I have these sections with headings, where the background goes outside the box (to look like a ribbon). But the height needs to be adjustable to accommodate long titles, and the inner container would go outside of hte containing div. So I put an overflow:auto on the outside div, but that cuts off the outside part of the ribbon.
Any ideas?
http://jsfiddle.net/S2p83/
You could insert a breaking element right before the close of the inner container you want to stretch (something like <div style="clear: both;"></div> or <br style="clear: both;"> BUT, that's adding unnecessary markup.
Your better (and more proper, in my opinion) option is to fix it in CSS. You'll want to use a clearfix on the overall container. Your best option is to add a CSS clearfix class. I prefer the "Micro Clearfix" hack, which I applied to your code here:
http://jsfiddle.net/N2Mh7/
EDIT: Pre-clarification answer:
You'll need to let the height size itself. So, set a min-height and use background-size (but be careful with backwards compatibility) to stretch the background.
The problem is, your background isn't going to stretch well. So, you might want to rethink how much text you're going to allow in that banner.
Here's an updated jsfiddle:
http://jsfiddle.net/Dmm34/
Related
Currently, when I add a line or two of text, everything that comes below the text within the div overlaps with the div below. I believe this is a positioning issue. What do I have to do so that I can add new content w/o worrying about divs overlapping?
It sounds like the item you are adding content to either has a height or max-height value set to it in CSS. If you remove those, it will allow the div to expand instead of running out.
Be careful though, as this might make other elements go wonky which will also need to be adjusted.
Use Samanime's answer, and to make navigation easier, set overflow=y: scroll or auto, so as long as contents overlaps the height you defined, the scrollbar will make possible to go around inside div. Like this:
<div style="max-height: 300px; overflow-y: auto;"> yourstuff </div>
I need a little bit of help disciplining my HTML. It seems to be acting up.
Anyway, the content area of a page I'm working on has two columns. To get the multi-column look, I'm not using one containing div for each column because some of the "rows" in the column need to be lined up.
So instead, I'm basically using several "rows" with two inline divs per row -- one for left content, one for right. Most of them are working correctly..but for some reason, my last row isn't. No matter what, it will not listen to me when I give it a width.
Here's what the relevent HTML looks like:
<div id="mainContainer">
<div id="topBar"></div> //full width
<div id="featured"> //this "row" is working fine
<div id="featuredVideos"></div> //these two
<div id="featuredLiterature"></div> //are inline
</div>
<div id="browseButtons"> //this is the "row" that is acting up
<div id="litBrowse"></div> //these two
<div id="vidBrowse"></div> //are inline
</div>
</div>
In the mean time, what types of situations can cause a div to not listen to a width? I even went so far as to give every single child div inside litbrowse and vidbrowse1 the same width that they have, 450px, and no dice. All of the content above it, which has essentially the exact same structure, is working fine. The only difference, maybe, is that the "row" above the row in question is comprised of two floating divs.
Here is a jsfiddle showing the issue. The bottom two divs (Browse lit by category, browse vids by category) should be spaced out, but they're scrunching together because they won't take their 450px width.
The problem is that you are saying that .browseBtn is inline. Inline elements don't take widths, only block level elements do.
Using inline-block instead will do what you want. It is inline enough to make the divs side by side and block enough to allow you to specify the width.
See http://jsfiddle.net/abtFr/2/
SECOND EDIT - Others have responded saying to use display: inline-block instead of display: inline. inline-block is not compatible with IE7. HOWEVER, we can make it compatible by appending
zoom:1;
*display: inline;
to the element using inline-block. To make compatible with IE6, you need to specify a height, so add
_height: [yourheight]px;
The underscore will target IE6 only.
Alternatively you can float the elements left, in which case my original reply may be relevant.
EDIT - I responded without seeing the jsFiddle; this response can probably be largely ignored.
To answer your question, floating an element will cause it to be taken out of the normal layout. If a div is floated left inside another div, it will be placed to the far left of that container, but its dimensions will not be taken into account when sizing that container div; in other words, that container will act like there are no divs inside.
To fix this you need to place another (empty) div inside the container, after the floating divs, and assign the style "clear: both" to it so that it will take the floating divs into account when being positioned. In turn, the container div will see the last cleared div and resize to take it into account.
Alternatively, sometimes you can skip adding the cleared div inside the container, and just add the style "overflow: hidden" to the container itself. This is somewhat of a hack, but a pretty robust one as far as hacks go.
Hope this solves your problem; if not we'll have to wait for more information.
It's simple, yes, you have a div, but you define its display as inline (with .browseBtn definition). So it's not a block-element anymore and it doesn't listen to width definition.
I've corrected the fiddle, although it might have other side effect.
I'm trying to get the div wrapper to surround all the divs within it so depending on the amount of content the height of wrapper will grow.
