I'm getting a pretty strange error when marshalling my object to json. My object is annotated like this.
My class:
#XmlRootElement(name = "myobject")
public class MyObject {
private List<String> contactPersonsForMyObject;
#javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlElement()
public List<String> getContactPersonsForMyObject() {
return contactPersonsForMyObject;
}
public void setContactPersonsForMyObject(List<String> contactPersonsForMyObject) {
this.contactPersonsForMyObject = contactPersonsForMyObject;
}
}
Everything works fine except for that if the List contactPersonsForMyObject contains only one value it get's marshalled to a string which ofcourse creates problems since the application consuming this expects a list.
The marshalled object:
[
{
"myobject": {
"somethingcool": "amazing",
"contactPersonsForMyObject": [
"test.test#gmail.com",
"test#test.se"
],
"myObjectId": "c85e48730501bfae41e67714c6131b7d"
}
},
{
"myobject": {
"somethingcool": "cool",
"contactPersonsForMyObject":"test#test2.se",
"myObjectId": "c85e48730501bfae41e67714cqwerty"
}
}
]
Why does this happen and how do I force it to create a list with one value?
Try using Jackson to handle processing your objects into JSON, it solved the same array problem for me in the past. If you are using RESTEasy (version 1.2 GA) with Maven, this link should help you get things setup to use Jackson to serialize objects to JSON.
This article also has some useful information for integrating Jackson with RESTEasy. Hope this helps!
Related
I have a Spring API that allows the user to specify the JsonView of each call using a view param like so:
/api/v1/person/1?view=viewName
I then use Spring's MappingJacksonValue to set the correct view dynamically instead of using #JsonView() annotation and finally I just return the MappingJacksonValue instance which produces something along the lines of
[
{ id: 1 },
{ id: 2 }
]
I can't for the life of me figure out how to easily wrap my MappingJacksonValue instances in an ObjectNode so that I can change all API results from the snippet above to this
{
"data" : [
{ id: 1 },
{ id: 2 }
]
}
I tried using a regular HashMap<> but that didn't work - the serialization completely ignores the MappingJacksonValue view and it also produces Map-specific results
{
data: {
value: [],
serializationView: "com.blah.models.view.View$Id",
filters: null,
jsonpFunction: null
}
}
So can someone pls let me know what's the best way to achieve result wrapping in my scenario?
Thanks in advance!
If anyone comes across this post looking to do the same thing, I realized I was looking at the problem in the wrong way. I ended up creating a ServiceResponse class and wrapped up the object in there like so
public class ServiceResponse {
#JsonView(View.Id.class)
private Object data;
public ServiceResponse (Object data) {
this.data = data;
}
}
So essentially instead of returning new MappingJacksonValue(someReturnObject) I'm returning new MappingJacksonValue(new ServiceResponse(someReturnObject)). This way everything is wrapped nicely in a data JSON object and the setSerializationView method still filters my objects properly.
Hope this helps someone.
I have come across a problem of parsing json data . I am building project using spring boot based on REST api . When i have to parse data corresponding to domain then it is very easy , i use RequestBody in controller method with domain name but in current scenerio i have a list of domain in json form :
{
"data":[
{
"type":"abc",
"subtypes":[
{
"leftValue":"BEACH",
"rightValue":"MOUNTAIN",
"preferencePoint":60
},
{
"leftValue":"ADVENTURE",
"rightValue":"LEISURE",
"preferencePoint":60
}
]
},
{
"type":"mno",
"subtypes":[
{
"leftValue":"LUXURY",
"rightValue":"FUNCTIONAL",
"preferencePoint":60
},
{
"leftValue":"SENSIBLE",
"rightValue":"AGGRESIVE",
"preferencePoint":0
}
]
}
]
}
I am sending data in list where type is the property of class Type
and class Type has list of Subtypes class and subtype class contains leftValue and rightValue as enums
I am using spring boot which uses jackson liberary by default and i want to parse this data into corresponding Type class using Jackson. Can any one provide me solution.
It wasn't clear to me if you have static or dynamic payload.
Static payload
For static one, I would personally try to simplify your payload structure. But your structure would look like this. (I skipped getters and setters. You can generate them via Lombok library).
public class Subtype{
private String leftValue;
private String rightValue;
private int preferencePoint;
}
public class Type{
private String type;
private List<Subtype> subtypes;
}
public class Data{
private List<Type> data;
}
Then in your controller you inject Data type as #RequestBody.
Dynamic payload
For dynamic payload, there is option to inject LinkedHashMap<String, Object> as #RequestBody. Where value in that map is of type Object, which can be casted into another LinkedHashMap<String, Object> and therefore this approach support also nested objects. This can support infinite nesting this way. The only downside is that you need to cast Objects into correct types based on key from the map.
BTW, with pure Spring or Spring Boot I was always able to avoid explicit call against Jackson API, therefore I don't recommend to go down that path.
