Scale image to fit a bounding box - html

Is there a css-only solution to scale an image into a bounding box (keeping aspect-ratio)? This works if the image is bigger than the container:
img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
Example:
Use case 1 (works): http://jsfiddle.net/Jp5AQ/2/
Use case 2 (works): http://jsfiddle.net/Jp5AQ/3/
But I want to scale up the image until a dimension is 100% of the container.
Use case 3 (doesn't work): http://jsfiddle.net/Jp5AQ/4/

Thanks to CSS3 there is a solution !
The solution is to put the image as background-image and then set the background-size to contain.
HTML
<div class='bounding-box'>
</div>
CSS
.bounding-box {
background-image: url(...);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: contain;
}
Test it here: http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/playit.asp?filename=playcss_background-size&preval=contain
Full compatibility with latest browsers: http://caniuse.com/background-img-opts
To align the div in the center, you can use this variation:
.bounding-box {
background-image: url(...);
background-size: contain;
position: absolute;
background-position: center;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}

Note: Even though this is the accepted answer, the answer below is more accurate and is currently supported in all browsers if you have the option of using a background image.
Edit 2: In the modern age, using object-fit might be an even better solution: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/object-fit
No, there is no CSS only way to do this in both directions. You could add
.fillwidth {
min-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
To the an element to always have it 100% width and automatically scale the height to the aspect ratio, or the inverse:
.fillheight {
min-height: 100%;
width: auto;
}
to always scale to max height and relative width. To do both, you will need to determine if the aspect ratio is higher or lower than it's container, and CSS can't do this.
The reason is that CSS does not know what the page looks like. It sets rules beforehand, but only after that it is that the elements get rendered and you know exactly what sizes and ratios you're dealing with. The only way to detect that is with JavaScript.
Although you're not looking for a JS solution I'll add one anyway if someone might need it. The easiest way to handle this with JavaScript is to add a class based on the difference in ratio. If the width-to-height ratio of the box is greater than that of the image, add the class "fillwidth", else add the class "fillheight".
$('div').each(function() {
var fillClass = ($(this).height() > $(this).width())
? 'fillheight'
: 'fillwidth';
$(this).find('img').addClass(fillClass);
});
.fillwidth {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
.fillheight {
height: 100%;
width: auto;
}
div {
border: 1px solid black;
overflow: hidden;
}
.tower {
width: 100px;
height: 200px;
}
.trailer {
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div class="tower">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/150/150" />
</div>
<div class="trailer">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/150/150" />
</div>

Here's a hackish solution I discovered:
#image {
max-width: 10%;
max-height: 10%;
transform: scale(10);
}
This will enlarge the image tenfold, but restrict it to 10% of its final size - thus bounding it to the container.
Unlike the background-image solution, this will also work with <video> elements.
Interactive example:
function step(timestamp) {
var container = document.getElementById('container');
timestamp /= 1000;
container.style.left = (200 + 100 * Math.sin(timestamp * 1.0)) + 'px';
container.style.top = (200 + 100 * Math.sin(timestamp * 1.1)) + 'px';
container.style.width = (500 + 500 * Math.sin(timestamp * 1.2)) + 'px';
container.style.height = (500 + 500 * Math.sin(timestamp * 1.3)) + 'px';
window.requestAnimationFrame(step);
}
window.requestAnimationFrame(step);
#container {
outline: 1px solid black;
position: relative;
background-color: red;
}
#image {
display: block;
max-width: 10%;
max-height: 10%;
transform-origin: 0 0;
transform: scale(10);
}
<div id="container">
<img id="image" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7d/Lenna_%28test_image%29.png">
</div>

Today, just say object-fit: contain. Support is everything but IE: http://caniuse.com/#feat=object-fit

html:
<div class="container">
<img class="flowerImg" src="flower.jpg">
</div>
css:
.container{
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
}
.flowerImg{
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
object-fit: cover;
/*object-fit: contain;
object-fit: scale-down;
object-position: -10% 0;
object-fit: none;
object-fit: fill;*/
}

