I recently noticed in several webpages, and some of my own, that when they are displayed in Internet Explorer 9, when its not on Quirks Mode, it renders a white line, about 1px, in the bottom of the page. It's like the html tag was with padding-bottom:1px and wrapped in another element with white background (but it's not, and it has no padding). It looks like the differences between IE9 standards and quirks mode shows when determining a wrapping element's width, but vertically. It also feels like the content of an element gets pushed 1px by a previous element, like their content, but, not margins or borders, were overlapping the next element dimensions.
I can't determine exactly what causes it. Sometimes, a page contains 2 tables and everything is fine. Then you need to add a third one, and the line shows up. Doesn't even need to be tables btw.
Sometimes, reseting css solves it. Setting the same line-height we have on body to links:
body {
line-height: 1
}
a, links, visited {
line-height: 1
}
fixes it, but not always. Only thing i can do, is check element by element, disabling/enabling their css rules till it's gone.
I noticed that when there are elements like tables, inputs, textareas, this issue is more likely to happen. 'resetting' their attributes, sometimes, solves it too.
I know it would be easier to provide a code as an example, but like i said, i coudn't determine a pattern for it. I can give you some examples of sites/urls i notice that error (you gotta look at the very bottom of the page and see the difference between IE and another browser, like Firefox):
casinosdelmundo.info, gatosabido.com.br, espanol.yahoo.com, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Beutler, ea.com/command-and-conquer-4, facebook.com (the ones with white, or almost white bg, change body background with f12, developer's tool, and you'll see). I found an example even here at stackoverflow (as today, the main page stackoverflow.com is showing that line too, but that can change since, sometimes the issue appears or disappears when new elements show up or are removed):
this question has the white-line:
Make link in table cell fill the entire row height
this one has not:
FireFox 3 line-height
Check this screenshot, if you still didn't see what im talking about:
the presence of this issue on very established (or not) sites makes me feel it's a IE9 bug and the only definitive fix for it is always use white background, so nobody will notice the white line (the line will still be there though). but thats obviously not the best option. I never found this white line in Chrome or Safari.
So, has anyone faced the same problem and got a better solution?
I'm not sure, cause there is no HTML here, but it is very resemble to standard browser behavior, when it displays inline content. It is due to the fact, that when text is displayed browser needs to leave some space at the bottom for letters and symbols such as: "," , "y" , "p" and so on, cause in that letters there is a part which protrudes to the bottom. You can better understand what I'm talking about when you look at this picture:
example of how inline content is displayed
so if you have some markup like
<body>
<div></div>
<textarea></textarea>
</body>
you'll get that extra space at the bottom. To get rid off it you have to use there either block element, or set to your inline-element a css style 'display: block'
I found a solution to the problem, if an idiotic one: set the toggle of your browser window's Maximize/Restore down to Maximize (= tooltip text; this indicates that the window is in a nonmaximal state). Make the browser window actually smaller than screen fit. Press F11 in this state and there is no white line at the bottom of your screen (Win7 x32 & x64). (BTW, FF dose not have this problem and is the best alternative.)
It happens when you use fractional font-sizes.
For example, stackoverflow uses h2 {font-size: 140%;} body { font-size:80%;}, which results in an total font-size of 112% for h2. Apply that to 16px default size, and you get 17.93px (including rounding errors, hooray!)
Try it yourself: getComputedStyle(document.querySelector('h2')).fontSize
Browsers have a hard time rendering fractional pixels, and thus may get confused and add a pixel at the bottom.
By the way, Firefox has some trouble too. The spacing between the footer lines is off by a pixel.
The fix is obvious: Use integer pixels to declare font-sizes.
Another way would be to apply a :after content to your body only for IE and Edge.
This way you will get rid of the extra white line.
