I have build my site using entity and repository pattern with ninject injection. My problem is my connections don't seem to get disposed. I have around 30 repositories (one for each table) and I get sql expiration timout preety quick. I can't use the regular using statement because the code recognize only the interface before the injection.
(in each controler I have my repositories interface instances which get injected via ninject).
I have searched the net but couldn't find a solution that was accurate for me.
can anyone please help me?
code example:
this is in the ninject controller under addBindings():
ninjectKernel.Bind<IMovieRepository>().To<MovieRepository>().InRequestScope();
and one of my repositories:
public class MovieRepository : IMovieRepository, IDisposable
{
private Entities dataContext = new Entities();
public System.Data.Entity.DbContext DbContext
{
get { return dataContext ?? (dataContext = new Entities()); }
}
public void Dispose() { dataContext.Dispose(); }
}
and in the Global.asax file:
ControllerBuilder.Current.SetControllerFactory(new NinjectControllerFactory() as IControllerFactory);
I would guess that your repositories (and therefore presumably your DbContexts) are being bound in transient scope, which I believe means a new one will be created every time Ninject needs to inject one somewhere. I'm not certain but I'm guessing then that these are all staying around for the lifetime of your application and maybe not being disposed.
Try binding your repositories in request scope, so that they are created and disposed per web request.
e.g.
Bind<IFooRepository>().To<ConcreteFooRepository>().InRequestScope();
From the Ninject wiki:
There are four built-in scopes available in Ninject:
Transient - A new instance of the type will be created each time one is requested. (This is the default scope). Binding method is .InTransientScope()
Singleton - Only a single instance of the type will be created, and the same instance will be returned for each subsequent request. Binding method is .InSingletonScope()
Thread - One instance of the type will be created per thread. Binding method is .InThreadScope()
Request - One instance of the type will be created per web request, and will be destroyed when the request ends. Binding method is .InRequestScope()
This kind of problem usually occur if long living objects depend on shorter living objects. E.g. A singleton service uses a repository in request scope.
Related
I've a data table as below:
<h:dataTable value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
I'd like to populate it with a collection from the database obtained from a service method so that it is immediately presented when the page is opened during an initial (GET) request. When should I call the service method? And why?
Call it before page is loaded. But how?
Call it during page load. How?
Call it in the getter method. But it is called multiple times.
Something else?
Do it in bean's #PostConstruct method.
#ManagedBean
#RequestScoped
public class Bean {
private List<Item> items;
#EJB
private ItemService itemService;
#PostConstruct
public void init() {
items = itemService.list();
}
public List<Item> getItems() {
return items;
}
}
And let the value reference the property (not method!).
<h:dataTable value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
In the #PostConstruct you have the advantage that it's executed after construction and dependency injection. So in case that you're using an EJB to do the DB interaction task, a #PostConstruct would definitely be the right place as injected dependencies would not be available inside a normal constructor yet. Moreover, when using a bean management framework which uses proxies, such as CDI #Named, the constructor may or may not be called the way you expect. It may be called multiple times during inspecting the class, generating the proxy, and/or creating the proxy.
At least do not perform the DB interaction job in the getter, unless it's lazy loading and you really can't do anything else. Namely, it would be invoked during every iteration round. Calling the service method during every iteration round is plain inefficient and may end up in "weird" side effects during presentation and postbacks, such as old values from DB seemingly still sticking around in the model instead of new submitted values.
If you rely on GET request parameters, then use <f:viewParam> and <f:viewAction> instead. See also Creating master-detail pages for entities, how to link them and which bean scope to choose.
If you want to preserve the model (the items property) across postbacks on the same view (e.g. CRUD table/dialog), then make the bean #ViewScoped, else the model won't be in sync with the view when the same model is concurrently edited elsewhere. See also Creating master-detail table and dialog, how to reuse same dialog for create and edit.
If you utilize JPA's #Version feature on the model, then you can catch OptimisticLockException to deal with it and show a message like "The data has been edited by someone else, please refresh/review if the desired changes are as intended". See also Letting the presentation layer (JSF) handle business exceptions from service layer (EJB).
