So I made a simplified version of the code I'm working on ...
I have a custom Flex component that has following structure (based on the s:HGroup):
<s:HGroup xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"
width="100%" height="100%" >
<fx:Script>
<![CDATA[
import spark.components.Button;
public function addButton():void{
var myButton:Button = new Button();
myButton.label = "New Button";
buttonContent.addElement(myButton);
}
]]>
</fx:Script>
<mx:HDividedBox width="100%" height="100%">
<s:VGroup width="100%" height="100%" gap="5">
<s:VGroup width="100%" height="100%">
</s:VGroup>
<s:Group width="100%" height="100%">
<s:Group left="5" top="15" bottom="5" right="5" id="buttonContent" />
</s:Group>
</s:VGroup>
<s:VGroup width="100%" height="100%">
</s:VGroup>
</mx:HDividedBox>
Inside this component I make use a the mx:HDividedBox component since there is no Sparkalternative...
So when I call the function addButton(), my intend is to add a custom Spark DataGrid (in this example a simple s:Button made with code) to the Spark Group with id buttonContent. I noticed that this button isn't added to the Groupwith id buttonContent.
When I commented out the mx:HDividedBox the Spark button was added like it should...
I suppose there is some conflict rising between the Sparkand mx display formats.
Has anyone had the same problem? Or know a usable solution / work around?
Any tips are welcome! Thanks!
Try adding an "id" field to the HDividedBox. Flex has had issues with not recognizing elements when their parents don't have an id in the past, this might be a regression issue?
(Would've added as a comment, but I don't have the access yet..)
Your exemple works on my computer.
Which flex SDK version are you using ?
Are you really using "100%" width and height in you real code ? (DividedBox are tricky with sizes, if you don't set resizeToContent to true then the dividedBox will not resize itself if the content changes)
Related
I have created an accordion to store images on categories. Everything is ok when I add a new element to an item, the scroller appears. The image address is saved in an txt file. However, when I open the application again the scroller does not appear. This is strange as it happens only in the first item of the accordion. If I add more elements to the other items (from the second further) everything works alright.
Does anybody have any idea why??
Hard to say without seeing your code.
Sample of using accordion with images inside which you can try
(scrollbars are visible for both tabs):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx">
<mx:Accordion height="500"
width="100%">
<s:NavigatorContent label="Tab 1"
height="100%"
width="100%">
<s:Scroller height="100%"
width="100%">
<s:Group>
<s:Image source="http://d1c739w2xm33i4.cloudfront.net/2.2/top_image.jpg"/>
</s:Group>
</s:Scroller>
</s:NavigatorContent>
<s:NavigatorContent label="Tab 2"
height="100%"
width="100%">
<s:Scroller height="100%"
width="100%">
<s:Group>
<s:Image source="http://eofdreams.com/data_images/dreams/image/image-07.jpg"/>
</s:Group>
</s:Scroller>
</s:NavigatorContent>
</mx:Accordion>
</s:Application>
In accordion just write resizetocontent = true; It will work
Hope it will help
I have a ViewStack, with a bunch of NavigatorContainers in. Each NavigatorContainer contains a different category of settings for the application.
I would like to be able to display a popup prompting the user if they try to leave the current NavigatorContainer without saving the changes they have made to the container's settings.
What would be ideal is something like the 'changing' event in the List component, whereby you are able to cancel or defer the event. Calling preventDefault() on the change event in ViewStack doesn't prevent the index change from happening.
Is there a way of doing this with a minimum of hoop-jumping?
Thanks
It depends what is changing your viewstack. For example if you have ButtonBar as view changer, then you can easily write like this:
protected function btnBar_changingHandler(event:IndexChangeEvent):void
{
event.preventDefault();
//enter code here
}
and
<s:VGroup width="100%" height="100%" horizontalAlign="center">
<s:ButtonBar id="btnBar" dataProvider="{viewStack}" requireSelection="true" changing="btnBar_changingHandler(event)">
<s:layout>
<s:ButtonBarHorizontalLayout gap="2" />
</s:layout>
</s:ButtonBar>
<mx:ViewStack id="viewStack" width="100%" height="100%">
<s:NavigatorContent width="100%" height="100%" label="First View">
<comp:FirstView/>
</s:NavigatorContent>
<s:NavigatorContent width="100%" height="100%" label="Second View">
<comp:SecondView/>
</s:NavigatorContent>
</mx:ViewStack>
</s:VGroup>
If nothing dreadful happens on index change, why not keep a current index and then in your change event just pop them back and give your alert?
I am developing a flex application which is embedded in a html file. The issue is I am not able to get the browser scroll bars, once the browser window resizes. I have tried setting overflow:scroll in the css code for html, but didn't work.
Consider an example like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" minWidth="600" minHeight="400" width="100%" height="100%">
<s:BorderContainer left="30" right="30" height="120" width="100%" backgroundColor="#FFFFFF" borderVisible="true">
<s:Label x="10" y="10" fontSize="12" fontFamily="Arial" fontStyle="normal" text="PCA title"/>
</s:BorderContainer>
<s:BorderContainer left="30" right="30" top="150" height="100%" bottom="30" width="100%" backgroundColor="#000000" borderVisible="true">
</s:BorderContainer>
</s:Application>
Here if i set the absolute values for height and weight as height="768" and weight="1366", i do get the scrollbars. But i am developing the application using relative coordinates so that it works across all machines irrespective of their screen sizes. So, i cannot specify absolute value for height and weight.