We may require some jQuery too so that the content applies only when you are at the bottom of the page.
body{
position:relative;
width:100%;
}
body:after{
content: "";
display:block;
background-color: #000;
height: 1px;
bottom: 0px;
position: fixed;
width: 100%;
}
jQuery
//add a border to internet explorer
if (bowser.name == "Microsoft Edge" || bowser.name == "Internet Explorer") {
//console.log(" iam inside");
$(window).scroll(function () {
if ($(window).scrollTop() + $(window).height() > $(document).height() - 100) {
$("body").addClass("end-border");
}
else {
$("body").removeClass("end-border");
}
});
}
Related
I'm building a Wordpress website by customizing and editing an existing theme called 'onetone'. It's an one-pager theme. The problem I'm having is that neither the homepage (the one-pager landing page) nor the individual posts/pages will extend to full height.
Under the footer, there's a thin black line 23 pixels in height, that extends 100% of the width.
Here's the quirky thing: while I'm logged into the site as an admin, the line disappears. When I'm visiting as an unlogged, regular user the line is there. All major browsers (FF, Opera, IE, Chrome). Also, on my sister's computer with FF installed the line didn't show even when unlogged.
I've searched StackOverflow, and the usual answer to have <body> and <html> set to height:100%; (including min-height:100%;) isn't working. I've also added height/min-height to containers and wrappers to test the setting. (Not all, though, only the ones I thought were relevant to the issue I was trying to solve) I've also tried the margin: 0; & padding: 0;, but NOTHING works.
I suspected it's the footer's fault, but using the inspect element function in my browser (and some further tests) I found the footer has nothing to do with it.
In the original, untouched theme, the line doesn't appear. So it must be some of my edits causing it, though even by comparing the original and my edited CSS file line by line, I couldn't find something that should've caused this error. And the CSS is the only thing I've edited.
I'm not a coding expert, and I've about exhausted my wits and available knowledge trying to figure this out. Does anyone have any idea what may be causing this glitch?
This is my site. The glitch is best seen on posts / pages. If any specific code samples are needed, just say and I'll post them.
Your code has this weird image just before the <body> tag ends, after all javascript calls:
<img src="http://pixel.wp.com/g.gif?v=ext&j=1%3A3.4.1&blog=50532064&post=651&tz=1&host=firstinkstudios.com&ref=http%3A%2F%2Ffirstinkstudios.com%2F&rand=0.7281985701993108" id="wpstats">
Remove it and you're golden
There's a background color on body. Getting rid of that fixes the "border".
body.custom-background {
background-color: #000000;
}
Also there's a smiley on the bottom
It looks like this
<img src="http://pixel.wp.com/g.gif?v=ext&j=1%3A3.4.1&blog=50532064&post=444&tz=1&host=firstinkstudios.com&ref=http%3A%2F%2Ffirstinkstudios.com%2Fblog%2F&rand=0.1907386933453381" id="wpstats" scale="0">
I can't get a input button to change its font size unless I change the background color.
this html:
<input type="button" id="startStop" value="start" />
and this css:
input#startStop{
font-size: 3em;
}
result in this:
which is exactly the same as with no styling at all.
Nothing I do to the css changes it: making it 60em; changing how I select it; they all result in the same, default-looking button.
I inspected it in Chrome, and the style is actually hitting the element, and not getting overridden:
But somehow the computed style isn't working:
(that's with a base font-size of 1em for the whole document. and, no, changing the base font-size has no effect)
The only thing that changes the font size it is if I give it a background-color:
input#startStop{
font-size: 3em;
background-color: white;
}
results in this:
Can anybody tell me what is going on?
EDIT: #Hashem Qolami, thanks for posting it in an external editor, which I should have done. When I look at your JS bin, it looks like this:
EDIT 2: it's browser specific.
The error is only occurring on Chrome, Safari and Opera, and only on Mac.
If renders correctly on Firefox for Mac and on all browsers (IE10, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Opera) on windows.
Indeed this only happens on WebKit-MacOS based browsers. Seems to be a WebKit restriction so that the Aqua appearance stays always so.
As long as the Aqua appearance is enabled for push buttons, certain CSS properties will be ignored. Because Aqua buttons do not scale, the height property will not be honored. Similarly font and color customizations will also not be honored. The overriding principle for push buttons is that you will never see a button that is some “half-Aqua” mix. Either the button will look perfectly native, or it will not be Aqua at all.
Source: https://www.webkit.org/blog/28/buttons
Which explains why setting a background makes font-size works; it breaks the Aqua appearance.
