Why am I getting this error? Error is showing up in the OR clause, but I'm selecting gl_ID inside the SELECT statement.
; DECLARE v_firstDate DATETIME
SET #p_ID = 368
SELECT SUBDATE(NOW(), 1) INTO v_firstDate;
SELECT t_ID, t_firstName, t_lastName
FROM t_table
WHERE
((#p_ID IN (
SELECT tt_ID
FROM tt_tableTwo
INNER JOIN st_stats ON (st_ID = tt_ID)
INNER JOIN da_data ON (da_ID = st_ID AND da_name IN ("allCompanies", "allglobals"))
)
))
OR
(
(gl_ID IN ( //problem is here
SELECT gl_ID
FROM gl_globals
INNER JOIN tr_transport ON (tr_id = gl_caseID AND tr_idOther = #p_ID)
INNER JOIN co_countries ON (co_ID = gl_ID AND co_ID = #p_ID)
)
)
)
Error message:
Unknown column 'gl_ID' in 'IN/ALL/ANY subquery'
Should I be using an AS or a HAVING?
gl_ID is not accessible in the OR clause because it doesn't exist in t_table. An inner join under the first FROM clause solves the problem.
; DECLARE v_firstDate DATETIME
SET #p_ID = 368
SELECT SUBDATE(NOW(), 1) INTO v_firstDate;
SELECT t_ID, t_firstName, t_lastName
FROM t_table
INNER JOIN gl_globals ON (t_ID = gl_ID) // fix
WHERE
((#p_ID IN (
SELECT tt_ID
FROM tt_tableTwo
INNER JOIN st_stats ON (st_ID = tt_ID)
INNER JOIN da_data ON (da_ID = st_ID AND da_name IN ("allCompanies", "allglobals"))
)
))
OR
(
(gl_ID IN (
SELECT gl_ID
FROM gl_globals
INNER JOIN tr_transport ON (tr_id = gl_caseID AND tr_idOther = #p_ID)
INNER JOIN co_countries ON (co_ID = gl_ID AND co_ID = #p_ID)
)
)
)
I have sql query:
SELECT leads.lead_id,
attributes.code AS attributeCode,
leads_notes.content AS noteContent,
leads_notes.task_type_id,
task_types.type_name
FROM leads,
leads_notes
INNER JOIN task_types
ON task_types.task_type_id = leads_notes.task_type_id
INNER JOIN leads_attributes
ON leads_attributes.lead_id = leads.lead_id
INNER JOIN attributes
ON attributes.attribute_id = leads_attributes.attribute_id
INNER JOIN leads_notes
ON leads_notes.lead_id = leads.lead_id
WHERE ( leads.ambassador = 1
OR leads.rents_bike = 1 )
AND ( leads.city <> '' )
AND ( leads.address <> ''
OR leads.address2 <> '' )
AND ( leads.country_id <> '' )
AND ( leads_attributes.attribute_id IN ( $attributes_id ) )
AND ( leads.lead_id = $lead_id )
But I get error:
Syntax error or access violation: 1066 Not unique table/alias:
'leads_notes''
How can I solve it? Thanks.
Never use commas in the FROM clause. Always use proper, explicit JOIN syntax.