Can someone help me with this as to how to get the scrollbars working without disturbing my relative coordinate system.
I'm not certain that I understand your question correctly, but I think you need SWFFit.
This is a JavaScript tool that can limit the minimum and maximum sizes of the container of your Flash object, and will force the browser to supply scrollbars when required.
In Flex 3, I used to be able to take 2 panels, lay them out with 100% width settings in an HBox. If I changed the width property of the first panel to something smaller, let's say 20%, the second would automatically update and fill in the space that used to be taken up by the first as the first resized down.
I notice in spark, this doesn't happen. I have an app with a HorizontalLayout, and a resizable panel control on the left and a panel on the right that has width="100%." When I resize my left-side panel down, the right side panel doesn't do anything. So I end up with a clean resizable panel, a bunch of wasted space, and my right-side panel just sitting there.
What I expect is that since the right-side panel has a width="100%" then if the panel to its left is resized, then there would be a corresponding growth in the right-side panel to fill in.
I've tried to manually trigger validation on properties and size without effect. I'm wondering what changed in the HorizontalLayout that no longer allows this technique to work. I would also like to know what solutions are available?
Here's some chomp chomp:
<mx:Application>
<mx:Script>
<![CDATA[
protected function resizeClick(event:MouseEvent):void
{
pnl1.percentWidth = 10; // When this would execute, pnl2 would automatically
// fill in the space previously held by pnl1.
}
]]>
</mx:Script>
<mx:HBox width="100%" height="100%">
<mx:Panel id="pnl1" width="40%" height="100%"> // Uses 40%
<mx:Button id="resizeButton" click="resizeClick(event)"/>
</mx:Panel>
<mx:Panel id="pnl2" width="100%" height="100%"/> // Fills in the rest of the available space
</mx:HBox>
</mx:Application>
Flex 4.5 doesn't automatically update the size of pnl2 when the size of pnl1 changes. I would think that since a HorizontalLayout is being used, that both children would update when the width of one of them was changed. But that just doesn't seem to be the case. I know I can create two states to accomplish this, but I was thinking that I shouldn't have to for something so trivial.
This sample works fine and illustrates correct changes of sizes:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Application minHeight="600" minWidth="955" xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark">
<s:VGroup height="100%" width="100%">
<s:HSlider change="firstPanel.percentWidth = event.currentTarget.value" maximum="100" minimum="0"
value="{firstPanel.percentWidth}" />
<s:HGroup height="100%" width="100%">
<s:Panel height="100%" id="firstPanel" minWidth="0" width="40%" />
<s:Panel height="100%" width="100%" />
</s:HGroup>
</s:VGroup>
</s:Application>
So this is how I eventually solved this problem. I should have been a little more specific in my post to explain that Panel 1 is actually a "collapsible" panel that modifies its own size whenever its header button is clicked. The example above does work, but since there is no numeric control on the view to "tell" the panel.percentWidth property how much to change, I set my collapsible panel up to dispatch custom events that are handled by the wrapper. The custom events basically indicate what is happening to the collapsible panel. From there, I can handle the events separately and then control the size of Panel 2.
The solution is actually rather simple and I was hoping for something a little more "behind the scenes" but this worked fine.
<s:Application initialize="initApp(event)">
<fx:Script>
<![CDATA[
protected function initApp(event:FlexEvent):void
{
this.addEventListener("PanelCollapse", panelHandler);
this.addEventListener("PanelNormal", panelHandler);
}
protected function panelHandler(event:Event):void
{
switch(event.type)
{
case "PanelCollapse":
pnl2.percentWidth = 100;
break;
case "PanelNormal":
pnl2.percentWidth = 60;
break;
}
}
]]>
</fx:Script>
<comp:CollapsiblePanel id="pnl1" width="40%" height="100%">
</mx:Panel>
<s:Panel id="pnl2" width="100%" height="100%"/> // Fills in the rest of the available space
</s:Application>
Please, can anyone help me out on this : the piece of code below was working fine until i decided to add a scroller for better view and suddenly, i get the error:
"Multiple initializer values for default property, 'viewport' of type 'spark.core.IViewport'"
Thanks
[CODE]
<s:Scroller
width="100%"
height="100%"
>
<s:Group id="basicDataGroup" includeIn="initial">
<s:HGroup id="buttonGroup"
x="250"
paddingTop="20"
gap="15">
<s:Button id="addBT" label="{resourceManager.getString('aggregationUI','add')}" click="addBT_clickHandler(event)"/>
<s:Button id="delBT" label="{resourceManager.getString('aggregationUI','delete')}"/>
</s:HGroup>
<s:DropDownList id="languageCombo"
prompt="{resourceManager.getString('aggregationUI','lang')}"
dataProvider="{new ArrayCollection([{locale:'fr_FI',label:'France'}, {locale:'en_US', label:'English'}])}"
change="languageChange(event)"
width="100"
x="473"
y="20"/>
<components:SearchComponent id="searchModel" searchClick="searchModel_searchClickHandler(event)"/>
<components:DataComponent id="basicData"
x="250"
y="50"/>
</s:Group>
<s:Group id="newModelGroup" includeIn="newModel">
<components:NewDataComponent id="newModelData"/>
</s:Group>
</s:Scroller>
[/CODE]
A scroller can only be a viewport to one component. In your scroller, you have basicDataGroup and newModelGroup. Even though you have states so they don't both exist at the same time, I don't think Flex is that coordinated to know that. Instead, wrap those two Groups in one Group, and make that parent Group the Scroller's viewport.
Hope that helps,
Ryan