I am trying to update a POCO using lin2sql. I can also use entity framework. For updating objects I follow the next routine.
//GridView Control gives me some updated POCOS As an Example: Person updated;
function UpdatePerson(Person myUpdatedPersonfromUI)
{
using (Entity con = new Entity() ) {
var recordFromdB = from obj in con.Person where obj.PK = myUpdatedPersonfromUI.PK
select obj;
Person personOnDB = recordFromdB.Single();
// now for each column I update personOnDB
personOnDB.Property1 = myUpdatedPersonfromUI.Property1 ;
personOnDB.Property2 = myUpdatedPersonfromUI.Property2 ;
personOnDB.Property3 = myUpdatedPersonfromUI.Property3 ;
personOnDB.Property4 = myUpdatedPersonfromUI.Property4 ;
// continue updating fields ...
..
.
personOnDB.Property124 = myUpdatedPersonfromUI.Property124 ;
con.SaveChanges();
}
}
Do I have to update each property manually . Please help .
You can use an object mapping tool like AutoMapper which pretty much will do the work for you - in this simple case (property names match between source and target) it would be a one-liner to map these.
Given that you are using you same object type in the UI, why not just plug it into the DAL and call update directly?
This link gives details on how to do it.
Related
I have two sql statements to be executed with a validity check. My need is that I execute the 1st query and store the response in one object and check the object is empty or not and execute the second query if it is not empty.
So, I have tried something like
In rolerepository.scala=>
override val allQuery = s"""
select UserRoles.* from
(select CASE rbac.roleTypeID
ELSE rbac.name JOIN dirNetworkInfo ni
ON UserRoles.PersonID = ni.PersonID
where ni.Loginname = {loginName}
and UserRoles.roleName in ( 'Business User ','Administrator')"""
(This is just some sample of the query - it is not fully written here.)
Then I map it to an object with model class written outside
override def map2Object(implicit map: Map[String, Any]):
HierarchyEntryBillingRoleCheck = {
HierarchyEntryBillingRoleCheck(str("roleName"), oint("PersonID")) }
Then I have written the getall method to execute the query
override def getAll(implicit loginName: String):
Future[Seq[HierarchyEntryBillingRoleCheck]] = {
doQueryIgnoreRowErrors(allQuery, "loginName" -> loginName) }
Then I have written the method to check whether the response from the 1st sql is empty or not. This is were I'm stuck and not able to proceed further.
def method1()= {
val getallresponse = HierarchyEntryBillingRoleCheck
getallresponse.toString
if (getallresponse != " ")
billingMonthCheckRepository.getrepo()
}
I am getting an error (type mismatch) in last closing brace and I don't know what other logic can be used here.
Can any one of you please explain and give me some solution for this?
And i also tried to use for loop in controller but not getting how to do that.
i tried ->
def getAll(implicit queryParams: QueryParams,
billingMonthmodel:Seq[HierarchyEntryBillingRoleCheck]):
Action[AnyContent] = securityService.authenticate() { implicit request
=> withErrorRecovery { req =>
toJson {
repository.getAll(request.user.loginName)
for {
rolenamecheck <- billingMonthmodel
}yield rolenamecheck
}}}}
You don't say which db access method you are using. (I'm assuming anorm). One way of approaching this is:
Create a case class matching your table
Create a parser matching your case class
use Option (or Either) to return a row for a specific set of parameters
For example, perhaps you have:
case class UserRole (id:Int, loginName:String, roleName:String)
And then
object UserRole {
val sqlFields = "ur.id, ur.loginName, ur.roleName"
val userRoleParser = {
get[Int]("id") ~
get[String]("loginName") ~
get[String]("roleName") map {
case id ~ loginName ~ roleName => {
UserRole(id, loginName, roleName)
}
}
}
...
The parser maps the row to your case class. The next step is creating either single row methods like findById or findByLoginName and multi-row methods, perhaps allForRoleName or other generic filter methods. In your case there might (assuming a single role per loginName) be something like:
def findByLoginName(loginName:String):Option[UserRole) = DB.withConnection { implicit c =>
SQL(s"select $sqlFields from userRoles ur ...")
