Is there a way to make an element not contribute to parent overflow, but keep it visible? Let me clarify
There is a watermark-like logo to be applied to a page in the manner below. It is supposed to be positioned partly outside the main content (dashed blue line)
I'm not aware of the option to set an element background in such a manner that it would persist as the browser window is resized horizontally, so I've just added a <div> with the logo as its background and position:absolute with the necessary offset relative to main content container.
Previously, the page would not get a horizontal scrollbar as long as the browser was wider than W1. Now, with an additional "watermark" element added outside of the main content box, the scrollbar would appear whenever the browser is narrower than W2
Is there something obvious I'm missing? A background setting, or possibly a neat margin workaround/
Update:
I've added a rough jsfiddle to illustrate the issue
Unfortunately, just because you nested the "watermark" div and positioned it absolutely doesn't make it outside of the document. If you put it outside of the document, the page will scroll (as you see).
To me, the first solution I think of is to move the watermark outside of the "content" div and apply the watermark to its parent container. I'm guessing you haven't done that because you need it to be relative to the "content" div, but it's something to try.
Also, the reason it scrolls is because the document has been overflow. The quick fix, yet not recommended, is to use "overflow-x: hidden;" on the parent container of the "content" div.
It's harder to give you a solution since you've stripped the rest of your HTML, and some "fixes" may not be as applicable if your structure is complicated in certain ways.
Remember that the width of your elements is greater than the actual "width" it includes padding & margins, if you have padding on your div reduce the "width" by the equivalent amount.
does that make sense? if you post the actual css & html it might be easier to give you a more detailed answer
additionally could you not assign the image as the background of the actual body element and set it to centered?
I've had a play with the code and come up with a possible solution for you.
set
body{overflow-x:hidden;}
then add
#media all and (max-width: 400px)
{
body{overflow-x:auto; }
}
as soon as your screen is smaller than 400px (the width of the div) your overflow:hidden will be overridden and you'll be given you scroll bars.
at this point you may also want to reduce the width of your watermark.
Related
I ran into this issue while implementing a sticky footer solution. I have the footer working well, but my body element which encompasses everything within the tag just will not auto-extend beyond a random point further down that can only be reached by scrolling down (it's a lengthy page). My intention is for the body container (does that sound morbid or what?) to auto extend past all the div elements it contains. Isn't that what it's supposed to be doing? Right now there are still div elements sitting further down from where it ends, and the footer is sitting in the middle of my page right below it. If I can't achieve this behavior, I'll have to set the body to a fixed position in css, which I don't want to do.
Using the following CSS styling doesn't work, probably because my content extends beyond a page.
html, body {min-height: 100%; height: 100%;}
Can someone articulate what the most likely issues could be? Also, feel free to make any constructive comments on my code. This is my first web project.
Here's a link to my HTML code on CodePaste: HTML Code
And here's a link to my CSS code: CSS Code
Lastly, a link to a screenshot of my webpage showing the issue. Screenshot
The green bar is the footer, and the red border is the body element styled in css so it can be viewed. You'll see it ends right after the picture.
I'm pretty sure your main problem is setting the height of the body tag. Try not giving it a height (no max-height or height tags) or giving it height: auto to make it expand as its contents.
It could also be that you are setting child elements to positon: absolute which means that the parent will collapse to the size of whatever non-absolute elements are inside it.
Also, why the <p1> tags? They should be just <p>.
Code criticism:
It was extremely difficult to figure out what the problem was and I'm not sure that I gave the correct solution because of the way you showed your code. In future, try to give your code as a JSFiddle or a Codepen.
Also, consider using a CSS framework which will reduce the amount of CSS code you write a lot. I would suggest Bootstrap or Materialize but Bootstrap is more widely used.
Don't forget to follow CSS guidelines which will make your code more readable.
You could stretch the element to the full height of the window using vh.
.container{
height: 100vh;
}
You could then position your footer to the bottom using absolute position.
footer{
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
I've used this in the past for full page landing pages that aren't meant to scroll.
I don't exactly know what the question is asking, but I experimented a bit and figured that if you remove the 1 from the <p1> so you would have a normal <p> tag, it moves the text up completely. I have a very rough JS Fiddle.
Thanks to all who contributed. Based on suggestions from Sankarsh and Ori, I was able to solve the problem. Once I changed my div to just as they suggested, I noticed it began functioning as I intended and forcing the parent element down beneath it. Unfortunately, that only solved the problem for that element alone. That led to me discovering the element had a default "static" position, while most of my other elements were set to "absolute". After changing the positions of the bulk of my content to "relative" or "static", everything is working as intended!
TLDR: If you want a child element to stay within the boundaries of its parent element, you need to set the child's position to "static" or "relative". You cannot use "absolute". This way, instead of overflowing beyond the border of the parent, the child will automatically extend the parent's border to its intended position.
I have to add a small banner at the top of a page and am having trouble with pushing the existing content down 40px so I can fit in the banner above.
The current layout has a lot of strangley positioned elements and they all keep moving out of place if I wrap the whole body area in a relative block div with a top margin.
Is there a technique that should work for this other than wrapping in a div like this?
If you do this, then you have to be careful that your CSS positioning on the divs that you want to move is not absolute. Because if it is, then they will just stay where they are. It should however, work if you add a div that encompasses everything and put a few pixels of padding on the top with CSS.
