In one of the online documents that talks about appcache for HTML5, it indicates that the cached files get updated once an offline user reconnects. I checked the original HTML5 appcache definition by W3, and I am not able to find anything that supports this statement.
Does anyone know if this is to be true?
Thanks in advance
MDN says the following, although if you scroll up on that page it says it's being deprecated.
If an application cache exists, the browser loads the document and its associated resources directly from the cache, without accessing the network. This speeds up the document load time.
The browser then checks to see if the cache manifest has been updated on the server.
If the cache manifest has been updated, the browser downloads a new version of the manifest and the resources listed in the manifest. This is done in the background and does not affect performance significantly.
And logic tells me that it would also depend on the app you're using, server you're trying to connect to and any special settings it might have, how long your browser keeps it's history, what it keeps, and if you saved the page to view offline - whether or not you have all the code/images saved in the right location(s).
Example:
Imagine you saved a page to view offline, and that page has a JS event handler that ran a while loop that did an ajax request every n seconds to do something, like make a number on a page change as long as you were online... As long as the loop is running, you suddenly connect to the internet, and it makes the request to the proper url with the right arguments, then it should go through, even though the url in your browser might say something like file:///C:/Users/you/Desktop/....
I've done this before, even though my url was like the one above. One time I was using braintree's drop-in javascript to a website, and using it's api on my backend. Trying to load the page when offline = Nothing. Online = Updated the spot on the page just fine when I had the required arguments, and it was pointing to the right url. If I got offline again, I could refresh the page, see the same images loaded in the <div>, but I couldn't send any data with it.
I just came across a website pagesource and saw this in the header:
<link href="../css/style.css?V1" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
Could we actually pass GET data to css? I tried searching but found no results apart from using PHP. Could anyone help make meaning of the ?V1 after the .css
I know this forum is for asking programming problems, however I decided to ask this since I have found no results in my searches
First of all, no you can't pass GET parameters to CSS. Sorry. That would have been great though.
As for the example url. It can either be a CSS page generated by any web server (doesn't have to be PHP). In this case the server can serve different pages or versions of the same page which might explain the meaning of V1, Version 1. The server can also dynamically generate the page with a server-side template. This is an example from the Jade documentaion:
http://cssdeck.com/labs/learning-the-jade-templating-engine-syntax
It can also just be used as cache buster, for versioning purposes. Whenever you enter a url the browser will try to fetch it only if it doesn't already have a cached copy which is specific to that URL. If you have made a change in your content (in this instance the css file) and you want the browser to use it and not the cached version you can change the url and trick the browser to think it's a new resource that is not cached, so it'll fetch the new content from the server. V1 can then have a symantic meaning to the developer serving as a note (ie I've changed this file once...twice..etc) but not actually do anything but break the cache. This question addresses cache busting.
There are different concepts.
At first, it only is a link - it has a name, it might have an extension, but this is just a convention for humans, and nothing more than a resource identifier for the server. Once the browser requests it, it becomes a server request for a resource. The server then decides how to handle this request. It might be a simple file it just has to return, it might be a server side script, which has to be executed by a server side scripting interpreter, or basically anything else you can imagine.
Again, do not trick yourself in thinking "this is a CSS file", just because it has a css extension, or is called style.
Whatever runs at the server, and actually answers the request, will return something. And this something then is given a meaning. It might be CSS, it might be HTML, it might be JavaScript, or an image or just a binary download. To help the browser to understand what it is, the server returns a Content-Type header.
If no content type is given, the browser has to guess what it is. Or the nice web author gave a hint on what to expect as response - in this case he gave the hint of text/css. Again, this is how the returned content should be interpreted by the client/browser, not how that content is supposed to created on the server side.
And about the ?V1? This could mean different things. Maybe the user can configure a style (theme) for the website and this method is used to dispatch different styles. Or it can be used for something called "cache busting" (look it up).
You can pass whatever you want; the server decides what to do with the data.
After all, PHP isn't your only option for creating a server. If i wrote a server in Node.js, set up a route for /css/style.css and made it return different things depending on what query was given, neither the server nor browser will bat an eyelid.
I've got an odd question. Say I have two HTML pages index1.html and index2.html. In both the pages is some jpg image called "Hello". When I use the browser to point to say www.testing.com/index1.html the browser will load index1.html and the image Hello.
Now my question is when I go click on some link in index1.html that takes me to index2.html, will the browser look to go to back to the server to get image Hello or will it use the Hello image used in index1.html?