You can accomplish this with pure CSS and complete browser support, both for vertically-long and horizontally-long images at the same time.
Here's a snippet which works in Chrome, Firefox, and Safari (both using object-fit: scale-down, and without using it):
figure {
margin: 0;
}
.container {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
width: 80px;
height: 80px;
border: 1px solid #aaa;
}
.container_image {
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
.container2_image2 {
width: 80px;
height: 80px;
object-fit: scale-down;
border: 1px solid #aaa;
}
Without `object-fit: scale-down`:
<br>
<br>
<figure class="container">
<img class="container_image" src="https://i.imgur.com/EQgexUd.jpg">
</figure>
<br>
<figure class="container">
<img class="container_image" src="https://i.imgur.com/ptO8pGi.jpg">
</figure>
<br> Using `object-fit: scale-down`:
<br>
<br>
<figure>
<img class="container2_image2" src="https://i.imgur.com/EQgexUd.jpg">
</figure>
<br>
<figure>
<img class="container2_image2" src="https://i.imgur.com/ptO8pGi.jpg">
</figure>

Another solution without background image and without the need for a container (though the max sizes of the bounding box must be known):
img{
max-height: 100px;
max-width: 100px;
width: auto; /* These two are added only for clarity, */
height: auto; /* as the default is auto anyway */
}
If a container's use is required, then the max-width and max-height can be set to 100%:
img {
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
width: auto; /* These two are added only for clarity, */
height: auto; /* as the default is auto anyway */
}
div.container {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
}
For this you would have something like:
<table>
<tr>
<td>Lorem</td>
<td>Ipsum<br />dolor</td>
<td>
<div class="container"><img src="image5.png" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>

This example to stretch the image proportionally to fit the entire window.
An improvisation to the above correct code is to add $( window ).resize(function(){});
function stretchImg(){
$('div').each(function() {
($(this).height() > $(this).find('img').height())
? $(this).find('img').removeClass('fillwidth').addClass('fillheight')
: '';
($(this).width() > $(this).find('img').width())
? $(this).find('img').removeClass('fillheight').addClass('fillwidth')
: '';
});
}
stretchImg();
$( window ).resize(function() {
strechImg();
});
There are two if conditions. The first one keeps checking if the image height is less than the div and applies .fillheight class while the next checks for width and applies .fillwidth class.
In both cases the other class is removed using .removeClass()
Here is the CSS
.fillwidth {
width: 100%;
max-width: none;
height: auto;
}
.fillheight {
height: 100vh;
max-width: none;
width: auto;
}
You can replace 100vh by 100% if you want to stretch the image with in a div. This example to stretch the image proportionally to fit the entire window.

Are you looking to scale upwards but not downwards?
div {
border: solid 1px green;
width: 60px;
height: 70px;
}
div img {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
min-height: 500px;
min-width: 500px;
outline: solid 1px red;
}
This however, does not lock aspect-ratio.

I have used table to center image inside the box. It keeps aspect ratio and scales image in a way that is totally inside the box. If the image is smaller than the box then it is shown as it is in the center. Below code uses 40px width and 40px height box. (Not quite sure how well it works because I removed it from another more complex code and simplified it little bit)
.SmallThumbnailContainer {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
float: left;
width: 40px;
height: 40px;
border: 1px solid #ccc;
margin: 0px;
padding: 0px;
}
.SmallThumbnailContainer {
width: 40px;
margin: 0px 10px 0px 0px;
}
.SmallThumbnailContainer tr {
height: 40px;
text-align: center;
}
.SmallThumbnailContainer tr td {
vertical-align: middle;
position: relative;
width: 40px;
}
.SmallThumbnailContainer tr td img {
overflow: hidden;
max-height: 40px;
max-width: 40px;
vertical-align: middle;
margin: -1px -1px 1px -1px;
}
<table class="SmallThumbnailContainer" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td>
<img src="https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/bf7d39f4ed9c289feca7de38a0093250?s=32&d=identicon&r=PG" width="32" height="32" alt="OP's SO avatar image used as a sample jpg because it is hosted on SO, thus always available" />
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Note: the native thumbnail size in this snippet is 32px x 32px, which is smaller than its 40px x 40px container. If the container is instead sized smaller than the thumbnail in any dimension, say 40px x 20px, the image flows outside the container in the dimensions that are smaller than the corresponding image dimension. The container is marked by a gray 1px border.