.on('loginName -> loginName)
.as(userRoleParser.singleOpt)
}
The .as(parser... is key. Typically, you'll need at least:
as(parser.singleOpt) which returns an Option of your case class
as(parser *) which returns a List of your case class (you'll need this if multiple roles could exist for a login
as(scalar[Long].singleOpt) which returns an Option[Long] and which is handy for returning counts or exists values
Then, to eventually return to your question a little more directly, you can call your find method, and if it returns something, continue with the second method call, perhaps like this:
val userRole = findByLoginName(loginName)
if (userRole.isDefined)
billingMonthCheckRepository.getrepo()
or, a little more idiomatically
findByLoginName(loginName).map { userRole =>
billingMonthCheckRepository.getrepo()
...
I've shown the find method returning an Option, but in reality we find it more useful to return an Either[String,(your case class)], and then the string contains the reason for failure. Either is cool.
On my version of play (2.3.x), the imports for the above are:
import play.api.db._
import play.api.Play.current
import anorm._
import anorm.SqlParser._
You're going to be doing this sort of thing a lot so worth finding a set of patterns that works for you.
WOW I don't know what's happening with the formatting here, I am really attempting to use the code formatter on the toolbar but I don't know why it won't format it, even when pressed multiple times. I invite the community to edit my code formatting because I can't figure it out. Apologies to OP.
Because I find Play's documentation to be very tough to trudge through if you're unfamiliar with it, I won't just leave a link to it only.
You have to inject an instance of your database into your controller. This will then give it to you as a global variable:
#Singleton
class LoginRegController #Inject()(**myDB: Database**, cc: ControllerComponents ) {
// do stuff
}
But, it's bad practice to actually use this connection within the controller, because the JDBC is a blocking operation, so you need to create a Model which takes the db as a parameter to a method. Don't set the constructor of the object to take the DB and store it as a field. For some reason this creates connection leaks and the connections won't release when they are done with your query. Not sure why, but that's how it is.
Create a Model object that you will use to execute your query. Instead of passing the DB through the object's constructor, pass it through the method you will create:
object DBChecker {
def attemptLogin(db:Database, password:String): String = {
}}
In your method, use the method .withConnection { conn => to access your JDBC connection. So, something like this:
object DBChecker {
def attemptLogin(db:Database, password:String):String = {
var username: String = ""
db.withConnection{ conn =>
val query:String = s"SELECT uploaded_by, date_added FROM tableName where PASSWORD = $password ;"
val stmt = conn.createStatement()
val qryResult:ResultSet = stmt.executeQuery(query)
// then iterate over your ResultSet to get the results from the query
if (qryResult.next()) {
userName = qryResult.getString("uploaded_by")
}
}
}
return username
}
// but note, please look into the use of PreparedStatement objects, doing it this way leaves you vulnerable to SQL injection.
In your Controller, as long as you import the object, you can then call that object's methods from your controller you made in Step 1.
import com.path.to.object.DBChecker
#Singleton
class LoginRegController #Inject()(myDB: Database, cc: ControllerComponents ) { def attemptLogin(pass:String) = Action {
implicit request: Request[AnyContent] => {
val result:String = DbChecker.attemptLogin(pass)
// do your work with the results here
}
I'm using EF5.0 in an ASP.NET MVC app. My Entity Model is named 'DataModel'. Included in the model is a table-valued function that exists in my MSSQL database, named MatchingEntries. It returns a table of integer ids.
I've looked at the DataModel.Context.cs file, that gets generated via the .tt (T4) template file. It has the following code in it:
[EdmFunction("DataEntities", "MatchingEntries")]
public virtual IQueryable<Nullable<int>> MatchingEntries(string term)
{
var termParameter = term != null ?
new ObjectParameter("Term", term) :
new ObjectParameter("Term", typeof(string));
return ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).ObjectContext.CreateQuery<Nullable<int>>("[DataEntities].[MatchingEntries](#Term)", termParameter);
}
The error I am getting results from using this method twice within the one query, such as:
IQueryable<int> one = db.MatchingEntries("\"one*\"");
IQueryable<int> two = db.MatchingEntries("\"two*\"");
List<int> both = one.Intersect(two).ToList();
The error is:
A parameter named 'Term' already exists in the parameter collection. Parameter names must be unique in the parameter collection.
