I want to register a generic delegate that resolves itself at runtime, but I cannot find a way to do this on generics.
Given a delegate that looks like this:
public delegate TOutput Pipe<in TInput, out TOutput>(TInput input);
And given a discretely registered delegate that look like this:
public class AnonymousPipe<TInput, TOutput>
{
public Pipe<TInput, TOutput> GetPipe(IContext context)
{...}
I want to register a function along the lines of this:
builder.RegisterGeneric(typeof(Pipe<,>)).As(ctx =>
{
var typeArray = ctx.RequestedType.GetGenericArguments();
// this can be memoized
var pipeDefinition = ctx.Resolve(typeof(AnonymousPipe<,>).MakeGenericType(typeArray));
return pipeDefinition.GetPipe(ctx);
I cannot find a way to provide an implementation of the generic as a parameter in Autofac - I may just be missing something. I know I can do this through a generic object or interface, but I want to stick with the lightness of a delegate. It makes unit testing super simple on the injection of these.
Any thoughts? I am having to do discrete registrations at the moment(one per type combination and no generics).
I can only come up with the registration source solution (the universal hammer in Autofac.)
class PipeSource : IRegistrationSource
{
public bool IsAdapterForIndividualComponents { get { return true; } }
public IEnumerable<IComponentRegistration> RegistrationsFor(
Service service,
Func<Service, IEnumerable<IComponentRegistration>> registrationAccessor)
{
var swt = service as IServiceWithType;
if (swt == null || !swt.ServiceType.IsGenericType)
yield break;
var def = swt.ServiceType.GetGenericTypeDefinition();
if (def != typeof(Pipe<,>))
yield break;
var anonPipeService = swt.ChangeType(
typeof(AnonymousPipe<,>).MakeGenericType(
swt.ServiceType.GetGenericArguments()));
var getPipeMethod = anonPipeService.ServiceType.GetMethod("GetPipe");
foreach (var anonPipeReg in registrationAccessor(anonPipeService))
{
yield return RegistrationBuilder.ForDelegate((c, p) => {
var anon = c.ResolveComponent(anonPipeReg, p);
return getPipeMethod.Invoke(anon, null); })
.As(service)
.Targeting(anonPipeReg)
.CreateRegistration();
}
}
}
Then:
builder.RegisterSource(new PipeSource());
Now, I'm certain that I can't type that code into a web page and have it actually compile and run, but it might come close :)
Related
I've implemented an IMvxNavigationFacade for deep linking in my MvvmCross 5.6.x sample app. I've added logic in BuildViewModelRequest() to construct a MvxViewModelRequest with parameters passed in as MvxBundle.
if (url.StartsWith("http://www.rseg.net/rewards/"))
{
var parametersBundle = new MvxBundle();
var id = url.Substring(url.LastIndexOf('/') + 1);
parametersBundle.Data.Add("id", id);
return Task.FromResult(
new MvxViewModelRequest(typeof(RewardDetailViewModel),
parametersBundle, null));
}
However, this approach causes the old style Init() method to be called in the target ViewModel rather than the new typesafe Prepare() method.
public class RewardDetailViewModel :
MvxViewModel<RewardDetailViewModel.Parameteres>
{
...
public new void Init(string id)
{
if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(id))
{
if (int.TryParse(id, out _rewardId))
RaiseAllPropertiesChanged();
}
}
public override void Prepare(Parameteres parameter)
{
if (parameter != null)
{
_rewardId = parameter.RewardId;
RaiseAllPropertiesChanged();
}
}
}
Is there a way to construct a MvxViewModelRequest so that you pass in an instance of the parameter class for the target ViewModel causing the Prepare() method to be called?
The entire solution can be viewed on GitHub https://github.com/rsegtx/So.MvvmNav2
Thanks in advance!
After doing some research I found at lease one way to accomplish this.
