A buddy of mine needed help adding multiple directories to an SQL database while sharing the same schema yet have different listings. I've scoured my "MySQL" books and Google, I can't find any definitive information. I was just hoping someone here knew how to do this.
To clarify, there are a total of 12 directories. 11 are to be searched independently of one another and the 12th (which already exists) will be a directory comprised of all 11 directories, all of which will have the same schema.
The goals are to create these unique directories using the existing schema model, and to upload multiple directory entries at a time to the directories.
Does this mean the names of the directory entries have to be unique (ie. Name_1, Name_2, Name_3, etc...?) Or, will it be a matter of duplicating the schema under a different name? Any advise will help.
A directory, in this context, is like a roledex. I mean to have 12 roledexes with each rolodex having unique entries frem eachother. How do you approach this database-wise?
After logging into your PHPMyadmin select or go in to the table you want to duplicate-and-rename, then click on "Operations." There you see a series of boxes with one called "Copy table to (database.table)" You can choose to duplicate structure and data, or structure only. Type the name you want and click go. And your new table with listing will be ready to edit and search!
If I understand what you're asking... I think you want to create a new database for each "directory," as you put it, with the same table definitions in it.
The word "database" in mySQL parlance means the same thing as "schema" in the parlance of some other RDBMS systems. You can't have two sets of data with the same table names in the same database (a/k/a schema). You need a different schema for this.
It's very common to have lots of databases in a single server with precisely the same tables / columns / keys etc. And yes, phpmyadmin can handle this.
The word "directory" is confusing, though. It ordinarily refers to the on-disk data storage used by the mySQL (RDBMS) server program. But I don't think that's what you mean. If you DO mean it, please make sure you are highly skilled at system administration before you try to muck around with the file systems on the mySQL server. It's easy to break stuff. (Ask me how I know how easy it is to break stuff :-) :-)
Related
Right now I have a database in phpMyAdmin, and off the the side of the screen, it shows the database name, and a list of tables inside the database. It's fine if it's only a couple of tables, but when there's dozens of tables, it gets hard to find the tables I want to edit. I've thought about creating another database to make it easier to organize, but then I'll have to connect using the different database's name and a different user login for the database, and I just thought how much easier would it be if I can make folders or something similar inside the database I already have to organize my tables. I'm wondering if something like this is possible, or anyone know any work-around this issue.
Well, you can't create a database (or folders) within a database; that's just not something MySQL is able to do.
phpMyAdmin has a grouping feature that may help your situation. By default, databases with a prefix followed by _ (a single underscore) will be grouped together, as will tables with __ (two underscores).
Here's an example of how this ends up looking when grouped:
Database:
Table:
If you're able to rename some of your tables, you'll be able to take advantage of the grouping feature to make the phpMyAdmin display a bit more manageable. Of course, this won't change the way other tools display the table list.
The configuration directives $cfg['NavigationTreeDbSeparator'] and $cfg['NavigationTreeTableSeparator'] control the separator used. The relevant documentation starts at http://docs.phpmyadmin.net/en/latest/config.html#cfg_NavigationTreeEnableGrouping and includes the next few line items.
I’m currently developing an Application for Win, Linux Mac. The Purpose of the Application is that multiple users are able create Projects based on a single Article. Every Article has up to 15 different Fields/Options (could also be more in future). The Fields of the Article should be changeable so I should be able to add, edit or remove them.
Fields I want to store:
Numbers
Texts (mostly options [1 Word], sometimes Comments [some sentences])
Path/Links to Files
What I want to do with the dB:
load all projects of a user at login
add, edit, remove, delete single projects
set a lock on projects (because multiple people are operating one user-account at the same time and therefore they may not be allowed to edit a project at the same time so if one starts editing it should be locked until he's saving, channelling or time-out)
What is the best way to manage this kind of Data?
Should I create a Table for each user and only make a ID Column and one where all the Values of the all the fields (who are merged to one big string)?
