Let's say I would want to use the frameScript method to add some stop and play methods to some frames.
Normally I would declare the stop function:
private function $FUN_FrameStop():void {
stop();
return;
}
and then use it like this:
addFrameScript(47, $FUN_FrameStop, 122, $FUN_FrameStop);
My question is, how can I create the same $FUN_FrameStop as a static function?
Static functions do not allow the use of this since static members are bound to a class and are not inherited by that class' instances.
So, is there a way to create a function similar to $FUN_FrameStop, but static?
I never added any frame script dynamically but.. did you try using the instance as the parameter?
private static function $FrameStop($inst:MovieClip):void {
$inst.stop();
}
The answer is that there's no way unless I have a static reference to the class instance, but that's not what I want.
public static var staticClassRef:MovieClip;
function $FUN_FrameStop():void {
staticClassRef.stop();
return;
}
You may declare a function outside of class but in package
package
{
public function Func(): void
{
trace( "Func" );
}
}
then you may call it everywhare with Func() after including the package ( if needed )
Related
I read a question on stackoverflow (couldn't find it now) about how variables in a method can be only accessed in that method, but the code still works with the answer being an analogy of a hotel room. In AS3, I believe everything that's not primitive gets passed as a reference. So, the following code would be the same as that question and isn't guaranteed to work?
public class Testy {
private var foo:Array;
public function Testy(input:Array) {
// Allow the whole class to access it
foo = input;
}
public function traceFoo(){
trace(foo);
}
}
Now, foo would be a reference to the input argument in the class' constructor. Is this safe code/good practice? Thanks!
Yes this is safe/good code practice as long as you don't want to manipulate the original Array. If you want to manipulate the original array, allow public access to the array by making it a public var or using a public getter/setter.
What you've described is a property, and is inline with encapsulation of object oriented programming.
This would expose a getter and setter:
package
{
import flash.display.Sprite;
public class Testy extends Sprite
{
private var _foo:Array;
public function get foo():Array
{
return _foo;
}
public function set foo(value:Array):void
{
_foo = value;
}
public function Testy()
{
super();
}
}
}
Also it's better to return _foo.concat() in getter not to break encapsulation.
What I am trying to do is kind of odd, but I am wondering if anyone can come up with a clever way to do what I want to do. Basically, I want to re-define a named function at runtime. I can do this with anonymous functions, but I can't figure out a way to do it for named functions. I want to do this so that I can implement a "spy" functionality on an object for a testing framework (a port of Jasmine to Flex).
Take, for instance, this class:
public class TestClass
{
public var anonymous:Function = function():void {
trace("original anonymous");
};
public function named():void {
trace("original named");
}
}
I can easily re-define the anonymous function because it is just a variable. Javascript uses this idiom a lot.
var testClass:TestClass = new TestClass();
testClass.anonymous = function():void { trace("overridden anonymous"); }
BUT, when I do the same thing for named functions, you get a compile-time error:
// Does not compile
testClass.named = function():void { trace("overridden named"); }
I tried to make it a bit more "squishy" but this leads to a runtime failure "Cannot assign to a method named on TestClass".
// Compiles with runtime failure
testClass["named"] = function():void { trace("overridden named"); }
Can anyone more clever than I come up with a way to hack this? Can the bytecode be hijacked? Something?
I want to modify an object, not a
class
But object doesn't contain functions, only non-static variables. I tried to use prototype property and replace method there, but original method still gets called instead of injected one.
About "hack" bytecode, do you mean "hack" already loaded SWF in runtime? I think it's not possible. I'm sure, though, you can parse SWF with something like as3swf, find method in bytecode, replace it and save result in new SWF.
I had an idea bout making a function "cache" . This might work with what you need.