I am pulling out my hair again. I am working thru possible solutions to my other question here. I have this class:
public class PartViewDTO : IDictionary<string, object>
{
...
}
It is constructed with the details of what fields it should represent - Name, PartNumber, Price, etc. etc.
I am trying to serialize a collection of PartViewDTO's as a response for a web service but I don't want the traditional-dictionary serialization of
[ { "Key": "Key1", "Value": "Value1" }, ...]
Instead I want
{ "Key1": "Value1", ... }
I have tried several variations on applying the JsonDictionaryAttribute to this class:
[Newtonsoft.Json.JsonDictionary(ItemTypeNameHandling=Newtonsoft.Json.TypeNameHandling.Objects)]
public class PartViewDTO : IDictionary<string, object>
But at run-time I get an exception thrown that "PartViewDTO is not a dictionary"
Bottom line - PartViewDTO is a dictionary but I want it to serialize like the keys in the dictionary were properties on the class. I'm returning an IEnumerable < PartViewDTO > of these from web services so I'm hoping an attribute applied to the class itself will clue JSON in on how it should be serialized.
What am I doing wrong?
It turns out JSON.NET does a fine job serializing dictionaries the way I want. The problem is it doesn't recognize that my type IS a dictionary. I ended up writing a custom converter for PartViewDTO which did the dictionary-thing.
All is well now!
I can't seem to find anything in the OpenRasta docs or tutorials that shows how to use arbitrary JSON objects (i.e. objects not predefined using C# classes) for both receiving from and responding back to the client.
One way to do it would be to use JsonValue and write a custom codec that would just use the (de)serialization features provided by JsonValue. That should be pretty straightforward and less than 50 lines of code, but I wondered if there isn't anything built into OpenRasta?
(One downside of JsonValue is that MS has not yet released it, so you can't yet deploy it to customers (see 1. "Additional Use Rights"). But in cases where that matters, any other Json library, like Json.NET can be used.)
I have written, like most people, a very simple codec that supports dynamics as inputs and outputs to handlers using json.net. You can also register that codec with an anonymous type and it works brilliantly. You end up with this:
public object Post(dynamic myCustomer) {
return new { response = myCustomer.Id };
}
I just implemented a JSON codec using JsonFx. It goes like this:
using System.IO;
using System.Text;
using JsonFx.Json;
namespace Example
{
[global::OpenRasta.Codecs.MediaType("application/json")]
public class JsonFXCodec : global::OpenRasta.Codecs.IMediaTypeWriter, global::OpenRasta.Codecs.IMediaTypeReader
{
public void WriteTo(object entity, global::OpenRasta.Web.IHttpEntity response, string[] codecParameters)
{
JsonWriter json = new JsonWriter();
using (TextWriter w = new StreamWriter(response.Stream, Encoding.UTF8))
{
json.Write(entity, w);
}
}
public object ReadFrom(global::OpenRasta.Web.IHttpEntity request, global::OpenRasta.TypeSystem.IType destinationType, string destinationName)
{
JsonReader json = new JsonReader();
using (TextReader r = new StreamReader(request.Stream, Encoding.UTF8))
{
return json.Read(r, destinationType.StaticType);
}
}
public object Configuration { get; set; }
}
}
If it is registered for "object" then it seems to work for any class:
ResourceSpace.Has.ResourcesOfType<object>()
.WithoutUri
.TranscodedBy<JsonFXCodec>();
I have a JSON object which I don't have control of and want to map it to a Java object which is pre-created.
There is one attribute in the JSON object which can be a URL or it could be a JSONArray.
Class SomeClass {
private URL items;
public URL getURL() {
return items;
}
public void setURL(URL url) {
this.items = url;
}
}
Below is the JSON:
Case A:
{
...
items: http://someurl.abc.com/linktoitems,
...
}
OR
Case B
{
...
items: [
{ "id": id1, "name": name1 },
{ "id": id2, "name": name2 }
]
...
}
If i create the POJO to map for Case A, Case B fails and vice versa. In short, is there a way to map the JSON attribute to the POJO field with different data types? In that case I will create two separate fields in the POJO named,
private URL itemLink;
private Item[] itemList;
It depends on exact details, but if what you are asking is if it is possible to map either JSON String or JSON array into a Java property, yes this can be done.
Obvious way would be to define a custom deserializer which handles both kinds of JSON input.
But it is also possible to define Java type in such a way that it can be constructed both by setting properties (which works from JSON Object) and have a single-String-arg constructor or static single-String-arg factory method marked with #JsonCreator.
Yet another possibility is to use an intermediate type that can deserialized from any JSON: both java.lang.Object and JsonNode ("JSON tree") instances can be created from any JSON. From this value you would need to do manual conversion; most likely in setter, like so:
public void setItems(JsonNode treeRoot) { .... }
What will not work, however, is defining two properties with the same name.
One thing I don't quite follow is how you would convert from List to URL though. So maybe you actually do need two separate internal fields; and setter would just assign to one of those (and getter would return value of just one).