It depends on the caching headers the server sends out alongside the image.
There are several ways in which caching can be done.
When a resource is served with an expiry date in the future, the browser will use its cached copy until that date is reached (or the cache is emptied or a refresh forced.
Another way is for the server to listen to the If-modified-since request header. The server can then check whether the resource has been modified since that date. If it hasn't, it will return a 304 not modified status; otherwise, the updated resource.
The Apache Caching guide is a (lengthy) introduction to the subject.
To see in your browser what caching rules apply, open its developer tools and look for the "Net" tab. It's a list of all the requests that were made in connection with the current page. It'll tell you whether a resource was loaded from the server, or a cached copy used.
For example, this result on a Stack Overflow image from Chrome's developer tools:
suggests the image was cached. When I click that row, I can switch to the "header" view, where I can see the exact caching instructions the server sends:
It means that as long as the browser has a cached copy of the image, it will keep on using that without ever checking with the server until December 17, 2014.
Different browsers handle this differently. It can also depend on user settings. Users can set the browser to cache nothing if they so desire.
Gurus of SO
I am trying to play with CACHE MANIFEST/HTML5. My app is JS heavy and built on jquery/jquerymobile.
This is an excerpt of what my Manifest looks like
CACHE MANIFEST
FALLBACK:
/
NETWORK:
*
CACHE:
/css/style.css
/js/jquery.js
But somehow, the app doesn't load the files the first time itself and the entire app breaks down.
Is my format wrong?
Should I never load JS into the Cache?
How should I treat this differently to always check the network first if anything isn't available and only load stuff available from the Cache?
Thank you.
I tried a simple page with your cache manifest and it worked fine for me, so I'm not really sure what the problem is. But,
Yes, there is something wrong with the format. The entries in the FALLBACK section need to have two parts: a pattern, and a URL. This says "if any page matching the pattern is not available offline, display the URL instead (which will be cached)." The main example of this (as shown here) is "/ /offline.html", which means "for all pages, if we are offline and they are not cached, display /offline.html instead." However, I don't think this is the source of your problem since I tested it with your exact manifest and it still worked.
There is nothing special about JS files. It should be fine to load them into the cache.
I don't understand the third question. There are possibly two goals here: a) how do you check to see if there is a newer version of the file available online first, before going back to the cache, and b) how do you check the network to see if there is a file that is not cached, and if we are offline, fall back to an error page. The answer to (a) is that once you have turned on the cache manifest, things work very differently. It will never check for new versions of the files unless there is a new version of the manifest also. So you must always update the manifest whenever you change any files. The answer to (b) is the FALLBACK section.
See Dive Into HTML5's excellent chapter on this, particularly the section "The fine art of debugging, a.k.a. “Kill me! Kill me now!”" which explains how the manifest updates.
Also I don't think we've gotten to the meat of your question, because it's unclear what you mean by "the app doesn't load the files the first time itself". Which files don't load? Do they load properly after a refresh? Etc.
The only way I got this to work to refresh a cache was to rename the manifest file with a commit number or timestamp, and change the cache declaration to
<html manifest='mymanifest382330.manifest'>
I made this part of my build.
Is there a way I can put some code on my page so when someone visits a site, it clears the browser cache, so they can view the changes?
Languages used: ASP.NET, VB.NET, and of course HTML, CSS, and jQuery.
If this is about .css and .js changes, then one way is "cache busting" by appending something like "_versionNo" to the file name for each release. For example:
script_1.0.css // This is the URL for release 1.0
script_1.1.css // This is the URL for release 1.1
script_1.2.css // etc.
or after the file name:
script.css?v=1.0 // This is the URL for release 1.0
script.css?v=1.1 // This is the URL for release 1.1
script.css?v=1.2 // etc.
You can check this link to see how it could work.
Look into the cache-control and the expires META Tag.
<META HTTP-EQUIV="CACHE-CONTROL" CONTENT="NO-CACHE">
<META HTTP-EQUIV="EXPIRES" CONTENT="Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:12:01 GMT">
Another common practices is to append constantly-changing strings to the end of the requested files. For instance:
<script type="text/javascript" src="main.js?v=12392823"></script>
Update 2012
This is an old question but I think it needs a more up to date answer because now there is a way to have more control of website caching.
In Offline Web Applications (which is really any HTML5 website) applicationCache.swapCache() can be used to update the cached version of your website without the need for manually reloading the page.