Create a ViewModelInstanceRequest rather than a ViewModelRequest so that you can call ViewModelLoader.LoadViewModel passing in a parameters object; the ViewModelRequest only allows parameters to be passed using a MvxBundle. Make the following change to BuildViewModelRequest() on the NavigationFacade:
var request = new
MvxViewModelInstanceRequest(typeof(RewardDetailViewModel));
var parameters = new RewardDetailViewModel.Parameteres();
.... parse parameters and fill in parameters object
request.ViewModelInstance = ViewModelLoader.LoadViewModel(
request, parameters, null);
return Task.FromResult((MvxViewModelRequest)request);
Create your own IMvxNavigationService and add logic to inspect the object returned from the NavigationFacde and if it is a ViewModelInstanceRequest then use it as is rather than one previously creating.
var facadeRequest = await facade.BuildViewModelRequest(path,
paramDict).ConfigureAwait(false);
...
if (facadeRequest is MvxViewModelInstanceRequest)
request = facadeRequest as MvxViewModelInstanceRequest;
else
{
facadeRequest.ViewModelType = facadeRequest.ViewModelType;
if (facadeRequest.ParameterValues != null)
{
request.ParameterValues = facadeRequest.ParameterValues;
}
request.ViewModelInstance = ViewModelLoader.LoadViewModel(
request, null);
}
I've updated the original example on GitHub https://github.com/rsegtx/So.MvvmNav2.
Is it possible to use a simple action method - just like with Caliburn.Micro - instead of a command with MvvmCross bindings?
Example:
public void Action()
{
Tip = 11;
}
<Button
android:text="Button"
android:layout_width="fill_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:id="#+id/button1"
local:MvxBind="Click Action" />
It doesn't work out of the box, I tested that.
While I found a lot of samples about adding new target bindings, I didn't find a single one about adding a new source binding.
UPDATE:
This works now out of the box with the Rio binding. To use it, add the MvvmCross MethodBinding NuGet package to the Android project.
Up until now, much of the emphasis for MvvmCross has been on allowing multi-platform target binding with the source remaining mainly 'vanilla' INotifyPropertyChanged.
There have been some deviation in terms of ViewModel structure - e.g.:
the MvxCommandCollection - http://slodge.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/fixing-mvvm-commands-making-hot-tuna.html
some users using Fody - http://twincoders.com/blog/codigo-limpio-con-fody/
Recently, several new feature requests have also been logged in this area:
AutoCommands - I think this is what you are asking about here - https://github.com/slodge/MvvmCross/issues/301
Rio binding sources - https://github.com/slodge/MvvmCross/issues/299
Tibet binding - https://github.com/slodge/MvvmCross/issues/298
Because of these, I do expect more functionality to be exposed in this area in the future...
With that said, if you wanted to get this working today, then MvvmCross Binding is overrideable so you could fairly easily do it:
1. Implement an ICommand that invokes a MethodInfo using reflection (for completeness this should probably also use a parameter if available) - some kind of InvokeMethodCommand (code for this left to the reader!)
.
2. Implement an MyMethodSourceBinding class which wraps the InvokeMethodCommand - something like:
public class MyMethodSourceBinding : MvxSourceBinding
{
private readonly MethodInfo _methodInfo;
protected MyMethodSourceBinding(object source, MethodInfo methodInfo)
: base(source)
{
_methodInfo = _methodInfo;
}
public override void SetValue(object value)
{
// do nothing - not allowed
}
public override Type SourceType
{
get { return typeof(ICommand); }
}
public override bool TryGetValue(out object value)
{
value = new InvokeMethodCommand(source, _methodInfo);
return true;
}
}
3. Override MvvmCross's registered IMvxSourceBindingFactory with your own implementation that can detect when a method is present - sadly most of this is cut and paste coding today - it would be something like
public class MySourceBindingFactory
: IMvxSourceBindingFactory
{
private IMvxSourcePropertyPathParser _propertyPathParser;
private IMvxSourcePropertyPathParser SourcePropertyPathParser
{
get
{
if (_propertyPathParser == null)
{
_propertyPathParser = Mvx.Resolve<IMvxSourcePropertyPathParser>();
}
return _propertyPathParser;
}
}
public IMvxSourceBinding CreateBinding(object source, string combinedPropertyName)
{
var tokens = SourcePropertyPathParser.Parse(combinedPropertyName);
return CreateBinding(source, tokens);
}
public IMvxSourceBinding CreateBinding(object source, IList<MvxPropertyToken> tokens)
{
if (tokens == null || tokens.Count == 0)
{
throw new MvxException("empty token list passed to CreateBinding");
}
var currentToken = tokens[0];
