How to find which rule is firing in Endeca PageBuilder? - workbench

Endeca's PageBuilder shows a particular landing page depending on which section of the site you're viewing. In our installation, a retail site, there are a ton of landing pages, so troubleshooting can be tough. Consider this situation:
I've created a template that should launch at location "Section: Men's wear", "Category: Ties". Instead, a different landing page is shown. It turns out someone had inserted a rule at a higher priority that applied to anything under "Section: Men's wear". Is there a way of querying the rule manager to find out which rule will fire for a particular set of dimensions, letting me go straight to that rule to edit it?

It is possible to use page builder or the rule manager and preview any url state. Just click the preview button that is located on the landing page view or rule manager view.
Also check out:
https://endecacommunity.com/

User #Wiszh has answered this in detail here:
Determine Rules triggered by endeca
The proper way to do this is with the Content Assembler API (endeca_content.jar). You need to create a content query and retrive the content object:
ContentItem content = results.getContent();
content.getName();

Related

I want to show results based on the user's input without reloading the page! (For Wordpress webdesign in html?)

please understand that I'm a total noob in coding.I'm working on a page of my local Scouting community that allows the visitor to type a number (which represents the age of their child. Ages from 0 to 18), which has to put something in motion so that the troop their child belongs to, instantly shows up on the page (without refreshing the page).This is my idea: https://i.stack.imgur.com/IzAM6.jpg(Text from the image:)
On the left side from top to bottom:- Visitor can click on boy/girl- Results shows directly after input. No Refreshing- Content loads after an upwards motionOn the right side from top to bottom:- Result remains on page until reload/backspace
About the website: https://www.eos-sthubertus.nl (Now under maintenance, so temporarily this website replaces the website stated above: http://eos.zellez.net)We are a local Scouting community that had a really old UI (a 2005 look). Together with a few other people, we are modernising the website and complying our website to the GDPR.
I am unable to give you any specific code examples as you havn't added any code yourself to the question. This is a generic jQuery AJAX tutorial for WordPress that should get you up on your feet:
https://premium.wpmudev.org/blog/using-ajax-with-wordpress/
You will be able to hook a javascript event to the boy/girl button to trigger the event:
https://api.jquery.com/click/

Game show buzzer screens

I'm doing a training class right now and one of the games I plan on doing is a Jeopardy style of Q & A. The problem I'm trying to figure out is the buzzer. My idea is to use the projector as the question board I control. The trainees would go to an HTML page with nothing more than a single button. They would turn their monitors around to face me up front. As soon as I read the question they would click the button and it would change their screens the color red.
The button and background color change is easy enough, I got that. There are two problems I'm facing: 1) I need it so that they can't click the button until I'm done reading the question - this one isn't as important, I can just make up a rule. 2) Only the fastest person will have a red screen. To show me who clicked first. The others' buttons will be disabled.
I just have no idea how to even Google these two things. Like: "Disable button for other users"...? Or maybe, "only one click"...?
Any direction to search is appreciated. Eventually, I'd like to add other aspects to like the presenter could click an "incorrect button" then it would clear the screen and enable all the buttons again, for the answer steal.
You can do it with modern WebSocket or applications interact via TCP. However, WebSocket may be overkill for the simple application with a few teams. I faced the same problem before and developed a simple solution with PHP using Flock to write into a shared file on disk. Only request from one team gets the chance to write into that file. Stick to not to use WebSocket, the web page on client site does some polling to receive the "restart" signal from the server for the new question/round. It can run in LAN, different team gets different site, i.e. http://[server-ip]/team1, http://[server-ip]/team2.
You can have control over the round: allow them to press button/ restart, start a new question in http://[server-ip]/admin.
Further improvement can be made in several ways to facilitate your needs (i.e. assign team name, register team, use database instead of a flock file). The code is available here : https://github.com/minhhn2910/buzzergameshow

html transfer information from one page to the next

So I have been looking into this for a few weeks and have come up with nothing!
I work on the website for my families music store, and have been asked to add a "Links" page to the website. My goal would be to have the categories of our vendors (i.e. Violin, Guitar, Piano, etc.) on the left of the page and when the category is selected the links come up on the right. That part I have. The tricky part here is: When a link to a vendor (i.e. Fender, G&L, Yahmaha) is clicked instead of taking them directly to the site, I want it to take them all to the same page, but embeded on that page is the site.
I have done a lot of research on this and have come up with nothing. I could just go through and make a new page for each of the vendors, with the embedding on each individual page, but that is extremely time consuming with the amount of vendors.
Is something like this at all possible? I've been playing with embedding itself and have that down. It just comes down to, which link did they click, and loading that specific page.
If there is any more information you may need to help or point me in the right direction please let me know! Same with any code that may be helpful!
I've come up dead on all my research on this.
EDIT: I guess my ultimate goal is that it will look something like this: http://answers.yahoo.com/ so that the vendors website is open on bottom, but our stores banner and links are still at the top. Out website can be found here: http://www.brassbellmusic.com/default.aspx
I've created a JSFiddle to demo this functionality using jQuery.
We iterate through the list of brand links in the ul:
$('#brandListing a')
Capturing a click event on each:
.click(function(ev){
jQuery passes an event object to the anonymous function (ev). When the link is clicked, we first must prevent the default action, which is to follow the link. Then we update the src attribute of the iframe (the "embedded page") with the value of the href that was clicked:
ev.preventDefault();
$('#embeddedBrandWebsite').attr('src', ev.target.href);
You'll need to add the jQuery library to your page to use my code sample, but it's possible to replicate the functionality without it.
EDIT
The sample above is for a single page implementation, where links and the embed are on the same page. To achieve the requested "transfer of information," I recommend passing the target href as a GET parameter (brassbellmusic.com/brandEmbed.aspx?path=http%3A//www.gibson.com/). On the single "embed" page, you can then extract this either on the server side to set the iframe's src, or using javascript. With javascript, you might use:
function getURLParameter(name) {
return decodeURI(
(RegExp(name + '=' + '(.+?)(&|$)').exec(location.search)||[,null])[1]
);
}
Source
And then after your document is ready, set the iframe src using getURLParameter('path').