See also:
Why JSF calls getters multiple times
What can <f:metadata>, <f:viewParam> and <f:viewAction> be used for?
How to choose the right bean scope?
JSF Controller, Service and DAO
I've a data table as below:
<h:dataTable value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
I'd like to populate it with a collection from the database obtained from a service method so that it is immediately presented when the page is opened during an initial (GET) request. When should I call the service method? And why?
Call it before page is loaded. But how?
Call it during page load. How?
Call it in the getter method. But it is called multiple times.
Something else?
Do it in bean's #PostConstruct method.
#ManagedBean
#RequestScoped
public class Bean {
private List<Item> items;
#EJB
private ItemService itemService;
#PostConstruct
public void init() {
items = itemService.list();
}
public List<Item> getItems() {
return items;
}
}
And let the value reference the property (not method!).
<h:dataTable value="#{bean.items}" var="item">
In the #PostConstruct you have the advantage that it's executed after construction and dependency injection. So in case that you're using an EJB to do the DB interaction task, a #PostConstruct would definitely be the right place as injected dependencies would not be available inside a normal constructor yet. Moreover, when using a bean management framework which uses proxies, such as CDI #Named, the constructor may or may not be called the way you expect. It may be called multiple times during inspecting the class, generating the proxy, and/or creating the proxy.
At least do not perform the DB interaction job in the getter, unless it's lazy loading and you really can't do anything else. Namely, it would be invoked during every iteration round. Calling the service method during every iteration round is plain inefficient and may end up in "weird" side effects during presentation and postbacks, such as old values from DB seemingly still sticking around in the model instead of new submitted values.
If you rely on GET request parameters, then use <f:viewParam> and <f:viewAction> instead. See also Creating master-detail pages for entities, how to link them and which bean scope to choose.
If you want to preserve the model (the items property) across postbacks on the same view (e.g. CRUD table/dialog), then make the bean #ViewScoped, else the model won't be in sync with the view when the same model is concurrently edited elsewhere. See also Creating master-detail table and dialog, how to reuse same dialog for create and edit.
If you utilize JPA's #Version feature on the model, then you can catch OptimisticLockException to deal with it and show a message like "The data has been edited by someone else, please refresh/review if the desired changes are as intended". See also Letting the presentation layer (JSF) handle business exceptions from service layer (EJB).
See also:
Why JSF calls getters multiple times
What can <f:metadata>, <f:viewParam> and <f:viewAction> be used for?
How to choose the right bean scope?
JSF Controller, Service and DAO
I've been running into endless problems attempting to use Windsor with Web API and injecting HttpRequestMessage into downstream dependencies of a controller. Since I've tried all the matching answers on Stackoverflow, I'd like to ask the question in a different way:
In Castle Windsor, how can I resolve a component instance while supplying a value for a downstream dependency? That is, the supplied value is required by a component that is required by the component being resolved.
For context, I'm trying to inject HttpRequestMessage so that I can use it to resolve the request context (primarily to resolve an absolute URL).
Edit I'd also like to point out that I don't currently have a dependency on Web Host / System.Web and I'd rather not change that.
A proper approach is to
Create IMyDesiredRouteParameterProvider
Implement it. Get the current request inside it and get the url
Register it and inject it in the desired dependent class via constructor.
I made myself such an implementation and I can say that this way it works fine. You can make Web.Infrastructure assembly and put the implementation there. Or put both the interface and the implementation there if you are going to reference it from another web module.
using System;
using System.Web;
namespace RouteParameterProvider
{
interface IMyRouteParameterProvider
{
string GetRouteParameter();
}
public class ControllerActionMethodRouteParameterProvider : IMyRouteParameterProvider
{
public string GetRouteParameter()
{
string Parameter = HttpContext.Current.Request.RequestContext.RouteData.Values["controller"] as string;
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(Parameter))
{
throw new InvalidOperationException();
}
return Parameter;
}
}
}
You can get every possible thing that the Request Context contains from :
HttpContext.Current.Request.RequestContext
And it will be better if you rethink your design decision :
I need HttpRequestMessage to be regstered prior to creating each
instance of SomethingController so that it will be available down at
the LinkGenerator layer.
