I would like to arrange my last commits as an MQ patch. All the commits are local (never pushed to the server), but not all the local commits are to be converted.
Say, I did 10 commits (never pushed) and now I wish to convert the last 5 to a patch.
How do I do it?
Short version:
$ hg qimport -r "-5:"
Long version:
$ hg qimport -r "last(all(), 5)"
You can import changesets via hg qimport if you've already got an MQ repository initialised (via hg qinit. The command only accepts one patch at a time, so to import your last five changesets, you'd need to run the command five times and specify the revision to import via the --rev XXX parameter.
If your using TortoiseHG, you can import patches from within the TortoiseHG Workbench by right-clicking the changeset to import, then selecting Modify History -> Import to MQ.
Related
I have read only permission to an hg repo and am trying to develop and test changes to it locally. The problem is that I am in the middle of changing dev machines and am caught in a weird/akward state across the two machines.
On my old machine I made lots of changes to the repo, locslly. I just cloned the repo on my new machine, but obviously that doesn't contain the changes from my old machine. I need a way to createe a patch/diff from my local working copy on my old machine, and then apply them to my local working copy on my new machine. The problem is that I already commited (hg commit -m "Blah") the changes on my old machine to the distributed repo on it.
What set of specific commands can I use to create a patch/diff of my old machine and then apply it to the repo on my new one?
Update
I commited all changes on my old machine and then ran hg serve, exposing http://mymachine.example.com:8000.
On my new machine, where I had made some different changes (locally) than the changes from my old machine, I ran hg pull http://mymachine.example.com:8000 and got:
myuser#mymachine:~/sandbox/eclipse/workspace/myapp$ hg pull http://mymachine.example.com:8000
pulling from http://mymachine.example.com:8000/
searching for changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 2 changesets with 16 changes to 10 files (+1 heads)
(run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
So I run hg merge:
myuser#mymachine:~/sandbox/eclipse/workspace/myapp$ hg merge
abort: uncommitted changes
(use 'hg status' to list changes)
What do I do now?!?
You can use:
$ hg diff > changes.patch
To create a patch file, then:
$ patch -p1 < changes.patch
To apply that patch file on your new machine.
Well, that's actually fantastic, mercurial is a distributed version control system and you do not need to go via any patch file at all: simply pull the changes from your old machine to your new machine:
hg pull URL
where URL can be any network URL or also ssh-login, e.g.
hg pull ssh://mylogin#old.maschine.box or hg pull path/to/old/repository/on/nfs/mount
`
Alternatively you can also use bundle and unbundle. They create bundles which can be imported in the new mercurial easily and keep all meta-information.
hg bundle -r XXX --base YYY > FILENAME
where YYY is a revision you know you have in your new repository. You import it into your new repo with hg unbundle FILENAME. Of course you can bundle several changesets at once by repeating the -r argument or giving a changeset range like -r X:Y.
The least comfortable method is a via diff or export:
hg export -r XXX > FILENAME or equivalent hg diff -c XXX > FILENAME where you need to import the result with patch -p1 < FILENAME or hg import FILENAME.
The easiest way is to do this is to ensure that all work on your old machine is committed. Then use this command on it from the base of your repo:
hg serve
which creates a simple http server on this repo. The monitor should state the name of the http URL it is serving.
On your new machine, just pull from that URL.
Once you've pulled your old changes you can stop the hg serve process with ^C.
The advantages of this method are that it is very quick, and that it works on just about any system. The ssh method is also quick, but it won't work unless your system is configured to use ssh.
Answer to Update
The OPs update is asking an orthogonal question about how to merge changes pulled from a server with local changes. If you haven't already done so, try to digest the information in this merge doc and this one.
Merging is for merging changesets. The error is happening because you have local changes that haven't been committed which mercurial can't merge. So the first thing to do is to commit your local changes, then you will be able to merge.
But before you merge, I strongly recommend that you are merging what you think you are merging. Either ensure there are only 2 heads, or specify which head you are merging with. When merging, you have to be at one of the heads you wish to merge; it's usually better to be at the head with the most changes since the common ancestor because the diffs are simpler.
After you've merged, don't forget to commit the merge. :-)
I've got a repository. In the middle of its life-cycle I deleted a lot of unnecessary files from it (I decided to keep them unversioned).
hg remove
hg commit
The repo grows bigger and bigger.
And I decided to get rid of old revisions the from initial one to the revision where lot of files were removed (let's name it X).
Other words I want combine these revisions (from the initial to the X) into one initial revision.
But same time to keep the history of the following revisions (X+1, etc..) as they are.
I googled for the solution, but failed.
And found nothing clever than do this:
hg init newrepo
cd oldrepo
hg archive -r X newrepo
hg export -r X+1: -o "~/patches/%R-%h.diff"
cd newrepo
hg commit -A -m 'initial release (after archiving)'
hg import ~/patches/*.diff
And damn it, after few successfully applied patches
I receive:
Hunk #1 FAILED at xxx
Hunk #2 FAILED at xxx
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file xxx.rej
abort: patch failed to apply
What I do wrong?
I've got 1 repo without branches (to be more exact to the revision X all branches were merged).
The second solution was
* hg convert to svn
* hg convert to mercurial from revisiob X+1
Failed with python backtrace (probably it was caused by our repo has about 3K files).
To filter out files from repository, you want to use hg convert (Mercurial to Mercurial) with --filemap argument (see documentation for more details). Keep in mind the affected changeset IDs (and those of all their descendants) will change.