Use Object Fit on both div and img to scale image
<div class="box"><img src="image.jpg"></div>
.box {height: auto;
object-fit: cover;}
img { height: 100%; object-fit: cover; }

This worked for my needs, doesn't flatten out the image while setting height limitation, it overflows instead.
.top-container{
width:50%;
}
.img-container {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
height: 40vh;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
.img-container img {
max-width: 10%;
max-height: auto;
transform: scale(10);
}
<div class='top-container'>
<div class='img-container'>
<img src='image.jpg'>
</div>
</div>

First some CSS:
div.image-wrapper {
height: 230px; /* Suggestive number; pick your own height as desired */
position: relative;
overflow: hidden; /* This will do the magic */
width: 300px; /* Pick an appropriate width as desired, unless you already use a grid, in that case use 100% */
}
img {
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: auto;
}
The HTML:
<div class="image-wrapper">
<img src="yourSource.jpg">
</div>

.img-class {
width: <img width>;
height: <img height>;
content: url('/path/to/img.png');
}
Then on the element (you can use javascript or media queries to add responsiveness):
<div class='img-class' style='transform: scale(X);'></div>

.boundingbox {
width: 400px;
height: 500px;
border: 2px solid #F63;
}
img{
width:400px;
max-height: 500px;
height:auto;
}
With the styles set as shown above in css, now the following html div will show the image always fit width wise and will adjust hight aspect ratio to width. Thus image will scale to fit a bounding box as asked in the question.
<div class="boundingbox"><img src="image.jpg"/></div>

Related

How to make an Height and Width Responsive Image with Kept Ratio in html and css?

There exist many similar questions, but none has yet solved my requirements:
Aspect ratio should be kept, AND
Height responsive, AND
Width responsive, AND
Full image should always be seen within the browser window (i.e. the responsiveness should be with regards to the tightest dimension).
I have achieved these requirements, but not all of them in the same time. For example:
If I let the code below as it is with
height="90%" width="auto"
then it is height responsive but not width responsive.
If I change to
height="auto" width="90%"
then it is width responsive but not height responsive.
If I change to
height="90%" width="90%"
then it is both height and width responsive, but the ratio is not kept.
To test, please "Run code snippet" and check with "Full page" the situation by changing both height and width of the browser window.
.test {
height: 90vh;
width: 90%;
background-color: #222;
color: #eee;
padding: 2rem;
}
.test img {
align-items: center;
}
<div class="test">
<img height="90%" width="auto" src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1418065460487-3e41a6c84dc5?ixid=MXwxMjA3fDB8MHxwaG90by1wYWdlfHx8fGVufDB8fHw%3D&ixlib=rb-1.2.1&auto=format&fit=crop&w=1600&q=80">
</div>
I have tested in many different ways (e.g. with max-width, etc.) but not succeeded so far.
Any idea how to change the above code so that all requirements are fulfilled simultaneously?
You can use max-width and max-height together on the image then it will keep your aspect ratio and always fit on the screen with the complete image showing
body {
margin: 0;
}
.test {
background-color: #222;
color: #eee;
padding: 2rem;
height: 90vh;
width: 90%;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.test img {
margin: auto;
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
<div class="test">
<img src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1418065460487-3e41a6c84dc5?ixid=MXwxMjA3fDB8MHxwaG90by1wYWdlfHx8fGVufDB8fHw%3D&ixlib=rb-1.2.1&auto=format&fit=crop&w=1600&q=80">
</div>
try this in your css:
.test img {
object-fit: cover;
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
Solution with use of aspect-ratio:
:root {
--imageWidth: 300;
--imageHeight: 150;
}
.image-container {
max-width: calc(var(--imageWidth) * 1px);
max-height: 100%;
aspect-ratio: var(--imageWidth) / var(--imageHeight);
}
.image {
display: block;
height: 100%;
aspect-ratio: var(--imageWidth) / var(--imageHeight);
}
.resize-wrapper {
display: inline-block;
resize: both;
overflow: hidden;
border: 1px solid black;
}
<div class="resize-wrapper">
<div class="image-container">
<img src="https://placehold.co/300x150/svg" class="image" />
</div>
</div>

