I have a test suite and a number of test in there own class files. These are selenium webdriver tests. Each test needs to start the webdriver before they start. How should this be done?
I can have the suite start the webdriver fine from its #BeforeClass. But when i try to run a single test from eclipse the webdriver doesnt start. The tests dont know that they are part of the suite and should run the suites #BeforeClass.
The single Tests would only run the #BeforeClass of the suite if their class extends the suite.
Due to the fact that that's a senseless relationship I think the solution for your Problem is either to define a BeforeClass in something like a TestFunctions.java file as Superclass for all Testclasses or create BeforeClasses for every single Testclass.
Keep in mind that the #BeforeClass and #Before Annotations of the superclass are executed before the #Before(Class) of the subclass but can be overridden.
Related
I am Using Junit5 with Quarkus F/w.
when I try to Mock Service class by Using #InjectMock(io.quarkus.test.junit.mockito.InjectMock) it gives an error
Like org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.TestInstantiationException: Failed to create test instance
and another side when I am using #InjectMocks which belongs to (org.mockito.InjectMocks) package
Junit Running fine but, the Service class Did not Mock it is hit a real DAO class and inserted data
inside database
total conclusion in #InjectMocks is not working.
Please give me any suggestion but this mocking
Thank you.
I am working in Java Play Framework project. I want to write some JUnit test cases to test my application code.
Now for my JUnit cases, I need to initiate the play server Application to get all the configuration.
How do I get current play Application instance to initiate my Global ServerConfig in JUnits
Example type of code:
#Test
TestCode(){
Global.init(CurrentApplication_Instance);
//tes
}
Where CurrentApplication_Instance should be current running play.Play.application().
You can extend your Test-Class from play.test.WithApplication which starts an application at the beginning of the test and provides it as a property. So you could:
public class MyTest extends play.test.WithApplication {
#Test
TestCode(){
Global.init(app);
}
}
I have several Spock test classes grouped together in a package. I am using Junit 4.10. Each test class contains several feature test methods.
I want to perform some setup steps (such as loading data into a DB, starting up a web server) before I run any test case, but only once when the testing starts.
I want this "OneTimeSetup" method to be called only once whether:
I run all the test classes in the package (for example if they are grouped in a Test Suite)
I run a few test classes
I run only one test class
I run only a certain feature method within a test class
From reading other posts on SO, it seems that this is what TestNG's #BeforeSuite does.
I am aware of Spock's setupSpec() and cleanupSpec() methods, but they only work within a given test class. I am looking to do something like "setupTestSuite()." How can this be achieved in Spock?
You can write a global extension, use a JUnit test suite, call a static method in a helper class (say from setupSpec) that does its work just once, or let the build tool do the job.
So for my normal Android project, I have the following in AndroidManifest.xml:
<application android:name=".utilities.App" ...>
....
</application>
And then I have my App class:
public class App extends Application {
....
}
And then I have an Android JUnit Test project associated with the Android project. Everything is all fine and dandy and I can write JUnit tests. However, I'm trying to run code coverage with my JUnit tests and I'm getting bloated results. The reason is because my App class gets called and initialized as if my application were actually started. I do not want my custom App class to execute when I run the JUnit tests or code coverage. Any setup I would need for the JUnit tests will go in the appropriate JUnit setup() method. Is there any way I can prevent it from executing my custom App class or a way that any classes/methods/lines that are executed due to the creation of my App class aren't counted towards the code coverage?
A temporary solution that I've found will work unless someone has any better ideas.
Go into the main Android project's AndroidManifest.xml.
Change the android:name attribute from ".utilities.App" to "android.app.Application"
Run the code coverage utility/JUnit tests
Change the android:name attribute back from "android.app.Application" to ".utilities.App"
Re-deploy the app onto the device (so that it uses the right Application class when it runs external to the code coverage/JUnit tests)
I'm sure the real solution is to automate this process, but I'm too lazy to do so, and it just feels hackish and wrong. But at least it's a workaround unless someone has any ideas.
Puzzled: I added a new test case function to a junit test. I run the entire class from either Eclipse or from maven, and the old case (there was only one before) runs and the new one does not. It doesn't fail. A breakpoint in it is not hit. The new function has an #Test annotation, just like the old one.
Junit version is 4.5.
Is there a way to get junit to log or trace its thought process in selecting functions to run?
I guess you still ran old class file, as new Java file was not be compiled successfully.
You could modify an old test method to see if the class is really modified: to let successful method to fail.