyJavascriptLibrary3.js'
},
callback: {
'script1': function (url, result, key) {
console.log('MyJavascriptLibrary1.js loaded'); //will not load in this example
},
'script2': function (url, result, key) {
console.log('MyJavascriptLibrary2.js loaded first');
},
'script3': function (url, result, key) {
console.log('MyJavascriptLibrary3.js loaded second');
}
}
});
If triggering false, MyJavascriptLibrary2.js and MyJavascriptLibrary3.js will load in the appropriate order, no matter what elements influence how they would behave normally (file size, connection speed, etc.). In these callbacks, you may fire additional javascript as well, in the order you wish to do so. Example:
'script2': function (url, result, key) {
alert('anything in here will fire before MyJavascriptLibrary3.js executes');
},
Note this can be done without Modernizr.load({...
but using simply yepnope({...
For more documentation, check out the yepnope.js API
I have some problems with thread synchronization in my Templated control (trying to do a AutoComplete control)
Inside my control I have this code:
protected override void OnApplyTemplate()
{
base.OnApplyTemplate();
var searchTextBox = GetTemplateChild("SearchTextBox") as TextBox;
if (searchTextBox != null)
{
var searchDelegate = SearchAsync;
Observable.FromEventPattern(searchTextBox, "TextChanged")
.Select(keyup => searchTextBox.Text)
.Where(TextIsLongEnough)
.Throttle(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(500))
.Do(ShowProgressBar)
.SelectMany(searchDelegate)
.ObserveOn(Dispatcher)
.Subscribe(async results => await RunOnDispatcher(() =>
{
IsInProgress = false;
SearchResults.Clear();
foreach (var result in results)
{
SearchResults.Add(result);
}
}));
}
}
And it is complaining that inside my ShowProgressBar method I'm trying to access code that was marshalled by another thread.
If I comment out the Throttle and the ObserveOn(Dispatcher) it works just fine, but it does not throttle my service calls as I want to.
If I only comment out the Throttle part, Nothing happens at all.
Asti's got the right idea, but a far better approach would be to provide the IScheduler argument to Throttle instead:
// NB: Too lazy to look up real name
.Throttle(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(500), CoreDispatcherScheduler.Instance)
This will make operations below it happen on the UI thread (including your ShowProgressBar), up until the SelectMany.
Every dependency object requires that any changes to dependency properties be made only on the Dispatcher thread. The Throttle is using a different scheduler, hence making any changes to the UI in a subsequent Do combinator would result in an access exception.
You can resolve this by:
Add an ObserveOnDispatcher before any actions which cause side-effects on the Dispatcher. Optionally use another scheduler down the pipeline.
Use Dispatcher.Invoke to execute side-effects through the dispatcher. E.g., .Do(() => Dispatcher.Invoke(new Action(ShowProgressBar)))