Let's say you have a class "Car" with a method you need to redefine at runtime:
public class Car extends Sprite
{
private var functionCache:Function;
public function Car()
{
super();
}
public function flexibleFunction(functionBody:*=null):void{
if(functionBody is Function){
functionBody.call();
functionCache=functionBody;
} else {
functionCache(functionBody);
}
}
}
Usage:
public class Main extends Sprite
{
private var car:Car;
public function Main()
{
car = new Car();
car.flexibleFunction(function(){trace("redefine test #1")});
car.flexibleFunction();
car.flexibleFunction(function(doParametersWork:String="let's see"){trace("redefine test #2: " + doParametersWork);});
car.flexibleFunction("yes they do");
car.flexibleFunction();
}
}
an easy way to accomplish what you want is to simply pass a new function to the original function and execute it from there:
package
{
//Imports
import flash.display.Sprite;
//Class
public class RedefineFunction extends Sprite
{
//Constructor
public function RedefineFunction()
{
originalFunction();
originalFunction(redefinedFunction);
}
//Original Function
public function originalFunction(redefinition:Function = null):void
{
if (redefinition != null)
redefinition();
else
trace("Original Function Definition");
}
//Redefined Function
private function redefinedFunction():void
{
trace("Redefined Function Definition")
}
}
}
traces:
Original Function Definition
Redefined Function Definition
I have 2 files: Main.mxml with application and one MyObject.as.
I create the instance of MyObject in mxml and can call its every public function from mxml. But what if for some reason I need to call some function declared in mxml from MyObject class? How to do that? I thought that I could pass the reference to main.mxml class into this object but I couldn't figure out what exact class is it (it inherits Application, right, but what exact class is it?)
Thanks
It is of type Main (it takes on the name of the mxml file). You can add a static variable and getter method to it:
private static var _instance : Main;
public static function get instance () : Main {
return _instance;
}
Then let instance refer to this after the application is complete:
private function applicationCompleteHandler():void
{
_instance = this;
}
Don't forget to set applicationComplete="applicationCompleteHandler" in your <mx:Application> tag.
After that you can call Main.instance from anywhere in your program to access the methods and variables.
If you are instantiating the MyObject class in your Main.mxml, you could also accomplish access to a method in Main by passing the method as a Function into the object.
Suppose you have in Main.mxml the function:
private function doSomething():*{
...
}
With an appropriate setter in MyObject.as:
private var _mainFunction:Function;
public function set mainFunction(f:Function):void
{
_mainFunction = f;
}
Then you can pass the method when you instantiate the MyObject class in the mxml:
<*:MyObject mainFunction='doSomething'/>
And now you just call _mainFunction in the MyObject.as code whenever you need it.
Of course, Weltraumpirat's suggestion would be more efficient if you needed to access more than one method and/or variable on your Application.
i've never tried to do this before, so my head a swimming a bit. i'd like to have a public boolean called enabled in myClass custom class. if it's called to be changed, how do i trigger a function from the change?
should i add an Event.CHANGE event listener to my variable? can i do that? or is there a more standard way?
We usually use properties for that.
Properties are just like public variables for the outside -- you can set instance.enabled = true; and so forth.. But you define properties as getters and/or setters functions for the class.
They are the perfect place for custom logic to be executed on value changes.
For example:
public class CustomClass {
private var _enabled:Boolean = false;
public function set enabled(value:Boolean):void {
trace('CustomClass.enabled is now', value);
this._enabled = value;
}
public function get enabled():Boolean {
trace('CustomClass.enabled was retrieved');
return this._enabled;
}
}
Note that they can't have the same name as your private variable and you don't need both of them defined. Actually, you don't even need a variable for a setter/getter. You could use them just like any function -- they just supply you with a different syntax.
For example:
var object:CustomClass = new CustomClass();
object.enabled = false;
if (object.enabled) {
...
}
They are great to expose a simple API, keeping you from rewriting outside code if the class' internals have to change.
AS3 Reference on getters and setters.
I've asked this same question with Python.
Now I like to know if this can be done in AS3.
If I have something like this:
package
{
public class SomeClass
{
private function A():void { C() }
private function B():void { C() }
private function C():void
{
// who is the caller, A or B ???
}
public function SomeClass()
{
A()
B()
}
}
}
Despite the design or other issues, this is only a question of an inquiring mind.
Note: I like to have an access to an instance of the caller function so I can call that caller function (if I want to)
Note 2 : This has to be done without changing function C() signature
"Unlike previous versions of ActionScript, ActionScript 3.0 has no arguments.caller property. To get a reference to the function that called the current function, you must pass a reference to that function as an argument."
From http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/arguments.html
That's the only way you can do that, otherwise you'll need to make a global variable to tell what function is calling C
Sure it can be done. You can do something like
private function C():void
{
var e:Error = new Error();
var stack:String = e.getStackTrace();
//analyze stack and find out which function called it.
}
this is ugly but it would work.