I'm currently evaluating the combination of jQuery Mobile and PhoneGap. For my application, I need a kind of "inner application" navigation model: A fixed header that contains elements to switch between various contexts and functions, and the entire region below that depends on whatever function is selected. An example: The user selects a customer and can then switch between different data and statistics views concerning that customer. Alternatively, the user can switch between different customers while keeping the same view. Each function / view might again be a rather complex construct of multiple pages with its own navigation.
I think I understand the basic ideas of jQuery Mobile by now, but I'm unsure how to implement this "the right way".
I could do this simply by coding the entire header with the navigation into every single page, but that feels like a really bad idea - lots of redundant code, lots of places to insert tiny mistakes that are very hard to find.
I could try to add all the UI elements for the different views to a single page, hide them and only display the ones that belong to the current function. This doesn't feel right either - I suspect that the DOM would be really large and I suspect that this might cause various (performance) issues.
I could try to create the contents of the page that depend on the function dynamically using jQuery DOM manipulation techniques. This sounds like a good idea, but the individual pages can be really complex, and I'm worried that generating lots of complex HTML code using JavaScript will lead to an unmaintainable blob of code.
I could try to combine the approaches - code the individual pages in the HTML file and then somehow "link" them into the appropriate place using DOM manipulation - but I've never done that and I'm unsure if and how I can get this working.
I could try to put the "detail" page into an iframe - would this work at all?
What is the best / canonical way of implementing this kind of application? Do you know of any tutorials or examples?
Just detach your header and then reattach it to your new page. For instance:
$footer = $("#myfooter");
$header = $("#myheader");
$footer.detach();
$footer.appendTo('#newpage');
$header.detach();
$header.prependTo('#newpage');
$.mobile.changePage('#newpage');
Detaching does not kill all of your button handlers / etc. You will need to keep track of what page you are on or look at location.hash to do different things depending on what page is being shown.
--Greg Frame
Thex Interactive
www.thexinteractive.com
The first way is the easiest way to do it. That's the way i did it too. Also this gives u the freedom to add a button specific to whats in the browsing area for that page.
The second approach will have loads of extra calls which you don't want.
The rest of the approaches are not worth the effort.
Related
I know there are several tools available to find unused CSS on a static web page. But in most real world scenarios I encounter, a lot of the CSS is used after some or the other interaction on the page, maybe a new modal opening up or an options popup etc.
In such scenarios, what would you suggest? How do I keep a tab on my ever-growing render blocking CSS?
The only way I guess one could do that is by running regular unused-css-detector type tools in conjunction with Selenium - test known interactions and see whats left unused. But a big assumption here is that I'd need to know all interactions on my page which could use new CSS. Is there a way to achieve my goal without making this assumption?
In an ideal world, I'd be able to post-back all CSS used by a visitor's browser on my page to my server. Then I'd collect data over a month, aggregate, and get a pretty accurate idea about actual unused CSS.
Any good ideas?
I am the author of a tool that is aiming at doing what you are describing. Everywhere I worked, the CSS is this "append-only" thing that is too risky, too time-consuming to clean up. And even when you try, the ROI is so low that it not worth it.
So I am working on a tool that is very similar to what you are describing. The goal is to bring confidence on what can be removed, and to actually do it automatically by submitting pull requests.
A snippet of JavaScript is running in the browser and sends reports of what is being used to a server. Once enough data is accumulated to build some "confidence score", it can create Pull Request automatically to remove selectors that are actually not used.
It is still very early stage, but you are welcome to try it and give some feedback about it.
https://www.bleachcss.com/
Lets say I want to make a website in which only one HTML template is used. For example, if one wants to create a new object, he clicks a button, and form shows up, leaving the remaining web page intact. My question is simples: should I use only 1 view to handle all the possible inputs/outcomes or should I have multiple views that handle the same template?
Thanks in advance
You can do one view, but if it starts to get complex, accounting for each possible input and output can become a headache. I suggest you use as many views as you need and then later implement AJAX to present everything as if it's only one-page
Seems like if that is the only thing that you want to do, having one FormView and handling the cases accordingly should suffice. For a given form, if it's not necessary, keeping it to one view is generally a good choice.
On this page, I want to get my scrolling dinosaur name window to specifically keep that dinosaurs name at the top so the person doesn't have to scroll all the way down to the next dinosaur.
I also want to know if there's an easier way to do this window.
My predicament is this....
I have over 30 dinosaurs on here. Each time I add a new one I have to update each and every one of the dinosaurs pages to add that one new dinosaur. Its not really time effective... Is there a better way without having to use frames?
My code is open so you can look at it and modify it at your leasure.
Thanks!
Vince
At this point I would suggest you go for server side code. Since you have 30 dinosaurs, it would be much easier to create and maintain a simple page using server side scripts such as PHP or ASP.NET to load the dinosaur from a database.
What are server side scripts?
Server side scripts allow you to dynamically generate a page on the fly whenever the user requests a page. For example, take youtube's search page. Rather than generate a seperate page for every single possible search term, they simply have a base template there, and then they fetch the relevant results based on the search query. The same can be applied to your site. You can have one page for all the dinosaurs, and you would just load the appropriate dinosaur based on the url.
Once you do that, putting the current dinosaur at the top of the page would be a trivial task. Since it appears that you already have a fair amount of knowledge in HTML, it should be easy for you to pick up and use some PHP. Codecademy has some excellent tutorials.
Along the same lines as Kevins answer but more specifically I'd like to recommend you look into a PHP MVC framework such as CakePHP, Laravel or CodeIgniter.
You've done all the hard work manually building these pages, which is awfully time consuming.