Containers are to be initialized at runtime and then used to resolve.
I need HttpRequestMessage to be regstered prior to creating each
instance of SomethingController so that it will be available down at
the LinkGenerator layer.
It sounds like you want to register an item with the container at runtime, post-startup. In general, this is not a good practice--registration should be a discrete event that happens when the app is fired up, and the container's state should not be changed during runtime.
Dependency Injection is about resolving service components, not runtime state--state is generally passed via methods (method injection). In this case it sounds like your LinkGenerator component needs access to the ambient state of the request.
I'm not that familiar with HttpRequestMessage, but this answer seems to show that it is possible to retreive it from HttpContext.Current. You could make this a method on your LinkGenerator class, or wrap this call in a separate component that gets injected into LinkGenerator (HttpRequestMessageProvider?). The latter would be my preferred method, as it allows LinkGenerator to be more testable.
Given the lack of a clean way of doing this and Web API not providing information as to the hosted endpoint beyond per-request context objects, I ended up injecting the base url from configuration.
Is this library by Mark Seemann the answer? In the description he writes explicitly :
This approach enables the use of Dependency Injection (DI) because the
request can be injected into the services which require it.
Then gives an example :
// Inside an ApiController
var uri = this.Url.GetLink(a=> a.GetById(1337));
By which you can then pass the URL down the road in the service that you have injected in the controller.
UPDATE :
Mark Seemann wrote about the same exact problem here:
"Because HttpRequestMessage provides the context you may need to
compose dependency graphs, the best extensibility point is the
extensibility point which provides an HttpRequestMessage every time a
graph should be composed. This extensibility point is the
IHttpControllerActivator interface:..."
This way you can pass request context information to a component deep in the object graph by getting from the HttpRequestMessage and passing it to the DI container.
Just take a look at the interface of IHttpControllerActivator.
The WEB API framework gets the IHttpControllerActivator through DependencyResolver. You probably already replaced it by your CastleWindsorDependencyResolver. Now you have to implement and register your HttpControllerActivator and register it.
When the WEB API framework gets IHttpControllerActivator from DependencyResolver (your Castle Windsor DR) and calls IHttpControllerActivator.Create() it will pass you the HttpRequestMessage. You can get your info from there and pass it to the your CastleDR before you call Resolve(typeof(MyController)) which will resolve the whole object graph - that means you will have MyHttpContextInfo to inject in your XYZComponent deep in the resolution stack.
This way tou are passing the arguments in the last possible moment but it is still possible. In Castle Windsor I make such passing of arguments though CreationContext.AdditionalArguments["myArgument"];.
Update: I think is down to a Windsor configuration, does any one have any idea as to what I have not configured correctly with Windsor?
I am currently using Envers within a C# WebApi project. Windsor is used for IoC.
I have a custom RevisionEntity which add a User property to audit the user who has made the data change.
To ensure all configurations were correct I started off with a "simple string here" being added in the NewRevision method;
public class AuditRevisionListener : IRevisionListener
{
public void NewRevision(object revisionEntity)
{
((AuditRevision)revisionEntity).User = "Simple string here";
}
}
and all persisted as expected.
Next step is to achieve a full User object to which I need to obtain the UserService;
public class AuditRevisionListener : IRevisionListener
{
public void NewRevision(object revisionEntity)
{
var userServices = (IUserServices)GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.DependencyResolver.GetService(typeof(IUserServices));
var user = userServices.GetRequestingUser();
((AuditRevision)revisionEntity).User = user;
}
}
However, the DependencyResolver.GetService is throwing the error;
"Cannot access a disposed object. Object name: 'Scope cache was already disposed. This is most likely a bug in the calling code.'. "
UPDATE
I have now created a demo project available at https://github.com/ScottFindlater/WindsorEnversIssue
On first setting up the solution all will run fine because the custom Envers RevisionListener is not performing any dependency resolving.
