I'm not really sure how to even ask the question, let alone find an answer. Let me explain:
I have one website (http://www.foo.com). I own a domain that I configured as a URL frame so that when I open http://xyz.bar.com I see my Magento website at http://foo.com/xyz.
The thing is I want to completely hide all references to foo.com. This way I hide it in the address bar, but I still get it when hovering over links and while opening media, in the lower left corner. A simple right mouse click would also give it away.
I know I can configure my Magento website to show a specific base URL. I've tried looking for solutions, but I just don't have the vocabulary to find anything that helps. I appreciate any assistance.
Edit: I understand that in order to post a question here one must know what one is talking about, but I'm stuck and I have no one to help me; so please take it easy with the negative reputation.
You can't.
If the browser is expected to ask example.com for the resource, then you have to tell the browser about example.com. Anything you tell the browser you also tell the user.
The only way to make the data appear to come from example.org would be to copy it from example.com to example.org so it really would be coming from example.org.
HTTP redirects could hide the real URL … but only until it was followed, at which browser the browser is informed where the data really lives.
You could grab the images through separate requests and store them in a temporary location. This will have a lot of overhead, so caching would be mandatory.
Another option is to grab all the images you need and store them permanently on your own server through a batch request.
It's not clear what your actual problem is, so we can't help further. (Why do you need to do this?) There might be a better solution to your problem.
There was already a different domain configured in the same server which is "mapped" to another folder. I simply copied the image files from /home/site1/pics to /home/website2/pics. When loading content from website2, I no longer see "loading from site1".
Related
Hello StackOverflow community,
I've just started having an issue with hyperlinks stored within an MS-Access table not behaving as expected.
I have a small database which, among other things, records links to documents hosted on a company Sharepoint site. Until a few days ago, all was working fine with both the database and the hyperlinks.
For some reason, within the last few days, whenever I (or any of my users) click on these hyperlinks through an Access form (or me clicking directly from the tables), I am getting strange behavior:
Clicking the link does open a new instance of the default browser, as desired. And that browser does navigate to the company Sharepoint site. But none of the links actually open the specific document that they are intended to point to.
Instead, all links are bringing up a general file/folder menu within the Sharepoint site. It is almost as if these links point to a non-existent file within an existing folder.
The very strange part is, if I "edit" any of the hyperlinks in my database, and simply select and copy the "address" text from within the edit hyperlink window, I will always immediately pull up the correct desired document if just paste the address directly into a new browser window.
I would have thought that this type of cutting/pasting would necessarily be equivalent to simply clicking the link. But that is obviously not the case.
I feel like I can safely rule out the possibility that any changes to the Sharepoint site itself would be causing my issue with simply clicking the links (otherwise cutting/pasting the addresses would not bring up the correct documents), but I have to admit I am simply stumped as to why just clicking the hyperlinks directly used to work, but no longer does.
I don't believe there is any code or other relevant information that might be helpful that I am neglecting to include, but would be eager to provide any clarifications/etc if anyone has any idea as to what might be happening here.
Thanks in advance for any thoughts or suggestions!
~JQN
EDIT: I had deleted this question because the issue described above had simply stopped happening. I was unable to explain why, but was also unable to reproduce the issue again after a certain point within a day or two of making the original post.
Since then, the issue has returned. I've been able determine the following:
As described in my note below, when I am getting this odd link behavior, I do NOT get the standard warning from MS-Access indicating that hyperlinks may be harmful, etc.
Strangely, simply opening up a file dialog/file picker and then navigating through that dialog to any location on the (sync'ed) Sharepoint site seems to make the problem go away. I do not need to actually select or open any location on Sharepoint, simply navigating within the sync'ed folder structure seems to do the trick.
Once this happens, all links behave as intended again (ie. they open the correct linked file directly instead of landing on the root folder page). They MS-Access hyperlink warning returns as well. The file/link behavior will remain in that state for several days. Only after, I'd estimate, a week or more of inactivity since the file dialog was last run will the issue return.
FURTHER EDIT: New update...Enough time has passed so that the issue is recurring again. As suspected, links to pages outside of Sharepoint are not affected, and open as expected without issue. Once again, the standard Microsoft hyperlink warning dialog is not coming up for any links.
Obviously, now that I've found the work-around with the file dialog, it's easy enough for me to fix the issue when it arises. I'm hoping that this rings a bell with somebody, though, and perhaps one of you could point me in the right direction for a more complete fix for my users.
Thanks again for any help with this!