Mimicking `object-fit: contain` for non-replaced elements [duplicate]

How can I make a div's sizing properties behave exactly like they do for image tags, if the div's background is an image?
The idea is to duplicate the way an image tag behaves in this code snippet:
div{
background-color: #2DBCFF;
text-align:center;
box-sizing: border-box;
font-size:0;
}
img{
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
width: auto;
height: auto;
vertical-align: middle;
}
<div style="width:300px; height: 150px; line-height: 150px;"><!-- <<<CSS props controlled
and changed with JS
--><img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/o23xS.jpg"><!--
--></div>
NOTE :
the div's height and width properties are changed with JS
FOR CLARITY :
I want the CSS properties width, height, max-width, and max-height properties behave the same as if the div tag was an image tag. (aspect ratio preserved, size of div is based on image, etc...)
There was a lot of modification done to this faux img (.imgDiv), the reason why it's harder than it should be is because img is a replaced element and div is not, this article will explain the differences (author's second language is English, but the grammatical errors do not hinder comprehension.)
Example 1. & 2. The following are the original img (.control) and .imgDiv:
// Example 1. `.control`: `position: relative` was added for demo purposes.
.control {
position: relative;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
width: auto;
height: auto;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.imgDiv {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
background-image: url(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/Lenna.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: contain;
background-position: center;
}
Background Properties
background-image
background-repeat
background-size
background-position
In short, if you want to mimic a replaced element, you should use a replaced element. What determines a replaced element's dimensions is not itself, but what it has (ie content of an img would be a png file), a non-replaced element is not determined by it's content (ie div). So I figured a video element would be a more suitable img replacement.
Example 3. & 4. A quick breakdown:
// Do not copy this code, I broke it into pieces so you don't have to scroll
<div class="case" style="width:300px; height: 150px; line-height: 150px;">
<video id="vid1"
poster="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/Lenna.png"
width="300" height="150"></video>
</div>
// Do not copy this code, I broke it into pieces so you don't have to scroll
<video id="vid2"
poster="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/Lenna.png"
src="https://glpjt.s3.amazonaws.com/so/av/vs8s3.mp4"
width="100%" height="auto">
</video>
Attributes:
poster: This attribute accepts a path to an image then displays the image until the video element plays. Without going any further, we can see that thevideo element can stand in for img easily.
controls: They are removed since we are only interested in the image aspects of the video element.
src: I assigned this attribute a small video (86.6KB). I don't think we need it, I just added it in for testing.
width and height: A video element by itself can be responsive just by setting width to 100% and height to auto.
Plunker
Snippet
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>35522592</title>
<style>
body {
counter-reset: exp;
}
span.txt:before {
counter-increment: exp;
content: "Example " counter(exp)". ";
}
.box {
position: relative;
display: inline-table;
min-width: 300px;
min-height: 150px;
margin: 5% auto;
}
.case {
position: relative;
background-color: #2DBCFF;
text-align: center;
box-sizing: border-box;
font-size: 0;
margin: 20px;
}
.control {
position: relative;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
width: auto;
height: auto;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.imgDiv {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
background-image: url(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/Lenna.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: contain;
background-position: center;
}
.big {
font-size: 24px;
}
.txt {
margin: 0 0 15px 20px;
}
#vid1,
#vid2 {
fit-object: contain;
}
#b2 {
background: #F06;
min-width: 40vw;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<section class="box">
<div class="case" style="width:300px; height: 150px; line-height: 150px;">
<img class="control" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/Lenna.png">
</div>
<span class="txt">This is the image<b class="big">⇧</b> from the OP.</span>
<div class="case" style="width:300px; height: 150px; line-height: 150px;">
<div class="imgDiv"></div>
</div>
<span class="txt">This div <b class="big">⇧</b> uses the property background-image.</span>
<div class="case" style="width:300px; height: 150px; line-height: 150px;">
<video id="vid1" poster="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/Lenna.png" width="300" height="150"></video>
</div>
<span class="txt"><b class="big">⇧</b>This is a video element it only has an image, no video.</span>
</section>
<section class="box" id="b2">
<video id="vid2" poster="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/Lenna.png" src="https://glpjt.s3.amazonaws.com/so/av/vs8s3.mp4" width="100%" height="auto"></video>
<span class="txt">This is a video element <b class="big">⇧</b>it has an image and a video.</span>
</section>
</body>
</html>
If what you mean is that the div width and height change with respect to the aspect ratio like the image then you can rely on CSS by using padding like this:
div {
width: 100%;
max-width: 300px;
height: 0;
box-sizing: content-box;
padding-bottom: 50%; /* Aspect ratio of the width/height */
}
No JS needed.