Parameter name: parameter
Is this a known limitation of the classes generated from an EDMX for table-valued functions? With LINQ2SQL I am able to execute this a a single query to the database (that does a JOIN between the 2 outputs from MatchingEntries) and it replaces the parameter name #Term with #p0 and #p1 for the two different instances of the call. I'd like to make Entity Framework do the same.
So, my question is, how can I get EF to work in the same manner and avoid the 'Duplicate parameter' error?
My fallback is to evaluate each call to db.MatchingEntries separately, by putting ToList() after them. My other idea has been to replace the ObjectParameter name in the T4 generated Context.cs class with something randomly generated each time. These feel like hacks that I should be able to avoid.
This answer is Linq to Entities specific. This doesn't have to be done in Linq to SQL (Linqpad).
Thanks to this question I got a pointer to a viable solution:
extend the autogenerated DBContext class (partial class)
add a method with two parameters in the partial class
at calling, pass an index as second parameter
Detailed Answer:
DataEntitys.my.cs:
[EdmFunction("DataEntities", "MatchingEntries")]
public virtual IQueryable<Nullable<int>> MatchingEntries(string term, int index)
{
string param_name = String.Format("k_{0}", index);
var termParameter = term != null ?
new ObjectParameter(param_name, term) :
new ObjectParameter(param_name, typeof(string));
return ((IObjectContextAdapter)this).
ObjectContext.CreateQuery<Nullable<int>>(
String.Format("[DataEntities].[MatchingEntries](#{0})", param_name),
termParameter);
}
Call the function:
foreach (string teil in such)
{
index++;
if (teil.Trim() != "")
res = res.Join(db.MatchingEntries("\"" + teil + "*\"", index), l => l.ID, s => s.KEY, (l, s) => l);
}
I would like to query a table based on a list of KeyValuePair. With a Model-First approach, I could do the following:
var context = new DataContext();
var whereClause = new StringBuilder();
var objectParameters = new List<ObjectParameter>();
foreach(KeyValuePair<string, object> pair in queryParameters)
{
if (whereClause.Length > 0)
whereClause.Append(" AND ");
whereClause.Append(string.Format("it.[{0}] = #{0}", pair.Key));
parameters.Add(new ObjectParameter(pair.Key, pair.Value));
}
var result = context.Nodes.Where(whereClause.ToString(), parameters.ToArray());
Now I'm using a Code-First approach and this Where method is not available anymore. Fortunately, I saw an article somewhere (I can't remember anymore) which suggested that I could convert the DbContext to a IObjectContextAdapter then call CreateQuery like this:
var result = ((IObjectContextAdapter)context)
.ObjectContext.CreateQuery<Node>(whereClause.ToString(), parameters.ToArray());
Unfortunately, this throws an error:
'{ColumnName}' could not be resolved in the current scope or context. Make sure that all referenced variables are in scope, that required schemas are loaded, and that namespaces are referenced correctly.
Where {ColumnName} is the column specified in the whereClause.
Any ideas how I can dynamically query a DbSet given a list of key/value pairs? All help will be greatly appreciated.
I think your very first problem is that in the first example you are using Where on the entity set but in the second example you are using CreateQuery so you must pass full ESQL query and not only where clause! Try something like:
...
.CreateQuery<Node>("SELECT VALUE it FROM ContextName.Nodes AS it WHERE " + yourWhere)
The most problematic is full entity set name in FROM part. I think it is defined as name of the context class and name of the DbSet exposed on the context. Another way to do it is creating ObjectSet:
...