In your case you also had lead_notes twice in the FROM clause. It is easier to write and read the query if you use table aliases:
SELECT l.lead_id, a.code as attributeCode, ln.content as noteContent, ln.task_type_id, tt.type_name
FROM leads l JOIN
leads_notes ln
ON ln.lead_id = l.lead_id JOIN
task_types tt
ON tt.task_type_id = ln.task_type_id JOIN
leads_attributes la
ON la.lead_id = l.lead_id JOIN
attributes a
ON a.attribute_id = la.attribute_id
WHERE (l.ambassador=1 OR l.rents_bike=1) AND
(l.city <> '') AND
(l.address <>'' OR l.address2 <>'') AND
(l.country_id <> '') AND
(la.attribute_id IN ($attributes_id)) AND
(l.lead_id = $lead_id);
You have add leads_notes table double: one in after leads table and another in inner join, so remove one solve your problem like following
SELECT leads.lead_id,
attributes.code AS attributeCode,
leads_notes.content AS noteContent,
leads_notes.task_type_id,
task_types.type_name
FROM leads
INNER JOIN task_types
ON task_types.task_type_id = leads_notes.task_type_id
INNER JOIN leads_attributes
ON leads_attributes.lead_id = leads.lead_id
INNER JOIN attributes
ON attributes.attribute_id = leads_attributes.attribute_id
INNER JOIN leads_notes
ON leads_notes.lead_id = leads.lead_id
WHERE ( leads.ambassador = 1
OR leads.rents_bike = 1 )
AND ( leads.city <> '' )
AND ( leads.address <> ''
OR leads.address2 <> '' )
AND ( leads.country_id <> '' )
AND ( leads_attributes.attribute_id IN ( $attributes_id ) )
AND ( leads.lead_id = $lead_id )
I have latest dates of 2017 in attandance date but its show just 2016 dates kindly plz help me
SELECT
added_on,
types. `type`,
student.`student_id`, student.`roll`, student.`class_id`, student.`name` AS student_name,
SUM(datewise_attandance.`total_classes`) AS SumOfTotal,
datewise_attandance.attandance_date AS attandance_date,
SUM(datewise_attandance.`status`) AS SumOfPresent,
#ROUND(((SUM(datewise_attandance.`status`)/SUM(datewise_attandance.`total_classes`))*100),2) AS percentage,
class.`name` AS class_name, student.`sex`, student.`father_name`, student.`address`,
student.`phone`, subject.`name` AS subject_name,
#types.`type`, types.`type_id`,
subject.`subject_id`,
#MAX( datewise_attandance.`date_to` ) AS MaxOfAtt_Date_To,
student.`session_id`
FROM
(( class
INNER JOIN `subject` ON class.`class_id` = subject.`class_id` )
INNER JOIN datewise_attandance # ( INNER JOIN types ON datewise_attandance.`type_id` = types.`type_id` )
ON ( subject.`subject_id` = datewise_attandance.`subject_id` )
AND ( class.`class_id` = datewise_attandance.`class_id` ))
INNER JOIN `types` ON( types.`type_id` = subject.`subject_type`)
INNER JOIN student ON ( student.`student_id` = datewise_attandance.`std_id` )
AND ( class.`class_id` = student.`class_id` )
GROUP BY student.`student_id`,
student.`roll`, student.`class_id`, student.`name`, class.`name`,
student.`sex`, student.`father_name`, student.`address`,
student.`phone`, subject.`name`,
# types.`type`, types.`type_id`,
subject.`subject_id`, student.`session_id`
HAVING (
(
student.`class_id` = 4
AND student.`roll` = 388
AND student.`session_id` = 5
)
) ORDER BY IFNULL(subject.final_exam,0) DESC
You are using inner join so if there are matching records then only result will be returned for 2017. Why dont you use left join and try the same
i am try to do somethink like this
UPDATE BA C
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT SUM(`Amount`) AS `LSC`,`To` FROM `Trans`
) A ON C.`UserID` = A.`To`
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT SUM(`Amount`) AS `LSC`,`From` FROM `Trans`
) B ON C.`UserID` = B.`From`
SET `Bal` = A.`LSC` - B.`LSC`;
and this is not workink :\
when i just do 1 inner join and run the query twice once to A and second to be it work but i want to do it in one query ...
UPDATE BA C
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT SUM(`Amount`) AS `LSC`,`To` FROM `Trans`
) A ON C.`UserID` = A.`To`
SET `Bal` = A.`LSC`; // Work
I have a query I built in 3 -4 parts. This takes over 140secs to run once I add the union join with join. How can I change the union join to execute it faster.
