Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm expect to install community edition of openbravo.but i can't find some information.
I want to know no of concurrent users limits of community versions, no of register
users andany restrictions of this system also.
Many thanks for any help..
Openbravo community edition have no limit of concurrent users but some of the premium features like require a Professional edition.
Core - Core: Included in the core, licensed under Openbravo Public License
Open Source Extension Module - Extension Module: Same as core from licensing and support perspective.
Premium Feature (zero cost) - Premium Feature: Same as core from licensing and support perspective, requires a Professional Edition or Basic Edition to use, zero cost
Commercial Extension Module (zero cost) - Commercial Extension Module: Requires a Professional Edition or Basic Edition to install and use, licensed under Openbravo Commercial License, zero cost for Professional Edition
Commercial Extension Module - Commercial Extension Module: Requires a Professional Edition or Basic Edition to install and use, licensed under Openbravo Commercial License, at additional cost
Please have a look at following URL for details,
http://wiki.openbravo.com/wiki/ERP/Roadmap
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have developed a PHP library which is a wrapper to our API.
Patents: The services rendered through the API are covered by patents and anyone using the library may be charged subject to usage crossing certain limits. The license must not grant anyone using the library any patent license.
How Free? Although the library is free, can be copied and distributed unmodified under the same name as much as it can be, usage will be charged depending on limits. In the event of non-payment, the services facilitated by the library will be disrupted.
Modifications & Redistribution: Although anyone is free to review, debug & modify the library, it is desired that modifications to the library are not released under the same name or seek to represent the original and intended library released by us.
Included libraries: The library we are providing uses PHPSecLib & SSS(Shamir's Secret Sharing) library by Kenny Millington. PHPSecLib is released under the MIT license & SSS is under GPLv3 or later.
In view of all this, which license should I choose?
Patents:
How Free?
A lot of API libraries are like that. The library is free but the service the API is utilizing isn't. See, for example, Google AdWords API PHP Client. It's Apache licensed which, in turn, is GPL compatible.
Modifications & Redistribution:
That's a problem. The PHP License has a similar restriction and as such it isn't GPL compatible. Of course if you don't care about GPL compatibility...
Included libraries:
The MIT license is pretty liberal and let's you do pretty much anything. GPLv3, however, is not. If you use GPLv3 code your license is going to need to be GPL compatible and with the restrictions you're wanting to impose it sounds like it's not going to be. My recommendation: maybe rewrite SSS? Compared to phpseclib it looks like an extremely small codebase.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
i am writing a javascript library and i am thinking to give it under triple licensed GPL3, MIT, BSD.
Also i found an Apache 2.0 open source project which i would like to include it in my project.
According to http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
Apache 2 software can be included in GPLv3 projects, so my project's GPL3 version is compatible.
Can i include Apache 2.0 code in MIT and BSD project, so the final project can be compatible with the triple license GPL3, MIT, BSD?
i found this site
http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/floss-license-slide.html
which explains realy simple which code can be used in which projects.
As i see, i can include MIT, BSD and Apache2.0 code and produce my GPL3 project.
But i cannot use Apache2.0 code to produce MIT or BSD projects.
The compatibility is only one way.
So if i want to make my project multilicensed and permissive compatible i have to publish it under Apache2.0/GPL3 licenses.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Let's say we are planning to use an open source project under GNU Lesser General Public License to develop a cloud-based social networking system (a web-based system having horizontaly scalable databases as back end). The completed application will be closed sourced.
So, if we use the source code licensed under GNU Lesser General Public License, or even if we modify it, are we allowed to do that (ie. are we violating the license if our completed product will be closed source.)
The completed application will be commercial based - BUT we are not selling any packaged product - and we will make profits by advertising or download apps, for example.
Yes, you can use modified sources for GPL or LGPL software in your cloud service. You only need to publish your modifications if you distribute the binaries.
This "loophole" is closed by the AGPL.
Yes, if your code is just linked to LGPL software, it can be distributed under a privative license.
However, if you do any modification to the LGPL software you must distribute it in source form if you distribute it at all. This does not include the part of your code that is only linked to (but not compiled together with) the LPGL software. On the other hand, if you do not distribute it at all, you do not have to distribute the sources. This is what some websearch companies do with their modified versions of the linux kernel, and this may be your case if your application is a kind of software-as-a-service application.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
On November, 11th, Moncaì has been announced.
The post describes the product as "a platform as a service(PAAS) cloud solution for .NET/Mono web applications" which would allow to "deploy your web applications with ease by using Git or Mercurial by simply issuing a push command" à la Heroku.
Beside this, very little is known about the supporting infrastructure.
Manos may be involved (tweet)
Maybe CouchDB could also be part through Ottoman API
It looks like Redis will also be used (tweet)
What have you been able to gather about the choosen tools (messaging, storage, ...) to support the project ?
Some informations are in this podcast.
EDIT: major highlights from podcast:
deployment of ASP.NET (MVC) applications a lot easier
very close to what Heroku does, but for ASP.NET
hosted git or mercurial server for deployment
custom cloud infrastructure based on posix systems and mono
option of picking the runtime (mono 2.6 LTS for .NET 3.5 or mono 2.8 for .NET 4.0)
private beta - testing moncai with ~ 2k people
fractional computing and billing
free option for hobbyist and developers with low traffic
sandboxed security - each user have separate process for his stuff
you don't have to worry about load or scale
add-ons for various stuff (batch jobs, ssl, ...)
plans for ssh to customize the VPSs
you will be able to choose between various frameworks like ASP.NET (MVC), manos, ...
try asking on http://sinesignal.com/email/support/moncai/com/ , or on their blog http://sinesignal.com/blog/archives/2010/11/11/introducing-moncai/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm currently looking at Prestashop, that uses an OSL 3.0 open source license. That license requires you to share the code even with users (so it plugs the famous "asp hole").
My question regards to it's plugin architecture for modules. Would the OSL 3.0 license apply also to modules, or it wouldn't be considered part of the distribution.
I've already read the license and searched for an explicit answer, but I haven't found it yet. Any insights?
Thanks,
Modules that are included in the main Prestashop distribution are subject to the same license, however any third-party modules or modules developed by Prestashop but not released in the main distribution can be subject to different license terms.
Each module can be written by a different developer/company and is subject to their own license terms. Modules can be free or commercial. Modules can be released under an Open Sourcee License (not necessarily OSL 3.0) or a bespoke license, a commercial license (could be perpetual or annual etc) or I've even seen case with no license details specified.
Also, modules do not have to be acquired from or purchased through the official marketplace they have developed (where Prestashop take a cut of the profits). They can be acquired direct from the software vendors, and installed easily by uploading a zip file.