I'm having a bit of a odd issue with my height of tables.
I have parent table (I know, I know tables... but I have no choice :( ) which has one row.. that contains 2 cells. each cell has a table of its own. The children tables have a border around them. I would like them both to stay the same height so that the borders align no matter how much content is in either. (they have flexible amounts of content so it cannot be set)
If you take the code below and dump it into a html file you will see (in Chrome at least) the right child table does not fill 100% of its cell that it is in. If you remove the "height:auto" on the parent table. then it does work but it also makes the parent table 100% height..
Why would these two things effect each other?
<style>
.cl2_h { background:red; }
.cl1_h { background:blue;}
.cl1, .cl2{ width:100%; border:1px solid black;}
table, tbody { height:100%; }
</style>
<table style="border:1px solid red;height:auto;">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:100%;">
<td style="width:50%">
<table class="cl2" style="text-align:left;">
<tbody>
<tr class="cl2_h">
<td>
RANDOM TEXT HERE
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<span>Select which asd asdthis item relates to.</span>
<ul>
<li>
<select>
<option value="-1">Please Select...</option>
</select>
</li>
<li>
<select>
<option value="302">Please Select...</option>
</select>
</li>
</ul>
SOME RANDOM TEXT
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td>
<table class="cl2" style="height:100%">
<tbody>
<tr class="cl2_h">
<td>
asd asd asd asda sda(NTF)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
DROPDOWNLIST Here
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Something of note is that if i set the parent to 200px then it continues to work... So I guess the real question is why doesn't it work when inside a parent table of "Auto" height
You can accomplish this using Javascript/jQuery:
var maxHeight;
$('.cl2').each(function() {
maxHeight = Math.max(maxHeight, $(this).height());
}).height(maxHeight);
Steve, "height: auto" does not inform the browser in time for render what the final height of the containing table will be so the 100% on the child tables is syntactically superfluous.
Only if you give css with a specified height (or give no height) to the parent container will the children know what "100%" means at render.
If you MUST keep the height: auto on the parent table then #RobB has a good javascript solution, but I would recommend either setting a specific height for the parent table or not setting one at all if you can help it.
Related
Currently trying to align an image to the bottom of it's table. At present it reverts to the top naturally. I've tried everything but the image still sits to the top of the table.
</table>
<td class="logo-label">
<table>
<img src="http://strawberry.wpdevcloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/smllnat_logo.jpg" height="36" width="113">
</td>
</table>
I know it will be something simple but at the moment I cannot get my head around why the image isn't moving.
First of all, the HTML structure is completely wrong. <td> and </td> are table cells, so they lie between <tr> and </tr> (table rows). <tr> and </tr> lie in between <table> and </table> (the table itself). The structure of a table is shown below:
<table>
<tr>
<td>Cell contents here</td>
</tr>
</table>
You can have as many <tr>s and <td>s as you wish.
A table by default has no width. Put in another way, its width is set to auto, i.e. it takes the width of its contents. Set the width and height attributes to avoid this. A table also has no borders by default. Set border="1" to make the borders visible.
To align an image to the bottom of its parent element (<td> in this case), one way to do it is to set position:relative for the parent element and set position:absolute for the child element. Then, set bottom:0 for the child element. The image will then be aligned to the bottom of the element. The snippet below sums up the whole process.
<table border="1" width="500" height="300">
<tr>
<td style="position: relative">
<img style="position:absolute; bottom:0" src="http://strawberry.wpdevcloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/smllnat_logo.jpg" alt="Natural Complexions" height="36" width="113">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
There may also be some rules in your logo-label CSS rule, which we don't know about.
First of all, that is a real mess you have. Secondly, you need to look at your CSS file and look up what "logo-label" is doing. That is controlling the alignment of the image.
<table>
<tr>
<td class="logo-label">
<img src="http://strawberry.wpdevcloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/smllnat_logo.jpg" alt="Natural Complexions" height="36" width="113">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
I'm trying to write some HTML/CSS to display a certain row with some of the elements left-aligned and some of them in the center. This was my HTML code:
<tr class="mainInfo" id="header">
<td> Item </td>
<td> Color </td>
<td> Size </td>
<div class="mid">
<td> Subtotal </td>
<td> Tax </td>
<td> Total </td>
</div>
</tr>
And this is my CSS code:
.mid {
text-align: center;
}
.mainInfo {
font: bold 13px Tahoma;
}
#header {
background-color: #68891;
color: white;
}
But the last three elements are not moving to the center, and I really don't understand why not. I tried putting class="mid" in the <td> tags and that worked, but doesn't that defeat the purpose of DRY?