Need image to responsively fill responive square area

Here is my jsfiddle code.
<div class="gallery-thumbnail">
<a href="google.com">
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ed/13Vend%C3%A9miaire.jpg/1024px-13Vend%C3%A9miaire.jpg" />
</a>
</div>
.gallery-thumbnail {
display: flex;
max-width: 400px;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
overflow: hidden;
background: silver;
}
.gallery-thumbnail a { /* This magic makes a square, because the padding % is of the element's width. */
height: 0;
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.gallery-thumbnail img {
position: relative;
object-fit: cover;
width: 100%;
background-color: green;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/hgw7s9qf/
I spent a while searching around how to make an element square for all screen sizes, and then some more time trying to set a not-perfectly-square image inside that area. I am finding I can't have everything at once.
How can I get that image to fit-fill the square responsively, the way one would expect object-fit: cover to work, yet still maintain the area as a dynamically-resizing square?
Important: I need this to be responsive, so the square shrinks as the window does, and the image inside should too.
I found a way.
I am not really sure why it works, exactly. Maybe one of you brilliant people can help with that.
.gallery-thumbnail {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.gallery-thumbnail img {
position:absolute;
object-fit: cover;
width:100%;
height:100%;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/7f13rnvu/
I'm not entirely sure what your end goal is but with the same markup, I got this to work:
.gallery-thumbnail {
max-width: 400px;
background: red;
}
.gallery-thumbnail img {
display: block;
object-fit: cover;
width: 100%;
height: 400px;
}
After reading this, I think that the image needs both width and height for object-fit to work its magic as it's fitting within the image sizing.
Hope that helps.
To make an image properly square you need to specify same height and width for the image. You can try like this
<div class="square">
<div class="content">
<img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ed/13Vend%C3%A9miaire.jpg/1024px-13Vend%C3%A9miaire.jpg" alt="">
</div>
</div>
.square {
border: 5px solid red;
text-align: center;
width: 50vw;
height: 50vw;
}
.content {
}
.content img{
height: 50vw;
width: 50vw;
}
Working Fiddle
Square Image

