Has anybody succeeded installing locally Google's open-sourced API Explorer? I'm trying to use that tool to expose my company's API, and I find it difficult to get it running: compilation required some minor code changes and library upgrades, and at runtime, some pieces of JavaScript get downloaded from different google servers etc.
I was able to see the API by doing the following in Chrome Version 31.0.1650.63:
Hit the combination "Ctrl+Shift+N" to open a "New incognito window" (or use the "Customize and control Google Chrome" menu to the right of the address box)
Enter the URL in the "incognito" window
http://localhost:8080/_ah/api/explorer
After the page loads, click the shield icon that appears at the far right within the address box.
Click "Load unsafe script". The API appeared.
There may be a way to configure Chrome to get past these steps but I have not found that yet.
The opensource repository for the APIs Explorer is woefully out of date, that is partially if not entirely my own fault. I'll work on that.
That being said, the APIs Explorer is not really intended for exploring just any API. It will work well for any of Google's Discovery-based APIs, which happens to include APIs created by the new Cloud Endpoints service, recently demoed at Google I/O.
Related
I am facing a Chrome popup while trying to run Robot Frame work script:
Microsoft Security Essentials wants to restore your Chrome settings to their
original defaults.
This will reset your homepage, new tab page and
search engine, disable your extensions, and unpin all tabs. It will
also clear other temporary and cached data, such as cookies, content
and site data.
In chrome extension, my developer mode is unchecked, whereas it should be checked.
The Robot Framework automation script is just to open the google Chrome browser and load google search page.
I am using Win 7 Home Basic OS.
I have attached screenshots.
It appears that most Chrome support specialists will ask you to run an anti-malware tool to verify that your system is running normally. These can be found by searching on the popup message.
One Reddit user commented that in his case the problem was resolved by altering the Windows registry:
I finally found a fix for this. There is a setting in the registry
that's causing it.
In the registry it's under
HKEY_CKU\CURRENT_USER\Software\Google\Chrome\TriggeredReset
Delete the TriggeredReset key and then close regedit. Fixed.
This is an API for 3rd party programmers who want to create cleaning
tools. But if the tool isn't written properly, the triggered reset
never gets deleted and we have it always asking.
I need to create a web application which will be stored in the traybar of Windows, this to prevent users from accidentally close my application (without the need of a pre-close alert message).
I thought that Google Chrome's background apps could be the right way to go, mostly because I don't need cross-browser compatibility and I have to choose which browser my users will use to run this web application.
The only problem is that I don't understand if I can achieve what I need with this feature.
I've found only this example of background app in Chrome countdown app
But this app uses the "background page" feature, that is different from what I'm looking for.
How can I let a Chrome app be minimized in the traybar (or even in the taskbar would be ok) instead of be closed?
Try to use node-webkit (chromium + node.js) for it: https://github.com/rogerwang/node-webkit
It allow to create any web-app and it support tray icons: https://github.com/rogerwang/node-webkit/wiki/Tray
You can download my windows example app here: https://mega.co.nz/#!xQMzgbxD!S58G-V23QLNRDFC10xso41-T2V8OZQVsQEH-lr46R3s
If you want exactly chrome, try this NPAPI plugin example: http://minimizetotray.googlecode.com/files/SourceCode.zip from http://habrahabr.ru/post/73003/
Unfortunately, I don't think you will be able to achieve exactly what you're after. You might be able to combine the two solutions below to nearly achieve your requirements. However, I don't think the type of control you are after is available via Google Apps.
Google App Launcher
The Google App Launcher would fulfill the "stored in the traybar of Windows" requirement.
The Chrome App Launcher is the hub of all your Chrome apps and with it
you have quick access to all of your apps from the desktop. When you
install an app from the "For Your Desktop" collection of the Chrome
Web Store, you get the App Launcher. The App Launcher requires you to
sign in to Chrome to enable apps that need access to your Google
account.
Manage apps
When you download a new app that enables App Launcher, the apps from
your Apps bookmark on Chrome New Tab page will also appear in the App
Launcher. Managing apps in the App Launcher is simple.
Add more apps: Click the Chrome Web Store button in your apps list and explore the apps in the store.
...
Background: Extending Your App's Life
You mentioned background apps in your question but I would recommend you explore it further. It essentially provides the "prevent users from accidentally close my application" requirement that you stated. This isn't foolproof (see bold sentence below) but it is about as close to the requirement I think you will be able to achieve.
As of Google Chrome 10, the background feature lets a hosted app run
as soon as the user logs into their computer—before the user launches
Chrome or the app—and to continue running even when Chrome or the app
has no visible windows. However, if the user explicitly quits Chrome,
the browser and app both exit.
I would like to create an extension or app for the Chrome browser which would require access to a user's Google Calender (for creating new appointments).
I am unsure of which technology to better research and use, Chrome extensions or apps. My "app" wouldn't need much of a GUI, so I'm leaning towards extension — but I don't know if this would pose any difficulties for accessing a user's Google Calender to add an event.
Anyone one have any idea which technology is best for this situation, and why? Thanks!
Either, or... Go with an extension if you'd like.
I assume you've looked at the API reference?
https://developers.google.com/google-apps/calendar/
From there, I'd imagine you'd just need OAuth to authenticate the user. Here's the JS library:
https://code.google.com/p/google-api-javascript-client/
There are pros/cons of each types, apps or extensions.
