I have a MovieClip holding an irregular shape such as this one:
I need to generate a random point on this shape.
I can use brute force by generating points within the bounding box and then hitTesting to see if they reside on the irregular shape. However, I'm sure there's a more efficient way to tackle this problem.
What is the most efficient way to generate a random point on an irregular shape?
You mentioned hitTest, but I assume you meant hitTestPoint().
If so, a function go get the random points you mention, would look a bit like this:
function getRandomPointsInClip(target:MovieClip,numPoints:int):Vector.<Point>{
var points:Vector.<Point> = new Vector.<Point>(numPoints,true);
var width:Number = target.width,height:Number = target.height;
for(var i:int = 0; i < numPoints ; i++){
var point:Point = new Point(target.x+Math.random() * width,target.y+Math.random() * height);
if(target.hitTestPoint(point.x,point.y,true)) points[i] = point;//is the random coord inside ?
else i = i-1;//nope, go back one step - > retry above until it is inside
}
return points;
}
The other I hinted at in my comment involves looping through non transparent pixels in a bitmap data of your object. This method would insure you don't have many duplicates, as opposed to the previous method, but it also means, you have less control over the number of points created and there's extra memory used for creating the bitmap. Still, for documentation purposes, here is the function:
function getGridPointsInClip(target:MovieClip,res:int,offset:Number = 3):Vector.<Point>{
var points:Vector.<Point> = new Vector.<Point>();
var x:int,y:int,alpha:int,w:int = int(target.width),h:int = int(target.height);
var bmd:BitmapData = new BitmapData(w,h,true,0x00FFFFFF);bmd.draw(target);
var pixels:Vector.<uint> = bmd.getVector(bmd.rect),numPixels:int = w*h;
for(var i:int = 0; i < numPixels; i+=res) {
x = i%bmd.width;
y = int(i/bmd.width);
alpha = pixels[i] >>> 24;
if(alpha > 0) points.push(new Point(x+random(-offset,offset),y+random(-offset,offset)));
}
return points;
}
function random(from:Number,to:Number):Number {
if (from >= to) return from;
var diff:Number = to - from;
return (Math.random()*diff) + from;
}
And here'a very basic test:
var pts:Vector.<Point> = getRandomPointsInClip(mc,300);
//var pts:Vector.<Point> = getGridPointsInClip(mc,100,4);
for(var i:int = 0 ; i < pts.length; i++) drawCircle(pts[i].x,pts[i].y,3,0x009900);
function getRandomPointsInClip(target:MovieClip,numPoints:int):Vector.<Point>{
var points:Vector.<Point> = new Vector.<Point>(numPoints,true);
var width:Number = target.width,height:Number = target.height;
for(var i:int = 0; i < numPoints ; i++){
var point:Point = new Point(target.x+Math.random() * width,target.y+Math.random() * height);
if(target.hitTestPoint(point.x,point.y,true)) points[i] = point;//is the random coord inside ?
else i = i-1;//nope, go back one step - > retry above until it is inside
}
return points;
}
function getGridPointsInClip(target:MovieClip,res:int,offset:Number = 3):Vector.<Point>{
var points:Vector.<Point> = new Vector.<Point>();
var x:int,y:int,alpha:int,w:int = int(target.width),h:int = int(target.height);
var bmd:BitmapData = new BitmapData(w,h,true,0x00FFFFFF);bmd.draw(target);
var pixels:Vector.<uint> = bmd.getVector(bmd.rect),numPixels:int = w*h;
for(var i:int = 0; i < numPixels; i+=res) {
x = i%bmd.width;
y = int(i/bmd.width);
alpha = pixels[i] >>> 24;
if(alpha > 0) points.push(new Point(x+random(-offset,offset),y+random(-offset,offset)));
}
return points;
}
function random(from:Number,to:Number):Number {
if (from >= to) return from;
var diff:Number = to - from;
return (Math.random()*diff) + from;
}
function drawCircle(x:Number,y:Number,radius:Number,color:uint):void{
graphics.lineStyle(1,color);
graphics.drawCircle(x-radius,y-radius,radius);
}
HTH
If you think of some non-blob like shapes, it's clear the check random pixel, try again method isn't really a good way. The bounding box area could be huge compared to the shape area.