.ObjectContext.CreateObjectSet<Node>().Where(yourWhere)
my query is :
var ReadAndUnreadMessages =
(from m in MDB.Messages
orderby m.Date descending
where m.ID_Receive == (Guid)USER.ProviderUserKey && m.Delete_Admin == false
select new AllMessages()
{
id = (LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).ID_Message,
parent = (Guid)(LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).ID_Message_Parent,
sender = (LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).ID_Sender,
receiver = (Guid)USER.ProviderUserKey,
subject = (LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).Subject.Subject1.ToString() == "Other" ?
(LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).Other_Subject
:
(LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).Subject.Subject1.ToString(),
body = (LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).Body.Length > 26 ?
(LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).Body.Substring(0, 25) + "..."
:
(LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).Body,
date = (LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).Date.ToShortDateString(),
read =(LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).IsRead,
finished = (LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)[LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message).Count - 1] as Message).IsFinished,
count = MessageClass.LoadAll(m.ID_Message).Count
}).ToList();
and exception is :
The argument 'value' was the wrong type. Expected 'Message'. Actual 'System.Object'.
what does meaning it?
LoadMessageChildren :
public static ArrayList LoadMessageChildren(Guid Parent)
{
ArrayList arr = new ArrayList();
Guid id = Parent;
while (id != Guid.Empty)
{
arr.Add(LoadMessage(id));
try
{
id = (Guid)MDB.Messages.Single(a => a.ID_Message_Parent == id).ID_Message;
}
catch
{
id = Guid.Empty;
}
}
return arr;
}
LoadMessage :
public static Message LoadMessage(Guid id)
{
var mess = from m in MDB.Messages
where m.ID_Message == id
select m;
return mess.Single();
}
The code is unreadable, and as a bad case of code repetition (and multiple executions of LoadMessageChildren).
For starters, consider the following:
from m in MDB.Messages
orderby m.Date descending
where m.ID_Receive == (Guid)USER.ProviderUserKey && m.Delete_Admin == false
let children = LoadMessageChildren(m.ID_Message)
let lastChildMessage = children.Last()
select new AllMessages()
{
id = lastChildMessage.ID_Message,
...
}
This may solve your problem, as it is might be caused by using the [] indexer.
Aside from that, it is not clear the posted code is causing the exception.
The only thing I see you using LoadChildMessages() for in the end is to get the child message count... Unless I am wrong I would think you could write it as a join. You doing a lot of queries with in queries that don't seem necessary and are probably causing multiple hits to the database. My question to that would be why isn't there a relationship in your dmbl/sql database so that LinqToSql knows to create a property as a List<Message> ChildMessages
But here is my take:
var query = from message in MDB.Messges
join childmessage in MDB.Messages.Where(child => child.ID_Message_Parent == message.ID_Message) into childMessages
from childMessage in childMessages.DefaultIfEmpty() // This creates a
// left outer join so you get parent messages that don't have any children
where message.ID_Receive == (Guid)USER.ProviderUserKey && message.Delete_Admin == false
select new AllMessages()
{
id = message.ID_Message,
parent = message.ID_Message_Parent,
sender = message.ID_Sender,
receiver = (Guid)USER.ProviderUserKey,
subject = message.Subject.Subject1.ToString() == "Other" ?
message.Other_Subject
:
message.Subject.Subject1.ToString(),
body = message.Body.Length > 26 ?
message.Body.Substring(0, 25) + "..."
:
message.Body,
date = message.Date.ToShortDateString(),
read =message.IsRead,
finished = message.IsFinished,
count = childMessage.Count() // This might have to be this
//count = childMessage == null ? 0 : childMessage.Count()
};
var ReadAndUnreadMessages = query.ToList();
But it's hard to say because I can't run the code... Please respond and let me know if this works.
Note: May I suggest using a class that links to your DataContext.Log property that writes the generated TSQL code to the debugger window. Here is an article on writing your own. It has really help me know when I am making unnecessary calls to the database.
The error is most likely caused by the use of the ArrayList.