YET ANOTHER EDIT: Ok....based upon all the things I've learned in the last couple of weeks (as captured in this post and the comments below), I was about to delete this question and re-post it as "Why is Sharepoint redirecting my URL requests from MS-Access?" As I tried to search the forum to make sure that that question hasnt already been asked, I stumbled across some info that I think gets at the underlying issue:
It looks like this is related to the (very opaque) way that Office processes URL requests. It apparently doesn't simply open the document at the specified link, it first "pre-tests" (I suppose that's the right word) the URL by sending a "Microsoft Office Protocol Discovery" request first.
Apparently, it is possible for Sharepoint to somehow not like the particulars of that MOPD request, and if that happens, then Sharepoint redirects to the file directory page -- and that directory page ends up being opened in the browser instead of the intended link/document.
Again, this only happens sometimes and not others. When it does happen, I've found a clumsy workaround that will correct the issue for about a week or so. I can't reproduce the issue during that week, I just have to wait for the workaround to expire (I obviously don't fully understand why my clumsy workaround works).
It doesn't seem possible to manipulate the particulars of the MOPD request. If possible, I'd love to be able to dispense with MOPD entirely, since I want all the files I'm linking to via Access to be opened as read-only anyway. Unfortunately, I don't think that that is possible either.
I've found some info on this in another SO thread HERE. I still am not quite at the point where I feel I'm ready to submit an answer to this question, but I have some ideas as to what sorts of things may function as an acceptable workaround.
It would be helpful if anyone had any ideas as to how I might be able to reproduce the issue on demand, rather than simply waiting another week for whatever keys/cookies/settings/etc to expire again. I'd need to implement any possible solutions entirely on the Access side of things if possible, rather than on the Sharepoint/server side. Thanks again for any suggestions!
I'm posting this as an answer now, but will avoid accepting it until I've had a chance to verify that it actually works.
I am inserting some code that will run on DB startup. It will open a (an invisible) form that has an Access WebBrowser control included. I'll have that control navigate to a specific file on the Sharepoint site. I believe that it is actually this action that somehow causes the link problems to resolve for a week of so.
This form will run silently in the background, navigate to the sharepoint file location, and then close. This should hopefully refresh whatever characteristics of the MODP request that are present when the links work properly (and are absent while they aren't working properly).
In essence, I'm hoping this approach will have the effect of resetting my (approximately) one week window of desired link functionality to start anew each time the database is opened. In other words, I'm thinking that this will work, although I still don't fully understand why.
Wish me luck!
;)
I have a one-page static website. My website is displaying different images than those referenced in the HTML. For example:
<img src="img/About_Us_Graphic.png" alt="About us photo" id="aboutUsPic" style="margin: auto;">
Will be sometimes displayed as the image that's actually
<img src="img/Facebook_icon.png">
This happens pretty much randomly. Sometimes the pictures are correct, sometimes they're totally different pictures. And when it's a wrong picture, it isn't consistently the same wrong picture. What causes this? How can I fix it?
My site uses Foundation 5 (not sure if that's relevant). Thanks!
I've found situations similar to the one you described to be the symptom of one of a few causes:
Someone is tinkering with the content on the site without you being aware. Ask your team members if they know of anyone who might do this.
Your client-side cache is taking over. To remedy this specific problem, go to your browser and clear out the temporary files. Sometimes you have to also clear out cookies and other historical items.
Client-side proxies. Sometimes proxy servers store caches of what they serve to reduce the load of their requests. When they work in a round-robin fashion, different servers within the proxy circle might have mismatched content. * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_balancing_(computing)
Load-balanced web servers. I've seen some situations where servers that are load balancing content will hold onto data. In my specific scenario, a memcache was used and would seemingly hold onto content until its index was refreshed.
Without more information about your set-up, there's not much anyone can do. As oxguy3 suggested - there could even be something in your code causing this.
Please try typing the URL of the image directly in your browser and see if it consistantly comes up the same, then try the same url with "?someArbitraryText" after it where "someArbitraryText" is just some random characters.
E.G. instead of "http://my.server.com/img/About_Us_Graphic.png", use "http://my.server.com/img/About_Us_Graphic.png?arbitrary". Most servers that I've encountered will still serve the image, but if a load balancer, proxy, or memcache is involved it will consider this a different URL and load it from the source rather than from some cached file.
I've seen some cases (such as on salesforce clouds) where doing so will bring up different results.
Let us know what you discover. Any little clue could help someone identify and determine the root cause.