SELECT
testing.CLIENTID,
testing.COMPANY,
testing.CONTACT,
testing.CONTACTID,
`orders`.`ORDERNO` AS `ORDERNO`,
`orders`.`BIDNO` AS `BIDNO`,
`projects`.`PROJID` AS `PROJID`,
`projects`.`PROJCODE` AS `PROJCODE`,
`projects`.`StartDate` AS `StartDate`,
`category`.`type` AS `CATEGORY`,
`projects`.`country` AS `COUNTRY`,
`projects`.`VALUE` AS `VALUE`,
`projects`.`PROCESSOR` AS `PROCESSOR`,
`projects`.`NES` AS `NES`,
`projects`.`SPECSALE` AS `SPECSALE`,
`projects`.`OFFICE` AS `OFFICE`,
`projects`.`LORM` AS `LORM`,
`lookupcountry`.`REGION` AS `REGION`
FROM
(
(
(
(
(
(
SELECT
contactmerge.CLIENTID,
contactmerge.CONTACT,
contactmerge.CONTACTID,
accountmerge.COMPANY
FROM
(
SELECT
`hdb`.`contacts`.`CONTACTID` AS `CONTACTID`,
`hdb`.`contacts`.`CLIENTID` AS `CLIENTID`,
concat(
`hdb`.`contacts`.`FIRSTNAME`,
" ",
`hdb`.`contacts`.`LASTNAME`
) AS CONTACT,
_utf8 'paradox' AS `SOURCEDATABASE`
FROM
`hdb`.`contacts`
UNION
SELECT
`sugarcrm`.`contacts`.`id` AS `CONTACTID`,
`sugarcrm`.`accounts_contacts`.`account_id` AS `CLIENTID`,
concat(
`sugarcrm`.`contacts`.`first_name`,
" ",
`sugarcrm`.`contacts`.`last_name`
) AS CONTACT,
_utf8 'sugar' AS `SOURCEDATABASE`
FROM
(
(
(
(
`sugarcrm`.`contacts`
LEFT JOIN `sugarcrm`.`email_addr_bean_rel` ON (
(
(
`sugarcrm`.`contacts`.`id` = `sugarcrm`.`email_addr_bean_rel`.`bean_id`
)
AND (
(
`sugarcrm`.`email_addr_bean_rel`.`primary_address` = 1
)
OR (
(
`sugarcrm`.`email_addr_bean_rel`.`primary_address` IS NOT NULL
)
AND (
`sugarcrm`.`email_addr_bean_rel`.`primary_address` <> 0
)
)
)
)
)
)
LEFT JOIN `sugarcrm`.`accounts_contacts` ON (
(
`sugarcrm`.`contacts`.`id` = `sugarcrm`.`accounts_contacts`.`contact_id`
)
)
)
JOIN `sugarcrm`.`email_addresses` ON (
(
`sugarcrm`.`email_addr_bean_rel`.`email_address_id` = `sugarcrm`.`email_addresses`.`id`
)
)
)
LEFT JOIN `sugarcrm`.`accounts` ON (
(
`sugarcrm`.`accounts`.`id` = `sugarcrm`.`accounts_contacts`.`account_id`
)
)
)
) AS contactmerge
LEFT JOIN (
SELECT
CLIENTID,
`hdb`.`clients`.`COMPANY` AS `COMPANY`
FROM
`hdb`.`clients`
UNION
SELECT
id AS CLIENTID,
`sugarcrm`.`accounts`.`name` AS `COMPANY`
FROM
`sugarcrm`.`accounts`
) AS accountmerge ON contactmerge.CLIENTID = accountmerge.CLIENTID
) AS testing
)
JOIN `orders` ON (
(
`testing`.`CONTACTID` = `orders`.`CONTACTID`
)
)
)
JOIN `projects` ON (
(
`orders`.`ORDERNO` = `projects`.`ORDERNO`
)
)
)
JOIN `category` ON (
(
`category`.`category_id` = `projects`.`category_id`
)
)
)
LEFT JOIN `lookupcountry` ON (
(
CONVERT (
`lookupcountry`.`COUNTRY` USING utf8
) = CONVERT (
`projects`.`country` USING utf8
)
)
)
)
ORDER BY
`testing`.`COMPANY`,
`projects`.`StartDate`
The table alias called testing is the one taking long to execute. I need to then turn this into a view
Original query without the joining of sugarcrm.