#pzin's response got me started on the right track. He's right in that anything that breaks aqua will get it done. The recommended way to handle it without having to specify a background color is this bad boy:
-webkit-appearance: button;
Setting a border property should also work. But I think -webkit-appearance: none; would be the best approach, as it "turns off" the Aqua appearance on MacOS browsers, so any other form control that Aqua inhibits CSS for would subsequently be style-able with your choice of CSS. Was meant to add this as a comment, but don't have enough reputation ;_;.
I see that you successfully had solved the problem, but I wonder, if the only problem is to make the button bigger, why sticking to font-size method while you can also change the button size by width + height or padding.
Problem
I have a <select> where one of its <option>’s text values is very long. I want the <select> to resize so it is never wider than its parent, even if it has to cut off its displayed text. max-width: 100% should do that.
Before resize:
What I want after resize:
But if you load this jsFiddle example and resize the Result panel’s width to be smaller than that of the <select>, you can see that the select inside the <fieldset> fails to scale its width down.
What I’m actually seeing after resize:
However, the equivalent page with a <div> instead of a <fieldset> does scale properly. You can see that and test your changes more easily if you have a <fieldset> and a <div> next to each other on one page. And if you delete the surrounding <fieldset> tags, the resizing works. The <fieldset> tag is somehow causing horizontal resizing to break.
The <fieldset> acts is as if there is a CSS rule fieldset { min-width: min-content; }. (min-content means, roughly, the smallest width that doesn’t cause a child to overflow.) If I replace the <fieldset> with a <div> with min-width: min-content, it looks exactly the same. Yet there is no rule with min-content in my styles, in the browser default stylesheet, or visible in Firebug’s CSS Inspector. I tried to override every style visible on the <fieldset> in Firebug’s CSS Inspector and in Firefox’s default stylesheet forms.css, but that didn’t help. Specifically overriding min-width and width didn’t do anything either.
Code
HTML of the fieldset:
<fieldset>
<div class="wrapper">
<select id="section" name="section">
<option value="-1"></option>
<option value="1501" selected="selected">Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.</option>
<option value="1480">Subcontractor</option>
<option value="3181">Valley</option>
<option value="3180">Ventura</option>
<option value="3220">Very Newest Section</option>
<option value="1481">Visitor</option>
<option value="3200">N/A</option>
</select>
</div>
</fieldset>
My CSS that should be working but isn’t:
fieldset {
/* hide fieldset-specific visual features: */
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: none;
}
select {
max-width: 100%;
}
Resetting the width properties to the defaults does nothing:
fieldset {
width: auto;
min-width: 0;
max-width: none;
}
Further CSS in which I try and fail to fix the problem:
/* try lots of things to fix the width, with no success: */
fieldset {
display: block;
min-width: 0;
max-width: 100%;
width: 100%;
text-overflow: clip;
}
div.wrapper {
width: 100%;
}
select {
overflow: hidden;
}
More details
The problem also occurs in this more comprehensive, more complicated jsFiddle example, which is more similar to the web page I’m actually trying to fix. You can see from that that the <select> is not the problem – an inline-block div also fails to resize. Though this example is more complicated, I assume that the fix for the simple case above will also fix this more complicated case.
[Edit: see browser support details below.]
One curious thing about this problem is that if you set div.wrapper { width: 50%; }, the <fieldset> stops resizing itself at the point then the full-size <select> would have hit the edge of the viewport. The resizing happens as if the <select> has width: 100%, even though the <select> looks like it has width: 50%.
If you give the <select> itself width: 50%, that behavior does not occur; the width is simply correctly set.
I don’t understand the reason for that difference. But it may not be relevant.
I also found the very similar question HTML fieldset allows children to expand indefinitely. The asker couldn’t find a solution and guesses that there is no solution apart from removing the <fieldset>. But I’m wondering, if it really is impossible to make the <fieldset> display right, why is that? What in <fieldset>’s spec or default CSS (as of this question) causes this behavior? This special behavior is probably be documented somewhere, since multiple browsers work like this.