Fiddle Demo
You cannot put a div instead of td element.
You should validate your HTML code with w3 validator.
If you'll do so you'll see you get this error message:
document type does not allow element "DIV" here; missing one of "TH", "TD" start-tag
Maybe you can do it this way:
<table>
<tr class="mainInfo" id="header">
<td> Item </td>
<td> Color </td>
<td> Size </td>
<td class="center">Subtotal</td>
<td class="center">Tax</td>
<td class="center">Total</td>
</tr>
</table>
JSFiddle example
No, you should not put divs inside tr's or tables.
And you should not use tr's or td's without table-element.
<table>
<tr>
<td>hello world</td>
<!-- This is bare minimum to use tables properly -->
</tr>
</table>
You can insert whatever(not tr or td, but could start new table) you want inside TD-elements though.
It's possible to use other elements to replace these standard ones with css display-property set to table-row etc., but you should stick to conventional tags.
Use colspan/rowspan to span over multiple table columns or rows.
CSS classes are designed to be used as often you need/want to. Only IDs should appear once per page.
Of course you should always keep the DRY concept in mind but in your case it's totally fine. It wouldn't if you would set your .mid class to every <td> because in that case you could just set the properties directly to the <td> element.
middle is not a valid value for text-align, so I'm going to assume, in your CSS, that's meant to be vertical-align. If so, it's because vertical-align will only apply to table cells, not divs - that would explain why it is only being successfully applied to your tds.
Additionally, you shouldn't really put a div inside a table (and shouldn't put a td inside of that) but that's not related to your problem.
Assign one class for left alignment and other for center like so...
.left {
text-align:left;
}
.center {
text-align:center;
}
Asign class to TD elements
<tr class="mainInfo" id="header">
<td class='left'> Item </td>
<td class='center'> Color </td>
</tr>
I have the following example
<table align="right" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
test
</td>
<td>
test
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
test
</td>
<td>
test
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="width: 100%; background-color: red">
test
</div>
If the code is run, the div will enter the floated table. The table will need to be floated so this can't change. Is there a way to stop the other content entering the floated element?
One solution is to give the table an explicit background color.
<table style="background:white; float:right" ...
See new JSFiddle.
The other answers all change other properties such as the relative widths or positions of the div and the table.
Try not to use depreciated HTML tags like align and border. Cellpadding and cellspacing can also be achieved with styles but I'll leave that as an exercise :) This will make the div take up as much space as is needed. If you know the size of the parent div which the table and this div are contained in, just set the width of the table and div to a fixed value.
<table style="float:right; border: 1px solid black;" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
test
</td>
<td>
test
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
test
</td>
<td>
test
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div style="float:left; background-color: red">
test
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/Shnjt/
use this
<div style="90%; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">
<table style="float:right;width:45%">
</table>
<div style="width:45%;background-color: red; float:left;">
test
</div>
</div>
If you want div and table to be floated you need to set width for both and css: float: left to the div and float: right to the table.
Otherwise you can try removing width:100% from your div and adding display: inline-block.
There is a css property that controls whether an element respect the previous floating element.
Here is the documentation: http://www.w3.org/wiki/CSS/Properties/clear
I do not know what you want to get, but that might help.
# Mr.Lister....
<div style="width: 100%; background-color: red;float:left;">
test
</div>
Float:left; will be helpful to your code.
Good Luck!
I have this code :
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="width:415px">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td style="font-family:Arial;min-height:60px;font-size:12px;line-height:14px;">
This is my text that I need in 2 lines
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td style="font-size:12px;line-height:14px">
Second Line
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
As you can see, the first tr/td should be height 60px (min-height:60px) but in fact it isn't.
For many reasons, I can't use height directly (this code is formatted trought back office system, in a newsletter).
So, how can I take the whole height on the td trought min-height?
Also, tried putting min-height:60px; on tr, but nothing change...
min-height doesn't work for table elements:
In CSS 2.1, the effect of 'min-width' and 'max-width' on tables, inline tables, table cells, table columns, and column groups is undefined.
I can only assume this applies to td and tr as well.
What should always work is wrapping the content in a div, and applying min-height to that, as shown in this JSFiddle:
<td style="font-family:Arial;min-height:60px;font-size:12px;line-height:14px;">
<div style="min-height: 60px; background-color: green">
This is my text that I need in 2 lines
</div>
</td>
Edit: You say this doesn't work with Outlook.