Should I create Tables for every Project and make Columns for every Field/Option and also one for the user / owner?
Or are there any other possibility’s?
If you don't know what you are going to store, then I doubt whether a relational database is the best option for you. Maybe a document store/noSQL database is a better decision, because you can just store documents (usually in the form of Json objects) that can have all kinds of additional fields.
A couple of such databases to look at are MongoDB, Cassandra, ElasticSearch, but you can find a big list on Wikipedia.
I asked a question a few days ago to know how to import an existing database into Neo4J. Thanks to the person who explained me how to do that. I decided to create a CSV file from my database (around 1 million entries) and to load it from the Neo4j webadmin to test it. The problem is that each row of this database contains redundant data, for example my database contains actions from different users but each user can do mutliple actions. The structure of my graph would be to create a node for each user that is linked to each action he does. That's why I have to create only one node for each user even if his name appears in several rows of my CSV file (because he made several actions). What is the method to do that ? I guess it's possible to do that in Cypher right ?
Thanks a lot
Regards
Sam
In case you have references that might or might not exist, you should use the MERGE statement. MERGE either finds something or creates something in your database.
Please refer to the respective section in the reference manual: http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/stable/cypherdoc-importing-csv-files-with-cypher.html. Here the country is shared my multiple users there the country is merged wheres the users and their relationships to countries are unconditionally created.
I have to build this retail site, and aparently all the properties info comes from a third party company. Everything looked fine, they sent me a .mdb file with all the tables (which convert to a .sql file), and later I get emailed with data to update those tables.
What confused me was the fact that a few of these tables already have values in them. And when looking at the documentation, it says that I will also get emailed 'dictionary tables'. It says: "These tables contain fixed values in reference to value tables".
I have googled and searched here at stalkoverflow but couldnt find an answer. What I read was something about 'sas' and 'proc sql' which I haven't heard before.
Could someone please explain me (or kindly point me to some understandable documentation) what this tables are (are they in fact tables?), and how can I use them to build my site? I also use Codeigniter, can I use active records on them? Or what would be the correct SQL to access that table? I'm pretty much lost here :(
I use Codeigniter 2.x and Mysql.
Thanks guys, I will be infinetely grateful for your help.
Two guesses:
a data dictionary provides information about tables in a database:
field names, field types, field sizes
stored procedures associated with certain tables
OR
simply a fixed table that provides lookup or validation for a separate updatable table.
I have this assignment that I think someone should be able to help me. I have 5 ACCESS databases wvrapnaoh.accdb, wvrappaul.accdb, ....etc. These databases have about 45 tables each and 15 forms. The good part is the structure, the name and the fields of each table in all the databases are all the same except the data or the records are different. For example I have a stress table in wvrapnoah as well as wvrappaul with the same fields in both tables but different data or records.
So, I need to merge all these five into a new Access database that will have the same structure as the 5 databases but will include the complete data that is all the records from the 5 databases merged into this new database.The same applies to even the 15 forms. It does not seem to be having a primary key I guess. I was planning to add a field for each table that would give me the name of the database as well from which it was merged. Example I will add a DBName field in Wvrapnoah in all the tables and add the name Noah in that field for all the records in each table. I basically need to automate this code.
I need a script (VBA or anything) so that the guys creating these databases can just run this script the next time and merge the databases.
Talking about the 'table' part of the problem:
Questions
Are the databases / table names defined or you don't know them?
Are you able to use linked tables?
I believe the straightforward way to merge all of them is to link all tables into a single access DB and then run a UNION ALL query. It would be something like this:
SELECT "HANK", *
FROM MyTableHank
UNION ALL
SELECT "JOHN", *
FROM MyTableJohn;
Notice I defined a field to identify the origin of the data being merged ("HANK", "JOHN"), as you suggested above.
About the forms, I believe you'll need to import them and then review the whole code. It basically depends on what the forms are doing. If they're query-based won't be a big deal (importing / fixing the queries, will make the form works). However, if the forms are related to the tables, you'll have more work to do.