Run the solution which performs a GET to the HomeController, which simply loads one User and modifies another;
Dependency resolving is shown to be working as there is an ActionFilter called DependencyResolverDoesWork which successfully resolves the UserServices.
Envers is shown to be working as the UserAudit table is populated.
To “turn on” the dependency resolving in the customer RevisionListener navigate to; Domain NHibernate project, Auditing folder, AuditRevisionListener class, NewRevision method and uncomment the 2 lines of code.
Full rebuild and then run the solution again and the project will run time exception in the WindsorDependencyResolver class, GetService method with “Cannot access a disposed object”, and clicking the View Detail Action expands this message to “{"Cannot access a disposed object.\r\nObject name: 'Scope cache was already disposed. This is most likely a bug in the calling code.'."}”.
The comment posted by Roger, thank you so much, which suggests changing the LifeStyle to Singleton does work. However, this demo has been purposefully kept simple and the use of PerWebRequest LifeStyle is needed because the ApplicationServices in the real project has contextual related data injected such as requesting user which is used to enforce security.
I am so stuck now and any pointers/ answers as to what I have setup wrong will be gratefully received. In addition, I know this has been posted at SO and Envers forum, I WILL update an answer on both.
I think is down to a Windsor configuration, does any one have any idea as to what I have not configured correctly with Windsor?
I haven't tried to run your sample, but I think this is down to an interplay between the two http modules defined in your web.config (https://github.com/ScottFindlater/WindsorEnversIssue/blob/master/API%20Endpoints/Web.config)
Castle.MicroKernel.Lifestyle.PerWebRequestLifestyleModule - Controls the lifetime of "per web request" components
APIEndpoints.HttpModules.NHibernateSessionCoordinator - Opens a session and begins a transaction at the beginning of each web request, then commits the transaction and disposes the session at the end of the web request
It is at the point where you commit your transaction - at the end of the request, triggered by NHibernateSessionCoordinator, that any changes you've made to objects within your NHibernate ISession actually get written to the database. This is the point at which Envers does its stuff and, in turn, at which you attempt to resolve IUserService from your Windsor container. The exception is thrown because IUserService is registered with the "per web request" lifestyle and Windsor is treating the current web request as complete and has disposed any objects tied to the request.
Have you tried reversing the order in which the HttpModules are defined, e.g. NHibernateSessionCoordinator before PerWebRequestLifestyleModule? This will result in your NHibernate transaction being committed before per web request components are disposed.
I am building a site using entity framework 4.1 and mvc3. I am using the Generic Repository pattern:
http://www.tugberkugurlu.com/archive/generic-repository-pattern-entity-framework-asp-net-mvc-and-unit-testing-triangle. I use ninject to inject my concretes repositories to the controllers.
My problem is that each of my dbcontext different and I cannot run complex queries without the code shouting something like "different contexts cannot be used in the same query". I tried using the "singleton" approach but then code shouted something like "tried to enter a disposed object (null reference exception)".
Does anyone have an idea of what I'm doing wrong?
The Singleton pattern is an anti-pattern that should be avoided. It leads to hard to test code with all kinds of side effects (for example, a disposed DbContext).
The UnitOfWork manages operations on different repositories. It will keep track of all the changes that are made and then it will write those changes in the right order to your database. The DbContext already implements the UnitOfWork pattern (Altough it's nicer to hide the DbContext behind a custom UnitOfWork interface).
If you are already using dependency injection trough NInject you are almost their! You should change the constructors of your Repository to take a DbContext:
public class MyRepository
{
private _unitOfWork;
public MyRepository(DbContext unitOfWork)
{
_unitOfWork = unitOfWork;
}
....
}
If you then wire the DbContext to NInject with a InRequestScope mode everything should work. Your DbContext will then be shared by all Repositories and Ninject will dispose of it at the end of your request.
Not sure if I'm getting your question or not, but your repositories should be able to work within a "Unit of Work" which would have a single dbcontext.
I find the best place to start this unit of work is on the begin request, which you can setup in your global.asax ( and the end request for tear down )