Alternative idea: Place a 60 px tall image in the td, and make it float: left:
<td>
<img src="..." style="float: left">
</td>
Use <td height="60"> not CSS height or min-height
For HTML email set your table cell as <td height="60"> and it will treat that as the min-height. If your content is more than 60px, it will expand accordingly.
Put a DIV in the cell, style the DIV instead.
Min-height doesn't works on tables.
It is sometimes useful to constrain the height of elements to a certain range. Two properties offer this functionality: min-height & max-height
But these can't be used on non-replaced inline elements, table columns, and column groups.
You can't set min-height and min-width, but you can use some CSS3 for achievements this same effect.
.default-table table {
border-collapse: collapse;
}
.default-table table td {
padding: 0;
}
.default-table tr:before {
width: 0px;
content: '';
float: left;
overflow: hidden;
height: 28px;
font-size: 0;
}
.default-table {
overflow: hidden;
}
<div class="default-table">
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Steve</td>
<td>Smith</td>
<td>stevesmith#gmail.com</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jone</td>
<td>Polanski</td>
<td>jonep#gmail.com</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
but if u having collapse or padding in td. You must give for .default-table table minus margin-left.
HTML :
<table></table>
CSS :
table{
height:0px; /*Set any facultative length value to Height (percentage value doesn't work)*/
min-height:100vh;
}
That's how I always resolve this problem ...
Add display block
<td style="font-family:Arial;min-height:60px;font-size:12px;line-height:14px;display:block;">
Here's a solution that works in Outlook (tested) and other e-mail clients:
<td style="mso-line-height-rule:exactly;line-height:300px;"> </td>
This is cleaner than using an image, which could negatively affect your spam score, and does the exact same thing.
If you have other content in the <td> that you don't want to have that line height, you can just wrap the non-breaking space in a <span> and set the line-height on that tag:
<td><span style="mso-line-height-rule:exactly;line-height:300px"> </span>**Other content without 300px line-height here**</td>
The reason height or min-height works on <div> tags and not <td> is because <td> are set to display:table-cell and do not respect height the same way that display:block (<div>) elements do.
I have resolved this issue by adding display:block; to its style as
<td style="display:block; min-height:200px;">
min-height does not work in td, Set height that will work like min-height and automatic increase height if needed. That is worked for me
Here is a solution that does not depend on the height in pixels. It works in all email clients:
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="width:415px">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td style="font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;line-height:14px;">
This is my text that I need in 2 lines
</td>
<td style="font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;line-height:14px;">
<br/><br/>
</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td style="font-size:12px;line-height:14px">
Second Line
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
The solution works by adding a zero-width column with two lines to the right of the first one. It uses the character, which is a non-breaking zero-width space.
It may be reviving a 2012 post, for those who searched and found this post like me:
Note: Check these addresses for the email client support before using this method, at the time of writing this answer, the support was around 50% -ish.
E-mail client support range of :first-child
E-mail client support range of ::before
table tr:first-child td:before {
min-height: 100px;
display: block;
content: ""
}
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>
What I found !!!, In tables CSS td{height:60px;} works same as CSS td{height:60px;}
I'm having a bit of an issue getting some stylesheet behavior that I want. I'm not even sure if it's possible. Basically I'm attempting to place a table with a variable number of cells with static cell width in a DIV with overflow: auto, and my goal is that when the tables width extends past the width of the container DIV that it becomes scrollable.
This isn't the case. The cells get shrunk together. A very basic representation (with inline styles for ease on this; not actually in the application haha) of the code:
<div style="width: 1000px; overflow-x: auto;">
<table>
<tr>
<td style="width:400px;">
This
</td>
<td style="width:400px;">
Should
</td>
<td style="width:400px;">
Scroll!
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
Is there anyway I can do this with CSS, or am I going to have to go back to setting the width inline on a second div containing the table through calculations?
Works if you set the width on the table itself.
<table style="width:1200px;">
The td will always shrink to the necessary size, they won't push the table wider in that situation.
using CSS can done like below but make sure you use id or class for applying css if you have more then one table or div.
<style>
div { width: 400px; overflow-x: auto; }
table { width:1200px; }
table td { width:400px; }
</style>
<div>
<table>
<tr>
<td>
This
</td>
<td>
Should
</td>
<td>
Scroll!
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
This should help
<table style="width: max-content;">