I'm creating a system with a JavaScript client that will communicate with the server over REST (HTTP)[JSON].
I am using role-based access control to manage the calls.
Example: [explicit URL will stay the same]
Anonymous -> request \
Server -> route to login form: \login\
User (now with cookie!) -> request \
if (user->role == "manager") return "\manager-homepage\";
else return "\homepage\";
Since REST is stateless how would I go about managing this use-case?
Do I send the cookie with each request, and the returned HTTP status codes will tell the JS where to route?
[Which would be rather inefficient + open to MITM attacks]
Can you not use a standard authentication scheme, such as http digest?
Example: [from Wikipedia page]
The client asks for a page that requires authentication but does not provide a username and password. Typically this is because the user simply entered the address or followed a link to the page.
The server responds with the 401 "client-error" response code, providing the authentication realm and a randomly-generated, single-use value called a nonce.
At this point, the browser will present the authentication realm (typically a description of the computer or system being accessed) to the user and prompt for a username and password. The user may decide to cancel at this point.
Once a username and password have been supplied, the client re-sends the same request but adds an authentication header that includes the response code.
In this example, the server accepts the authentication and the page is returned. If the username is invalid and/or the password is incorrect, the server might return the "401" response code and the client would prompt the user again.
Note: A client may already have the required username and password without needing to prompt the user, e.g. if they have previously been stored by a web browser.
See also this answer to a very similar question: REST and authentication variants
Depending on your desired security level, you could serve the whole thing over ssl. That will prevent mitm attacks.
Related
I have Zabbix server 5.0 and I should check an availability of Outlook authorization.
I'm trying to make a Web scenario with 2 steps:
Checking of the authorization page.
I use https://<domain_name>/owa but it is redirected to https://<domain_name>/owa/auth/logon.aspx?replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2f<domain_name>%2fowa%2f. I tick "Follow redirects" and get status code 200.
https://i.stack.imgur.com/Pzmhp.jpg
Trying of authorization.
I use the same URL that I was redirected to in the first step, also I input this in Raw Post
destination=https%3A%2F%2F<domain_name>%2Fowa&flags=4&forcedownlevel=0&username=&password=&isUtf8=1 (I can use Form Data too). But if I input an invalid password and username, status code in response is 200 too (screens are below). I think it's because of redirections: authorization is not done and I was redirected at the same page.
https://i.stack.imgur.com/wVAwa.jpg
https://i.stack.imgur.com/9ddgp.jpg
After this step is finished I get status code 200 always.
How to do it correctly?
Add a string check to the scenario you already created. Look for a string that is present only after a successful login.
Required regular expression pattern.
Unless retrieved content (HTML) matches the required pattern the step will fail. If empty, no check on required string is performed.
https://www.zabbix.com/documentation/4.2/manual/web_monitoring
When I make a request using Postman to query the Visma Net API /account endpoint, I get a HTTP 400 Bad Request error:
{
"ExceptionType": "IPPException",
"ExceptionMessage": "",
"ExceptionFaultCode": "12002",
"ExceptionMessageID": "12002_12002_some-guid",
"ExceptionDetails": ""
}
The request I send is to:
https://integration.visma.net/API/controller/api/v1/account?active=true
I put the received Bearer token from the OAuth authentication step in the Authorization header.
A 12002 code is returned by Visma.net for at least the following cases:
The company ID is not set (in Swagger site: enter the ID in top right corner, retrieve list of companies available to you using Context in list).
The user is not authenticated on the company ID provided in the HTTP header.
To use swagger: https://integration.visma.net/API-index/.
The ipp-company-id in the top right corner of the visma.net API swagger site can also manually be handled.
Besides the Authorization header, you set two headers:
ipp-company-id: the company id
ipp-application-type: always "Visma.net Financials"
Best is to enter into a partner agreement with Visma. They have a lot of additional information and training videos. Note that implicit grant is not supported, only code grant flow, so there are some security risks involved when running on untrusted devices. Best is to acquire a client ID per untrusted environment or use visma.net APIs only from your own trusted environment.