What you could do to improve the effectiveness is getting a vector of the BitmapData of the shape. It should contain all pixels of the bounding box. Update - it would be nice now if we could pick a random point, and remove it from the vector if it isn't inside the shape. Unfortunately the vector only contains the pixels' colour, not the position which is implicit and only correct if we don't change the vector's length. Since we don't need to know the actual colour, we can omit all transparent pixels and store an inside pixel's position as it's value in the vector. This way we don't need to create a new object for each pixel of the shape (that would be quite expensive!).
var v:Vector.<uint> shapeBoxBitmap.getVector(shapeBoxBitmap.rect);
var pixelNum:int = v.length;
for(var i:uint = 0; i < pixelNum; i++) {
if( v[i] && 0xFF000000 == 0) { // transparent pixel, outside off shape
v.splice(i,1);
} else {
v[i] = i;
}
}
//get random point
var randomPixel:int = v[Math.floor(Math.random()*v.length)];
var point:Point = new Point(randomPixel%shapeBitmap.width,int(randomPixel/shapeBitmap.width));
Related
This code builds a palette of tiles for use in a map maker program. It takes in an array set by its parent and uses the bitmaps(from the objects) in that array to display a grid of tiles. Right now it only does a 5x5 grid, but what if there are more than 25 tiles in my tileSet? I want to display only the 5x5 tile grid, but be able to scroll through the images. I imagine that I need to make another rectangle to use as its mask and use a ScrollBar to make it scrollRect, but I can't get this working. Please Help.
public function Palette(X:uint, Y:uint, tileSet:Array)
{
addChild(handleGraphics);
var palette:Rectangle = new Rectangle(X, Y, 5*32, tileSet.length*32); //Default size is 5x5 tiles.
handleGraphics.DrawGrid(32,palette.x,palette.y,5,5);
var counter:int = 0;
for(var i:int = 0; i < 5; i++)
{
paletteArray[i] = [];
for(var u:int = 0; u < 5; u++)
{
if(counter >= tileSet.length)
{
counter = 0; //Which frame to show?
}
var b:Bitmap = new Bitmap(tileSet[counter].Graphic);
b.x = (palette.x) + 32 * u; //Align with palette Rectangle.
b.y = (palette.y) + 32 * i; ///////////////////////////////
addChild(b);
var tileObj:Object = new Object();
tileObj.Name = tileSet[counter].Name;
tileObj.Frame = tileSet[counter].Frame;
tileObj.Graphic = tileSet[counter].Graphic;
paletteArray[i].push(tileObj);
setChildIndex(b, 0); //Under grid.
counter++;
}
}
ActivatePaletteListeners();
}
This code works great for a tileSet array that has less than 25 objects. It loops and shows them continuously until it hits 25. I could do without this I guess, but it is a neat affect.
In another class (HandleTiles) I cycle through my tileSet MovieClip and use each frame to create a new object for each tile.
public function GetPaletteTiles(MC:MovieClip)
{
if (tileArray != null)
{
tileArray.length = 0;
}
for(var i:int = 1; i <= MC.totalFrames; i++)
{
MC.gotoAndStop(i); //Change frame for new info.
var tileObj:Object = new Object(); //The object to push to an array of tiles.
var graphicData:BitmapData = new BitmapData(32,32);
graphicData.draw(MC); //Graphic data from sampleTS.
tileObj.Name = MC.currentFrameLabel;
tileObj.Frame = MC.currentFrame;
tileObj.Graphic = graphicData;
tileArray.push(tileObj);
}
BuildIndexArray(15, 20); //Default size 15 x 20.
}
And here I set the tileSet to use
private function ChangeActiveTileset(Mc:MovieClip)
{
activeTileset = Mc;
GetPaletteTiles(activeTileset);
UpdatePalette();
}
I can change the tileSet with a comboBox. That's why I tear down the tileArray every time I call GetPaletteTiles(). Each tileSet is a different MovieClip, like Buildings, Samples, InTheCity, etc.