if (tokens.Count == 1)
{
return CreateLeafBinding(source, currentToken);
}
else
{
var remainingTokens = tokens.Skip(1).ToList();
return CreateChainedBinding(source, currentToken, remainingTokens);
}
}
private static MvxChainedSourceBinding CreateChainedBinding(object source, MvxPropertyToken propertyToken,
List<MvxPropertyToken> remainingTokens)
{
if (propertyToken is MvxIndexerPropertyToken)
{
return new MvxIndexerChainedSourceBinding(source, (MvxIndexerPropertyToken) propertyToken,
remainingTokens);
}
else if (propertyToken is MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken)
{
return new MvxSimpleChainedSourceBinding(source, (MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken) propertyToken,
remainingTokens);
}
throw new MvxException("Unexpected property chaining - seen token type {0}",
propertyToken.GetType().FullName);
}
private static IMvxSourceBinding CreateLeafBinding(object source, MvxPropertyToken propertyToken)
{
if (propertyToken is MvxIndexerPropertyToken)
{
return new MvxIndexerLeafPropertyInfoSourceBinding(source, (MvxIndexerPropertyToken) propertyToken);
}
else if (propertyToken is MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken)
{
//**************************
// Special code is here
var propertyToken = (MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken) propertyToken;
if (source != null)
{
var method = source.GetType().GetMethod(propertyToken.PropertyName, BindingFlags.FlattenHierarchy | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance);
if (method != null)
{
return new MyMethodSourceBinding(source, method);
}
}
return new MvxSimpleLeafPropertyInfoSourceBinding(source,
(MvxPropertyNamePropertyToken) propertyToken);
// Special code ends here
//**************************
}
else if (propertyToken is MvxEmptyPropertyToken)
{
return new MvxDirectToSourceBinding(source);
}
throw new MvxException("Unexpected property source - seen token type {0}", propertyToken.GetType().FullName);
}
}
4. Supply this source binding factory in your own custom binding builder - e.g.:
public class MyAndroidBindingBuilder
: MvxAndroidBindingBuilder
{
protected override IMvxSourceBindingFactory CreateSourceBindingFactory()
{
return new MvxSourceBindingFactory();
}
}
5. Supply this binding builder during your setup
public class Setup : MvxAndroidSetup
{
// ....
protected override MvxAndroidBindingBuilder CreateBindingBuilder()
{
return new MyAndroidBindingBuilder();
}
}
Note: This approach is only for advanced users right now... As suggested in the first part of this question, I do expect the code in this area to change quite a lot so you might also encounter some issues maintaining a fork in this area. (Indeed the code in this area has already changed quite significantly on the Tibet Binding branch within the GitHub repo!)
How would I write a simple LINQ to SQL extension method called "IsActive" which would contain a few basic criteria checks of a few different fields, so that I could reuse this "IsActive" logic all over the place without duplicating the logic.
For example, I would like to be able to do something like this:
return db.Listings.Where(x => x.IsActive())
And IsActive would be something like:
public bool IsActive(Listing SomeListing)
{
if(SomeListing.Approved==true && SomeListing.Deleted==false)
return true;
else
return false;
}
Otherwise, I am going to have to duplicate the same old where criteria in a million different queries right throughout my system.
Note: method must render in SQL..
Good question, there is a clear need to be able to define a re-useable filtering expression to avoid redundantly specifying logic in disparate queries.
This method will generate a filter you can pass to the Where method.
public Expression<Func<Listing, bool>> GetActiveFilter()
{
return someListing => someListing.Approved && !someListing.Deleted;
}
Then later, call it by:
Expression<Func<Filter, bool>> filter = GetActiveFilter()
return db.Listings.Where(filter);
Since an Expression<Func<T, bool>> is used, there will be no problem translating to sql.
Here's an extra way to do this:
public static IQueryable<Filter> FilterToActive(this IQueryable<Filter> source)
{
var filter = GetActiveFilter()
return source.Where(filter);
}
Then later,
return db.Listings.FilterToActive();
You can use a partial class to achieve this.
In a new file place the following:
namespace Namespace.Of.Your.Linq.Classes
{
public partial class Listing
{
public bool IsActive()
{
if(this.Approved==true && this.Deleted==false)
return true;
else
return false;
}
}
}
Since the Listing object (x in your lambda) is just an object, and Linq to SQL defines the generated classes as partial, you can add functionality (properties, methods, etc) to the generated classes using partial classes.