Fitting an image and corresponding span to parent div

I have a div of fixed width and height.
I want to put and image and caption to it (using img and figurecaption) such that they both never exceeds the dimensions of the parent.
I tried this :
`
parent->
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
margin: 0;
img->
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
figurecaption->
text-align: center
`
When the image is of greater size than the specified height and width, the caption goes outside. How to deal with this. Thanks.
If you are trying to avoid both the image and the caption going outside the parent container, you have several options. The nicest might be to set the image max-height and max-width to 100% and then to overlay the caption on the bottom. If you want to keep them completely separate, you can do something like this:
#container {
height: 400px;
width: 300px;
border: 1px solid #000000;
text-align:center;
}
#image {
max-height: calc(100% - 50px);
max-width: 100%;
}
#caption {
background: #282828;
max-height: 50px;
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
color: #ffffff;
}
<div id="container">
<img id="image" src="http://www.fixedstars.com.au/images/runBack.jpg">
<div id="caption">This is the caption</div>
</div>
This sets the maximum height of the image at100% less the height of the caption. If you prefer for the caption to be stuck to the bottom of the container, even if the image is shorter, st the container to position: relative and give the caption position: absolute; bottom:0; for the container and the caption.
To Fix this issue you have to set width and height to 100% for Image
Below is the complete demo.
Hope this will helpful to you.
<style>
.mydiv {
border-color: red;
border-style: solid;
height: 50px;
width: 80px;
}
.imgStyle {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
</style>
<html>
<div class="mydiv">
<img src="http://www.boltoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/only-3d-natural-1024x768.jpg" class="imgStyle" />
Your Text Goes Here
</div>
</html>

How to "crop" a rectangular image into a square with CSS?