Apps
If you would like to create a client application of Google Calendar which has many rich GUI components, this type will become a better solution.
In addition, Chrome apps can communicate with many hardware devices and other servers. Of course, your Chrome app can become as a server (that is, your app can open a server socket and accept a request from other client apps).
Chrome apps can be executed not depending on your Chrome Web browser. That is, Chrome apps cannot access to a context of your Chrome Web browser.
Probably, you don't want to get the pros above, I guess...
Extensions
If you would like to create a small UI for posting your schedule to Google Calendar, this type will become a better solution.
In addition, Chrome extensions can access to a context of your Chrome Web browser. That is, your extension can get page contents of each tab and inject your CSS and/or JS code. For example, your extension will get a URL of some opened tab and include it in a body of the posted schedule.
Chrome extensions completely depend on your Chrome Web browser. That is, your extension cannot execute independently.
Also, generally, high cost will be needed to develop Chrome apps than Chrome extensions. As the result, you should choose Chrome extensions, I believe.
I uploaded a utility in the last few days to google cloud storage.
It's a zip file containing two executables and a readme file.
I tested the download and it worked fine. I then looked into how I could see the download stats and yesterday I enabled logging.
I posted the link to a mailing list this afternoon and clicked it to verify that I had the right link and the download in chrome reports "xxx.zip appears to be malicious".
This did not happen prior to when I enabled logging, but I don't know for sure that is what caused it.
I am using a CNAME alias for the download, and I am a paying google apps customer.
The executables are not malicious in any way. They are simple utilities for doing replacements in text files. They do not access the network at all.
My question is "Why is my zip file being reported as malicious?" and is there any way to remedy this situation?
I looked around for a solution to this problem and I found the following advice:
1) Sign your EXEs. As it turns out, this advice is incorrect. While it has worked for some people, there are people who report that even signed executables are reported as malicious downloads.
2) Use SSL. SSL access is not available for google cloud storage unless you use the commondatastorage.googleapis.com or sandbox.google.com URLs. While this does might work, it doesn't resolve my problem.
3) Use the commondatastorage.googleapis.com URL. This works. The same file using the commondatastorage.googleapis.com url rather than my custom CNAME record does not report that it "appears malicious".
4) Register your site with Google Webmaster Tools. Getting around Chrome's Malicious File Warning According to this stackoverflow entry, the solution is to sign up for Google Webmaster Tools and add your site.
I have tried this one, but it has not made a change just yet. Because this is google cloud storage and not a main site, I added an index.html page, a 404 page, and ran the gsutil commands to enable web configuration within google cloud storage. I added the site to Webmaster Tools and additionally added it to Google Analytics.
I'll give solution 4 a few days to see if it pans out.
It seems like this is more of an issue with Google Chrome and not necessarily Google Cloud Storage. Chrome's methods for identifying malicious files are less than desirable right now.
I'm working on a Google Drive interface for Emacs. The concept is that Emacs could provide a platform-agnostic way to load, modify and save text documents stored in Google Drive. I've registered my app and can authenticate with OAuth2 and get a file listing with the Docs List API, but when I try to execute an Insert with the Google Drive API, I see an error:
"The authenticated user has not installed the app with client id ..."
Reading further, it seems I need to publish my Emacs application in the Chrome Web Store to get access to the Drive API. That doesn't make sense to me...I noticed that there is a FUSE project in development for Google Drive, which suggests that native development is possible. When I skimmed the code, however, I didn't see a Chrome Web Store component to getting it working.
Am I trying to misuse the API, or is there an route to make this work that makes more sense?
EDIT:
According to Ali Afshar, of the Google Drive team, installation is no longer required to use this API. So what follows may no longer be relevant, but will be left for historical purposes.
So, first off the API does not support application development in the sense that we are both doing it, I wouldn't use the word native though. The good news is I have been doing some research and Google Drive is really just a rebranding of Google Docs. So the Google Docs API could be a good choice as well for the same purposes.
Anyway, here's the steps to solve the error: "The authenticated user has not installed the app with client id ..." Which is a 403 error, for the sake of this answer. These steps assume you have set up an app in the chrome web store as is required, and installed it. I am working on my local machine too, with my project: http://github.com/tom-dignan/gdrive-cli which I have gotten past this error, so I think you should keep plugging away at your emacs version, because I think we can make this work.
a. Open the Google APIs console.
b. Confirm you've already enabled the apis under "API Access" both the API and SDK for Google drive should be enabled. There you get your client secrets/api keys and such. I am almost positive you've done this already, so go ahead to C. (this is here for others who may have missed it)
c. In the left navigation bar, under "Drive SDK" you will need to do the following:
Add a "Support URL" (required)
Add at least a small 16x16 application icon (required)
Add "OAuth Client ID (Required)" under Drive Integration (I was just tinkering and this seems to be the key field.)
Add "Open URL (Required) URL to open for your app from the google drive UI."
Check off "Multiple File Support"
Add some MIME types and file extensions, "text/plain", and txt for example
Add the the auth scopes:
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.email
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.profile
Don't bother trying to add the auth scopes for Google Docs here, because it won't work. Google does not want us to use it that way because files that drive apps create should be private to that app. Integration with Google Docs will have to be separate.
Now I know you must be thinking "why do I have to add some of these..." It's because the form makes them required fields. In mine, I put a couple URLs that point to static HTML pages.
Once you've done the above, clean up your state and reinstall your chrome app. Then try your code again, and it should stop giving you a 403.