Sorry I didn't have time to get this code together earlier. Here's tiling code pieces. Because you're using rectangle and you have to stay under max dimensions you have to move the source mc. I think you already know everything else in there.
// set the bmp dimensions to device screensize to prevent exceeding device's max bmp dimensions
if (bStagePortrait) {
iTileWidth = Capabilities.screenResolutionX;
iTileHeight = Capabilities.screenResolutionY;
} else {
iTileWidth = Capabilities.screenResolutionY;
iTileHeight = Capabilities.screenResolutionX;
}
// mcList.mcListVector is the source mc - a regular mc containing mcs, jpgs, dynamic text, vector shapes, etc.
// mcList.mcListBmp is an empty mc
aListTiles = new Array();
iNumberOfTiles = Math.ceil(mcList.height / iTileHeight);
for (i = 0; i < iNumberOfTiles; i++) {
var bmpTile: Bitmap;
// move the source mc
mcList.mcListVector.y = -(i * iTileHeight);
bmpTile = fDrawTile(mcList, 0, 0, iTileWidth, iTileHeight);
mcList.mcListBmp.addChild(bmpTile);
bmpTile.x = 0;
bmpTile.y = (i * iTileHeight);
aListTiles.push(bmpTile);
}
// remove the regular mc
mcList.mcListVector.removeChild(mcList.mcListVector.mcPic);
mcList.mcListVector.mcPic = null;
mcList.removeChild(mcList.mcListVector);
mcList.mcListVector = null;
}
function fDrawTile(pClip: MovieClip, pX: int, pY: int, pWidth: int, pHeight: int): Bitmap {
trace("fDrawTile: " + pX + "," + pY + " " + pWidth + "," + pHeight);
var rectTemp: Rectangle = new Rectangle(pX, pY, pWidth, pHeight);
var bdClip: BitmapData = new BitmapData(pWidth, pHeight, true, 0x00000000);
var bdTemp: BitmapData = new BitmapData(pWidth, pHeight, true, 0x00000000);
bdClip.draw(pClip, null, null, null, rectTemp, true);
bdTemp.copyPixels(bdClip, rectTemp, new Point(0, 0));
var bmpReturn: Bitmap = new Bitmap(bdTemp, "auto", true);
return bmpReturn;
}
I have two spites created by drawPath(). Sometimes they might overlap each other and when it happens i want to create new sprite, which contains only overlapping part. Maybe it is really simple but i couldn't find any solution exept draw a rectangle of zone where they overlaps. So if it could be done i really appreciate your help.
for (var j:int = 0; j < zonesAmount; j++) {
var sp:Sprite = new Sprite();
var zoneCoord:Vector.<Number> = new Vector.<Number>(0, false);
var zoneCommands:Vector.<int> = new Vector.<int>(0, false);
var o:XML;
for each (o in xml.ZONE[j].POINT)
{
var tmpCoord:int = o.#X;
zoneCoord.push(tmpCoord);
tmpCoord = o.#Y;
zoneCoord.push(tmpCoord);
}
zoneCommands.push(GraphicsPathCommand.MOVE_TO);
for (var i:int = 0; i < (zoneCoord.length - 2)/4; i++)
zoneCommands.push(GraphicsPathCommand.CURVE_TO);
sp.graphics.beginFill(xml.ZONE[j].#COLOR);
sp.graphics.drawPath(zoneCommands, zoneCoord);
sp.graphics.endFill();
sp.alpha = 0.1;
zones[xml.ZONE[j].#ID - 1] = sp;
var picsToolt:mapTooltip = new mapTooltip(15, 15, xml.ZONE[j].SOURCE.#NMB, xml.ZONE[j].SOURCE.#SRC);
picsToolt.Register(zones[xml.ZONE[j].#ID - 1], "");
addChild(zones[xml.ZONE[j].#ID - 1]);
}
Don't bother for addChild(zones[xml.ZONE[j].#ID - 1]) it doesn't matter
Here is examples of what i'm trying to do:
first and second
Second one describes exactly in what i'm intrested, red rect is what i can do and blue line is what i want
I’m trying to make a game like tower defence in AS3 and currently cant find solution to check which item in an array has the lower value of distance between enemy and turret, in order to choose which enemy to attack first.