I guessed that the way of doing this would be to set height: 100% but as you can see from the screen grab below, this is not the case.
Where it says 'No :-(' is what having height: 100% is doing where ideally I would like wrapper to be at the bottom where it says 'Yes' and I have drawn a red line.
Any help is much appreciated.
If you are using floats, giving the container overflow:hidden might fix the problem. If no fixed size is given to the div, this makes it stretch over the floated elements.
If you have absolutely positioned elements inside the container, it would be good to see the html/css for a solution.
Sounds like you need a clearfix.
http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/clear-fix/
You'll want to define the clearfix class (as stated in the above link) add .clearfix to the #wrapper.
Can you post a link to the css?
The first thing that comes to my mind is the position attribute of the divs inside the wrapper. If they are set to float or absolute they will not be contained in the wrapper. That is intended behavior.
i.e. Here is a nice article about containing floats:
http://complexspiral.com/publications/containing-floats/
If, as is likely, that is the problem, you can either relative-position the inside divs or, if you are using floats, you can add an invisible block-displayed hr at the end of the wrapper, like so:
<div id="wrapper">
/*All divs to be contained here*/
<hr style="display:block;clear:left;visibility:hidden;">
</div>
The clear:left; is what gets rid of the "floating" of the previous elements. THe 'left' should be changed according to your floats.
More in the article above, this is the method i like best.
I have a div that is float: right and it is inside a parent div. There are p elements inside that same parent div also, and the text wraps around the float: right div properly.
However, if I set the p elements to have a border, or do a <hr />, the border does not stop where the text stops, but extends behind the float: right div.
Here is a beautiful mspaint depiction of the situation:
Note that the green part of the black horizontal line is behind the floating div.
How do I get the border or <hr /> or whatever to be only as wide as the text, and not go behind the div?
I know this problem was posted some time ago, but I had the same problem today and found another solution:
http://jsfiddle.net/MvX62/
I use border-bottom instead of the <hr /> tag and had to add an overflow: hidden;. Look at the fiddle, i think this is more useful then the accepted solution, because you can also add a margin to the horizontal line and there is the same gap, as the text has.
Also you don't need to define z values and don't need any hacks or workarounds.
I've had this problem before, and I wasn't sure if it was solvable.
In your case, however, you could wrap the green box with another element and swap margin with padding and set its background to #fff to cover the offending line.
Check out the fiddle...
http://jsfiddle.net/UnsungHero97/8BwGB/3/
What I did here was give the floated element a z-index CSS property, which will put it "above" the non floated element (which has a smaller valued z-index) and the <hr /> will not go above the floated element.
In regards to getting it as wide as the text, in my example it is as wide as the text, but I'm not sure if that holds across browsers (I'm on Chrome). Let me know if it doesn't.
I hope this helps.
Hristo
p.s. excellent mspaint skillz :)
You would have to set the width of the paragraphs to the width of the container minus the width of the floating element, or you could give them a margin on the same side of the float equal to the float's width.
Div cannot wrap around another div. Wrapping is text-only property. You can simulate wrapping by setting the margin-right for the master div to the width of the div you want it to wrap, but text wil not flow under the inset div.
Some values of the overflow property can cause this behavior. Specifically, overflow: visible which is often set by popular CSS resets/normalization.
Here is my site, first of all.
You'll notice that underneath the divider bar in the middle of the page, there are three columns, one with a form, one with text, one with links.
Now, resize the window to slightly smaller, and the right div will drop down to the next line.
Is there anyway to just not display that? So, the divs will adjust (I have a liquid layout) up to the point where they won't fit, then, instead of wrapping the div down to the next line, it just won't be displayed?
You can also achieve that with CSS only.
Just assign the following CSS attributes to #row4:
#row4 {
min-width:1202px; /* the exact value depends on the sum of the width of your 3 column boxes */
overflow:hidden;
}
This differs slightly from your intended solution, since the right box will stay partly visible when sizing down the window and will not immediately disappear completely.
Please be aware that min-width won't work in IE6. However, there are several ways to emulate the min-width property, if you need to support old IEs:
http://www.thecssninja.com/xhtml/ie6-min-width-solutions
You can give them a wrapper div with a min-width set and force it to use a horizontal scrollbar if it gets too small. The nice thing about a wrapper div is you can give it a max-width as well and keep things from getting wonky on super huge monitors.
I'm not a fan of horizontal scrollbars, but it beats completely removing content.
Ok here is what you should do
Wrap all three floated division on a parent div, something like this
<div id="parent">
<div class="form">......</div>
<div class="text">......</div>
<div class="links">.....</div>
</div>
Now to solve your problem give a fixed height to the parent div like
#parent { height:400px;clear:both; }
You would have to use Javascript to get the width of the viewport, then change the display property of the div that is wrapping to display:none so that it doesn't show up when the browser width is too small.