I don't believe the above will be rendered into the SQL query. If you want to do all the logic in the SQL Query, I would recommend making a method that calls the where method and just calling that when necessary.
EDIT
Example:
public static class DataManager
{
public static IEnumerable<Listing> GetActiveListings()
{
using (MyLinqToSqlDataContext ctx = new MyLinqToSqlDataContext())
{
return ctx.Listings.Where(x => x.Approved && !x.Deleted);
}
}
}
Now, whenever you want to get all the Active Listings, just call DataManager.GetActiveListings()
public static class ExtensionMethods
{
public static bool IsActive( this Listing SomeListing)
{
if(SomeListing.Approved==true && SomeListing.Deleted==false)
return true;
else
return false;
}
}
Late to the party here, but yet another way to do it that I use is:
public static IQueryable<Listing> GetActiveListings(IQueryable<Listing> listings)
{
return listings.Where(x => x.Approved && !x.Deleted);
}
and then
var activeListings = GetActiveListings(ctx.Listings);
The task was meant to be quite simple: I needed to initialize variable with new keyword dynamically, depending on it's type. For example:
public var object:Sprite;
...
object = new Sprite();
In this case type is Sprite, but it could be anything and a method which actually instantiates it with new, doesn't know with what type it was declared. Of course I could store type (or class name) in string variable and instantiate object with it. But I just wonder if I could get that type info from the object itself, 'cause it's declared in a class and logically thinking it's type info might be stored somewhere and be retrievable.
Yes, you can, but the variable must be public (or have accessor methods), and you need its name as a String:
Use describeType() to get an XML Description of your class, then get accessors and variables as XMLList, iterate until you find your variable's name, and get the class by calling getDefinitionByName(). Here's an example:
var className : String = "";
var type:XML = describeType (this);
var variables:XMLList = type..variable;
for each (var variable:XML in variables) {
if (variable.#name == myVariableName) {
className = variable.#type;
break;
}
}
if (className == "") {
var accessors:XMLList = type..accessor;
for each (var accessor:XML in accessors) {
if (accessor.#name == myVariableName) {
className = accessor.#type;
break;
}
}
}
if (className=="") {
trace ("no such variable");
return;
}
var ClassReference : Class = getDefinitionByName( className.replace ("::", ".") ) as Class;
myVariable = new ClassReference( );
I can't figure out how to "reply" to an answer, otherwise I would add this to the current top answer.
If you have a list of known types that the object could be, you could test against those types using typeof.
switch(typeof unknownVar)
{
case typeof Function:
unknownVar = new Function();
break;
case typeof String:
unknownVar = "Bruce Lee";
break;
case typeof Number:
unknownVar = 3.14;
break;
default:
trace(typeof unknownVar); // This is not normally helpful...
}
In short no, you can't get the type of an uninitialised variable.
Sounds like this is kind of a factory pattern implementation. Your best bet is to pass a reference of the Class to the method
method:
public function create(class:Class) : void
{
return new class();
}
calling code:
public var object:Sprite;
...
object = createObject(Sprite)
I am trying to understand the way the AsyncToken works in actionscript. How can I call a remote service and ensure that a specific parameter is available in the result or fault event functions? I think it is the async functionality I want to use.
The following code will hopefully explain what I am trying to do. Feel free to modify the code block as your explanation.
Thanks.
public function testSerivceCall(data:Object, callBackCommand:String):void
{
// Assume callBackCommand == "FOO";
// How can I pass in callBackCommand as a parameter to the result or fault events?
// How do I create an async token here?
var remoteObject:RemoteObject;
remoteObject = new RemoteObject();
remoteObject.destination = "zend";
remoteObject.source = "MyService";
remoteObject.endpoint = "http://example.com/service";
remoteObject.test.addEventListener(ResultEvent.RESULT, _handleTestResult);
remoteObject.test.addEventListener(FaultEvent.FAULT, _handleTestFault);
remoteObject.test(data);
}
private function _handleTestResult( event:ResultEvent ) : void
{
// How do I get the async token value?
// How can I get the value of callBackCommand in this code block?
if (callBackCommand == "FOO")
{
// do something related to "FOO"
}
else
{
// do something else with the result event
}
}
private function _handleTestFault( event:FaultEvent ) : void
{
// How do I get the async token value?
// How can I get the value of callBackCommand in this code block?