Duplicate a tab in Chrome without Reloading the Page?

Is there any way to completely duplicate the state of a current tab in Google Chrome? I want an exact copy of the current state of the page without having to reload the page in another tab.
An example use case:
While browsing a "slideshow" on a news website, I want to preserve the current slide that I'm on, but create a duplicate so that I can continue viewing the next slide. If I simply Right-Click and "Duplicate" the tab, the new page will completely Reload, reprocessing all of the Javascript and running the pre-slideshow advertisement again.
In short "NO" you can't.
I am not expert on this
but a similar behavior can be achieved in some ways i know :
Dump the whole DOM
Never tried this though. You can convert the DOM to a string, pass it to the new window and then parse it as a document. This will let you lose your DOM events and State manipulation javascript. (But that's good for your case)
var dtab = window.open('about:blank', 'duplicate_a_tab');
dtab.document.open();
dtab.document.write("... yout html string ..");
dtab.document.close();
Develop an extension
Let the users continue on the current tab with the current state, your extension should be able to capture the screenshot of that area and open that screenshot in new tab. There are plenty of screenshot taking extensions are available in the market.
If that website is your own
You can develop your services that uses state locally like progressive web apps. Give a link separately to 'duplicate' which will eventually open the same URL in different tab with the same local state and with the flag do-not-sync.
This will not work when the user uses browser inbuilt duplicate
feature.

To target=_blank or not to target=_blank, that is the question!

Should links to external sites set target=_blank? E.g. I am on www.acme.net and have a link to www.otherplace.net, should that link be:
<a href='http://www.otherplace.net' target='_blank'>otherplace's website</a>
or:
<a href='http://www.otherplace.net'>otherplace's website</a>
I was under the impression that using _blank to sites outside your domain was best practice, but now I am being told otherwise.
Some web idealists will state that you should allow the user to make their own choices when it comes to navigation - I have a lot of sympathy with this view. As web developers, we shouldn't be forcing such decisions on our visitors.
However, I also know that businesses often want to 'retain control' and so insist on spawning a new tab/window for external sites. An I understand this too - It's a very practical approach, particularly when you consider that how many users don't know how to control their own UA.
I often tend to steer a middle course between the two, by adding an image (I'm sure you will have seen many in your time) that indicates which links are external, and a note to indicate that external links will open in a new tab/window.
Not quite as 'pure' as the first option, but at least it is clear to the user how the site will behave.
found this on the w3c site
Checkpoints in this section:
•10.1 Until user agents allow users to
turn off spawned windows, do not cause
pop-ups or other windows to appear and
do not change the current window
without informing the user. [Priority
2] Content developers should avoid
specifying a new window as the target
of a frame with target="_blank".
More info here
the question you need to ask your client is "To what priority level are you aiming to achieve?"
I think it totally depends on your use case.
If you are opening a site in another domain and need to keep your site open, and I think in most cases you do, then use target='_blank'.
As a user, I find it annoying when I click on a link to another domain and it moves me from the original domain. Of course, using ctrl+click in most browsers is a way to defend against this - but why make the user do more work?
It might also be worth to mention that using target attribute is not xhtml valid. I do usually open links in external window or tab because I see that most regular users (not the advanced ones) want it that way so that they can always get back to the site they were on - usually they would go deep into the other site and then it become unfriendly for them having to click back multiple times.
So in terms of usability I think that there's more users that don't use special techniques to manually open links in new window/tab.
With regards to the xhtml validation, you might want to decorate your links with rel="external" or some similar word then use this JS function to handle new window open. I did it like this 99% of time in the last few years.
function externalLinks() {
if (!document.getElementsByTagName) return;
var anchors = document.getElementsByTagName("a");
for (var i = 0; i < anchors.length; i++) {
var anchor = anchors[i];
if (anchor.getAttribute("href") &&
anchor.getAttribute("rel") == "external")
anchor.target = "_blank";
}
}
/**
DOCUMENT LOAD
**/
$(document).ready(function () {
/**
external links
**/
externalLinks();
....
Just don't do it. Using target attributes with links presents complications for assistive technology users who may not know another tab has opened. It becomes a bad experience for these users when the back button does not work in the new tab to take them back to the page they started on. This practice can also be disorienting to people with cognitive disorders. It is best to let users decide where links will open.
You need to predict what your users want. Use target="_blank" if you expect your users will want to stay on the site.
For example if a blog post has a link in the middle of the post, it makes sense to open that link in a new tab since you are expecting the reader to return to the page and continue reading.
Some people argue that the reader could simply click "Back" when they wanted to come back to the page,
But new webpages will have more links to webpages that have more links, what happens is that the reader has to "Back" a couple of times to get back to your blog post. Either that, or he ends up "lost" in the myriad of linked pages and couldn't come back to your blogpost (you can be sure that no one wants to open History and find your page again when they are "lost", unless there is a big incentive to coming back to your page).
As it is a governmental website, this is a tricky question. I regularly see disclaimers for external sites on these type of sites. I don't know if this is a standard or not.
I think the answer is probably down to your own opinion, which should probably be based on usability and integrity.
Just make two buttons for your users: One to open in new tab, and another to abandon the current page in favor of the linked page.
[ www.google.com ]
[Open Google in place of THIS page]