I want to clone my Mercurial repository into my /public_html folder on my web server. My Mercurial project looks like this...
- /ProjectName
- /public
- /application
- /config
- /library
What I want is to just get the contents of "ProjectName" into my /public_html folder. Unfortunately, cloning the repository includes "ProjectName" and all of the subfolders are in there.
Any idea how to accomplish this without a symbolic link?
Just to put it out there, you probably don't want a full clone in your public_html unless you really want every version that ever was out there on the web. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, but since you'll have a .hg in public_html people will even be able to clone your repository from it.
Instead consider using the hg archive command which exports all the files as they exist at a specific revision and places them wherever you want.
For example:
cd your_clone
hg archive --rev release /public_html
That takes the code pointed to by the release label (which could be a tag, bookmark, or branch head) and puts the files, but not a full-history clone, in /public_html.
I actually found an easy way to do this.
hg clone https://me#bitbucket.org/me/ProjectName "/home/website/public_html"
public_html has to be empty to clone the repository into it, so I moved everything out, cloned the repo, then moved the pre-existing files and folder back.
Here is a simple step that you can follow:
cd /public_html
hg init .
hg pull ../pathto/ProjectName/
This will pull all the files and folders under ProjectName in public_html without creating /public_html/ProjectName.
But it will still copy all the resources that are in the mercurial repository (Files and Folders) into your directory.
Related
I have file/directory structure:
main/.hg
main/subrepo/.hg
main/subrepo1/.hg
I have .hgignore file with such content
.hg
Finally, I want to make a commit in 'main' repository that will include all files in it, including all files from main/subrepo and main/subrepo1 and excluding folders main/subrepo/.hg and main/subrepo1/.hg (so all files from main folder, excluding .hg folders in it will be commited). But Mercurial skips main/subrepo/* and main/subrepo1/*. It does not include this subfolders/subrepos to commit fully. How can I fix this?
I'm going to guess that you have simply created some nested repositories, but not properly linked them as subrepositories.
Make sure that the root of the main repository has a file called .hgsub. You create the file, add the following and then add + commit the file to the main repository:
subrepo = https://path-to-subrepo/
subrepo1 = https://path-to-subrepo1
If the subrepos do not point to some remote server, you would use the local path of course.
I currently have a project versioned using Mercurial. On my computer, there is a .hg folder in the root of my local repository.
I want to change from Mercurial to Git, so I'm wondering if removing the .hg folder is enough to remove Mercurial versioning from this folder?
If not, what can I do? (I don't want to move the existing sources on my computer).
Yes, all the bits that make it a Mercurial repository are in the .hg folder so you can delete that to remove the Mercurial versioning.
Note though that doing this will obviously lose all your source control history as well.
Looks like there are some options to convert the repository if you want to keep that history, first hit on google:
http://arr.gr/blog/2011/10/bitbucket-converting-hg-repositories-to-git/
yes that should work.
mercurial stores chancesets and so on in the .hg folder, but you will lose all your projects history if you just delete the .hg folder and use git instead then.
Following is the scenario: I have a remote Mercurial repository at ssh://remotehost//dir/repo and I am able to clone it to a local host "pandora" in directory /home/user/localrepo/.
Now, I have a superset of this remote repository, where I add my own testing framework, but do not want to merge to the main depot until I am certain it works. So I clone this "local" repo to /home/user/workingdir/ but when I issue the command to do so
$ hg clone /home/user/localrepo/
only the repository folder gets copied none of the files get copied.
I'm not sure what you mean when you say that "only the repo folders gets copied". So there's two things you can try :
Try to do a hg update in your new clone.
List the directory in /home/user/workingdir and if there is a directory name localrepo in it, this is actually your repository. To clone in the current directory, you must do hg clone /home/user/localrepo .
This sounds odd but try a few things:
First in the local repo that you cloned from do a
hg status -A
are all the files that you think should be in there in there? If not are you at the tip of the repo.
You can see what revision you are at with
hg parent
If you want to just go to the tip do hg update
If there still aren't any files listed in the repo do the same to check the one on the server.
If there aren't any files on the server you will need to add all of the files you want mercurial to track, mercurial doesn't automagically start tracking files in the repo location.
(Use hg add --all to add all of the file in the entire directory tree under the repo location.)
If there are files in the local repo, check the testing area and make sure that it is on the proper changeset.
I have a project, which is in the Mercurial repository. In the root folder there is a .hgignore file, which states, that the "Bin" folder should be ignored (and also some other files and folders).
Now I want to clone this repository but in a way, that ALL folders and files should be cloned, also the original ignored ones. If I just clone the repository, than I get only the files, which are included in the repository thus my bin folder is missing.
How can I get cloned repository with all files in it? I want to merge these two repositories together in a while...
PS - I am working on a legacy application which has a lot of external dll-s in the bin folder of the application. I know I should put them to a seperate folder, but that's another story.
Just copy it.
Copy the whole tree from point a to point b, and the new copy will function perfectly as a repository. The only thing that would be different from a clone is the lack of hardlinks and that the default pull/push path will be set-up to be the same as the original, rather than pointing to the original. That's easy to change by editing .hg/hgrc if you want to.
An ignored file is not in your repository, so it will not be cloned. You should copy these files by hand after you have cloned the repository.
When you copy those files, I think it won't be a problem if you overwrite other files that are in your repository (they're essentially the same files after all), so as long as you don't copy the .hg folder in the root of your checkout, you'll probably be fine.
Hey, I'm using Mercurial. I just found out that there is a .hg folder in my home directory. I presume it is keeping track of all mercurial repositories I have lying around in my home directory. Is this true?
Also , I need to move the .hg folder to another directory. Can anyone guide me as to how to do this?
Thanks
Having a .hg/ in your home directory indicates that your entire home directory is under version control, which probably is not what you want. Mercurial does not "keep track" of multiple repositories.
To move a repository somewhere else, use "hg clone".
no
cp src dst, or better hg clone
In contrast to e.g. svn, mercurial keeps all repository related information under one directory, so you just need to move this directory to its destination.
Ps. It's a little unusual to have a repository (.hg) under home, though. More typically, you'll find a .hgrc under home, which contains some mercurial configuration.
More on mercurial usage and internals: http://hgbook.red-bean.com