The problem is that LINQ was designed to work with generic collections that implement the System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<T> interface. The ArrayList is a nongeneric collection that internally stores everything as an Object. So when you retrieve something from the ArrayList you need to cast it to a Message.
Looking at your error message it looks like somewhere a Message object is expected, but the instance in your ArrayList (an Object) is not casted to a Message object when that reference occurs. Also, the ArrayList does not implement the IEnumerable<T> interface which might get you into trouble in certain situations also.
How to fix it?
I suggest changing the implementation of your LoadMessageChildren to use a generic list (List<Message>):
public static List<Message> LoadMessageChildren(Guid Parent)
{
List<Message> arr = new List<Message>();
Guid id = Parent;
while (id != Guid.Empty)
{
arr.Add(LoadMessage(id));
try
{
id = (Guid)MDB.Messages.Single(a => a.ID_Message_Parent == id).ID_Message;
}
catch
{
id = Guid.Empty;
}
}
return arr;
}
You will have to make also change the code that interacts with the generic list in terms of retrieving/referencing items. But that is just syntax. Since equivalent methods for dealist with lists and items exist.
There are also advantages in terms of performance and compile-time validation for switching from ArrayList to List<T>. The ArrayList is basically an inheritance from version 1.0 of the .Net Framework when there was no support for generics and it just get kept in the framework probably for compatibility reasons.
There are greater benefits for using generics.
UPDATED ANSWER:
The "Method 'System.Collections.Generic.List'1[Message] LoadMessageChildren(System.Guid)' has no supported translation to SQL" exception that you are getting is caused by the fact that your LoadMessageChildren method is not mapping to a stored procedure or a user defined function in your database.
You cannot have any regular C# method call inside your LINQ to SQL queries. The LINQ to SQL object model interprets a method found inside your query as either a stored procedure or a user defined function. So the engine is basically looking for a method called LoadMessageChildren that maps to a stored procedure or a user defined function in your database. Because there are no mappings, it tells you that no supported translation to SQL was found. The LINQ to SQL object model link shows you how to use method attributes to map a method that executes a stored procedure.
You have a few choices now:
create stored procedures of your regular C# method calls
rewrite your LINQ query to use joins to select child messages
Using Linq commands and Linq To SQL datacontext, Im trying to instance an Entity called "Produccion" from my datacontext in this way:
Demo.View.Data.PRODUCCION pocoProduccion =
(
from m in db.MEDICOXPROMOTORs
join a in db.ATENCIONs on m.cmp equals a.cmp
join e in db.EXAMENXATENCIONs on a.numeroatencion equals e.numeroatencion
join c in db.CITAs on e.numerocita equals c.numerocita
where e.codigo == codigoExamenxAtencion
select new Demo.View.Data.PRODUCCION
{
cmp = a.cmp,
bonificacion = comi,
valorventa = precioEstudio,
codigoestudio = lblCodigoEstudio.Content.ToString(),
codigopaciente = Convert.ToInt32(lblCodigoPaciente.Content.ToString()),
codigoproduccion = Convert.ToInt32(lblNroInforme.Content.ToString()),
codigopromotor = m.codigopromotor,
fecha = Convert.ToDateTime(DateTime.Today.ToShortDateString()),
numeroinforme = Convert.ToInt32(lblNroInforme.Content.ToString()),
revisado = false,
codigozona = (c.codigozona.Value == null ? Convert.ToInt32(c.codigozona) : 0),
codigoclinica = Convert.ToInt32(c.codigoclinica),
codigoclase = e.codigoclase,
}
).FirstOrDefault();
While executing the above code, I'm getting the following error that the stack trace is included:
System.NotSupportedException was caught
Message="The explicit construction of the entity type 'Demo.View.Data.PRODUCCION' in a query is not allowed."