I'm using an HTML client, and have the following situation:
Using Embarcadero's RAD Server's built-in method for authentication, I have successfully logged in a user and would like to now pass the session token back and forth in such a fashion that the connection is RESTful. The problem lies in the fact that for some reason, I have no clue as to how to track said session token within RAD Server. Embarcadero themselves have been secretive, telling our company that we can do it with Sencha/ExtJS, but we'd prefer not to have to buy even more software. The overall structure is as follows:
Login POSTs username and password (working) to RAD Server (still working) and receives response complete with session token. At this point, I want to open up another HTML file and maintain that session token AS I show data, such that with every JSON request, I send that session token. But in RAD Studio, as far as I can tell, I cannot manually add JSON data to an already-constructed JSON object to feed to the FDBatchMoveJsonWriter component. Any suggestions/examples anyone has done regarding this, if it is even possible?
I've not yet used RAD Server, but post to many REST services. Might RAD Server support Authentication additions in the header? I connect a THTTPBasicAuthenticator to my TRESTClient and in the OnAuthenticate event add token data.
procedure TCLTSProcessor.RESTAuthenticatorAuthenticate(ARequest: TCustomRESTRequest; var ADone: Boolean);
begin
ARequest.AddAuthParameter('token', userToken, pkHTTPHEADER);
end;
Another method I use is connecting a TOAuth2Authenticator to the REST client and set the TokenType to ttBEARER and set the AccessToken property.
I've set up a MediaWiki server on an Azure website with the PluggableAuth and OpenID Connect extensions. The latter uses the PHP OpenID Connect Basic Client library. I am an administrator in the Azure AD domain example.com, wherein I've created an application with App ID URI, sign-on URL and reply URL all set to https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/. When I navigate to the wiki, I observe the following behavior (cookie values omitted for now):
Client Request
GET https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/ HTTP/1.1
RP Request
GET https://login.windows.net/example.com/.well-known/openid-configuration
IP Response
(some response)
RP Response
HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
Location: https://login.windows.net/{tenant_id}/oauth2/authorize?response_type=code&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.azurewebsites.net%2F&client_id={client_id}&nonce={nonce}&state={state}
Client Request
(follows redirect)
IP Response
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/?code={code}&state={state}&session_state={session_state}
Client Request
(follows redirect)
RP Request (also repeats #2 & #3)
POST https://login.windows.net/{tenant_id}/oauth2/token
grant_type=authorization_code&code={code}&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.azurewebsites.net%2F&client_id={client_id}&client_secret={client_secret}
IP Response
(As interpreted by MediaWiki; I don't have the full response logged at this time)
AADSTS50001: Resource identifier is not provided.
Note that if I change the OpenID PHP client to provide the 'resource' parameter in step 8, I get the following error response from AAD instead:
RP Request
POST https://login.windows.net/{tenant_id}/oauth2/token
grant_type=authorization_code&code={code}&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.azurewebsites.net%2F&resource=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.azurewebsites.net%2F&client_id={client_id}&client_secret={client_secret}
IP Response
AADSTS90027: The client '{client_id}' and resource 'https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/' identify the same application.
(This has come up before.)
Update
I've made some progress based on #jricher's suggestions, but after working through several more errors I've hit one that I can't figure out. Once this is all done I'll submit pull requests to the affected libraries.
Here's what I've done:
I've added a second application to the example.com Azure AD domain, with the App ID URI set to mediawiki://wiki.azurewebsites.net/, as a dummy "resource". I also granted the https://wiki.azurewebsites.net/ application delegated access to this new application.
Passing in the dummy application's URI as the resource parameter in step #8, I'm now getting back the access, refresh, and ID tokens in #9!
The OpenID Connect library requires that the ID token be signed, but while Azure AD signs the access token it doesn't sign the ID token. It comes with the following properties: {"typ":"JWT","alg":"none"}. So I had to modify the library to allow the caller to specify that unsigned ID tokens are considered "verified". Grrr.
Okay, next it turns out that the claims can't be verified because the OpenID Provider URL I specified and the issuer URL returned in the token are different. (Seriously?!) So, the provider has to be specified as https://sts.windows.net/{tenant_id}/, and then that works.