SELECT
`clients`.`CORPORATE` AS `CORPORATE`,
`clients`.`COMPANY` AS `COMPANY`,
`clients`.`CLIENTID` AS `CLIENTID`,
`contacts`.`CONTACTID` AS `CONTACTID`,
concat(
`contacts`.`LASTNAME`,
`contacts`.`FIRSTNAME`,
`contacts`.`INITIALS`
) AS `Contact`,
`orders`.`ORDERNO` AS `ORDERNO`,
`orders`.`BIDNO` AS `BIDNO`,
`projects`.`PROJID` AS `PROJID`,
`projects`.`PROJCODE` AS `PROJCODE`,
`projects`.`StartDate` AS `StartDate`,
`category`.`type` AS `CATEGORY`,
`projects`.`country` AS `COUNTRY`,
`projects`.`VALUE` AS `VALUE`,
`projects`.`PROCESSOR` AS `PROCESSOR`,
`projects`.`NES` AS `NES`,
`projects`.`SPECSALE` AS `SPECSALE`,
`projects`.`OFFICE` AS `OFFICE`,
`projects`.`LORM` AS `LORM`,
`lookupcountry`.`REGION` AS `REGION`
FROM
(
(
(
(
(
`clients`
JOIN `contacts` ON (
(
`clients`.`CLIENTID` = `contacts`.`CLIENTID`
)
)
)
JOIN `orders` ON (
(
`contacts`.`CONTACTID` = `orders`.`CONTACTID`
)
)
)
JOIN `projects` ON (
(
`orders`.`ORDERNO` = `projects`.`ORDERNO`
)
)
)
JOIN `category` ON (
(
`category`.`category_id` = `projects`.`category_id`
)
)
)
LEFT JOIN `lookupcountry` ON (
(
CONVERT (
`lookupcountry`.`COUNTRY` USING utf8
) = CONVERT (
`projects`.`country` USING utf8
)
)
)
)
ORDER BY
`clients`.`CORPORATE`,
`clients`.`COMPANY`,
`contacts`.`LASTNAME`,
`projects`.`StartDate`
Your LEFT JOIN from sugarcrm.contacts to sugarcrm.email_addr_bean_rel
ON the id=bean_id is ok, but then your test for Primary_Address = 1
OR ( primary address IS NOT NULL AND primary_address <> 0 ) is wasteful.
Not null mean it has a value. The first qualifier of 1 is ok, but then
you test for any address not equal to 0 (thus 1 is, but so is 2, 3, 400, 1809 or
any other number. So why not just take how I've simplified it.
SELECT
O.ORDERNO,
O.BIDNO,
CASE when c.ContactID IS NULL
then sc.id
ELSE c.contactid END as ContactID,
CASE when c.ContactID IS NULL
then sac.account_id
ELSE c.clientid END as ClientID,
CASE when c.ContactID IS NULL
then concat( sc.first_name, " ", sc.last_name )
ELSE concat( c.FIRSTNAME, " ", c.LASTNAME ) END as Contact,
CASE when c.ContactID IS NULL
then sCli.`name`
ELSE cCli.Company END as Company,
CASE when c.ContactID IS NULL
then _utf8 'sugar'
ELSE _utf8 'paradox' END as SOURCEDATABASE,
P.PROJID,
P.PROJCODE,
P.StartDate,
Cat.`type` AS CATEGORY,
P.`country` AS COUNTRY,
P.`VALUE` AS `VALUE`,
P.PROCESSOR,
P.NES,
P.SPECSALE,
P.OFFICE,
P.LORM,
LC.REGION
FROM
orders O
JOIN projects P
ON O.ORDERNO = P.ORDERNO
JOIN category Cat
ON P.category_id = Cat.category_id
LEFT JOIN lookupcountry LC
ON CONVERT( P.`country` USING utf8 ) = CONVERT( LC.COUNTRY USING utf8 )
LEFT JOIN hdb.contacts c
ON O.ContactID = c.ClientID
LEFT JOIN hdb.clients cCli
ON c.ClientID = cCli.ClientID
LEFT JOIN sugarcrm.contacts sc
ON O.ContactID = sc.id
LEFT JOIN sugarcrm.accounts sCli
ON sc.id = sCli.id
LEFT JOIN sugarcrm.accounts_contacts sac
ON sc.id = sac.contact_id
LEFT JOIN sugarcrm.accounts Acc
ON sac.account_id = Acc.id
LEFT JOIN sugarcrm.email_addr_bean_rel EABR
ON sc.id = EABR.bean_id
AND EABR.primary_address IS NOT NULL
LEFT JOIN sugarcrm.email_addresses EA
ON EABR.email_address_id = EA.id
ORDER BY
CASE when c.ContactID IS NULL
then sCli.`name`
ELSE cCli.Company END,
P.StartDate
I don't mind helping, but from now on, you should take a look at what I'm doing... Establish the relationships... Start with the basis of your data (orders) and look at ONE PATH on how to connect to your "contacts" table... Write those joins (as left-joins). THEN, write your paths to the SUGAR account contacts and write THOSE joins (also left-joins). Don't try to prequery all possible contacts, but using the CASE/WHEN to determine which to get based on a null route vs not just as I have with the contact, client, company, etc. You will get the data from one path vs the other... just keep it consistent.