Source="System.Data.Linq"
StackTrace:
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitMemberInit(MemberInitExpression init)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitInner(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.Visit(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitSelect(Expression sequence, LambdaExpression selector)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitSequenceOperatorCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitInner(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.Visit(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitFirst(Expression sequence, LambdaExpression lambda, Boolean isFirst)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitSequenceOperatorCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitMethodCall(MethodCallExpression mc)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.VisitInner(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.QueryConverter.ConvertOuter(Expression node)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.SqlProvider.BuildQuery(Expression query, SqlNodeAnnotations annotations)
en System.Data.Linq.SqlClient.SqlProvider.System.Data.Linq.Provider.IProvider.Execute(Expression query)
en System.Data.Linq.DataQuery`1.System.Linq.IQueryProvider.Execute[S](Expression expression)
en System.Linq.Queryable.FirstOrDefault[TSource](IQueryable`1 source)
en Demo.View.InformeMedico.realizarProduccionInforme(Int32 codigoExamenxAtencion, Double precioEstudio, Int32 comi) en D:\cs_InformeMedico\app\InformeMedico.xaml.cs:línea 602
en Demo.View.InformeMedico.UpdateEstadoEstudio(Int32 codigo, Char state) en D:\cs_InformeMedico\app\InformeMedico.xaml.cs:línea 591
en Demo.View.InformeMedico.btnGuardar_Click(Object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) en D:\cs_InformeMedico\app\InformeMedico.xaml.cs:línea 683
InnerException:
Is that now allowed in LINQ2SQL?
Entities can be created outside of queries and inserted into the data store using a DataContext. You can then retrieve them using queries. However, you can't create entities as part of a query.
I am finding this limitation to be very annoying, and going against the common trend of not using SELECT * in queries.
Still with c# anonymous types there is a workaround, by fetching the objects into an anonymous type, and then copy it over into the correct type.
For example:
var q = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new {Name = emp.First + " " + emp.Last, EmployeeId = emp.ID }
var r = q.ToList();
List<User> users = new List<User>(r.Select(new User
{
Name = r.Name,
EmployeeId = r.EmployeeId
}));
And in the case when we deal with a single value (as in the situation described in the question) it is even easier, and we just need to copy directly the values:
var q = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new { Name = emp.First + " " + emp.Last, EmployeeId = emp.ID }
var r = q.FirstOrDefault();
User user = new User { Name = r.Name, EmployeeId = r.ID };
If the name of the properties match the database columns we can do it even simpler in the query, by doing select
var q = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new { emp.First, emp.Last, emp.ID }
One might go ahead and write a lambda expression that can copy automatically based on the property name, without needing to specify the values explictly.
Here's another workaround:
Make a class that derives from your LINQ to SQL class. I'm assuming that the L2S class that you want to return is Order:
internal class OrderView : Order { }
Now write the query this way:
var query = from o in db.Order
select new OrderView // instead of Order
{
OrderID = o.OrderID,
OrderDate = o.OrderDate,
// etc.
};
Cast the result back into Order, like this:
return query.Cast<Order>().ToList(); // or .FirstOrDefault()
(or use something more sensible, like BLToolkit / LINQ to DB)
Note: I haven't tested to see if tracking works or not; it works to retrieve data, which is what I needed.
I have found that if you do a .ToList() on the query before trying to contruct new objects it works
I just ran into the same issue.
I found a very easy solution.
var a = att as Attachment;
Func<Culture, AttachmentCulture> make =
c => new AttachmentCulture { Culture = c };
var culs = from c in dc.Cultures
let ac = c.AttachmentCultures.SingleOrDefault(
x => x.Attachment == a)
select ac == null ? make(c) : ac;
return culs;
I construct an anonymous type, use IEnumerable (which preserves deferred execution), and then re-consruct the datacontext object. Both Employee and Manager are datacontext objects:
var q = dc.Employees.Where(p => p.IsManager == 1)
.Select(p => new { Id = p.Id, Name = p.Name })
.AsEnumerable()
.Select(item => new Manager() { Id = item.Id, Name = item.Name });
Within the book "70-515 Web Applications Development with Microsoft .NET Framework 4 - Self paced training kit", page 638 has the following example to output results to a strongly typed object:
IEnumerable<User> users = from emp in employees where emp.ID !=0
select new User
{
Name = emp.First + " " + emp.Last,
EmployeeId = emp.ID
}
Mark Pecks advice appears to contradict this book - however, for me this example still displays the above error as well, leaving me somewhat confused. Is this linked to version differences? Any suggestions welcome.