I'm really stuck with this problem and asking for your help.
Here is a short code:
var enemyArray:Array = new Array();
var turretArray:Array = new Array();
addEventListener(Event.EnterFrame, loop);
// adding enemies
for(var i:int=0; i<3; i++){
var enemy:Enemy = new Enemy();
...
...
enemyArray.push(enemy);
addChild(enemy);
}
// adding turret
for(var t:int=0; t<2; t++){
var turret:Turret = new Turret();
...
...
turret.destinationX = 0;
turret.destinationY = 0;
turret.distance = 0;
turretArray.push(turret);
addChild(turret);
}
// loop
function loop(event:Event):void{
for(var j:int=enemyArray.length-1; j>=0; j--){
for(var k:int=turretArray.length-1; k>=0; k--){
// getting destination
turretArray[k].destinationX = turretArray[k].x - enemyArray[j].x;
turretArray[k].destinationY = turretArray[k].y - enemyArray[j].y;
// getting distance between turret and enemy
turretArray[k].distance = Math.sqrt(turretArray[k].destinationX*turretArray[k].destinationX+turretArray[k].destinationY*turretArray[k].destinationY);
// here i need to get min value from all turrets distance
}
}
}
Looks like you just need to be keeping track of the lowest value you've found as you go rather than overwriting it every time (if I've understood your code, correctly).
// loop
function loop(event:Event):void{
for(var k:int=turretArray.length-1; k>=0; k--)
{
turretArray[k].distance = -1;
for(var j:int=enemyArray.length-1; j>=0; j--)
{
var dx = turretArray[k].x - enemyArray[j].x;
var dy = turretArray[k].y - enemyArray[j].y;
var dist = Math.sqrt(dx * dx + dy * dy);
if(dist < turretArray[k].distance || turretArray[k].distance < 0)
{
turretArray[k].distance = dist;
turretArray[k].destinationX = dx;
turretArray[k].destinationY = dy;
}
}
}
}
Here, we store the initial distance value found in turretArray[k].distance, and only overwrite that if we find a lower one. We set it to -1 each time so we can tell if it's been set, yet, or not.
This is the equation you want:
http://www.mathopenref.com/coorddist.html
sqrt( (turret1X - turret2x)^2 + (turret1Y - turret2Y)^2 )
I'm looking for an efficient way to filter a specific color from a bitmapData object in ActionScript 3. Currently I use a loop with readByte32(). This takes about a second to process which is unacceptable. I have been trying to get paletteMap() to work but so far haven't been able to grasp its API (any truly useful links? Google has failed me...).
Here's my current logic, which I want to improve:
var n:int = bitmapData.width;
for (var i:int = 0; i < n; i++) {
var m:int = bitmapData.height;
for (var j:int = 0; j < m; j++) {
var color:int = bitmapData.getPixel(i, j);
if (color == 0xCACACA) {
bitmapData.setPixel32(i, j, 0x00000000);
}
}
}
I can get slightly better performance from using Vectors but it's only marginally better...
var v:Vector.<uint> = bitmapData.getVector(bitmapData.rect);
var n:int = bitmapData.width * bitmapData.height;
for (var i:int = 0; i < n; i++) {
var color:uint = v[i];
v[i] = color == 0xFFCACACA ? 0x00000000 : color;
}
bitmapData.setVector(bitmapData.rect, v);
I really think there must be a better way to do this that only takes a few 100 milliseconds. If anyone can unlock the mysteries of bitmapData for me, you will be the new leader of my people.
PS I am using bitmapData.lock() and unlock(); I just didn't post the boilerplate stuff.