Background goal and requirements
The reason I’m trying to do this is as part of writing mobile styles for an existing page with a big form. The form has multiple sections, and one part of it is wrapped in a <fieldset>. On a smartphone (or if you make your browser window small), the part of the page with the <fieldset> is much wider than the rest of the form. Most of the form constrains its width just fine, but the section with the <fieldset> does not, forcing the user to zoom out or scroll right to see all of that section.
I’m wary of simply removing the <fieldset>, as it is generated on many pages in a big app, and I’m not sure what selectors in CSS or JavaScript might depend on it.
I can use JavaScript if I need to, and a JavaScript solution is better than nothing. But if JavaScript is the only way to do this, I’d be curious to hear an explanation for why this is not possible using only CSS and HTML.
Edit: browser support
On the site, I need to support Internet Explorer 8 and later (we just dropped support for IE7), the latest Firefox, and the latest Chrome. This particular page should also work on iOS and Android smartphones. Slightly degraded but still usable behavior is acceptable for Internet Explorer 8.
I retested my broken fieldset example on different browsers. It actually already works in these browsers:
Internet Explorer 8, 9, and 10
Chrome
Chrome for Android
It breaks in these browsers:
Firefox
Firefox for Android
Internet Explorer 7
Thus, the only browser I care about that the current code breaks in is Firefox (on both desktop and mobile). If the code were fixed so it worked in Firefox without breaking it in any other browsers, that would solve my problem.
The site HTML template uses Internet Explorer conditional comments to add classes such .ie8 and .oldie to the <html> element. You can use those classes in your CSS if you need to work around styling differences in IE. The classes added are the same as in this old version of HTML5 Boilerplate.
Update (25 Sept 2017)
The Firefox bug described below is fixed as of Firefox 53 and the link to this answer has finally been removed from Bootstrap's documentation.
Also, my sincere apologies to the Mozilla contributors who had to block removing support for -moz-document partly due to this answer.
The fix
In WebKit and Firefox 53+, you just set min-width: 0; on the fieldset to override the default value of min-content.¹
Still, Firefox is a bit… odd when it comes to fieldsets. To make this work in earlier versions, you must change the display property of the fieldset to one of the following values:
table-cell (recommended)
table-column
table-column-group
table-footer-group
table-header-group
table-row
table-row-group
Of these, I recommend table-cell. Both table-row and table-row-group prevent you from changing width, while table-column and table-column-group prevent you from changing height.
This will (somewhat reasonably) break rendering in IE. Since only Gecko needs this, you can justifiably use #-moz-document—one of Mozilla's proprietary CSS extensions—to hide it from other browsers:
#-moz-document url-prefix() {
fieldset {
display: table-cell;
}
}
(Here's a jsFiddle demo.)
That fixes things, but if you're anything like me your reaction was something like…
What.
There is a reason, but it's not pretty.
The default presentation of the fieldset element is absurd and essentially impossible to specify in CSS. Think about it: the fieldset's border disappears where it's overlapped by a legend element, but the background remains visible! There's no way to reproduce this with any other combination of elements.
To top it off, implementations are full of concessions to legacy behaviour. One such is that the minimum width of a fieldset is never less than the intrinsic width of its content. WebKit gives you a way to override this behaviour by specifying it in the default stylesheet, but Gecko² goes a step further and enforces it in the rendering engine.
However, internal table elements constitute a special frame type in Gecko. Dimensional constraints for elements with these display values set are calculated in a separate code path, entirely circumventing the enforced minimum width imposed on fieldsets.
Again—the bug for this has been fixed as of Firefox 53, so you do not need this hack if you are only targeting newer versions.
Is using #-moz-document safe?
For this one issue, yes. #-moz-document works as intended in all versions of Firefox up until 53, where this bug is fixed.
This is no accident. Due in part to this answer, the bug to limit #-moz-document to user/UA stylesheets was made dependent on the underlying fieldset bug being fixed first.
Beyond this, do not use #-moz-document to target Firefox in your CSS, other resources notwithstanding.³
¹ Value may be prefixed. According to one reader, this has no effect in Android 4.1.2 Stock Browser and possibly other old versions; I have not had time to verify this.
² All links to the Gecko source in this answer refer to the 5065fdc12408 changeset, committed 29ᵗʰ July 2013; you may wish to compare notes with the most recent revision from Mozilla Central.