Once you learn one of these frameworks and you'll rebuild this site in a day.
If your links had id attributes on them you could scroll the list to a position by linking to #whatever. Here's a quick code example of a link.
<li id="camarasaurus">Camarasaurus</li>
Here's a small example: http://jsbin.com/ExExEvAB/1/edit?html,css,output
As for making it easier to administrate, I'd look into PHP since it's widely available and there's tons of resources to learn from. When you're basically looking for is <?php include "dinosaur-menu.html" ?> since you're thinking in terms of frames. You can make it even easier but this alone should make it a ton easier to update.
I really started to enjoy Mixture recently. It's great for prototyping and is, in my opinion, perfect for exactly what you're trying to do here.
I frequently need to pop up the form html tags in lightbox so where should i store these form tags?
1. should i store tags in server and get via ajax fn() : web page looks very clean
2. or should i just write somewhere in webpage and get innerHTML tags by js fn() : web page looks lengthy.
Whether i am not very clear about the light weight & fast loading. Does it really matter if i choose to write the tags in webpage, what do you say ??
If I understood well, you have several forms which you want to display in a lightbox (jQuery?). If that's correct, I think it will be lighter to add a few lines to your code than making a query for retrieve them.
Think about having your forms at the end of your file (or in a separate file containing all the forms you want to display that you include in the main page). You could select them by using css selectors like
$('.form1').lightbox()
Sorry if this is not the answer you look for but I can't comment on the post.
Rules of optimization:
don't optimize
don't optimize (yet)
More specifically, I would say to go with the simplest method (inner html) then change it later if you identify a performance problem. HTML pages can be quite lengthy these days, check a twitter page for example, you'd be surprised...
I imagine there are many of you out there who have developed an application online which automates a lot of processes and saves people at your company time and money.
The question is, what are your experiences with developing that application, having it all set in place, then "spicing" it up with some Ajax, so it makes for a better user experience?
Also, what libraries would you suggest using when adding Ajax to an already-developed web application?
Lastly, what are some common processes you see in web applications that Ajax does well with? For example, auto-populating the search box as you type.
My preferred way of building Ajax-enabled applications is to build it the old-fashioned way where every button, link, etc. posts to the server, and then hijack all those button, link, etc. clicks to the Ajax functionality.
This ensures that my app is down-browser compatible, which is good.
It doesn't really matter which you use, unless you're trying to do something very specialized.
Here's a good list: http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/.
Yes, auto-completers are a pretty handy implementation of Ajax. It's also quite useful for data-intensive activities like populating drill-down data.
A lot of what you can do with these libraries isn't Ajax-specific, there is a lot of UI interaction that can benefit the user as well. You can do things like slideshows and lightboxes quite easily with many of these libraries.
Pick the one that you're comfortable with. The syntax they all use is a little different. Give a few a spin and try to build simple examples. Stick with the one you like.
Using ASP.NET Ajax to wrap a few chunks of code is an easy way to get going. But personally I prefer to use jQuery. You can easily add some simple Ajax calls with it to make the UI more responsive without the ASP.NET Ajax overhead.
If you are using ASP.NET to write your applications, adding AJAX using ASP.NET AJAX is very straightforward and in many places will not require you to change any code at all except add two controls to the pages you want to modify.
This works using partial page loads. The controls you have to add (off the top off my head) are called something like
<asp:ScriptManager
and
<asp:UpdatePanel
The biggest thing I use for AJAX is lists and search forms. Why? Because the overhead of loading an entire page when you are going though a list of, let's say, 200 records, it will get frustrating for a user to go though everything. However, it is important that if you click on a link in the page and then hit the back button or use a link at the top to return to the same page you were on.
For search forms, as you fill out the form I use AJAX queries to return the first few results and a number indicating how many records that were returned.
For AJAX frameworks, I use mootools. http://www.mootools.net.
Please ignore if not using ASP.NET. Your platform wasn't clear from your question.
Depending on when you created your web application, your web config file may need some tweaks to use ASP.NET Ajax. The easiest way to see is to create a new web site with the ASP.NET Ajax template and compare the web config, copying over configuration items as needed to bring the old one up to date.
If "spicing it up" is all you're after then develop the fully functional app without AJAX first. From here you can unobtrusively add AJAX functionality and ensure that the app degrades well for non JavaScript-enabled browsers.
I've started using jQuery for JavaScript on my site. It takes away all the worry of cross-browser JavaScript differences - things like class and classname, and getElementById. It also includes some very handy and simple functionality for AJAX postbacks. It's very easy to learn and extremely lightweight when used well.
I've seen some good use of AJAX right here on Stack Overflow, things like the tag selector and the question lookup when you type a question title. I think these simple things work best; we're just adding to the user experience with small additions to functionality that are intuitive, we're not flooding the screen with drag/drop handles etc.
I would differ from the first poster. Adding Ajax isn't always as easy as 1,2,3. It really depends on what you are after.
Adding things such as a colour animation can be made fairly easy, but if you are after things such as auto populating a text box, this requires extra code. It's not as easy as adding just something client side. You would also need to add in server-side support to fetch the partial query results.
Going beyond that, it can become even more complex keeping your client-side script in sync with server-side support.
But with the spirit of simplicity in mind there are libraries you can use to 'spice' up a website with animations and other eyecandy that can be implemented fairly easily which have been mentioned already.
I've often had to Ajax-enable an old-fashioned ASP.NET 2.0 sites. The easiest way I've found to do that is to create a new Ajax-enabled site and copy and paste certain sections of the web.config into your old project's web.config.
Just compare the two and see what's missing in your old one. You'll obviously also need to add references to AjaxExtensions and AjaxControlToolkit.