Why not just put a at the top of the page and set that div to clear:both afterwards. This should shift the rest of the page down 40px, or whatever you set the height of that div to. Of course, I'm just guessing here without looking at code and/or a sample site. Since I assume by strangely positioned you mean weird usage of position:absolute, this should allow your current setup to remain consistent.
I have a dojox chart (chartDiv) that gets created within another container div (panelContainer).
Even though I have the width and height of the chartDiv set to be 90%, it either introduces scroll bars into the chartDiv, or if I dtart altering the padding and margin settigns for the ChartDiv, it will spill outside of the parent container.
I know this is going to be a basic issue, but I have been playing with lots of different CSS settings but nothing seems to solve keeping the chartDiv within the confines of the panelContainer (taking up 95% of the space)
This fiddle might help you spot where I have gone wrong.
When you make a chart (or a dojox.gfx canvas) without width/height, it will try its best to determine its dimensions from the container you put it in. It can get confused though!
In your fiddle's case, #chart has a known width, because it's a block element and inherits its width from panelBG which is 100% of panelContainer's width.
The #chart div doesn't really have a height though, since a block element is 0px tall until you put something in it (or add some style to it). As a consequence, (I think) the chart simply assumes a height of some proportion to the width.
In your CSS, I see you have a #chartDiv rule with width and height 90%. I'm guessing you intended that to be #chart. That wouldn't actually have resolved the problem entirely though!
Assuming you changed that, the chart would now use 90%x90% as width/height, but if you try it, you'll see that the labels/axis are still positioned incorrectly.
Because you've floated the title container to the left, the chart container starts on the same "line" and tries to have its content "float" around the title container. This skews the axis labels out of place (green), while the actual chart (svg/canvas, pink) drops down below the title container.
To fix this, tell the chart container to stay clear of floats on both sides:
#chart {
width: 90%;
height: 90%;
clear: both;
}
It isn't really necessary to float anything though, and setting the height to 90% isn't always ideal. I made a suggestion in an updated fiddle: http://fiddle.jshell.net/froden/WsrHs/4/ .
The differences are just that the title container is a div spanning across the top, while the chart container is absolutely positioned so that it fills whatever space is left underneath. You can then just set width/height on panelContainer.
Absolutely positioned elements are taken out of the normal flow. This is why some of the elements are expanding beyond their containers. I have a feeling your floats are involved in that, too, but the fiddle is a little too complicated and a simpler version needs to be made.
I'm trying to stretch an image vertically in a parent container of my site (not the full body), it is the div with the id "imagen-fondo"
I have tried either backstretch plugin and also just css background-image with background-size to do it.
But the problem in both cases is that the calculated height of the parent container is smaller that the immediate child height, so, the background image looks smaller than the content itself.
How can I make it to be the same height as his immediate child or at least bigger?
You can see the live demo here:
http://50.21.181.12:3001/plantillas/mba
UPDATE:
I think the problem is that div#imagen-fondo is getting the height of the window and not of his content, that is the reason that when the screen is big, the problem doesn't happen, but when the height of the window is smaller than the content it happens, you can check it with this two screenshots, just as you start scrolling vertical the background image ends:
Something with overflows?
UPDATE 2:
For now I introduced some javascript to make it work,
Getting the footer offset position and stretching the height of the ".backstretch" div to that height.
But, if you resize the window to make the vertical scroll bar appear and inspect the page, you can still see that the parent container "#imagen-fondo" (from where backstretch should automatically get his height) is still getting the height of the visible viewport and not from the content itself.
If anyone finds a better way to do it CSS only will use that approach instead of this dirty one.
Clear floats in parent div using clear: both;
Or use clearfix on parent div.
For now I introduced some javascript to make it work,
Reading the footer position and stretching the height of the ".backstretch" div to that height.
But, if you resize the window to make the vertical scroll bar appear and inspect the page, you can still see that the parent container "#imagen-fondo" (from where backstretch should automatically get his height) is still getting the height of the visible viewport and not from the content itself.
If anyone finds a better way to do it CSS only will use that approach instead of this dirty one.
This seems like it should be the easiest thing in the world, but I'm having difficulties. I'm started to think I didn't know as much about CSS as I thought, or CSS was designed more poorly than I thought.
I have a page. At the top, there's an arbitrary amount of markup. Then there's a block element. All I want to do is make this block element extend its height to the bottom of the window.
See http://jsfiddle.net/vHVeC/4/. It's close, but the last block element extends beyond the visible area of the browser, creating scrollbars. No content should extend beyond the dimensions of the viewport (ie there should be no scrollbars).
How can I do this with having to use JavaScript?
Apparently, CSS has massive troubles finding heights. Widths, no worries.
Using Javascript, you'd go:
//Grab div element
var obj = document.getElementById('theDiv');
//Enable sizing
obj.style.position = 'relative';
//Force to window
obj.style.height = document.documentElement.clientHeight+'px';
Incidentally, in your Fiddle, the plaintext node above the div is offsetting the div below. It's finding 100% of the body height, but then being bumped down, causing the scrollbar. The way to fix this in CSS is position:absolute;left:0;top:0 which locks it in place.
Also note that in any of these cases, if you do end up scrolling (e.g. to 150%), you'll see the bottom edge of your div down there at 100%.
You've hit the css box model problem. A quick and dirty solution is to set the overflow: hidden property to prevent the scrollbars but you should be very careful doing this. You will need to make sure your content fits on screen as any content extending beyond the block element will be inaccessible to users.
This is how you can do it using a table (It's pure CSS):
http://vidasp.net/tinydemos/table-layout.html