³ See e.g. SO #953491: Targeting only Firefox with CSS and CSS Tricks: CSS hacks targeting Firefox for widely referenced articles on high-profile sites.
Safari on iOS issue with selected answer
I found the answer from Jordan Gray to be particularly helpful.
However it didn't seem to solve this issue on Safari iOS for me.
The issue for me is simply that the fieldset cannot have an auto width if the element within has a max-width as a % width.
Fix for issue
Simply setting the fieldset to have a 100% width of it's container seems to get around this issue.
Example
fieldset {
min-width: 0;
width: 100%;
}
Please refer to the below for working examples - if you remove the % width off the fieldset or replace it with auto, it will not continue to function.
JSFiddle | Codepen
I’ve struggled for many hours with this, and basically, the browser is applying computed styling that you need to override in your CSS. I forget the exact property that is being set on fieldset elements versus divs (perhaps min-width?).
My best advice would be to change your element to a div, copy the computed styles from your inspector, then change your element back to fieldset and compare the computed styles to find the culprit.
Hope that helps.
Update: Adding display: table-cell helps in non-Chrome browsers.
.fake-select { white-space:nowrap; } caused the fieldset to interpret the .fake-select element by its original width, rather than its forced width (even when the overflow is hidden).
Remove that rule, and change .fake-select's max-width:100% to just width:100% and everything fits. The caveat is that you see all of the content of the fake-select, but I don't think this is all that bad, and it fits horizontally now.
Update: with the current rules in the following fiddle (which contains only real selects), the fieldset's children are constrained to correct widths. Other than removing rules for .fake-select and fixing comments (from // comment to /* comment */, I've noted changes in the fiddle's CSS.
I understand your problem better now, and the fiddle reflects some progress. I set default rules for all <select>s, and reserve .xxlarge for those which you know will be wider than 480px (and this only works because you know the width of #viewport, and can manually add the class to those too wide. Just requires a little bit of testing)
Proof
I am creating a website and there's a strange white space at the bottom of the page (only at IE). safari is fine. i am using ie8.
I want the white background ended after that black navigation links.
http://www.applezone.com.hk/newrx/
I can't figure out which part of the css causing that white space.
Thanks.
try adding those:
.navlink{
display: inline-block;
margin-left: 51px;
}
i don't have IE8 to test on but i do use "IE tester" program which showed me the problem.
If you use Firebug (Firefox add-on) you can select that white space and it will show you where it is in the DOM, i.e. what the HTML is that is actually generating it - which element it's part of.
You can also switch on and off the individual styles on the fly.
The equivalent in IE is to hit F12 and get the 'Developer Tools' console. Find -> Select Element by Click.
Try display:block and/or margin:0 and/or padding:0 for the element in question. One of them is going to be the culprit.
IE 9 on Hover over a link, pushes some of the HTML down the page.
When i remove the color from
td.subarea > h2 > a:hover { color: #aa051a; text-decoration: none;}
the problem does not occur.
I can't paste all the code here, and fairly sure its a unique problem to this page.
But maybe someone out there has seen something similar.
Its not moving the Link(a tag) down the page, its the whole containing table that moves.
This problem seems to occur in IE9 when the container element is set to overflow: auto and there is some hover action taking place in the child element.
There is a very simple solution of adding min-height: 0px to the container element, which works.
The detailed explanation of the bug and this solution can be found in this link:
http://blog.brianrichards.net/post/6721471926/ie9-hover-bug-workaround
Make sure your line-height and font-size properties are the same for normal and hover.
Sort of found the problem, well makes the table stop moving. margin-top:-20px.
Although it olny shifted down about 10px.
Probably some IE9 rendering issue. IE7/8 actually move the table on intial loading.
The font sizes, line-heights, all that css, is all good for the link.
Marc B is probably close to the issue of IE rendering something wrong and cauing floats and such to mess up.
Now have to real style a table layout wihtin a table layout page(ugh, hate table layout).
For me I had to specify
height:100%;
Then I had to go ahead and specify
width:100%;
The 'min-height: 0px' by mohitp above got me on the right track.