I know that it is impossible to actually modify an image with CSS, which is why I put crop in quotes.
What I'd like to do is take rectangular images and use CSS to make them appear square without distorting the image at all.
I'd basically like to turn this:
Into this:
A pure CSS solution with no wrapper div or other useless code:
img {
object-fit: cover;
width: 230px;
height: 230px;
}
Assuming they do not have to be in IMG tags...
HTML:
<div class="thumb1">
</div>
CSS:
.thumb1 {
background: url(blah.jpg) 50% 50% no-repeat; /* 50% 50% centers image in div */
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.thumb1:hover { YOUR HOVER STYLES HERE }
EDIT: If the div needs to link somewhere just adjust HTML and Styles like so:
HTML:
<div class="thumb1">
Link
</div>
CSS:
.thumb1 {
background: url(blah.jpg) 50% 50% no-repeat; /* 50% 50% centers image in div */
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.thumb1 a {
display: block;
width: 250px;
height: 250px;
}
.thumb1 a:hover { YOUR HOVER STYLES HERE }
Note this could also be modified to be responsive, for example % widths and heights etc.
If the image is in a container with a responsive width:
.rect-img-container {
position: relative;
}
.rect-img-container::after {
content: "";
display: block;
padding-bottom: 100%;
}
.rect-img {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
<div class="rect-img-container">
<img class="rect-img" src="https://picsum.photos/id/0/367/267" alt="">
</div>
(edit: updated from sass to plain css)
(edit: Added dummy image for reference)
Place your image in a div.
Give your div explicit square dimensions.
Set the CSS overflow property on the div to hidden (overflow:hidden).
Put your imagine inside the div.
Profit.
For example:
<div style="width:200px;height:200px;overflow:hidden">
<img src="foo.png" />
</div>
Using background-size:cover - http://codepen.io/anon/pen/RNyKzB
CSS:
.image-container {
background-image: url('http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png');
background-size:cover;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
width:250px;
height:250px;
}
Markup:
<div class="image-container"></div>
I actually came across this same problem recently and ended up with a slightly different approach (I wasn't able to use background images). It does require a tiny bit of jQuery though to determine the orientation of the images (I' sure you could use plain JS instead though).
I wrote a blog post about it if you are interested in more explaination but the code is pretty simple:
HTML:
<ul class="cropped-images">
<li><img src="http://fredparke.com/sites/default/files/cat-portrait.jpg" /></li>
<li><img src="http://fredparke.com/sites/default/files/cat-landscape.jpg" /></li>
</ul>
CSS:
li {
width: 150px; // Or whatever you want.
height: 150px; // Or whatever you want.
overflow: hidden;
margin: 10px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
}
li img {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
width: auto;
}
li img.landscape {
max-width: none;
max-height: 100%;
}
jQuery:
$( document ).ready(function() {
$('.cropped-images img').each(function() {
if ($(this).width() > $(this).height()) {
$(this).addClass('landscape');
}
});
});
Check out CSS aspect-ratio
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/aspect-ratio
.square-image{
width: 50%;
background-image: url('https://picsum.photos/id/0/367/267');
background-size: cover;
background-position: center;
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
}
<div class="square-image"></div>
You can also do this with a regular img tag as follows
.square-image{
width: 50%;
object-fit: cover; /* Required to prevent the image from stretching, use the object-position property to adjust the visible area */
aspect-ratio: 1/1;
}
<img src="https://picsum.photos/id/0/367/267" class="square-image"/>
Today you can use aspect-ratio:
img {
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
}
It has wide support amongst modern browsers as well:
https://caniuse.com/mdn-css_properties_aspect-ratio
object-fit: cover will do exactly what you need.
But it might not work on IE/Edge. Follow as shown below to fix it with just CSS to work on all browsers.
The approach I took was to position the image inside the container with absolute and then place it right at the centre using the combination:
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
Once it is in the centre, I give to the image,
// For vertical blocks (i.e., where height is greater than width)
height: 100%;
width: auto;
// For Horizontal blocks (i.e., where width is greater than height)
height: auto;
width: 100%;
This makes the image get the effect of Object-fit:cover.
Here is a demonstration of the above logic.
https://jsfiddle.net/furqan_694/s3xLe1gp/
This logic works in all browsers.
Original Image
Vertically Cropped
Horizontally Cropped
Square Container
I had a similar issue and could not "compromise" with background images.
I came up with this.
<div class="container">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/800x600/nature">
</div>
.container {
position: relative;
width: 25%; /* whatever width you want. I was implementing this in a 4 tile grid pattern. I used javascript to set height equal to width */
border: 2px solid #fff; /* just to separate the images */
overflow: hidden; /* "crop" the image */
background: #000; /* incase the image is wider than tall/taller than wide */
}
.container img {
position: absolute;
display: block;
height: 100%; /* all images at least fill the height */
top: 50%; /* top, left, transform trick to vertically and horizontally center image */
left: 50%;
transform: translate3d(-50%,-50%,0);
}
//assuming you're using jQuery
var h = $('.container').outerWidth();
$('.container').css({height: h + 'px'});
Hope this helps!
Example:
https://jsfiddle.net/cfbuwxmr/1/
Use CSS: overflow:
.thumb {
width:230px;
height:230px;
overflow:hidden
}
Either use a div with square dimensions with the image inside with the .testimg class:
.test {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
overflow:hidden
}
.testimg {
margin-left: -76px
}
or a square div with a background of the image.
.test2 {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
background: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png) 50% 50%
}
Here's some examples: http://jsfiddle.net/QqCLC/1/
UPDATED SO THE IMAGE CENTRES
.test {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
overflow: hidden
}
.testimg {
margin-left: -76px
}
.test2 {
width: 307px;
height: 307px;
background: url(http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png) 50% 50%
}
<div class="test"><img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/GA6bB.png" width="460" height="307" class="testimg" /></div>
<div class="test2"></div>
I came with a different approach. You basically have to crop the rectangular image to fit it inside the square is all there is to it. Best approach is if the image width is greater than the height, then you crop the image alittle from left and right side of the image. If the image height is greater than the image width then you crop the bottom of the image. Here is my solution. I needed a little help from PHP though.
<div style="position: relative; width: 154px; height: 154px; overflow: hidden;">
<?php
//get image dimmensions whichever way you like. I used imgaick
$image = new Imagick("myimage.png");
$width = $image->getImageWidth();
$height = $image->getImageHeight();
if($width > $height){
?>
<img src="myimage.png" style="display: block; position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 50%; transform: translateX(-50%); -ms-transform: translateX(-50%); -webkit-transform: translateX(-50%); height: 100%; " />
<?php
}else{
?>
<img src="myimage.png" style="display: block; position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 100%; " />
<?php
}
?>
</div>