Next, I found that I hadn't run the MediaWiki DB upgrade script for the OpenID Connect extension yet. Thankfully that was a quick fix.
After that, I am now left with (what I hope is) the final problem of trying to get the user info from AAD's OpenID Connect UserInfo endpoint. I'll give that its own section.
Can't get the user info [Updated]
This is where I am stuck now. After step #9, following one or two intermediate requests to get metadata and keys for verifying the token, the following occurs:
RP Request:
(Updated to use GET with Authorization: Bearer header, per MSDN and the spec.)
GET https://login.windows.net/{tenant_id}/openid/userinfo
Authorization: Bearer {access_token}
IP Response:
400 Bad Request
AADSTS50063: Credential parsing failed. AADSTS90010: JWT tokens cannot be used with the UserInfo endpoint.
(If I change #10 to be either a POST request, with access_token in the body, or a GET request with access_token in the query string, AAD returns the error: AADSTS70000: Authentication failed. UserInfo token is not valid. The same occurs if I use the value of the id_token in place of the access_token value that I received.)
Help?
Update
I'm still hoping someone can shed light on the final issue (the UserInfo endpoint not accepting the bearer token), but I may split that out into a separate question. In the meantime, I'm adding some workarounds to the libraries (PRs coming soon) so that the claims which are already being returned in the bearer token can be used instead of making the call to the UserInfo endpoint. Many thanks to everyone who's helped out with this.
There's also a nagging part of me that wonders if the whole thing would not have been simpler with the OpenID Connect Basic Profile. I assume there's a reason why that was not implemented by the MediaWiki extension.
Update 2
I just came across a new post from Vittorio Bertocci that includes this helpful hint:
...in this request the application is asking for a token for itself! In Azure AD this is possible only if the requested token is an id_token...
This suggests that just changing the token request type in step 8 from authorization_code to id_token could remove the need for the non-standard resource parameter and also make the ugly second AAD application unnecessary. Still a hack, but it feels like much less of one.
Justin is right. For authorization code grant flow, your must specify the resource parameter in either the authorization request or the token request.
Use &resource=https%3A%2F%2Fgraph.windows.net%2F to get an access token for the Azure AD Graph API.
Use &resource=https%3A%2F%2Fmanagement.core.windows.net%2F to get a token for the Azure Service Management APIs.
...
Hope this helps
Microsoft's implementation of OpenID Connect (and OAuth2) has a known bug where it requires the resource parameter to be sent by the client. This is an MS-specific parameter and requiring it unfortunately breaks compatibility with pretty much every major OAuth2 and OpenID Connect library out there. I know that MS is aware of the issue (I've been attempting to do interoperability testing with their team for quite a while now), but I don't know of any plans to fix the problem.
So in the mean time, your only real path is to hack your client software so that it sends a resource parameter that the AS will accept. It looks like you managed to make it send the parameter, but didn't send a value that it liked.
I had issues getting this running on Azure, even though I got something working locally. Since I was trying to setup a private wiki anyway, I ended up enabling Azure AD protection for the whole site by turning on:
All Settings -> Features -> Authentication / Authorization
From within the website in https://portal.azure.com
This made it so you had to authenticate to Azure-AD before you saw any page of the site. Once you were authenticated a bunch of HTTP Headers are set for the application with your username, including REMOTE_USER. As a result I used the following plugin to automatically log the already authenticated user into Azure:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Auth_remoteuser
I am implementing a Jetty Websocket servlet.
When the server receives a new connection, I want to send a message that will be read by websocket's onopen function. I want this message to be sent only during the open and not using the regular connection.SendMessage() function. Is it possible to do that? and how?
Don't forget the query string. It's valid in WebSocket url.
new Websocket('ws://yoursite.com/path?a=1&b=2&c=3')
Then you can easily parse this url on server side to retrieve the data.
There is no support for this in the protocol but you could fudge something yourself.
When your server completes a handshake, store the initial message you want to deliver to a client.
In your client's onopen function, send a "read initial message" request.
In your server, check that this client hasn't read its initial message; respond with the message; set a flag saying that the initial message has been sent.
Your client and server are both now free to send other messages.