I found another workaround for the problem that even lets you retain your result as IQueryale, so it doesn't actually execute the query until you want it to be executed (like it would with the ToList() method).
So linq doesn't allow you to create an entity as a part of query? You can shift that task to the database itself and create a function that will grab the data you want. After you import the function to your data context, you just need to set the result type to the one you want.
I found out about this when I had to write a piece of code that would produce a IQueryable<T> in which the items don't actually exist in the table containing T.
pbz posted a work around by creating a View class inherited from an entity class that you could be working with. I'm working with a dbml model of a table that has > 200 columns. When I try and return the whole table I get "Root Element missing" errors. I couldn't find anyone who wanted to deal with my particular issue so I was looking at rewriting my entire approach. Just creating a view class for the entitiy class worked in my case.
As pbz suggests : Create a view class that inherits from your entity class. For me this is tbCamp so :
internal class tbCampView : tbCamp
{
}
Then use the view class in your query :
using (var dc = ConnectionClass.Connect(Dev))
{
var camps = dc.tbCamps.Select(s => new tbCampView
{
active = s.active,
idCamp = s.idCamp,
campName = s.campName
});
SmartTableViewer(camps, dg1);
}
private void SmartTableViewer<T>(IEnumerable<T> allRecords)
{
// Build sorted rows back into new table
var table = new DataTable();
// Create columns based on type
if (allRecords is IEnumerable<tbCamp> tbCampRecords)
{
// Get the columns you want
table.Columns.Add("idCamp");
table.Columns.Add("campName");
foreach (var record in tbCampRecords)
{
// Make a new row
var r = table.NewRow();
// Add the contents to each column of the row
r["idCamp"] = record.idCamp;
r["campName"] = record.campName;
// Add the row to the table.
table.Rows.Add(r);
}
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("Unhandled type. Add support for new data type in SmartTableViewer()");
return;
}
// Update table in grid
dg1.DataSource = table.DefaultView;
}
Here is what happens when you try and create an entity class object in the query.
I didn't want to have to use an anonymous type if I could help it because I wanted the type to be tbCamp. Since tbCampView is of type tbCamp the is operator works well. see Brian Hasden's answer Passing a generic List<> in C#
I'm surprised this is even an issue but with larger tables I run into this error so I thought I would just show it here :
When trying to read this table into memory I get the following error. There are < 2000 rows but the columns are > 200 for each. I don't know if that is an issue or not.
If I just want a few columns I need to create a custom class and handle that which isn't that big of a pain. With the approach pbz provided I don't have to worry about it.
Here is the entire project in case it helps someone.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
private const bool Dev = true;
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void btnGetAllCamps_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
using (var dc = ConnectionClass.Connect(Dev))
{
IQueryable<tbCampView> camps = dc.tbCamps.Select(s => new tbCampView
{
// Project columns as needed.
active = s.active,
idCamp = s.idCamp,
campName = s.campName
});
// pass in as a
SmartTableViewer(camps);
}
}
private void SmartTableViewer<T>(IEnumerable<T> allRecords)
{
// Build sorted rows back into new table
var table = new DataTable();
// Create columns based on type
if (allRecords is IEnumerable<tbCamp> tbCampRecords)
{
// Get the columns you want
table.Columns.Add("idCamp");
table.Columns.Add("campName");
foreach (var record in tbCampRecords)
{
//var newRecord = record;
// Make a new row
var r = table.NewRow();
// Add the contents to each column of the row
r["idCamp"] = record.idCamp;
r["campName"] = record.campName;
// Add the row to the table.
table.Rows.Add(r);
}
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("Unhandled type. Add support for new data type in SmartTableViewer()");
return;
}
// Update table in grid
dg1.DataSource = table.DefaultView;
}
internal class tbCampView : tbCamp
{
}
}