This is a code example from the Beginner's Guide to Using the Application Cache on HTML5 Rocks explaining how to update users to the newest version of your site:
// Check if a new cache is available on page load.
window.addEventListener('load', function(e) {
window.applicationCache.addEventListener('updateready', function(e) {
if (window.applicationCache.status == window.applicationCache.UPDATEREADY) {
// Browser downloaded a new app cache.
// Swap it in and reload the page to get the new hotness.
window.applicationCache.swapCache();
if (confirm('A new version of this site is available. Load it?')) {
window.location.reload();
}
} else {
// Manifest didn't changed. Nothing new to server.
}
}, false);
}, false);
See also Using the application cache on Mozilla Developer Network for more info.
Update 2016
Things change quickly on the Web.
This question was asked in 2009 and in 2012 I posted an update about a new way to handle the problem described in the question. Another 4 years passed and now it seems that it is already deprecated. Thanks to cgaldiolo for pointing it out in the comments.
Currently, as of July 2016, the HTML Standard, Section 7.9, Offline Web applications includes a deprecation warning:
This feature is in the process of being removed from the Web platform.
(This is a long process that takes many years.) Using any of the
offline Web application features at this time is highly discouraged.
Use service workers instead.
So does Using the application cache on Mozilla Developer Network that I referenced in 2012:
Deprecated This feature has been removed from the Web standards.
Though some browsers may still support it, it is in the process of
being dropped. Do not use it in old or new projects. Pages or Web apps
using it may break at any time.
See also Bug 1204581 - Add a deprecation notice for AppCache if service worker fetch interception is enabled.
Not as such. One method is to send the appropriate headers when delivering content to force the browser to reload:
Making sure a web page is not cached, across all browsers.
If your search for "cache header" or something similar here on SO, you'll find ASP.NET specific examples.
Another, less clean but sometimes only way if you can't control the headers on server side, is adding a random GET parameter to the resource that is being called:
myimage.gif?random=1923849839
I had similiar problem and this is how I solved it:
In index.html file I've added manifest:
<html manifest="cache.manifest">
In <head> section included script updating the cache:
<script type="text/javascript" src="update_cache.js"></script>
In <body> section I've inserted onload function:
<body onload="checkForUpdate()">
In cache.manifest I've put all files I want to cache. It is important now that it works in my case (Apache) just by updating each time the "version" comment. It is also an option to name files with "?ver=001" or something at the end of name but it's not needed. Changing just # version 1.01 triggers cache update event.
CACHE MANIFEST
# version 1.01
style.css
imgs/logo.png
#all other files
It's important to include 1., 2. and 3. points only in index.html. Otherwise
GET http://foo.bar/resource.ext net::ERR_FAILED
occurs because every "child" file tries to cache the page while the page is already cached.
In update_cache.js file I've put this code:
function checkForUpdate()
{
if (window.applicationCache != undefined && window.applicationCache != null)
{
window.applicationCache.addEventListener('updateready', updateApplication);
}
}
function updateApplication(event)
{
if (window.applicationCache.status != 4) return;
window.applicationCache.removeEventListener('updateready', updateApplication);
window.applicationCache.swapCache();
window.location.reload();
}
Now you just change files and in manifest you have to update version comment. Now visiting index.html page will update the cache.
The parts of solution aren't mine but I've found them through internet and put together so that it works.
For static resources right caching would be to use query parameters with value of each deployment or file version. This will have effect of clearing cache after each deployment.
/Content/css/Site.css?version={FileVersionNumber}
Here is ASP.NET MVC example.
<link href="#Url.Content("~/Content/Css/Reset.css")?version=#this.GetType().Assembly.GetName().Version" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
Don't forget to update assembly version.
I had a case where I would take photos of clients online and would need to update the div if a photo is changed. Browser was still showing the old photo. So I used the hack of calling a random GET variable, which would be unique every time. Here it is if it could help anybody
<img src="/photos/userid_73.jpg?random=<?php echo rand() ?>" ...
EDIT
As pointed out by others, following is much more efficient solution since it will reload images only when they are changed, identifying this change by the file size:
<img src="/photos/userid_73.jpg?modified=<? filemtime("/photos/userid_73.jpg")?>"
A lot of answers are missing the point - most developers are well aware that turning off the cache is inefficient. However, there are many common circumstances where efficiency is unimportant and default cache behavior is badly broken.