An easy way is using the threshold method. It's a bit cumbersome at first, but it's pretty fast (as fast as you'll get, I think)
This will change every red pixel (considering red only a pixel whose value is exactly 0xffff0000) to blue (0xff0000ff).
var colorToReplace:uint = 0xffff0000;
var newColor:uint = 0xff0000ff;
var maskToUse:uint = 0xffffffff;
var rect:Rectangle = new Rectangle(0,0,bitmapData.width,bitmapData.height);
var p:Point = new Point(0,0);
bitmapData.threshold(bitmapData, rect, p, "==", colorToReplace,
newColor, maskToUse, true);
Flash has an API to a shader like language called pixel bender that may be of use to you in this case. Here is a tutorial from adobe on how to apply a pixel bender filter to an image in flash.
Otherwise you could processes rows at a time. (Note a slight error in your code was to re-get the height on each iteration of width):
private var currentRow:Number = 0;
private var timer:Timer;
public function processImage(event:Event=null):void
{
var m:int = bitmapData.height;
for (var j:int = 0; j < m; j++)
{
if (bitmapData.getPixel(currentRow, j) == 0xCACACA)
{
bitmapData.setPixel32(currentRow, j, 0x00000000);
}
}
currentRow++;
if(currentRow < bitmapData.width)
{
timer = new Timer(1, 500);
timer.addEventListener(TimerEvent.COMPLETE, processImage);
timer.start();
}
}
The processing will take a bit longer but at least your display won't be blocked.
I'm trying to make a dynamic image gallery from and xml. From my tutorials, right now i've got it so it will constantly add the next thumbnail below the other, which is fine, but I'm trying to figure out how to make it that once it reaches a certain y coordinate, it will move the x coordinate over and stack them again. So that rather one long list of thumbs, it will be a side by side stack. For some reason, I can't get it in my head how something like this would work. My goal is to have a side by side stack that I will end up putting in a movie clip that will be masked to show only 2 stacks at a time. Then when clicking a button will slide it over. I was planning to use the "movieclip.length" to calculate how far over to move it, but i haven't gotten that far yet. This is what I got:
var gallery_xml:XML;
var xmlReq:URLRequest = new URLRequest("xml/content.xml");
var xmlLoader:URLLoader = new URLLoader();
var imageLoader:Loader;
function xmlLoaded(event:Event):void
{
gallery_xml = new XML(xmlLoader.data);
info_txt.text = gallery_xml.screenshots.image[0].attribute("thumb");
for(var i:int = 0; i < gallery_xml.screenshots.image.length(); i++)
{
imageLoader = new Loader();
imageLoader.load(new URLRequest(gallery_xml.screenshots.image[i].attribute("thumb")));
imageLoader.x = 0;
imageLoader.y = i * 70 + 25;
imageLoader.name = gallery_xml.screenshots.image[i].attribute("src");
addChild(imageLoader);
imageLoader.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, showPicture);
}
}
xmlLoader.load(xmlReq);
xmlLoader.addEventListener(Event.COMPLETE, xmlLoaded);
function showPicture(event:MouseEvent):void
{
imageLoader = new Loader();
imageLoader.load(new URLRequest(event.target.name));
imageLoader.x = 200;
imageLoader.y = 25;
addChild(imageLoader);
}
I can't seem to wrap my head around what I can do to move things over dynamically without having to write a custom if for each set of positions.. I get the feeling I've totally forgotten how to do algebra.
I'd suggest one of the following two solutions (untested):
var next_x:Number = 0.0;
var next_y:Number = 25.0;
for (var i:int = 0; i < gallery_xml.screenshots.image.length(); ++i)
{
// ...
imageLoader.y = next_y;
imageLoader.x = next_x;
next_y += 70;
if (next_y > THRESHOLD)
{
next_x += X_OFFSET;
next_y = 25.0;
}
}
That is, just keep track of where your next image will be placed and adjust that coordinate accordingly when you exceed thresholds. If you want to use your i variable, you'll have to calculate what row and column the image will be placed at:
for (var i:int = 0; i < gallery_xml.screenshots.image.length(); ++i)
{
// ...
var row:int = i % MAX_ITEMS_PER_COLUMN;
var column:int = i / MAX_ITEMS_PER_COLUMN;
imageLoader.y = 25 + row * 70;
imageLoader.x = column * COLUMN_WIDTH;
}