Razor, MVC4, #html.dropdownlistfor problems - razor

I'm trying to create a drop down list that populates from a database. I have:
public class Employee
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
[Required]
public String FirstName { get; set; }
[Required]
public String LastName { get; set; }
[Required]
public String JobTitle { get; set; }
}
public class Project
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
[Required]
public String ProjectName { get; set; }
[Required]
public String CompanyName { get; set; }
}
public class ProjectHour
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
[Required]
public decimal Hours { get; set; }
[Required]
public DateTime Date { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Employee> employeeId { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Project> projectId { get; set; }
}
What I want is to create a form that will create new project hours associated with a project and an employee. I'm trying to use dropdownlists to display the employees and the projects on the create form. Obviously, I'm completely new at this, but what I have so far is:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult CreateProjectHour(ProjectHour newProjectHour)
{
using (var db = new TimesheetContext())
{
IEnumerable<SelectListItem> emp = db.Employees
.Select(c => new SelectListItem
{
Value = c.Id.ToString(),
Text = c.LastName
});
ViewBag.EmployeeId = emp;
db.ProjectHours.Add(newProjectHour);
db.SaveChanges();
}
return RedirectToAction("ProjectHourList");
}
}
And on the form:
#model TimesheetMVC.Models.ProjectHour
...
#Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.employeeId, (SelectList)ViewBag.EmployeeId)
Which is apparently horribly wrong. Any help would be much appreciated...!

Don't use the same name EmployeeId. You need 2 things to create a dropdown list in ASP.NET MVC: a scalar property that will hold the selected value and a collection property that will contain the possible values. But since you are using the ViewBag (which I totally recommend against) you could do the following:
ViewBag.Employees = emp;
and in your view:
#Html.DropDownListFor(
model => model.employeeId,
(IEnumerable<SelectListItem>)ViewBag.Employees
)
But as I said this is not at all an approach that I recommend. I recommend using view models. So define an IEnumerable<SelectListItem> property on your view model:
public IEnumerable<SelectListItem> Employees { get; set; }
and in your controller populate this view model property and then make your view strongly typed to the view model.

Or you could just do a
in the controller
SelectList selectList = new SelectList(db.Employees, "Id", "LastName");
ViewBag.EmployeeList = selectList;
and in the View
#Html.DropDownBoxFor(model => model.id_Employee, ViewBag.EmployeeList as SelectList)
I find this approach easier.

EmployeeId is an IEnumerable<SelectListItem>, not a SelectList.
Therefore, your cast cannot work.
You need to explicitly create a SelectList.

Related

Return a non-mapped Entity property based on a SUM of child records in the EntityFramework

Using an example, I have the following two Entities. The OrderEntity contains a collection of OrderLineEntites
public class OrderEntity
{
public string Reference { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public bool Confirmed { get; set; }
[NotMapped]
public int OrderLineCount { get; set; }
[InverseProperty("Order")]
public virtual ICollection<OrderLineEntity> OrderLineEntity__OrderEntity { get; set; }
}
public class OrderLineEntity
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
}
Using the following code I can load all the OrderLineEntities for all confirmed orders.
DbSet<OrderEntity> orderEntity.Where(x => x.Confirmed).Include(x => x.OrderLineEntity__OrderEntity)
What I need to do is set the non-mapped OrderLineCount property with the Count of the OrderLine records (to save actually loading them).
So for each loaded Order I have a fully populated Entity including the [NotMapped] property with an empty OrderLine collection.
Advise would be appreciated :)
Thanks
You can do this, but you have to change your approach. You have to manually map the objects yourself:
var query = from a in context.Orders.Where(x => x.Confirmed)
select new OrderEntity
{
Reference = a.Reference,
Description = a.Description,
Confirmed = a.Confirmed,
OrderLineCount = a.OrderLineEntity__OrderEntity.Count
};
return query.ToList();

best way to exclude some parameters in a modelview when editing a page

I know there are a couple of options to exclude/include some parameters in a modelview like using bind or using interfaces. However I have some problems when I am trying to implement nested IEnumerable variables. For example:
public class TestViewModel()
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public IEnumerable<Organisation> KPI { get; set; }
}
public class Organisation
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Name {get; set;}
public DateTime StartDate {get; set;}
public IEnumerable<Regiod> CategoryValues { get; set; }
}
public class Region
{
public System.Guid Id { get; set; }
public System.Int32 RegionId { get; set; }
public int Value { get; set; }
public System.String RegionName { get; set; }
}
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult edit(int id)
{
var model = new TestViewModel();
// Do something to populate the model
view(model)
}
In the view page (razor) all fields are disabled or hidden, except field Value in Region class and StartDate in Organization. My action Code is something like:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult edit(TestViewModel model)
{
// Do something to populate the model
}
Everything works fine, unless somebody uses for example fiddler to set other disabled or hidden values, so those fields will be updated.
What I am after is to update just enabled fields and exclude the rest even somebody tries to set a value for them.
I tried bind[Exclude and Include], but my problem is I can bind 2 values from different classes. I tried UpdateModel(model, include) and it didn't work.
Any advice would be appreciated.