These include nested, iterative script testing (the big one!) and broken third party software workarounds. None of the solutions given here are adequate to address such common scenarios. Most web browsers are far too aggressive caching and provide no sensible means to avoid these problems.
Updating the URL to the following works for me:
/custom.js?id=1
By adding a unique number after ?id= and incrementing it for new changes, users do not have to press CTRL + F5 to refresh the cache. Alternatively, you can append hash or string version of the current time or Epoch after ?id=
Something like ?id=1520606295
<meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" />
Also see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/126772/how-to-force-a-web-browser-not-to-cache-images
Here is the MDSN page on setting caching in ASP.NET.
Response.Cache.SetExpires(DateTime.Now.AddSeconds(60))
Response.Cache.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.Public)
Response.Cache.SetValidUntilExpires(False)
Response.Cache.VaryByParams("Category") = True
If Response.Cache.VaryByParams("Category") Then
'...
End If
Not sure if that might really help you but that's how caching should work on any browser. When the browser request a file, it should always send a request to the server unless there is a "offline" mode. The server will read some parameters like date modified or etags.
The server will return a 304 error response for NOT MODIFIED and the browser will have to use its cache. If the etag doesn't validate on server side or the modified date is below the current modified date, the server should return the new content with the new modified date or etags or both.
If there is no caching data sent to the browser, I guess the behavior is undetermined, the browser may or may not cache file that don't tell how they are cached. If you set caching parameters in the response it will cache your files correctly and the server then may choose to return a 304 error, or the new content.
This is how it should be done. Using random params or version number in urls is more like a hack than anything.
http://www.checkupdown.com/status/E304.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_ETag
http://www.xpertdeveloper.com/2011/03/last-modified-header-vs-expire-header-vs-etag/
After reading I saw that there is also a expire date. If you have problem, it might be that you have a expire date set up. In other words, when the browser will cache your file, since it has a expiry date, it shouldn't have to request it again before that date. In other words, it will never ask the file to the server and will never receive a 304 not modified. It will simply use the cache until the expiry date is reached or cache is cleared.
So that is my guess, you have some sort of expiry date and you should use last-modified etags or a mix of it all and make sure that there is no expire date.
If people tends to refresh a lot and the file doesn't get changed a lot, then it might be wise to set a big expiry date.
My 2 cents!
I implemented this simple solution that works for me (not yet on production environment):
function verificarNovaVersio() {
var sVersio = localStorage['gcf_versio'+ location.pathname] || 'v00.0.0000';
$.ajax({
url: "./versio.txt"
, dataType: 'text'
, cache: false
, contentType: false
, processData: false
, type: 'post'
}).done(function(sVersioFitxer) {
console.log('Versió App: '+ sVersioFitxer +', Versió Caché: '+ sVersio);
if (sVersio < (sVersioFitxer || 'v00.0.0000')) {
localStorage['gcf_versio'+ location.pathname] = sVersioFitxer;
location.reload(true);
}
});
}
I've a little file located where the html are:
"versio.txt":
v00.5.0014
This function is called in all of my pages, so when loading it checks if the localStorage's version value is lower than the current version and does a
location.reload(true);
...to force reload from server instead from cache.
(obviously, instead of localStorage you can use cookies or other persistent client storage)
I opted for this solution for its simplicity, because only mantaining a single file "versio.txt" will force the full site to reload.
The queryString method is hard to implement and is also cached (if you change from v1.1 to a previous version will load from cache, then it means that the cache is not flushed, keeping all previous versions at cache).
I'm a little newbie and I'd apreciate your professional check & review to ensure my method is a good approach.
Hope it helps.
In addition to setting Cache-control: no-cache, you should also set the Expires header to -1 if you would like the local copy to be refreshed each time (some versions of IE seem to require this).
See HTTP Cache - check with the server, always sending If-Modified-Since
There is one trick that can be used.The trick is to append a parameter/string to the file name in the script tag and change it when you file changes.
<script src="myfile.js?version=1.0.0"></script>
The browser interprets the whole string as the file path even though what comes after the "?" are parameters. So wat happens now is that next time when you update your file just change the number in the script tag on your website (Example <script src="myfile.js?version=1.0.1"></script>) and each users browser will see the file has changed and grab a new copy.