I'm using a facebook like chat called envolve for my site. It works great, except that it changes the some layout properties of my site, specifically the size of some font and links, and the font background in pre tags that are embedded in a custom "lesson" class ()
I was on their site where i asked about it and a couple other people mentioned they have some similar problems but didn't know how to fix it. I contacted their support and after about a week they sent me an email about how they don't have enough resources to look further into the problem, which is understandable since i can't even figure it out ;)
I'm just asking here in case someone might have an answer to this.
To see how the background of the font inside pre tags change when the chat is enabled, go here:
http://braynzarsoft.net/index.php?p=D3D11OBJMODEL
You will have to log in to enable the chat and see the change. Log in with:
username: guest
password: pass
First look at the page without being logged in, then look at it logged in to see the difference. I'm really out of ideas, so i hope someone here might be able to shed some light on this
EDIT: i should mention to enable envolve on my site, i only need a single line in php, which connects to the envolve server, so there's really not much i can do with the files they provide to enable the service. There's one file that comes with it, called envolve_api_client.php, but all this file does is connect to their server
I would do the following:
Make sure all your styling is in stylesheet(s).
Remove your stylesheet.
Confirm that their part looks ok.
Start adding yuor styles back in, one by one (or in groups) and seeing what conflicts.
Decide what you want to keep and what you want to add.
I'm trying to do some HTML layouts, and pretty much my problem comes in here:
<img src = "https://something.com/image.png">
The image can be displayed in a browser when navigating to the URL, but not in Microsoft Visual Studio (or the browser when loading this HTML page), it displays as a broken image instead. This leads me to believe it cannot be linked to in such a way (as I can view other images this way). I'm wondering if it has anything to do with it requiring a secure http connection and if there's any way around this.
Basically, the picture comes up when the url is navigated to. However, when opening this HTML file that has the image displayed on it, it comes up as a broken image. I'm wondering why this is.
Thanks.
You 'll need to establish a secure connection to do that. When the browser comes across the url you have placed as src of the image it sends out a request to that server, which responds by offering different encryption methods it supports. But since you 'll be browsing the page as http data you won't be able to understand the response (which is supposed to be image data if the other side is http and now happens to be a query for encryption method). In short you are missing an SSL layer to make your communication sensible and therefore you see a broken image.
Try making it a background image in your css.
edit I am getting down voted for this question. I should have prefaced that I am not sure and was taking a wild guess, if anything to offer an idea that was not presented by the asker to help solve the problem :)
I am thinking to create an website that generates HTML through a wizard.Finally, I want to make the users to buy the generated HTML source if they like what they see.
But I don't want to let the users to steal the HTML, CSS and JS that I use to create the effect they want.
I want a technique which is immune to Firebug and Right Click -> View Page Source.
Any thoughts ?
edit: I remember something about iframes or frameset, but I'm not sure how to fool the browser and Firebug to execute the code without updating their capability of showing that source code. A popup is also a possible solution.
edit 2: html hosted in silverlight ? will you use it ?
The best thing you can do is to just obfuscate your code. Trying to hide the source is not going to work (for ex: if you disable right click-> view source that doesn't stop them from using the menu or saving the page or using a shortcut key or writing an app to stream the http request into a file and open that, etc).
Firstly, depending on what you are doing you can have the HTML code loaded through JS after the page load (AJAX).
As far as your JS goes:
Free Obfuscator
Not Free Obfuscator
In the end though, there is no stopping someone who really wants to get that source. Even obfuscated code can be rebuilt (though it's hell on wheels painful depending on how good the obfuscator is).
To really protect the sample HTML from prying eyes, you'd need to render it on the server-side and only pass image data to the client. If you want the user to be able to interact with the sample as if it were a normal Web page, you'll also need to send their pointer and keyboard inputs to the server and update the displayed image when necessary. At that point, though, you're basically making an HTTP-based version of VNC. This is definitely possible, but I don't think it will be easy, and I doubt there are any existing software packages to let you do this. If I were you, I'd rethink my business model a bit.
Sending XSL-templated XML to the browser may be enough fool some, and it will work more or less the same in many modern browsers including IE6 (maybe even 5.5).
But really, trying to hide the HTML code isn't going to work if anyone halfway serious wants to get it.
I am thinking to create an website that generates HTML through a wizard.
Finally, I want to make the users to buy the generated HTML source if they like what they see.
If this is what you need you might consider the possibility of creating a preview of the page as an image, and provide the download of the source only after the user agreed and paid. There is no magic way to let a browser display a code that you can't see.
You can make a video, showing the functionality and upload the same, which may help users to view / feel it.