}
An edit to make this question more clear:
Assume I make the following method call somewhere in my code:
testSerivceCall(personObject, "LoginCommand");
How do I get access to the actual string "LoginCommand" inside the _handleTestResult function block?
The reason I want to do this is because I want to dynamically call back certain functions and hand off the result data to specific commands that I know ahead of time when I am making the service call.
I am just having a time grokking the AsyncToken syntax and functionality.
I did not even need closures. I added a class as below which I called externally.
The call was like this:
public class MyClass
{
...
var adminServerRO:AdminServerRO = new AdminServerRO();
adminServerRO.testSerivceCall("FOO",cptyId);
}
public class AdminServerRO
{
private function extResult( event:ResultEvent, token:Object ) : void
{
//the token is now accessed from the paremeter
var tmp:String = "in here";
}
private function extFault( event:FaultEvent ) : void
{
var tmp:String = "in here";
}
public function testSerivceCall(callBackCommand:String, cptyId:String):void
{
var remoteObject:RemoteObject = new RemoteObject();
remoteObject.destination = "adminServer";
var token:AsyncToken = remoteObject.getCounterpartyLimitMonitorItemNode(cptyId);
token.addResponder(new AsyncResponder(extResult,extFault,cptyId));
}
}
While the accepted answer will accomplish what the original submitter wants it does not actually answer the question which was asked. An AsyncToken is created as a result of a remote method call and is accessible from the ResultEvent. Since AsyncToken is a dynamic class you can add whatever property to it that you want. The code below should demonstrate this:
public function testSerivceCall(data:Object, callBackCommand:String):void
{
var remoteObject:RemoteObject;
remoteObject = new RemoteObject();
remoteObject.destination = "zend";
remoteObject.source = "MyService";
remoteObject.endpoint = "http://example.com/service";
remoteObject.test.addEventListener(ResultEvent.RESULT, _handleTestResult);
remoteObject.test.addEventListener(FaultEvent.FAULT, _handleTestFault);
var token:AsyncToken = remoteObject.test(data);
token.callBackCommand = callBackCommand;
}
private function _handleTestResult( event:ResultEvent ) : void
{
if (event.token.callBackCommand == "FOO")
{
// do something related to "FOO"
}
else
{
// do something else with the result event
}
}
private function _handleTestFault( event:FaultEvent ) : void
{
//event.token.callBackCommand should be populated here too
}
If you want to access the properties used during the remote call (parameters to the call and/or AsycToken), you can make use of closures. Just define the result event handler inside the calling method as a closure. It can then access any variable in the calling function.
public function testSerivceCall(data:Object, callBackCommand:String):void
{
var _handleTestResult:Function = function( event:ResultEvent ) : void
{
// token is visible here now
if (callBackCommand == "FOO")
{
// do something related to "FOO"
}
else
{
// do something else with the result event
}
}
var remoteObject:RemoteObject;
remoteObject = new RemoteObject();
remoteObject.destination = "zend";
remoteObject.source = "MyService";
remoteObject.endpoint = "http://example.com/service";
remoteObject.test.addEventListener(ResultEvent.RESULT, _handleTestResult);
remoteObject.test.addEventListener(FaultEvent.FAULT, _handleTestFault);
var token = remoteObject.test(data);
}
If I'm reading your question correctly, you're trying to figure out how to access the actual data returned by the ResultEvent ?
If so, assuming you've made the call correctly and you've gotten data back in a format you're expecting:
private function _handleTestResult( event:ResultEvent ) : void
{
// you get the result from the result property on the event object
// edit: assuming the class Person exists with a property called name
// which has the value "John"
var person : Person = event.result as Person;
if (person.name == "John")
{
Alert.show("John: " + person.name);
}
else
{
Alert.show("Not John: " + person.name);
}
}
private function _handleTestFault( event:FaultEvent ) : void
{
// Maybe you know the type of the returned fault
var expectedFault : Object = event.fault as MyPredefinedType
if (expectedFault.myPredefinedTypesPredefinedMethod() == "BAR")
{
// something here
}
}
The ResultEvent has a property called result which will hold an instance of the object returned by the result (it might be the output of an XML file if using a web service, or a serialized object if using AMF, for example). This is what you want to access. Similarly, FaultEvent has a fault property that returns the fault information.
Edit: Changed code in _handleTestResult() in response to Gordon Potter's comment.