Take a look at the Collapse extension which seems to do what you want.
You can fold changesets with MQ, or use histedit extension
I have a large commit of many files on one branch, I need to transfer the modifications of a single file in that changeset to another branch. How can I do this? I am mostly using TortoiseHg but commandline solutions are also fine.
If I go to the changeset in TortoiseHg and select the file I can see the diffs I want to transfer, but not a way to actually apply them.
You can get the patch for just that file using:
hg log -r THEREVISIONWITHLOTSOFCHANGES -p -I path/to/justthatfile > justthatfile.patch
which you can then import on whatever branch you want by doing:
hg update anotherbranch
hg import --no-commit justthatfile.patch
hg commit
The most basic solution is to dump the patch of the file, apply it to the current working revision, and commit it (assuming you're at the root of the repository):
$ hg up <revision-to-apply-the-patch-to>
$ hg diff -c <revision-containing-the-patch> <files-to-include> | patch -p0
$ hg ci -m "Transplanting selected changes from <revision-contain...>"
The drawback of this method is that it isn't very obvious what you've done from a revision history perspective. A good commit message helps here, but the history graph gives no hint about the process of transplanting some changes. In that case merging and reverting may be a better solution:
$ hg up <revision-to-apply-the-patch-to>
$ hg merge -r <revision-containing-the-patch>
$ hg revert --no-backup <files-to-exclude>
$ hg ci -m "Merge in changes of <files-to-include>"
Probably there are more solutions to do this -- these two came to my mind first.
Using Mercurial, say if I do an hg pull and hg up and now the local repo and working directory are both up to date.
What if I commit often, say 1 day later, and then 2 days later, and want to diff with the revision as of right now?
Otherwise, the diff is always comparing to the previous committed version.
I can use pencil and paper and write down the revision number right now, say, 4117, and then 1 day later, 2 days later, and any time before I am sure and push to the remote central repo, do an
hg vdiff -r 4117
(either using vdiff or diff). But instead of remembering this "magic number" 4117, is there a way to make Mercurial somehow remember this number? That way, hg vdiff is to see the difference between minor changes against committed code, but there is a diff that shows all changes before pushing to the remote repo.
(or, if there is command that shows the revision number since your last pull, which should also show 4117, so on bash we can do something like hg vdiff -r `hg --what-is-last-pull` )
Update: does hg out --patch show the diff of what would be pushed to the remote repo? If so, maybe it serves the purpose without caring the "magic number". But how to show the patch diff using kdiff3 or any other diff tools? Also, it seems we can do hg out and if we see 4118, 4119, 4120, then we know if we do hg vdiff -r ___ we should use (4118 - 1) which is 4117.
Update 2: actually, hg out --patch shows the diff between local repo and the remote repo, so it is close, but not exactly the same as the diff between working directory and the local or remote repo.
If you want to mark a revision you can use bookmarks extensions. It is shipped with mercurial. Documentationis available here
In your case,
hg pull -u
hg bookmarks lastpull
..hack..hack..
hg ci -m new-hack
hg diff -r lastpull:tip
hg bookmarks -d lastpull
Do it with multiple clones. When you clone from the remote repo initially use clone -U to create a clone that has no working directory files at all. Then clone again locally, for example:
$ hg clone my-local-clone-with-no-working-files my-working-clone
Do your commits and work in my-working-clone and then at any time you can check the tip in my-local-clone-with-no-working-files to see what the last thing you pulled from the server was. If you want to get fancy you could create a shell alias for:
hg diff -r $(hg -R $(hg root)/../my-local-clone-with-no-working-files id -i -r tip)
which will compare the working directory of the repo in which you run it (my-working-clone) with the tip of whatever you last pulled from the server.
It's worth nothing that this takes no extra disk space because local clones use hardlinks under the covers the the my-local-clone-with-no-working-files has no working directory files.
You can replace pen and paper with a local tag: hg tag -l -r <revision number on paper> tagname. Notice the -l, which makes the tag local, which means it does not get transferred by push and pull. You can also remove this tag by hg tag -l --remove tagname.
is this possible with Mercurial? and which Version Control system can do this besides Clearcase?
David is correct that you can't have a branch that exists on only a single file, but it's worth pointing out that people often have branches that alter only a single file. Since the branch metadata is stored in the changeset, and since the changeset contains only a delta (change), having a branch that alters only a single files is nearly instantanous to create, update, commit, and merge, plus it takes up almost no space on disk.
Resultingly, it's a very common way to handle per-customer configurations. Keep the tiny change for them in a branch, and merge from main, where development happened, into that branch, whenever you want to update their deployment.
How you could use MQ:
$ hg qnew -m "Changes for client0" client0
... change the file ...
$ hg qref # update the client0 patch with the changes
$ hg qpop # pop the changes off the queue stack
... develop like normal ...
... client0 asks for a build ...
$ hg qpu # apply client0's patch
$ make release
$ hg qpop
It would get a bit finicky if you've got to deal with a lot of clients… But it may be worth considering.
The other thing you could do, of course, is just commit a bunch of .diff files:
... make changes for client 0 ...
$ hg diff > client0.diff
$ hg revert --all
$ hg add client0.diff
$ hg ci -m "Adding client0 changes"
... develop ...
... client0 asks for a build ...
$ patch -p1 < client0.diff
$ make release
$ hg revert --all
No, it's not possible. A branch in Mercurial is a snapshot of the entire repository state.
You could do it with CVS, though, as CVS tracks changes on a per-file basis :)