Populate DropDown from database in an edit view using MVC4

I am new to MVC and trying to populate a dropdown list in the "create" view which is generated from a view model, but it returns with an error saying object reference is not an instance of an object. below is my code :
Controller Code:
public ActionResult Create()
{
return View(new AddRecipeViewModel());
}
Model Code:
public class DifficultyLevel
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Difficulty { get; set; }
}
public class AddRecipeViewModel
{
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<RecipeReview> Reviews { get; set; }
public virtual IEnumerable<DifficultyLevel> Difficulty { get; set; }
}
View:
<div>
<select>
#foreach (var item in Model.Difficulty)
{
<option>#item.Difficulty</option>
}
</select>
</div>
Is there an easy workaround this ? as I will be adding more drop downs in this as I go along.
Thanks,
Vishal
not sure if you need to use virtual in your view models.. that's usually only for the entity models. but anyway, try adding a constructor to AddRecipeViewModel and set the collections equal to empty lists so they won't be null.
public class AddRecipeViewModel
{
public AddRecipeViewModel()
{
Reviews = new List<RecipeReview>();
Difficulty = new List<DifficultyLevel>();
}
[Key]
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<RecipeReview> Reviews { get; set; }
public virtual IEnumerable<DifficultyLevel> Difficulty { get; set; }
}

unidirectional many-to-many relationship with Code First Entity Framework

I am new to EF, and trying to get many-to-many unidirectional relationship with code first approach. For example, if I have following two classes (not my real model) with be a N * N relationship between them, but no navigation property from "Customer" side.
public class User {
public int UserId { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
public ICollection TaggedCustomers { get; set; }
}
public class Customer {
public int CustomerId { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
}
The mapping code looks like ...
modelBuilder.Entity()
.HasMany(r => r.TaggedCustomers)
.WithMany(c => c.ANavgiationPropertyWhichIDontWant)
.Map(m =>
{
m.MapLeftKey("UserId");
m.MapRightKey("CustomerId");
m.ToTable("BridgeTableForCustomerAndUser");
});
This syntax force me to have "WithMany" for "Customer" entity.
The following url, says "By convention, Code First always interprets a unidirectional relationship as one-to-many."
Is it possible to override it, or should I use any other approach?
Use this:
public class User {
public int UserId { get; set; }
public string Email { get; set; }
// You must use generic collection
public virtual ICollection<Customer> TaggedCustomers { get; set; }
}
public class Customer {
public int CustomerId { get; set; }
public string FirstName { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
}
And map it with:
modelBuilder.Entity<User>()
.HasMany(r => r.TaggedCustomers)
.WithMany() // No navigation property here
.Map(m =>
{
m.MapLeftKey("UserId");
m.MapRightKey("CustomerId");
m.ToTable("BridgeTableForCustomerAndUser");
});

Code First Object not properly instantiating

I have a class department inheriting from activeentity
public class ActiveEntity : Entity, IActive
{
public ActiveEntity()
{
IsActive = true;
}
[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public bool IsActive { get; set; }
[Timestamp, ScaffoldColumn(false), DatabaseGenerated(System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.DatabaseGeneratedOption.Computed)]
public Byte[] Timestamp { get; set; }
[ScaffoldColumn(false)]
public string CreationUserId { get; set; }
[ScaffoldColumn(false)]
public string LastModifiedUserId { get; set; }
}
public class Department:ActiveEntity
{
public Department()
{
this.Address = new DepartmentAddress();
}
[StringLength(9),MinLength(9),MaxLength(9)]
public string Name { get; set; }
public Guid ManagerId { get; set; }
[UIHint("AjaxDropdown")]
public User Manager { get; set; }
public Guid? AddressId { get; set; }
public DepartmentAddress Address { get; set; }
public ICollection<OverheadRate> OverheadRates { get; set; }
}
I am just using annotations no Fluent API. The data saves to the data Sql Server 2008 just fine however the address object never gets instantiated, even though I have the context use the include
return c.Set<Department>().Include(d => d.Address).Include(d => d.Manager).Where(predicate);
The data is returned I run sql profiler and then run the query it returns the correct data.
Any thoughts or suggestions?
Remove instantiating the address (this.Address = new DepartmentAddress();) in the Department constructor. Instantiating navigation references in the default constructor is evil and has nasty side effects like these:
What would cause the Entity Framework to save an unloaded (but lazy loadable) reference over existing data?
EF 4.1 Code First: Why is EF not setting this navigation property?