Force browsers to clear cache or reload correct data? I have tried most of the solutions described in stackoverflow, some work, but after a little while, it does cache eventually and display the previous loaded script or file. Is there another way that would clear the cache (css, js, etc) and actually work on all browsers?
I found so far that specific resources can be reloaded individually if you change the date and time on your files on the server. "Clearing cache" is not as easy as it should be. Instead of clearing cache on my browsers, I realized that "touching" the server files cached will actually change the date and time of the source file cached on the server (Tested on Edge, Chrome and Firefox) and most browsers will automatically download the most current fresh copy of whats on your server (code, graphics any multimedia too). I suggest you just copy the most current scripts on the server and "do the touch thing" solution before your program runs, so it will change the date of all your problem files to a most current date and time, then it downloads a fresh copy to your browser:
<?php
touch('/www/sample/file1.css');
touch('/www/sample/file2.js');
?>
then ... the rest of your program...
It took me some time to resolve this issue (as many browsers act differently to different commands, but they all check time of files and compare to your downloaded copy in your browser, if different date and time, will do the refresh), If you can't go the supposed right way, there is always another usable and better solution to it. Best Regards and happy camping. By the way touch(); or alternatives work in many programming languages inclusive in javascript bash sh php and you can include or call them in html.
For webpack users:-
I added time with chunkhash in my webpack config. This solved my problem of invalidating cache on each deployment. Also we need to take care that index.html/ asset.manifest is not cached both in your CDN or browser. Config of chunk name in webpack config will look like this:-
fileName: [chunkhash]-${Date.now()}.js
or If you are using contenthash then
fileName: [contenthash]-${Date.now()}.js
This is the simple solution I used to solve in one of my applications using PHP.
All JS and CSS files are placed in a folder with version name. Example : "1.0.01"
root\1.0.01\JS
root\1.0.01\CSS
Created a Helper and Defined the version Number there
<?php
function system_version()
{
return '1.0.07';
}
And Linked JS and SCC Files like below
<script src="<?= base_url(); ?>/<?= system_version();?>/js/generators.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="<?= base_url(); ?>/<?= system_version(); ?>/css/view-checklist.css" />
Whenever I make changes to any JS or CSS file, I change the System Verson in Helper and rename the folder and deploy it.
I had the same problem, all i did was change the file names which are linked to my index.html file and then went into the index.html file and updated their names, not the best practice but if it works it works. The browser sees them as new files so they get redownloaded on to the users device.
example:
I want to update a css file, its named styles.css, change it to styless.css
Go into index.html and update , and change it to
in case interested I've found my solution to get browsers refreshing .css and .js in the context of .NET MVC (.net fw 4.8) and the use of bundles.
I wanted to make browsers refresh cached files only after a new assembly is deployed.
Buinding on Paulius Zaliaduonis response, my solution is as follows:
store your application base url in the web config app settings (the HttpContext is not yet available at runtime during the RegisterBundle...), then make this parameter changing according to the configuration (debug, staging, release...) by the xml transform
In BundleConfig RegisterBundles get the assembly version by the means of reflection, and...
...change the default tag format of both styles and scripts so that the bundling system generates link and script tags appending a query string parameter on them.
Here is the code
public static void RegisterBundles(BundleCollection bundles)
{
string baseUrl = system.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["by.app.base.url"].ToString();
string assemblyVersion = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().GetName().Version.ToString();
Styles.DefaultTagFormat = $"<link href='{baseUrl}{{0}}?v={assemblyVersion}' rel='stylesheet'/>";
Scripts.DefaultTagFormat = $"<script src='{baseUrl}{{0}}?v={assemblyVersion}'></script>";
}
You'll get tags like
<script src="https://example.org/myscriptfilepath/script.js?v={myassemblyversion}"></script>
you just need to remember to to build a new version before deploying.
Ciao
2023 onward
At the time of writing, many web browsers support the Clear-Site-Data HTTP header [MDN reference]. To instruct the client web browser to clear the cache for the website domain and subdomains, set the following header in the HTTP response from the server:
Clear-Site-Data: "cache"
Alternatively, the following header may be better supported across browsers, but it clears other website data, such as localStorage and cookies, in addition to the cache.
Clear-Site-Data: "*"
However note that intermediate caches (e.g. a CDN) may not understand or respect this header, so intermediate caches may still respond with previously cached data.
Do you want to clear the cache, or just make sure your current (changed?) page is not cached?
If the latter, it should be as simple as
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Pragma" CONTENT="no-cache">